Technoeconomic analysis and life cycle assessment of purification processes for captured CO 2 streams
Captured carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) streams contain impurities that must be removed to meet specifications for safe transport, storage, and utilization. Among these impurities, oxygen poses challenges due to its high reactivity and potential to cause corrosion, motivating stringent purity limits below 10 ppmv. Building on recent experimental demonstrations of catalytic oxygen removal using hydrogen (H 2 ), carbon monoxide (CO), methanol (CH 3 OH), and methane (CH 4 ) as reducing agents, this study presents a technoeconomic (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of these four catalytic purification pathways. Process flowsheets were developed and simulated in Aspen Plus for CO 2 streams representative of both low-temperature and high-temperature capture processes, with integrated heat recovery and energy optimization. Results showed that total purification costs were dominated by feedstock procurement and electricity consumption. Among the studied reducing agents, the CH 4 -assisted route achieved the lowest purification cost and highest CO 2 recovery. Sensitivity analyses showed that the H 2 route became competitive at H 2 prices below $\$$0.56/kg to $\$$0.84/kg, depending on the CO 2 feed temperature conditions. In conclusion, environmental impacts were primarily driven by indirect CO 2 emissions from raw material production and utility consumption.