Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “sails”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14

Optical Performance of Reflectivity Control Devices for Solar Sail Applications

Reflectivity control devices (RCDs) based on polymer dispersed liquid crystals were fabricated for Solar Cruiser, a SmallSat NASA Pathfinder Mission consisting of a 1653 square meter solar sail that would establish an artificial orbit sunward of the L1 Lagrange point for heliophysics observations. Here we describe the optical characterization of these birefringent electro-optic devices including thin film measurements and analysis, hyperspectral bidirectional reflectance distribution function measurements, and radiometric analysis. These measurements demonstrate the promise of RCDs for roll control and momentum management of solar sails.

Radiometry↗

Optical Performance of Reflectivity Control Devices (RCDs) for Solar Sail Applications

Reflectivity control devices (RCDs) based on polymer dispersed liquid crystals were fabricated for Solar Cruiser, a SmallSat NASA Pathfinder Mission consisting of a 1653 square meter solar sail that would establish an artificial orbit sunward of the L1 Lagrange point for heliophysics observations. Here we describe the optical characterization of these birefringent electro-optic devices including thin film measurements and analysis, hyperspectral bidirectional reflectance distribution function measurements, and radiometric analysis. These measurements demonstrate the promise of RCDs for roll control and momentum management of solar sails.

Solar Sails↗

Characterization of Orography-Influenced Riming and Secondary Ice Production and Their Effects on Precipitation Rates Using Radar Polarimetry and Doppler Spectra (CORSIPP-SAIL)

The Characterization of Orography-Influenced Riming and Secondary Ice Production and Their Effects on Precipitation Rates Using Radar Polarimetry and Doppler Spectra (CORSIPP) project was conducted to help improve the understanding of precipitation formation in orographically influenced terrain. Special focus is put on the two processes of riming and secondary ice production and their external drivers. Two instruments, a polarimetric W-band simultaneous transmission simultaneous reception (STSR) Doppler cloud radar manufactured by Radiometer Physics GmbH (RPG, instrument type RPG-FMCW-94-DP), from now on named LIMRAD94, and the video in situ snowfall sensor (VISSS), were deployed at the U. S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility’s Surface Atmosphere Integrated Field Laboratory (SAIL) site in Gothic, Colorado between November 2022 and June 2023 during the second SAIL winter. Note that the exact dates of data availability differ between the instruments. Both instruments arrived at Gothic on November 2, 2022, 09:20 local time. VISSS, described by Maahn et al., is equipped with two camera systems with telecentric lenses. The two cameras are at a 90° angle to each other. This configuration allows for size-independent measurements by capturing images of hydrometeors from two sides at a high frame rate of 250 Hz. With a minimum detection size of 200 μm, VISSS provides valuable insights into particle size, number, shape, complexity, and fall velocity. The VISSS was deployed on the grassland next to the ARM facility with the amazing help of the ARM employees on site. The setup started on November 2, 2022, and was finished on November 5, 2022, without major problems. VISSS measurements were started on November 6, 2022. LIMRAD94 was installed on a scaffolding platform near Orehouse (Gothic) on November 9, 2022, with the great help of RMBL staff. LIMRAD94 was mounted on a cold temperature scanner prototype. After a short test of the setup on November 9, 2022, the digital control of the scanner elevation stopped working for (at that time) unknown reasons. All attempts to resolve the problem failed. This malfunction made it impossible to operate LIMRAD94 in scanning mode. The scanner was then manually moved to zenith pointing mode and between November 10 and November 15, 2022, vertical observations for polarimetric calibration were performed. On November 15, 2022, after the polarimetric calibration was applied, the scanner was manually moved to 40° elevation with azimuthal view towards the Ka-band ARM Zenith Radar (KAZR) and measurements were continued at constant elevation. Investigation of the scanner malfunction on February 6, 2023, by Benn Schmatz revealed a disengagement between the cogwheel of the elevation motor and the cogwheel moving the scanner in elevation. This mechanical issue was temporarily solved by re-engaging the cogwheels. This made the scanner operational again for about four weeks, until mechanical force disengaged the cogwheels again on March 15, 2023. This repeated scanner failure remained undetected for about three weeks until April 8, 2023; during this time the scanner was stuck at 72° elevation. However, the radar software continued to produce data files falsely indicating that the scanner was still operational. After the scanner failure was noticed, scanning was stopped again, and we returned to constant elevation measurements. On May 15, 2023, the cogwheels of the elevation motor were secured with additional screws sent by the manufacturer. At some point in May, the cogwheels of the azimuth motor were also disengaged by mechanical force, which still allowed for range height indicator (RHI) but no plan position indicator (PPI) scans in the last weeks of the campaign. The azimuth motor was repaired in Germany after the end of the campaign. Throughout the campaign, RMBL and ARM staff kept the radar and the VISSS free of snow.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Field Validation of Cloud Properties Sensor (SAIL Field Campaign Report)

The purpose of the Field Validation of Cloud Properties Sensor – SAIL campaign was to deploy Aerodyne’s extended-wavelength TWST cloud optical properties sensor (TWST-CPS) in an operationally relevant environment with co-located, externally validated sensors. Colocation with The U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility’s deployment of its second Mobile Facility (AMF2) on the Surface Atmosphere Integrated Field Laboratory (SAIL) campaign at Crested Butte, Colorado was ideal because of the variety of operational sensors that can measure some of the same cloud properties using different modalities. While cloud property sensors have long existed, they tend to be costly to produce and maintain. Our sensor measures absolute spectral radiance over 440-1700 nm and retrieves cloud optical depth (COD), droplet effective radius (Reff), and thermodynamic phase (Phase). Our prototype is built predominantly from off-the-shelf components and uses uncooled spectrometers. A low-cost, easy-to-use sensor such as this could allow deployment at many more sites for greater spatial coverage. Instrument deployment to test robust operations and a new stray-light baffle design, and the continued development of analysis and retrieval algorithms using the data from this deployment, are central technical objectives of Aerodyne Research’s U.S. Department of Energy Small Business Innovative Research Phase 2 contract (DE-SC0020473, Low-cost shortwave spectroradiometer for retrieval of cloud properties).

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Field Validation of Cloud Properties Sensor – SAIL Field Campaign Report

The purpose of the Field Validation of Cloud Properties Sensor – SAIL campaign was to deploy Aerodyne’s extended-wavelength TWST cloud optical properties sensor (TWST-CPS) in an operationally relevant environment with co-located, externally validated sensors. Colocation with The U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility’s deployment of its second Mobile Facility (AMF2) on the Surface Atmosphere Integrated Field Laboratory (SAIL) campaign at Crested Butte, Colorado was ideal because of the variety of operational sensors that can measure some of the same cloud properties using different modalities. While cloud property sensors have long existed, they tend to be costly to produce and maintain. Our sensor measures absolute spectral radiance over 440-1700 nm and retrieves cloud optical depth (COD), droplet effective radius (Reff), and thermodynamic phase (Phase). Our prototype is built predominantly from off-the-shelf components and uses uncooled spectrometers. A low-cost, easy-to-use sensor such as this could allow deployment at many more sites for greater spatial coverage. Instrument deployment to test robust operations and a new stray-light baffle design, and the continued development of analysis and retrieval algorithms using the data from this deployment, are central technical objectives of Aerodyne Research’s U.S. Department of Energy Small Business Innovative Research Phase 2 contract (DE-SC0020473, Low-cost shortwave spectroradiometer for retrieval of cloud properties).

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

SAIL Supermicron Bioaerosol (SSB) Field Campaign Report

The Surface Atmosphere Integrated Field Laboratory (SAIL) Supermicron Bioaerosol (SSB) study was designed to complement the larger Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) SAIL science goals to understand aerosol processes and aerosol-cloud interactions in the Colorado River’s East River Watershed Basin. Supermicron aerosol, particles larger than one micron in diameter, and bioaerosols, primary particles containing biological material, are important for understanding atmospheric processes and sources within high mountainous terrain. For example, they can interact with clouds and the water cycle such as by serving as nuclei for cloud droplets and ice crystals that can eventually result in precipitation events. These particles can also be recycled back to the surface via wet and dry deposition, where they can alter plant and microbial growth and/or be reemitted again, forming a positive feedback loop within the Earth system known as bioprecipitation.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

SAIL Radar b1 Data Processing: Corrections, Calibrations, and Processing Report

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility deployed the second ARM Mobile Facility (AMF2) near Crested Butte, Colorado for the Surface Atmosphere Integrated Field Laboratory (SAIL) campaign. The SAIL campaign occurred from September 1, 2021, to June 15 2023. To study the water cycle in the East River Watershed, ARM deployed a vertically pointing Ka-band ARM Zenith radar (KAZR) and a scanning X-band precipitation radar managed by Colorado State University (CSU XPRECIP), as shown in Figure 1.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Calibration and Validation of the SAIL Radar

Calibration of a weather radar is not a simple process, as is well described and documented in several articles (Chandrasekar, V, L Baldini, N Bharadwaj, and PL Smith. 2015. "Calibration procedures for global precipitation-measurement ground-validation radars." URSI Radio Science Bulletin 2015(355): 45–73, https://10.23919/URSIRSB.2015.7909473.). Direct hardware-based characterization is called calibration whereas indirect check with other sources such as disdrometer, or comparison with other radars or indirect means, is called validation. The validation process has its own measurement error and the comparison should fall within its limit. In the following we describe calibration and validation processes for the SAIL radar. Based on the comparison of calibration and validation, an addition of 2 dB is suggested for the SAIL radar observations, with a nuanced Z dr calibration correction, as presented. If a fixed Z dr calibration is preferred, a bias addition of 0.5 dB is suggested.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Bioaerosol Properties using WIBS from SAIL on Mt. Crested Butte, CO

We deployed a Wideband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor (WIBS-Neo, DMT) to measure different properties of fluorescent bioaerosol particles (FBAP) during SAIL. Our measurements were collected at the supplementary site on Crested Butte Mountain from inside the ARM Aerosol Observing System (AOS) sampling from the AOS inlet. We had two deployment periods at SAIL during biologically active seasons: summer 2022 (15 June 2022 - 13 September 2022) and spring 2023 (21 March 2023 - 19 June 2023). The WIBS is an online single-particle measurement that detects FBAPs (within a size range of 0.5 - 30 microns in diameter) based on the excitation and emission wavelengths of the individual particles. Using two xenon lamps, the WIBS excites FBAPs at 280 nm and 370 nm. Their emission is detected across two wavebands of 310-400 nm and 420-650 nm. We classified the FBAPs into seven different categories (A, B, C, AB, BC, AC, and ABC) using the classification scheme in Perring et. al. (2015) [1]. Here, we report one-minute averaged number concentration of FBAPs (total and by category) and NFBAPs. We also present one-minute-averaged size distributions and the asymmetry factor (AF, a surrogate for shape) of all FBAPs and NFBAPs. The logarithmic bin width of the size bins is the same as the average bin width of the AOS's optical particle counter (OPC, Grimm) for the range of sizes in which they overlap (26 bins from 0.5 - 30 microns). AF of the particles ranges from 0-100 and is divided into five bins with a linear spacing at increments of 20. The smallest AF bin represents more spherical particles while the largest bin represents more rod-shaped particles. We recommend referring to the readme file for more details of the variables present in the files. [1] Perring, A. E., et al. (2015), Airborne observations of regional variation in fluorescent aerosol across the United States, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 120, 1153-1170, doi:10.1002/2014JD022495. Abstract and description of the campaign can be found here: https://www.arm.gov/research/cam

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Back Trajectories during SAIL

This data set contains air mass back trajectories generated during the Surface Atmosphere Integrated Field Laboratory (SAIL) campaign using the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory model (HYSPLIT, Stein et al. 2015, Rolph et al. 2017). For each hour from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2023, a 96-hour back trajectory was initiated at the SAIL sampling site, starting 100 m above ground level. The calculations used the GDAS meteorological data set with model vertical velocity. The files within this dataset show location and meteorological parameters of the back trajectory analysis. There are 21 columns within each data file. The first 2 columns pertain to back trajectory parameters: the trajectory number (which is always 1) and the meteorological grid number. The next 9 columns pertain to spatiotemporal information: the year, month, day, hour (0-23), and minute of the trajectory, the previous time of the trajectory (in negative hours), and the airmass location (latitude, longitude, and height in m AGL). The rest of the parameters within each file pertains to surface and meteorological characteristics of the airmass: pressure (in hPa), potential temperature (in K), temperature (in K), precipitation rate (in mm/hr), mixing depth (in m), relative humidity (in % relative to liquid water), specific humidity (in g/kg), H2O mixing ratio (in g/kg), underlying terrain height (in meters above sea level), and incoming radiation (in W/m^2).

back trajectory↗

Size-Resolved Chemical Composition of Particles Collected Using STAC at the Ground Site During the SAIL Campaign in Gunnison, Colorado

Aerosol particles were collected using a four-stage Size and Time-resolved Aerosol Collector (STAC) during the SAIL field campaign. Each stage of STAC separates particles into distinct aerodynamic size fractions with 50% cut-off diameters: Stage A: 2.27 µm Stage B: 0.615 µm Stage C: 0.421 µm Stage D: 0.119 µm Each stage provides both size- and time-resolved sampling, enabling investigation of particle composition across different atmospheric regimes. Only a subset of samples was selected for analysis based on prevailing meteorological conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, and air-mass influence) to capture representative aerosol types under distinct weather patterns. Collected substrates were first examined under Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to evaluate particle loading, morphology, and spatial distribution. Subsequently, Computer-Controlled Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (CCSEM/EDX) was performed to obtain size-resolved elemental composition of individual particles. A rule-based classification scheme was applied to categorize particles into major compositional groups (e.g., biological, carbonaceous, dust, sulfate, Na-rich, and mixed types). This dataset provides high-resolution morphological and chemical information on atmospheric particles collected during the SAIL campaign, offering insights into the influence of meteorology on aerosol composition and mixing state.

Size and Time-resolved Aerosol Collector↗

Comparison of the solar sail with electric propulsion systems

The propulsive efficiencies of the solar sail and of electric propulsion systems are compared on the basis of specific impulse. It is shown that the solar sail is more efficient at one a.u. for mission durations greater than about two months, that the advantage is increased for missions toward the inner planets, and that the same conclusions are reached when the comparison is based on maximizing the momentum transferred to the payload. Other factors that will influence the choice of a propulsion system for a specific mission are mentioned.

Macneal, R. H.↗

The sail wing windmill and its adaptation for use in rural India

An 8 meter-diameter prototype sail wing windmill is reported that uses a one meter-diameter bullock cartwheel to which three bamboo poles are latched in a triangular pattern with overlapping ends, to form the airframe for cloth sails. This device lifts 300 pounds to a height of 20 feet in one minute in a 10 mph wind.

Sherman, M. M.↗

Optimum solar-sail interplanetary trajectories

A description is given of the optimization of solar-sail interplanetary trajectories. The optimization procedure is based on the calculus of variations. Attention is given to aspects of thrust optimization, optimization criteria, a terrestrial planet rendezvous, the Venus and Mars rendezvous, the Mercury rendezvous, and an asteroid roundtrip mission. The investigation shows that a solar-sail spacecraft represents a viable option for the exploration of the solar system in the future.

Sauer, C. G., Jr.↗

Preliminary Design and Fabrication Assessment for Two Solar Sail Candidates

Primary emphasis is directed to the spinning sail design and fabrication assessment. Several methods of fabricating the spinning sail blades are presented and compared. Evaluations are made of each proposed design, as well as the baseline design. These efforts resulted in the recommendation of an apparent optimum design and fabrication plan with an assessment of the major advantages/disadvantages of each concept considered.

Weis, R.↗

Solar sail attitude dynamics and control

This paper describes some results of an attitude dynamics and control study for a solar sailing vehicle. This type of vehicle is currently under study and evaluation at JPL and has very high potential for interplanetary missions in and beyond the 1980s. Crucial to the success of such a vehicle would be the performance of its onboard attitude control system. Because of the vehicle's large size and its flexibility, vehicle deformations may have a potential for causing a degradation in vehicle performance. It may therefore be necessary for the control system to take into account the vehicle deformations as well as its rigid-body motions. Distributed parameter system analysis techniques are used in the paper to study certain fundamental aspects of such a control system for the sail vehicle. The techniques can, however, be more generally applicable to other large flexible vehicles.

Rodriguez, G.↗

Optimal solar sail spiral to escape

A solar sail is being considered for various solar system missions, such as a comet rendezvous and a planetary sample return. Such missions might include a planetocentric escape or capture trajectory segment. This paper considers a method for calculating time optimal planetocentric solar sail spiral trajectories to near escape and orbit to orbit transfers. A number of examples illustrate trajectories generated with a computer program, SUNSPOT, based on this analysis.

Sackett, L. L.↗