A Replacement Reaction Enabled Interdigitated Metal/Solid Electrolyte Architecture for Battery Cycling at 20 mA cm-2 and 20 mAh cm-2
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “composite Li anode”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Nickel Sulfide-Nanowire-Filled Carbon Nanotubes as an Efficient Overall Water Splitting Electrocatalyst
Pursuing stable, efficient, and cost-effective nanostructured bifunctional electrocatalysts is crucial for advancing the electrochemical water splitting process and enabling clean hydrogen energy production. In recent years, considerable efforts have focused on developing highly efficient and durable commercial electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and overall water splitting (OWS). This research introduces an OWS electrocatalyst-nickel sulfide-filled carbon nanotubes grown on a carbon cloth substrate (Ni 3 S 2 @CNTs/CC), synthesized via a one-step in-situ process. The synergistic integration of metal sulfide (Ni 3 S 2 ) and carbon nanotubes provides abundant active sites for catalytic reactions, ensuring a robust composite nanostructure with enhanced durability. Furthermore, the electrocatalytic performance for OER and OWS has been significantly improved by a simple acid treatment to the electrocatalysts, which introduces physical and chemical defects, particularly oxygen functional groups (the acid-treated sample is termed as Ni 3 S 2 @CNTs/CC-AT). As OER electrocatalysts, Ni 3 S 2 @CNTs/CC and Ni 3 S 2 @CNTs/CC-AT present overpotentials of 304 and 200 mV, respectively, for achieving a current density of 10 mA/cm 2 in the OER process. Furthermore, for complete water splitting in 1.0 M KOH electrolyte, Ni 3 S 2 @CNTs/CC and Ni 3 S 2 @CNTs/CC-AT exhibit potentials of 1.63 and 1.44 V, respectively, to achieve a current density of 10 mA/cm 2 when employed as both anode and cathode. Moreover, Ni 3 S 2 @CNTs/CC and Ni 3 S 2 @CNTs/CC-AT demonstrate durable nature for 22 and 20 h durability in the OER and OWS processes, respectively, offering a promising alternative to ruthenium- and iridium-based electrocatalysts for electrochemical hydrogen production through water splitting. In conclusion, the in-situ synthesis method and acid treatment strategy described in this research are promising approaches to fabricating high-performance encapsulated carbon-nanotube-based electrocatalysts.
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
Comparative Study of Vinylene Carbonate and Lithium Difluoro(oxalate)borate Additives in a SiO x /Graphite Anode Lithium-Ion Battery in the Presence of Fluoroethylene Carbonate
The SiO x /graphite composite is recognized as a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), owing to the high theoretical capacity of SiO x combined with the excellent stability of graphite. However, the inherent disadvantage of volume expansion in silicon-based anodes places significant challenges on the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and severely degrades the electrochemical performance. Rational formulation of electrolyte, including its additives, is crucial in accommodating and optimizing the composition of the SEI and enhancing the cell performance. In this work, we present a comparative study of vinylene carbonate (VC) and lithium difluoro(oxalate)borate (LiDFOB) additives combined with fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) in the electrolyte for SiO x /graphite∥LiNi 1–x–y–z Co x Mn y Al z O 2 full cells. VC outperformed LiDFOB as an additive, delivering higher capacity cycling, higher Coulombic efficiency, and better cycle stability up to 400 cycles. XPS and impedance analyses reveal that LiDFOB contributed to SEI/CEI with both a lower proportion of LiF and a higher proportion of poly(VC), which tended to produce higher cell impedance. XRD and XANES further indicated that using the LiDFOB additive, the NCMA cycled to a shallower degree than that of the VC additive. Although the VC additive maintained a higher capacity up to 400 cycles, microstrain and SEM analyses show a higher strained NCMA along with clear evidence of cracking over the surface of the NCMA particle in VC-based electrolyte but not in LiDFOB. In conclusion, this suggests that the negative influence of LiDFOB at the anode (inferior SEI) supersedes the negative impact of both a cracked NCMA and a deeper cycled NCMA and SiO x -based anode.
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗