SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “WASTE FORMS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2021

A Focused Ion Beam-Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Study on Technetium Incorporation within Iron Oxides through Fe(OH) 2 (s) Mineral Transformation

Incorporation of Tc(IV) into iron oxide/hydroxide minerals has been explored and proposed as a promising pathway to preventing Tc(IV) reoxidation to environmentally mobile pertechnetate (TcO 4 - ) and improving long-term immobilization of radioactive technetium-99 (Tc). However, visual evidence evaluating the distribution of Tc(IV) incorporated within iron oxide/hydroxide phases has not been available, until now, despite potential implications on Tc(IV) stability within the host phase. For the purpose of this study Tc(IV) incorporation into iron oxide/hydroxide phases was facilitated via Fe(OH) 2 (s) oxidation and mineral transformation to magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ). Focused ion beam - scanning transmission electron microscopy equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (FIB/STEM-EDS) methods were then combined with X-ray diffraction and absorption spectroscopy techniques to characterize and visually demonstrate that, for the first time, Tc(IV) is heterogeneously incorporated into different iron oxide/hydroxide phases as Tc(IV)-incorporated magnetite and/or TcO 2 ·2H 2 O(s) via different incorporation mechanisms. Heterogeneous distribution of Tc(IV) in magnetite suggests either (i) TcO4- is reduced quickly at the magnetite surface and then encapsulated into magnetite during continued octahedral crystal growth, or (ii) Tc(IV) alternatively partitioned into multiple layers of a blocky, plate-like morphological magnetite structure showing stratified Tc. With limited Tc-hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) incorporation, the results suggest that TcO 2 ·2H 2 O(s) is formed and mainly associated/embedded in fibrous nanometer-sized polycrystalline hematite. This work highlights the power of modern state-of-the-art FIB/STEM-EDS approach to provide essential visual insights of the Tc-iron oxide/hydroxide incorporation and generate reliable mechanism-informed designs for waste forms relying on Tc mineral incorporation.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2021

Annual Status Update for OWL

This report represents completion of milestone deliverable M2SF-22SN010309082 Annual Status Update for OWL, which is due on November 30, 2021 as part of the fiscal year 2022 (FY2022) work package SF-22SN01030908. This report provides an annual update on status of FY2021 activities for the work package “OWL - Inventory – SNL”. The Online Waste Library (OWL) has been designed to contain information regarding United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE)-managed (as) high-level waste (DHLW), DOE-managed spent nuclear fuel (DSNF), and other wastes that are likely candidates for deep geologic disposal. Links to the current supporting documents for the data are provided when possible; however, no classified or official-use-only (OUO) data are planned to be included in OWL. There may be up to several hundred different DOE-managed wastes that are likely to require deep geologic disposal. This report contains new information on sodium-bonded spent fuel waste types and wastes forms, which are included in the next release of OWL, Version 3.0, on the Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) External Collaboration Network (ECN). The report also provides an update on the effort to include information regarding the types of vessels capable of disposing of DOE-managed waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2024

Cradle to grave: the importance of the fuel cycle to molten salt reactor sustainability

Advanced reactor technologies are being considered for the next-generation of nuclear power plants. These plants are designed to have a smaller footprint, run more efficiently at higher temperatures, have the flexibility to meet specific power or heating needs, and have lower construction costs. This paper offers a perspective on molten salt reactors, promoted as having a flexible fuel cycle and close-to-ambient pressure operation. A complexity introduced by reducing the reactor footprint is that it may require low-enriched fuel for efficient operation, available from enrichment of the feed salt or by reusing actinides from existing used nuclear fuel (UNF). Recycling UNF has the potential to reduce high-level waste, if done correctly. Release limits from UNF processing are stringent, and processes for waste reduction, fission gas trapping, and stable waste-form generation are not yet ready for commercial deployment. These complex processes are expensive to develop and troubleshoot because the feed is highly radioactive. Thus, fuel production and supply chain development must keep abreast of reactor technology development. Another aspect of reactor sustainability is the non-fuel waste streams that will be generated during operation and decommissioning. Some molten salt reactor designs are projected to have much shorter operational lifetimes than light-water reactors: less than a decade. A goal of the reactor sustainability effort is to divert these materials from a high-level waste repository. However, processing of reactor components should only be undertaken if it reduces waste. Economic and environmental aspects of sustainability are also important, but are not included in this perspective.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2026

A Brief Review of Technologies for Separating Tritium from the Aqueous Effluent of Reprocessing Plants

The scope of this letter report encompasses a review of technologies applicable to separating tritiated water from light and heavy water with a focus on wastewater arising from the reprocessing of UNF. Reports considering flowsheet options for tritium management are also reviewed. The main objective of this letter report is to support consideration of programmatic opportunities for the Materials Recovery and Waste Form Development (MRWFD) Campaign within the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Using Cosmic Ray Muons to Assess Geological Characteristics in the Subsurface

This is a technical presentation that does not take into account contractual limitations or obligations under the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (Standard Contract) (10 CFR Part 961). For example, under the provisions of the Standard Contract, spent nuclear fuel in multi-assembly canisters is not an acceptable waste form, absent a mutually agreed to contract amendment.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

System Analysis Modeling and Intermodal Transportation for Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Removal of High Specific Activity Fission Products from Uranyl Sulfate Waste Solutions

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) is currently providing support to SHINE Medical Technologies (SHINE) which plans to deploy a low energy, accelerator-based neutron source to fission low enriched U in a uranyl sulfate target solution for 99 Mo production. The 99 Mo is initially separated from the fission products and target solution by an extraction column. Subsequent washing of the column will generate waste solutions containing residual U and fission product activity. A small number of high specific activity fission products (e.g., 90 Sr, 137 Cs, and 144 Ce) in these streams will likely control the classification of the low level waste (LLW). If a sufficient amount of the high specific activity isotopes are separated from the SHINE waste streams and concentrated into a waste form, it would be possible to treat a majority of the wash solutions from the column operations as a lower class of LLW (Class A versus Class B or C or Class B versus Class C). The high specific activity fission product elements could then be dispositioned as a much smaller volume of waste rather than requiring the disposal of the entire waste stream at the higher waste classification. The Savannah River Site (SRS) has experience with using monosodium titanate (MST) and crystalline silicotitanate (CST) to remove Cs and Sr from high salt content waste solutions generated during the reprocessing of nuclear fuels and targets. Both of these materials have worked very well for their intended purposes at the SRS where the fission product elements are removed from highly alkaline waste. On the other hand, SHINE waste streams from the extraction column contain H 2 SO 4 which makes the solution acidic. Additionally, the SRS waste streams do not contain other fission product elements such as transition metals or lanthanides because they precipitate upon neutralization of the SRS waste and are not present in the supernate which is dispositioned as LLW following treatment. As such, there are inherent differences between SHINE and SRS waste treatment strategies. Savannah River National Laboratory was tasked with performing scoping studies to see if MST and CST would remove Sr, Cs, and Ce from an acidic mixed metal simulant solution. Batch contact experiments were performed using MST and two CST type materials. The MST material is a 15 wt % powder in 0.15 M NaOH slurry. The MST showed low adsorption for elements of interest from acidic solution. Furthermore, the powder size makes MST non-ideal for column operations. A CST IE-911 ion exchange material had high Cs adsorption, moderate Sr, and marginal Ce adsorption. Based on adsorption of all species, the ion exchange capacity was found to be 0.032 meq/mL. A bench-top column experiment to measure elemental breakthrough curves was performed using CST IE-911 where chromatographic separations of the mixed simulant were expected to occur. While most elements behaved as expected, the lanthanide series, containing Ce, broke though the column earlier than expected. The second CST material, CST R9120, displayed high adsorption for all elements in the acidic mixed simulant solutions in a batch contact study, and had a calculated loading capacity of 0.091 meq/mL. Future studies to develop a waste treatment flowsheet should focus on CST R9120 to treat SHINE waste solutions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2026

Retention of LDR Inorganics in Solidified/Immobilized Waste

This report provides a summary of the laboratory data and statistical analysis used to calculate retention factors in solidified/stabilized Hanford tank waste for the 13 LDR inorganic species associated with Hanford tank waste (SRNL-STI-2020-00228). The data presented is a summary of the results of research performed to build a correlation between the untreated waste concentration and the TCLP response of a solidified/stabilized waste form. This report establishes the efficacy of two treatment technologies found in 40 CFR 268.42, CHRED (chemical reduction) and STABL (stabilization), that are key to the Sample-and-Send strategy.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Crystallization Constraints for WTP LAW Operations: Assessment of CCC Impacts on VHT and PCT

Much work has been done to expand the glass composition region available for operation of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant. This includes the development of updated glass property-composition models as well as constraints. This report supports this effort by suggesting constraints for avoiding excessive, and likely detrimental, crystallization during slow cooling of the low-activity glass waste forms in their containers. The constraints target crystals in the Na-Al-silicate and Na-Ca-silicate families. These types of crystals were found to be potentially detrimental to glass durability as they remove Al and Si from the glass matrix, resulting in poor performance of the residual glass during testing such as the Product Consistency Test and the Vapor Hydration Test. Using previously acquired results and results from testing during this effort, the constraints described in the report were determined, and are suggested as options to reduce the risk of forming crystals of the types and concentrations that are likely detrimental to glass durability.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Verification and Validation of START: A Spent Nuclear Fuel Routing and Decision Support Tool

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Performance Assessment for the E-Area Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility at the Savannah River Site: Appendix D

This appendix to Chapter 5, Section 5.1 provides supplemental concentration profiles for radionuclide species in STs and ETs that contribute to at least 0.1% of the sum-of-fractions. All concentrations are reported as pCi L -1 per Ci parent buried. The following nomenclature is used for all radionuclides in all DUs: an uppercase letter suffix indicates a SWF (e.g., I-129G, C-14N, H-3F, etc.), while the absence of an uppercase letter denotes a generic waste form (e.g., I-129, C-14, H-3, etc.).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Thermal conversion in air of rare-earth fluorides to rare-earth oxyfluorides and rare-earth oxides

Phase transformations of seven different rare-earth fluorides (i.e., REF3) where RE = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Tm, Yb, Lu at temperatures ranging from 400–1400°C in air were investigated with X-ray diffraction. All of the REF3 compounds first transformed to oxyfluorides and then to oxides, with the exception of CeF3, which transformed directly to an oxide. This study focuses on the phase transitions of REF3 to REOx by simple heat-treatment processes in air and shows plausibility to remove RE elements from fluoride salt streams from molten salt reactors through fluoride-to-oxyfluoride or fluoride-to-oxide conversion mechanisms, which will result in precipitation. This could be used to remove fission product poisons from molten salt reactor waste streams. A waste form option for the resulting REOx products is lanthanide aluminoborosilicate (LABS) glass. To demonstrate this NdF3 was converted to Nd2O3 and immobilized in a LABS glass.

oxyfluoride, molten salt reactors, fluoride salt w↗

DOE OSTI2021

Examining Thermolytic Production of Hydrogen from Lubrication Oil

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Remediation (SRR) to conduct testing via Technical Task Request (HR) to determine the thermolytic HGR of Mobil SHC™ 630, a lubrication oil. Currently, 35 gallons of contaminated Mobil SHC 630 is proposed for release into the recycle stream from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) to Tank 22 and then to the 242-16H (2H) Evaporator system. Inhibited recycle waste in the Recycle Collection Tank (RCT) is transferred to Recycle Pump Tank (RPT) in the Low Point Pump Pit (LPPP) and then to the Concentration, Storage and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) H-area. The lubrication oil would be added directly to the RPT, bypassing the RCT. The current DWPF waste compliance plan for liquid transfers from the RCT to the CSTF limits the concentration of Mobil SHC 630 to <1,100 ppm which is equal to <9.3 gallons of Mobil SHC 630 when considering a 7,500 gal RCT batch with an initial Mobil SHC 630 concentration of 42 mg/L. Mobil SHC 630 is expected to be largely immiscible in the caustic aqueous waste stream. It is a blend of base oils including polyalphaolefin (PAO) base oil and additives such as triphenylphosphate and cresyl diphenyl phosphate at various concentrations (<0.25 wt%). While the base oils are expected to be largely unreactive in CSTF waste, the triarylphosphates additives would be expected to hydrolyze in the caustic waste, forming diarylphosphates and phenol. The tests described herein were governed by a single Run Plan and will determine thermolytic HGR from the caustic aqueous solution, as well as from any organic phases present.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2025

Real Time, In-line Monitoring of Hanford Tank Wastes - Year 1 Report

The team comprised of students, postdocs, early, mid and senior career scientists from Los Alamos National Laboratory, Savanah River National Laboratory, Georgia Tech and Florida International University, with the guidance of H2C, is developing a suite of in-line instruments for the Hanford high level waste (HLW) and low active waste (LAW) processes to provide near-real-time analysis of waste form physical properties and composition. The work builds on results from the recent DOE-ORP, EM Technology Development and other projects that demonstrated promise for the use of real-time in-line monitoring (RTIM) to measure chemical compositions of slurries of up to 20 weight % solids. The goal is for this instrument suite is to substantially reduce the need for sampling for process control. Sample waste, exposure associated with sample analysis, and the demand for an external laboratory facility would be greatly reduced. The throughput of waste treatment systems would be improved by elimination of the downtime caused by waiting for sample results. This translates into reduced process storage as process knowledge will be continuously updated in near-real-time. These breakthrough technologies would significantly reduce the life cycle cost and accelerate the schedule for the Hanford tank waste mission.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Groundwater and Intruder Radionuclide Screening

Solid Waste Management (SWM) operates the E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility (ELLWF) where low level on-site and off-site solid waste streams are buried. The facility has been in operation since late 1994 and is currently projected to remain in operation until 2065. This facility can accommodate a broad range of waste forms resulting from the six different types of disposal unit options (i.e., varying degrees of engineered barriers → trenches to concrete vaults). This facility is currently operating under a Performance Assessment (PA) issued back in 2008, along with several subsequent supporting Special Analyses (SA). The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) developed the prior PAs and SAs and has been tasked to update the facility’s PA. For operating the E-Area facility, a Waste Inventory Tracking System (e.g., WITS) is actively employed by waste generators where every radionuclide entering the facility (to be buried in one of its many disposal units) must be either directly or indirectly accounted for. Since there is a large number of radionuclides in existence (>3,000), the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP-107) has provided guidance on the subset of radionuclides requiring further assessment in landfills such as the E-Area LLWF. The ICRP-107 publication provides critical radiological information on 1,252 radionuclides of 97 elements. This database is the critical starting point for developing a consistent inventory limit system. The explicit measurement and tracking of all radionuclides are not necessary when process knowledge, burial history, and radiological aspects are factored into conservative groundwater and intruder screening processes. Across the DOE complex these screening processes have been historically performed using the methodology suggested by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) as presented in their original report (NCRP 1984) and then refined in a later report (NCRP 1996). In the recommended screening models employed within this report the traditional NCRP models are updated to better handle progeny and better reflect the known characteristics of E-Area. This improved screening process is referred to as the “NCRP-like” method. Various upgrades to the traditional NCRP methodology have been used by others (e.g., NRC funded effort by Kennedy and Strenge 1992). The more detailed models by Kennedy and Strenge (1992) were considered in this effort and are compared to the results from the more traditional NCRP-like models. The groundwater and inadvertent intruder screening analyses presented in this report start with this 1,252 radionuclide list and reduces it down to more manageable lists that are applicable to the various disposal unit types contained within E-Area. In order to reduce this starting list, some level of exposure risk must be considered acceptable. Historically, a dose (or concentration level) has been compared with a screening criterion set to 1% of a performance measure (e.g., a beta-gamma dose not to exceed the 4 mrem/yr beta-gamma performance measure x 0.01 = 0.04 mrem/yr). Thus, if a radionuclide produced a bounding or screening-level dose (or concentrations) less than the screening criterion, it could be safely removed from further consideration. Several tiers of screening and bounding level analyses have been considered in this report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Groundwater and Intruder Radionuclide Screening

Solid Waste Management (SWM) operates the E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility (ELLWF) where low level on-site and off-site solid waste streams are buried. The facility has been in operation since late 1994 and is currently projected to remain in operation until 2065. This facility can accommodate a broad range of waste forms resulting from the six different types of disposal unit options (i.e., varying degrees of engineered barriers → trenches to concrete vaults). This facility is currently operating under a Performance Assessment (PA) issued back in 2008, along with several subsequent supporting Special Analyses (SA). The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) developed the prior PAs and SAs and has been tasked to update the facility’s PA. For operating the E-Area facility, a Waste Inventory Tracking System (e.g., WITS) is actively employed by waste generators where every radionuclide entering the facility (to be buried in one of its many disposal units1) must be either directly or indirectly accounted for. Since there is a large number of radionuclides in existence (>3,000), the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP-107) has provided guidance on the subset of radionuclides requiring further assessment in landfills such as the E-Area LLWF. The ICRP-107 publication provides critical radiological information on 1,252 radionuclides of 97 elements. This database is the critical starting point for developing a consistent inventory limit system. The explicit measurement and tracking of all 1,252 ICRP-107 radionuclides can be reduced when process knowledge, burial history, and radiological aspects are factored into conservative groundwater and intruder screening processes. Across the DOE complex these screening processes have been historically performed using the methodology suggested by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) as presented in their original report (NCRP 1984) and then refined in a later report (NCRP 1996). In the recommended screening models employed within this report the traditional NCRP models are updated to better handle progeny and better reflect the known characteristics of E-Area. This improved screening process is referred to as the “NCRP-like” method. Various upgrades to the traditional NCRP methodology have been used by others (e.g., NRC funded effort by Kennedy and Strenge 1992). The more detailed models by Kennedy and Strenge (1992) were considered in this effort and are compared to the results from the more traditional NCRP-like models. The groundwater and inadvertent intruder screening analyses presented in this report start with this 1,252 radionuclide list and reduces it down to more manageable lists that are applicable to the various disposal unit types contained within E-Area. In order to reduce this starting list, some level of exposure risk must be considered acceptable. Historically, a dose (or concentration level) has been compared with a screening criterion set to 1% of a performance measure (e.g., a betagamma dose not to exceed the 4 mrem/yr beta-gamma performance measure x 0.01 = 0.04 mrem/yr). Thus, if a radionuclide produced a bounding or screening-level dose (or concentrations) less than the screening criterion, it could be safely removed from further consideration. Several tiers of screening and bounding level analyses have been considered in this report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2025

Conceptual Model Testing Related to SDU 6 Drainwell Observations

From its inception in the early 1950s through the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, the Savannah River Site (SRS) produced nuclear materials for national defense in five reactors. Additionally, irradiated reactor fuel and target tubes were dissolved in nitric acid to recover plutonium and uranium using the PUREX (Plutonium Uranium Reduction EXtraction) process. Liquid waste from these chemical separations processes was then stored onsite in 51 underground tanks. Eight waste storage tanks have been operationally closed (i.e. cleaned and grouted) and the remaining tanks hold a mixture of liquids, insoluble solids, and precipitated salts (SRMC-LWP-2022-00001), the latter generated by evaporating water from the liquid waste. Waste is currently being retrieved from tanks and separated into 1) high-radioactivity, low-volume, and 2) low-radioactivity, high-volume components, principally through the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) (SRMC-LWP-2023-00001). The former waste stream is vitrified in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), stored onsite, and destined for offsite disposal in a deep geologic repository. The latter stream is mixed with dry cementitious materials in the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF) and the wet slurry placed in onsite Saltstone Disposal Units (SDUs) within the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF), where it hardens into a cement waste form termed saltstone. A low-infiltration surface cover system will be placed over the SDF at closure, where SDUs will then be in the subsurface post-closure (SRR-CWDA-2019-00001).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Halogenation of used aluminum matrix test reactor fuel – a bench-scale demonstration with surrogate materials

In this work, experiments with surrogate materials were performed at bench scale to demonstrate a halogenation technique applicable to treatment of used aluminum matrix test reactor fuel. The technique involves dissolution and separation of aluminum from used aluminum matrix test reactor fuel in molten-halide salt systems prior to treatment and disposition of the fuel’s uranium and fission products. Demonstration of the halogenation technique was performed with neodymium metal as a non-radiological surrogate for uranium metal. Experiments involved blending forms of aluminum and neodymium metal with ammonium and lithium chloride or ammonium and lithium bromide, which upon heating decomposed into ammonia gas and the respective hydrogen chloride or bromide gas. The latter reacted with the metals to form the respective aluminum and neodymium halides. At elevated temperatures, aluminum halides gasified away from the respective neodymium halides, which fused with their respective lithium halides. Samples of fused and distillate salts were collected and analyzed, yielding extents of aluminum removal that ranged from 94.5–98.2% for chlorination runs and 91.4–97.8% for bromination runs. No neodymium was detected in the distillate fractions. Some experiments were repeated with excess reactants, and a portion of aluminum chloride distillate was processed into a consolidated waste form.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗