Pitch Guidance Optimization for the Orion Ascent Abort Flight Tests
Conference presentation sharing aspects of the pitch guidance optimization for the Orion ascent Abort Flight Test.
Stillwater, Ryan Allanque↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “abort”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Evaluation of Acoustic Emission NDE of Composite Crew Module Service Module/Alternate Launch Abort System (CCM SM/ALAS) Test Article Failure Tests
Failure tests of CCM SM/ALAS (Composite Crew Module Service Module / Alternate Launch Abort System) composite panels were conducted during July 10, 2008 and July 24, 2008 at Langley Research Center. This is a report of the analysis of the Acoustic Emission (AE) data collected during those tests.
Horne, Michael R.↗
The Parachute System Recovery of the Orion Pad Abort Test 1
The Orion Pad Abort Test 1 was conducted at the US Army White Sands Missile range in May 2010. The capsule was successfully recovered using the original design for the parachute recovery system, referred to as the CEV Parachute Assembly System (CPAS). The CPAS was designed to a set of requirements identified prior to the development of the PA-1 test; these requirements were not entirely consistent with the design of the PA-1 test. This presentation will describe the original CPAS design, how the system was modified to accommodate the PA-1 requirements, and what special analysis had to be performed to demonstrate positive margins for the CPAS. The presentation will also discuss the post test analysis and how it compares to the models that were used to design the system.
Machin, Ricardo↗
Orion Pad Abort 1 Crew Module Inertia Test Approach and Results
The Flight Loads Laboratory at the Dryden Flight Research Center conducted tests to measure the inertia properties of the Orion Pad Abort 1 (PA-1) Crew Module. These measurements were taken to validate analytical predictions of the inertia properties of the vehicle and assist in reducing uncertainty for derived aero performance results calculated post launch. The first test conducted was to determine the Ixx of the Crew Module. This test approach used a modified torsion pendulum test step up that allowed the suspended Crew Module to rotate about the x axis. The second test used a different approach to measure both the Iyy and Izz properties. This test used a Knife Edge fixture that allowed small rotation of the Crew Module about the y and z axes. Discussions of the techniques and equations used to accomplish each test are presented. Comparisons with the predicted values used for the final flight calculations are made. Problem areas, with explanations and recommendations where available, are addressed. Finally, an evaluation of the value and success of these techniques to measure the moments of inertia of the Crew Module is provided.
Herrera, Claudia↗
Evaluation of the Orion Pad Abort 1 Flight Test Objectives
Presentation will show the successful flight test of the Orion Launch Abort System. Presentation will discuss lessons learned, which will benefit those in the audience.
Clarke, Robert↗
The Best Estimated Trajectory Analysis for Pad Abort One
I. Best Estimated Trajectory (BET) objective: a) Produce reconstructed trajectory of the PA-1 flight to understand vehicle dynamics and aid other post flight analyses. b) Leverage all measurement sources taken of vehicle during flight to produce the most accurate estimate of vehicle trajectory. c) Generate trajectory reconstructions of the Crew Module (CM), Launch Abort System (LAS), and Forward Bay Cover (FBC). II. BET analysis was started immediately following the PA-1 mission and was completed in September, 2010 a) Quick look version of BET released 5/25/2010: initial repackaging of SIGI data. b) Preliminary version of BET released 7/6/2010: first blended solution using available sources of external measurements. c) Final version of BET released 9/1/2010: final blended solution using all available sources of data.
Kutty, Prasad↗
Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) Landing Parachute Demonstrator (LPD) Drop Test
The Landing Parachute Demonstrator (LPD) was conceived as a low-cost, rapidly-developed means of providing soft landing for the Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) crew module (CM). Its experimental main parachute cluster deployment technique and off-the-shelf hardware necessitated a full-scale drop test prior to the MLAS mission in order to reduce overall mission risk. This test was successfully conducted at Wallops Flight Facility on March 6, 2009, with all vehicle and parachute systems functioning as planned. The results of the drop test successfully qualified the LPD system for the MLAS flight test. This document captures the design, concept of operations and results of the drop test.
Shreves, Christopher M.↗
Flight Reynolds Number Testing of the Orion Launch Abort Vehicle in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility
A 6%-scale unpowered model of the Orion Launch Abort Vehicle (LAV) ALAS-11-rev3c configuration was tested in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility to obtain static aerodynamic data at flight Reynolds numbers. Subsonic and transonic data were obtained for Mach numbers between 0.3 and 0.95 for angles of attack from -4 to +22 degrees and angles of sideslip from -10 to +10 degrees. Data were also obtained at various intermediate Reynolds numbers between 2.5 million and 45 million depending on Mach number in order to examine the effects of Reynolds number on the vehicle. Force and moment data were obtained using a 6-component strain gauge balance that operated both at warm temperatures (+120 . F) and cryogenic temperatures (-250 . F). Surface pressure data were obtained with electronically scanned pressure units housed in heated enclosures designed to survive cryogenic temperatures. Data obtained during the 3-week test entry were used to support development of the LAV aerodynamic database and to support computational fluid dynamics code validation. Furthermore, one of the outcomes of the test was the reduction of database uncertainty on axial force coefficient for the static unpowered LAV. This was accomplished as a result of good data repeatability throughout the test and because of decreased uncertainty on scaling wind tunnel data to flight.
Chan, David T.↗
Orion Pad Abort 1 Crew Module Mass Properties Test Approach and Results
The Flight Loads Laboratory at the Dryden Flight Research Center conducted tests to measure the inertia properties of the Orion Pad Abort 1 (PA-1) Crew Module (CM). These measurements were taken to validate analytical predictions of the inertia properties of the vehicle and assist in reducing uncertainty for derived aero performance coefficients to be calculated post-launch. The first test conducted was to determine the Ixx of the Crew Module. This test approach used a modified torsion pendulum test setup that allowed the suspended Crew Module to rotate about the x axis. The second test used a different approach to measure both the Iyy and Izz properties. This test used a Knife Edge fixture that allowed small rotation of the Crew Module about the y and z axes. Discussions of the techniques and equations used to accomplish each test are presented. Comparisons with the predicted values used for the final flight calculations are made. Problem areas, with explanations and recommendations where available, are addressed. Finally, an evaluation of the value and success of these techniques to measure the moments of inertia of the Crew Module is provided.
Herrera, Claudia↗
Launch Vehicle Debris Models and Crew Vehicle Ascent Abort Risk
For manned space launch systems, a reliable abort system is required to reduce the risks associated with a launch vehicle failure during ascent. Understanding the risks associated with failure environments can be achieved through the use of physics-based models of these environments. Debris fields due to destruction of the launch vehicle is one such environment. To better analyze the risk posed by debris, a physics-based model for generating launch vehicle debris catalogs has been developed. The model predicts the mass distribution of the debris field based on formulae developed from analysis of explosions. Imparted velocity distributions are computed using a shock-physics code to model the explosions within the launch vehicle. A comparison of the debris catalog with an existing catalog for the Shuttle external tank show good comparison in the debris characteristics and the predicted debris strike probability. The model is used to analyze the effects of number of debris pieces and velocity distributions on the strike probability and risk.
Gee, Ken↗
Flight Performance Feasibility Studies for the Max Launch Abort System
In 2007, the NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) initiated the Max Launch Abort System Project to explore crew escape system concepts designed to be fully encapsulated within an aerodynamic fairing and smoothly integrated onto a launch vehicle. One objective of this design was to develop a more compact launch escape vehicle that eliminated the need for an escape tower, as was used in the Mercury and Apollo escape systems and what is planned for the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV). The benefits for the launch vehicle of eliminating a tower from the escape vehicle design include lower structural weights, reduced bending moments during atmospheric flight, and a decrease in induced aero-acoustic loads. This paper discusses the development of encapsulated, towerless launch escape vehicle concepts, especially as it pertains to the flight performance and systems analysis trade studies conducted to establish mission feasibility and assess system-level performance. Two different towerless escape vehicle designs are discussed in depth: one with allpropulsive control using liquid attitude control thrusters, and a second employing deployable aft swept grid fins to provide passive stability during coast. Simulation results are presented for a range of nominal and off-nominal escape conditions.
Tarabini, Paul V.↗
The Max Launch Abort System - Concept, Flight Test, and Evolution
The NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) is an independent engineering analysis and test organization providing support across the range of NASA programs. In 2007 NASA was developing the launch escape system for the Orion spacecraft that was evolved from the traditional tower-configuration escape systems used for the historic Mercury and Apollo spacecraft. The NESC was tasked, as a programmatic risk-reduction effort to develop and flight test an alternative to the Orion baseline escape system concept. This project became known as the Max Launch Abort System (MLAS), named in honor of Maxime Faget, the developer of the original Mercury escape system. Over the course of approximately two years the NESC performed conceptual and tradeoff analyses, designed and built full-scale flight test hardware, and conducted a flight test demonstration in July 2009. Since the flight test, the NESC has continued to further develop and refine the MLAS concept.
Gilbert, Michael G.↗
m+p VibRunner Abort Anomaly
During vibration testing an anomalous abort was experienced using m+p VibRunner vibration control system. This presentation describes the circumstances of the anomaly, the investigation of the cause, and the solutions implemented to prevent similar anomalies in future testing.
Test↗
Orion Ascent Abort 2 Test - Benefits of a Digital Collaboration Environment
The Ascent Abort-2 Crew Module and Separation Ring (CSR) were developed internally to NASA, led by the JSC EA Integrated Product Team. The CSR IPT leveraged Sharepoint as an Integrated Data environment to link systems engineering and project management data element, enabling collaborative development and engagement from across the project (NASA-wide). This presentation describes the mission, the development approach, and the benefits of this approach. flight operations
Devolites, Jenny↗
Morpheus and Ascent Abort-2 Lessons Learned in Lean SE&I
The purpose of this presentation is to describe key features of the streamlined systems engineering approach for two in-house NASA projects, the Morpheus lander (2010-2014) and Orion’s Ascent Abort 2 (AA-2) Crew Module and Separation Ring (CSR) project.
Lean development↗
Design and Test of the Orion Crew Module Launch Abort System Hatch
The Orion spacecraft is part of NASA’s Artemis program to establish a permanent human presence on the lunar surface and further enable future crewed missions to Mars. One of the key safety features of Orion is the Launch Abort System (LAS) which pulls the Orion Crew Module (CM) away in the event of a launch vehicle malfunction. It was necessary to design a LAS hatch that allows for crew access to the CM during pad operations. This paper describes the background and evolution of the LAS hatch design, the features used to address the crew safety requirements, the testing challenges in preparation for the Artemis crewed missions, and lessons learned.
Hatch↗
Design and Test of the Orion Crew Module Launch Abort System Hatch
The Orion spacecraft is part of NASA’s Artemis program to establish a permanent human presence on the lunar surface and further enable future crewed missions to Mars. One of the key safety features of Orion is the Launch Abort System (LAS) which pulls the Orion Crew Module (CM) away in the event of a launch vehicle malfunction. It was necessary to design a LAS hatch that allows for crew access to the CM during pad operations. This paper describes the background and evolution of the LAS hatch design, the features used to address the crew safety requirements, the testing challenges in preparation for the Artemis crewed missions, and lessons learned.
Hatch↗
Electron Ion Collider Machine Protection System: On the necessity of the MPS abort system for Rapid Cycling Synchrotron
The Electron Ion Collider (EIC) accelerator complex includes multiple high-energy high-power accelerators [1]. Operation of such a complex is associated with numerous dangers of possible damage to the equipment. The EIC machine protection system (MPS) scope is to protect the components of each accelerator from damage by the beam. The EIC MPS design, commissioning and operation is closely interconnected with the protection of various accelerator subsystems, such as RF-system, cryogenics, vacuum system etc. Yet, the primary goal of the MPS is to protect the EIC accelerators from the possible damage caused by electron and proton beams.
43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗