Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “EVA”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Tactile Display for EVA

As human spaceflight crews engage in more complex missions beyond low Earth orbit, their need for autonomy increases. ISS-like operations in which Earth-based mission control monitors life-critical systems and provides real time support for crew tasks will be limited by communication bandwidth and delays, forcing the crew to take on a subset of these responsibilities. This presents the biggest challenge during Extravehicular Activity (EVA)s, where the crew is already overloaded and their ability to interact with information systems is severely limited. Tactile displays, which present information using the sense of touch, expand the users' communication bandwidth. This untapped interface modality can be used for a wide range of interactions during EVA, including emergency alerts, non-emergency situational awareness, and simple instruction.

Aceves, Ricco↗
NASA NTRS2019

An Astronaut's Risk of Experiencing a Critical Impact from Lunar Ejecta During Lunar EVA

The Moon is under constant bombardment by meteoroids. When the meteoroid is large, the impact craters the surface, launching crater ejecta far from the impact potentially threatening astronauts on the lunar surface. In the early 1960’s, the ejecta impact flux was thought no more than the sporadic meteoroid flux but with speeds one to two orders of magnitude smaller. However, the Lunar Module designers realized by 1965 that meteoroid bumpers do not perform well at the smaller ejecta impact speeds. Their estimates of the Lunar Module risk of penetration by ejecta were 25 to 50% of the total risk. This was in spite of the exposure time to ejecta being only a third of that to sporadic meteoroids. The standard committee based the 1969 NASA SP-8013 lunar ejecta environment on Zook’s 1967 flux analysis and Gault, Shoemaker and Moore’s 1963 test data for impacts into solid basalt targets. However, Zook noted in his 1967 analysis, that if the lunar surface was composed of soil, that the ejected soil particles would be smaller than ejected basalt fragments and that the ejection speeds would be smaller. Both effects contribute to reducing the risk of a critical failure due to lunar ejecta. The authors revised Zook’s analysis to incorporate soil particle size distributions developed from analysis of Apollo lunar soil samples and ejected mass as a function of ejecta speed developed from coupling parameter analyses of soil impact-test data. The authors estimated EVA risk by assuming failure occurs at a critical impact energy. At these impact speeds, this might be true for suit hard and soft goods. However, these speeds are small enough that there may be significant strength effects that require new test data to modify the hypervelocity critical energy failure criterion. With these caveats, Christiansen, Cour-Palais and Freisen list the critical energy of the ISS EMU hard upper torso as 44 J and the helmet and visor as 71 J at hypervelocity. The authors then assumed that the lunar EVA suit fails at 50 J critical energy. This results in a 1,700,000 years mean time to failure using the results of this analysis and a 3,800 years mean time to failure using NASA SP-8013.

Bjorkman, Michael D.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Development and Evaluation of the Active Response Gravity Offload System as a Lunar and Martian EVA Simulation Environment

In preparation for future exploration missions, NASA seeks the ability to simulate partial-gravity operations for use in ground-based research, crew training, and engineering design evaluations. The Active Response Gravity Offload System (ARGOS) at the Johnson Space Center (JSC) is designed to simulate reduced gravity environments, such as lunar, Martian, or microgravity, using a robotic system similar to an overhead bridge crane. ARGOS continuously offloads a portion of a suited human’s weight during all dynamic motions within the test facility, which can include basic functional movements such as walking, running, and jumping, as well as a wide range of planetary surface activities. This system will be used as part of a metabolic-rate task characterization study to determine the workload associated with partial-gravity extravehicular activity (EVA). Pilot testing was conducted using the MKIII prototype planetary space suit and two gimbal designs to determine the ability of the ARGOS test environment to simulate planetary EVA operations. This paper will describe the lessons learned from the feasibility testing, simulation-environment mockup design, and the results from the pilot tests and their influence into the final study design. Being able to effectively simulate partial-gravity environments and characterize the performance of crewmembers will have an impact on multiple domains including suit design, task design, thermal models, and life-support-system capacity verification plans, among others.

Omar S Bekdash↗
NASA NTRS2021

IROSA 2B/4B EVA Robotics

The MAGIK Robotic analysis team provides kinematic feasibility assessments and robotic visualizations for the ISS. This animation was created with configurations provided by the CX Team and showcases the robotics for the IROSA install 2B and 4B EVAs. The ExtraVehicular Activities (EVAs) shown include the extraction of the two ISS Roll-Out Solar Arrays (IROSAs) from the ISS Power Augmentation (IPA) carrier by an astronaut on the end of the Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) and subsequent handoff to a second astronaut on the ISS port side truss. Extravehicular activities not shown will complete the install of the IROSAs.

Alexander Radford Fryer↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EMU CO2 Washout Comparative Assessments for the HAB/HAP-E in support of EVA 80

After water was reported in the EMU helmet during ISS US EVA-80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. But before a mitigation strategy can be implemented, it must first be proven to be safe. Towards this aim, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to assess the effect that the absorbent material has on the concentration of carbon dioxide in the EMU helmet. Within a small, closed volume such as a helmet, some amount of the carbon dioxide produced by the suit-wearer will be re-inhaled before being cleared from the oral-nasal region. The ability of the suit to remove carbon dioxide is referred to as CO2 washout. Pathological levels of inhaled CO2 (hypercapnia) are associated with dizziness, fatigue, and headaches. The CFD model was built in ANSYS Fluent and adapted to assess CO2 washout in a variety of scenarios grouped into three categories: purge cases, varying metabolic rates, and varying sorbent material configurations. The presence of the sorbent material did not prove detrimental to CO2 washout in the helmet.

Moses Navarro↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of HAB Particulate Tracing in EMU Helmet in Support of Eva 80

After water was reported in the EMU helmet during ISS US EVA-80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. But before a mitigation strategy can be implemented, it must first be proven to be safe. Towards this aim, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was done tracing the paths of particulates potentially generated by the absorbent material. The objective was to characterize the risk these particulates pose for inspiration and eye irritation by tracking what percentage of particulates contact the suit-wearer’s face, eyes, or mouth. The model consisted of a human mannikin head and torso inside the EMU suit and helmet. The software used was ANSYS Fluent, with discrete phase modeling enabled to generate and track the particulates within the ventilation flow of the helmet.

Abigail Rose Baukus↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EMU Helmet Free Water Transport Assessment for the HAB in Support of Eva 80

After water was reported in the EMU helmet during ISS US EVA-80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. To assess the effectiveness of this strategy, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a human mannikin head in the EMU helmet was used to track water droplets and quantify how much water is likely to be caught by the absorbent material. A combination of engineering judgment, tests, and CFD results were used to develop the expected path of droplets in the helmet, to account for the simplifications necessary in modeling two-phase flow.

Abigail Rose Baukus↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EMU CO2 Washout Comparative Assessments for the HAB/HAP-E in Support of EVA 80

After water was reported in the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) helmet during ISS US EVA 80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. But before a mitigation strategy can be implemented, it must first be proven to be safe. Towards this aim, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to assess the effect that the absorbent material has on the concentration of carbon dioxide in the EMU helmet. Within a small, closed volume such as a helmet, some amount of the carbon dioxide produced by the suit-wearer will be re-inhaled before being cleared from the oral-nasal region. The ability of the suit to remove carbon dioxide is referred to as CO2 washout. Pathological levels of inhaled CO2 (hypercapnia) are associated with dizziness, fatigue, and headaches. The CFD model was built in ANSYS Fluent and adapted to assess CO2 washout in a variety of scenarios grouped into three categories: ventilation cases, varying metabolic rates, and varying sorbent material configurations. The presence of the sorbent material did not prove detrimental to CO2 washout in the helmet.

Moses Navarro↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EMU Helmet Free Water Transport Assessment for the HAB in Support of Eva 80

After water was reported in the EMU helmet during ISS US EVA-80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. To assess the effectiveness of this strategy, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a human mannikin head in the EMU helmet was used to track water droplets and quantify how much water is likely to be caught by the absorbent material. A combination of engineering judgment, tests, and CFD results were used to develop the expected path of droplets in the helmet, to account for the simplifications necessary in modeling two-phase flow.

Abigail Baukus↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of HAB Particulate Tracing in EMU Helmet in Support of Eva 80

After water was reported in the EMU helmet during ISS US EVA-80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. But before a mitigation strategy can be implemented, it must first be proven to be safe. Towards this aim, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was done tracing the paths of particulates potentially generated by the absorbent material. The objective was to characterize the risk these particulates pose for inspiration and eye irritation by tracking what percentage of particulates contact the suit-wearer’s face, eyes, or mouth. The model consisted of a human mannikin head and torso inside the EMU suit and helmet. The software used was ANSYS Fluent, with discrete phase modeling enabled to generate and track the particulates within the ventilation flow of the helmet.

Abigail Baukus↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EMU CO2 Washout Comparative Assessments for the HAB/HAP-E in Support of EVA 80

After water was reported in the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) helmet during ISS US EVA 80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. But before a mitigation strategy can be implemented, it must first be proven to be safe. Towards this aim, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to assess the effect that the absorbent material has on the concentration of carbon dioxide in the EMU helmet. Within a small, closed volume such as a helmet, some amount of the carbon dioxide produced by the suit-wearer will be re-inhaled before being cleared from the oral-nasal region. The ability of the suit to remove carbon dioxide is referred to as CO2 washout. Pathological levels of inhaled CO2 (hypercapnia) are associated with dizziness, fatigue, and headaches. The CFD model was built in ANSYS Fluent and adapted to assess CO2 washout in a variety of scenarios grouped into three categories: ventilation cases, varying metabolic rates, and varying sorbent material configurations. The presence of the sorbent material did not prove detrimental to CO2 washout in the helmet.

Moses Navarro↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of HAB Particulate Tracing in EMU Helmet in Support of Eva 80

After water was reported in the EMU helmet during ISS US EVA-80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. But before a mitigation strategy can be implemented, it must first be proven to be safe. Towards this aim, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was done tracing the paths of particulates potentially generated by the absorbent material. The objective was to characterize the risk these particulates pose for inspiration and eye irritation by tracking what percentage of particulates contact the suit-wearer’s face, eyes, or mouth. The model consisted of a human mannikin head and torso inside the EMU suit and helmet. The software used was ANSYS Fluent, with discrete phase modeling enabled to generate and track the particulates within the ventilation flow of the helmet.

Abigail Baukus↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EMU Helmet Free Water Transport Assessment for the HAB in Support of Eva 80

After water was reported in the EMU helmet during ISS US EVA-80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. To assess the effectiveness of this strategy, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a human mannikin head in the EMU helmet was used to track water droplets and quantify how much water is likely to be caught by the absorbent material. A combination of engineering judgment, tests, and CFD results were used to develop the expected path of droplets in the helmet, to account for the simplifications necessary in modeling two-phase flow.

Abigail Baukus↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis III EVA Mission Capability for de Gerlache-Shackleton Ridge

NASA has committed to sending humans to the Moon no earlier than 2025. The Artemis III mission will include scientific, technology demonstrations, commercial, inspirational, and explorational objectives. Achieving these goals will depend upon balancing priorities and mission constraints. A landing location needs to meet terrain conditions suitable for the lander with acceptable thermal and lighting conditions. This location must also allow access to geological areas of interest within traverse range and capability of walking astronauts. A representative EVA timeline is then developed for an example location on the de Gerlache-Shackleton ridge and used to examine the location’s acceptability as a candidate site for Artemis III. Similar studies are being conducted to NASA’s Science Mission Directorate and Flight Operations.

EVA↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Excess Water in Astronaut Helmet During EVA on ISS: Mitigations with Flight Demonstrations

Following a second crew report of excess water inexplicably accumulating in the helmet during EVA-80 on March 23, 2022, NASA initiated an aggressive effort to identify, mitigate, and/or eliminate all sources of the potentially life-threatening water. Our narration highlights demonstrations of microgravity flow expectations using terrestrial scale models, mitigations to dangerous water migration within the helmet, low-g two-phase flow separations for the flow entering the helmet, and an investigation of the nature of liquid carry-over from the EMU condensing heat exchanger source. Fast-to-flight demonstrations of each aspect of the work are carried out during hands-on crew interaction with flight scale hardware on ISS during the 2022-2023 timeframe. The results of the tests are described with a focus on the rarely observed, and thus rarely studied, large length scale air-driven wall-bound droplet and rivulet twophase flows in microgravity. The success of the mitigations and directions for continued work is discussed in summary.

spacesuit↗
NASA NTRS2023

Excess Water in Astronaut Helmet During EVA on ISS: Mitigations with Flight Demonstrations

Following a second crew report of excess water inexplicably accumulating in the helmet during EVA-80 on March 23, 2022, NASA initiated an aggressive effort to identify, mitigate, and/or eliminate all sources of the potentially life-threatening water. Our narration highlights demonstrations of microgravity flow expectations using terrestrial scale models, mitigations to dangerous water migration within the helmet, low-g two-phase flow separations for the flow entering the helmet, and an investigation of the nature of liquid carry-over from the EMU condensing heat exchanger source. Fast-to-flight demonstrations of each aspect of the work are carried out during hands-on crew interaction with flight scale hardware on ISS during the 2022-2023 timeframe. The results of the tests are described with a focus on the rarely observed, and thus rarely studied, large length scale air-driven wall-bound droplet and rivulet twophase flows in microgravity. The success of the mitigations and directions for continued work is discussed in summary.

spacesuit↗