Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “WASHINGTON”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

Plasma Science and Innovation Center (PSI-Center) at Washington, Wisconsin, and Utah State, ARRA Supplement

The objective of the Plasma Science and Innovation Center (PSI-Center) is to develop and deploy computational models that simulate conditions in smaller, concept-exploration plasma experiments. The PSIC group at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, led by Prof. Carl Sovinec, uses and enhances the Non-Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics with Rotation, Open Discussion (NIMROD) code, to simulate macroscopic plasma dynamics in a number of magnetic confinement configurations. These numerical simulations provide information on how magnetic fields and plasma flows evolve over all three spatial dimensions, which supplements the limited access of diagnostics in plasma experiments. The information gained from simulation helps explain how plasma evolves. It is also used to engineer more effective plasma confinement systems, reducing the need for building many experiments to cover the physical parameter space. The ultimate benefit is a more cost-effective approach to the development of fusion energy for peaceful power production. The supplemental funds provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 were used to purchase computer components that were assembled into a 48-core system with 256 Gb of shared memory. The system was engineered and constructed by the group's system administrator at the time, Anthony Hammond. It was successfully used by then graduate student, Dr. John O'Bryan, for computing magnetic relaxation dynamics that occur during experimental tests of non-inductive startup in the Pegasus Toroidal Experiment (pegasus.ep.wisc.edu). Dr. O'Bryan's simulations provided the first detailed explanation of how the driven helical filament of electrical current evolves into a toroidal tokamak-like plasma configuration.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2016

HySafe research priorities workshop report Summary of the workshop organized in cooperation with US DOE and supported by EC JRC in Washington DC November 10-11 2014.

The HySafe research priorities workshop is held on the even years between the International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS) which is held on the odd years. The research priorities workshop is intended to identify the state-of-the-art in understanding of the physical behavior of hydrogen and hydrogen systems with a focus on safety. Typical issues addressed include behavior of unintended hydrogen releases, transient combustion phenomena, effectiveness of mitigation measures, and hydrogen effects in materials. In the workshop critical knowledge gaps are identified. Areas of research and coordinated actions for the near and medium term are derived and prioritized from these knowledge gaps. The stimulated research helps pave the way for the rapid and safe deployment of hydrogen technologies on a global scale. To support the idea of delivering globally accepted research priorities for hydrogen safety the workshop is organized as an internationally open meeting. In attendance are stakeholders from the academic community (universities, national laboratories), funding agencies, and industry. The industry participation is critically important to ensure that the research priorities align with the current needs of the industry responsible for the deployment of hydrogen technologies. This report presents the results of the HySafe Research Priorities Workshop held in Washing- ton, D.C. on November 10-11, 2014. At the workshop the participants presented updates (since the previous workshop organized two years before in Berlin, Germany) of their research and development work on hydrogen safety. Following the workshop, participants were asked to provide feedback on high-priority topics for each of the research areas discussed and to rank research area categories and individual research topics within these categories. The research areas were ranked as follows (with the percentage of the vote in parenthesis): 1. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) Tools (23%) 2. Reduced Model Tools (15%) 3. Indoor (13%) 4. Unintended Release-Liquid (11%) 5. Unintended Release-Gas (8%) 6. Storage (8%) 7. Integration Platforms (7%) 8. Hydrogen Safety Training (7%) 9. Materials Compatibility/Sensors (7%) 10. Applications (2%) The workshop participants ranked the need for Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA) tools as the top priority by a large margin. QRA tools enable an informed expert to quantify the risk asso- ciated with a particular hydrogen system in a particular scenario. With appropriate verification and validation such tools will enable: * system designers to achieve a desired level of risk with suitable risk mitigation strategies, * permitting officials to determine if a particular system installation meets the desired risk level (performance based Regulations, Codes, and Standards (RCS) rather than prescrip- tive RCS), and * allow code developers to develop code language based on rigorous and validated physical models, statistics and standardized QRA methodologies. Another important research topic identified is the development of validated reduced physical models for use in the QRA tools. Improvement of the understanding and modeling of specific release phenomena, in particular liquid releases, are also highly ranked research topics. Acknowledgement The International Association HySafe, represented here by the authors, would like to thank all participants of the workshop for their valuable contributions. Particularly appreciated is the active participation of the industry representatives and the steady support by the European Com- mission's Joint Research Centre (JRC). Deep gratitude is owed for the great support by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's Fuel Cell Technologies Office (EERE/FCTO) for the organization of the 2014 version of the hydrogen safety research priorities workshop. This page intentionally left blank.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2017

Report of the HPC Correctness Summit, January 25-26, 2017, Washington, DC

Technologies for verification and debugging have made significant strides in the context of general systems software. An investment in such technologies to make them applicable for High Performance Computing (HPC) could lead to substantial improvements in the productivity and sustainability of HPC software development. Such improvements will be essential to fully exploit new exascale computer architectures. Without such investment, there is the possibility of a substantial crisis in our ability to advance the field of HPC, as the complexity of our architectures, algorithms, and applications is moving beyond the ability of our developers. As HPC is of strategic importance to our nation, forming the bedrock of its scientific and technological capabilities, such investment is highly warranted.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2014

Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Systems and Applications, August 13-14, 2014, University of Washington, Seattle

In our efforts to continue the momentum toward quantitative understanding of the performance, power, and reliability of systems and applications, the modeling and simulation (hereafter ModSim) community gathered for its annual Workshop on Modeling & Simulation of Systems and Applications, held August 13-14, 2014 in Seattle. The 2014 Workshop on Modeling & Simulation of Systems and Applications, or ModSim 2014, focused on three critical technological areas: 1. Integrated Modeling and Simulation of Performance, Power, and Reliability; 2. Standards, Integration, and Interoperability of ModSim Methodologies and Tools; and 3. Advances in Core Modeling and Simulation Methods and Tools. The two-day meeting featured 21 presentations (based on peer-reviewed submissions) delivered over six parallel sessions, and there were six invited talks. Discussions aimed toward consolidating and directing this diverse technical community were especially beneficial as we continue to map out the future and form of ModSim research and development. This report presents a summary of the presentations, discussions, and findings culled from ModSim 2014. Each of the three critical technology areas are presented, structured as major research directions, gaps, cross-pollination, and path forward.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2017

6th Annual Earth System Grid Federation Face-to-Face Conference Report, December 5–9, 2016, Washington, D.C.

Since its inception in the late 1990s, the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) has evolved significantly as a system. As technology changed and its user base grew larger and more diverse, ESGF gradually developed into the state-of-the-art federated system it is today. Due to the enormity of its scope and the urgency of community needs, many features had to be tested in the real world during the expansion process. The rollout of Version 2.4 in 2016 culminated a series of releases and user feedback initiatives that began in 2013. During this 3-year period, ESGF hosted user group meetings to better understand how the system was being used; this information was then leveraged to begin Version 3.0 planning and preparations. The user meetings were collectively led and organized by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Infrastructure for the European Network for Earth System Modelling (IS-ENES), the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Australian National Computational Infrastructure (NCI), the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF). The information emerging from the user group meetings influenced requirements, development, and operations. In 2015, representatives from a significant fraction of projects that use ESGF to disseminate and analyze data attended the Fifth Annual ESGF Face-to-Face (F2F) Conference (DOI: 10.2172/1253685). Attendees provided important feedback regarding current and future community data use cases. Discussions focused on maintaining essential operations while developing new and improved software to handle ever-increasing data variety, complexity, velocity, and volume—a task accomplished by the entire consortium.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2015

Lignocellulosic Biomass for Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts: Workshop Report, Washington, DC, June 23-24, 2014

Multiple societal benefits underlie the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) support for a viable and sustainable domestic lignocellulosic advanced biofuels and bioproducts industry. These benefits include ensuring future energy security, lowering greenhouse gases to mitigate climate impacts, diversifying the range of available products, producing less toxic chemicals and byproducts, creating jobs in rural areas, and improving the trade balance. A DOE workshop sought ways to realize these benefits by accelerating the emergence of a robust, new cellulosic ethanol industry. The resulting report, Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol (U.S. DOE 2006), outlined a path toward this future, emphasizing integrated research from feedstock development to conversion technologies. Since then, DOE’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), operating within the Office of Science, has supported transformational bioenergy research through the vertically integrated DOE Bioenergy Research Centers and development of biomass feedstocks and biofuels-relevant microbes. A number of important breakthroughs have resulted from this fundamental research and include the (1) demonstration that lignin composition and deposition can be genetically engineered to reduce plant cell wall recalcitrance without impacting plant viability; (2) development of effective pretreatments that can be adapted commercially to lower costs; (3) discoveries of novel microbes and enzymatic pathways for more efficient deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass; (4) proof-of-concept research for consolidated bioprocessing (CBP; i.e., production of ethanol and other biofuels by naturally cellulolytic microbes); (5) metabolic engineering of microorganisms and plants for biological production of numerous advanced biofuels or their immediate precursors; and (6) identification of hundreds of new plant genes and developing an understanding of their role in cell wall biosynthesis.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Maintenance Plan for the Composite Analysis of the Hanford Site, Southeast Washington

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) manuals for radioactive waste management, DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 2 and DOE-STD-5002-2017, require that the Hanford Site maintain site performance assessments and composite analyses (CAs). This document describes the plan for maintaining the CA that supports waste disposal and remedial actions for the Hanford Site. An initial CA of the site was issued in 1998, conditionally approved in 1999, received further analysis to satisfy conditions in an addendum in 2001, and was approved in 2002. This document meets the maintenance plan requirements described in DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 2 and DOE-STD-5002-2017 and implements the requirements of the disposal authorization related to the CA for the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, the responsible field Office, and its contractors. In addition to providing current plans for revisions to the CA, this maintenance plan describes the work expected to be completed for ongoing reviews of new information; data related to residual sources of radioactive material, land use, and monitoring; and research and development related activities being conducted at the Hanford Site and within other U.S. Department of Energy programs. The main emphasis of this maintenance plan is to identify additional data and information to support the next revision of the Hanford Site CA. Improvements are expected regarding the knowledge of waste characterization and inventory, site-specific geotechnical data, and final disposition of major disposal facilities and waste sites.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

HySafe research priorities workshop report: Summary of the workshop organized in cooperation with US DOE and supported by EC JRC in Washington DC November 10-11, 2014

The HySafe research priorities workshop is held on the even years between the International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS) which is held on the odd years. The research priorities workshop is intended to identify the state-of-the-art in understanding of the physical behavior of hydrogen and hydrogen systems with a focus on safety. Typical issues addressed include behavior of unintended hydrogen releases, transient combustion phenomena, effectiveness of mitigation measures, and hydrogen effects in materials. In the workshop critical knowledge gaps are identified. Areas of research and coordinated actions for the near and medium term are derived and prioritized from these knowledge gaps. The stimulated research helps pave the way for the rapid and safe deployment of hydrogen technologies on a global scale. To support the idea of delivering globally accepted research priorities for hydrogen safety the workshop is organized as an internationally open meeting. In attendance are stakeholders from the academic community (universities, national laboratories), funding agencies, and industry. The industry participation is critically important to ensure that the research priorities align with the current needs of the industry responsible for the deployment of hydrogen technologies. This report presents the results of the HySafe Research Priorities Workshop held in Washing ton, D.C. on November 10-11, 2014. At the workshop the participants presented updates (since the previous workshop organized two years before in Berlin, Germany) of their research and development work on hydrogen safety. Following the workshop, participants were asked to provide feedback on high-priority topics for each of the research areas discussed and to rank research area categories and individual research topics within these categories.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2020

CMDV (CM)4 Project - University of Washington contribution. Final report

The original goal of this project was to diagnose and improve CLUBB, the turbulence and cloud fraction parameterization used in DOE’s E3SM model. For this purpose, we planned to use large-eddy simulation (LES) and ARM observations from the NE Pacific Ocean and the SGP site, in coordination with ARM’s LASSO program. It was determined that for these cloud regimes, many of the turbulent ‘moment closures’ which underlie CLUBB’s mathematical formulation are inconsistent with LES, which is an appropriate benchmark for testing this. The research assistant found that these closures could be more accurately formulated using machine learning using the LES as a training dataset. However the resulting parameterization proved to quickly drift away from physical plausibility. A novel machine-learning based boundary layer parameterization called MARBLE based on matching the time evolution of a parameterized cloud-topped boundary layer to reanalysis was then developed and published.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2021

Vadose and Saturated Zone Flow and Transport Model Package Report for the Active Trenches of the Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Washington

This model package report (MPR) documents the development of the integrated vadose and saturated zone flow and transport model developed for the performance assessment of Trenches 31 and 34 in the low-level burial grounds (LLBGs). This modeling capability is intended for use in addressing the analysis requirements outlined in DOE O 435.1, Chg 1, Radioactive Waste Management1. The overall objective of the modeling effort is to provide a basis for making informed disposal decisions pertinent to Trenches 31 and 34. The purpose of the MPR is to document the development of the three-dimensional numerical vadose zone and saturated flow and transport model test case and evaluate its adequacy to support the LLBG performance assessment. The purpose is not to present results for DOE 435.1 decision making. The use of the model to perform base case and sensitivity analysis for the LLBG performance assessment, including inputs and results, is documented separately in subsequent environmental calculation files. This report discusses the development and translation of the conceptual model for flow and contaminant transport into the LLBG performance assessment three-dimensional numerical flow and transport model evaluated using the Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases (STOMP©) simulator. The development of representative geologic framework is described along with the implementation of waste release models used to represent contaminant release from waste disposed in the trenches. The report also provides the technical basis for specific model parameters and boundary conditions, along with description of modeling assumptions. This MPR includes certain calculations that are necessary to demonstrate the soundness of the model. Results provided by the model include vadose zone and saturated zone flow fields, and estimates of the possible future concentration in groundwater of technetium-99 and iodine-129 as example test cases. As an evaluation of the test cases, the model estimates of current vadose conditions are compared to available and analogous field and laboratory data, and compared to the results from the original performance assessment model (WHC-EP-0645, Performance Assessment for the Disposal of Low-Level Waste in the 200 West Area Burial Grounds 2 ). The features, events, and processes applicable to vadose zone and saturated zone flow and transport model are identified, and representative initial estimates for various parameters are documented. Note that the parameter estimates presented in this MPR are for illustration purposes, and may or may not reflect values selected for eventual performance assessment. Several key topical discussions (i.e., basis for recharge estimates, basis for vadose zone modeling, basis for saturated zone model development, and calibration) are included, which serve as the groundwork for confidence building for the groundwater pathway modeling and results. Numerical simulation results based on an example test case are included to illustrate the use of the combined saturated-unsaturated model in performance assessment calculations. Sensitivity and uncertainty results are not included in this MPR. Those results will be included in future environmental calculation files. The inclusion of the trapezoidal trench geometry and construction details in the finite difference grid introduces some gross simplifications regarding the trench and liner systems. The model test case presented in this MPR includes the assumption that the trench liner system does not affect flow through or around the trenches after the liner system is assumed to fail. This MPR also includes results of other test cases that involve alternate assumptions about how to incorporate the hydraulic effects of the trenches into the vadose zone of the model. These alternate cases do not attempt to account for the presence of the liner system after its assumed failure either. None of these cases is considered to be the base case at this time. Analysis and alternate cases that attempt to account for the presence of the liner system in greater detail, and its effect on flow through and around it, are to be documented in subsequent environmental calculation files. Depending on the results of those analyses and alternate cases, the eventual base case may involve more detailed inclusion of the effects of the liner system hydraulics.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Natural Systems Data Package for the Active Trenches of the Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Washington

This document summarizes the available information regarding the natural system (vadose zone and saturated zone) at the active trenches of the 200 West Area and 200 East Area Low-Level Burial Grounds (LLBGs). This information is relevant for developing the natural system fate and transport model for the update of the active trenches performance assessment. This document presents a description of the major features, events, and processes of the natural system at the active trenches of the 200 West Area and 200 East Area LLBGs that involves the geologic features or framework, and the vadose zone and groundwater flow and transport system. The description of the geologic features includes the following items: geologic setting, major structural features, major hydrostratigraphic units, and geologic framework. The discussion concerning vadose zone flow and transport at the active trenches of the 200 West Area and 200 East Area LLBGs includes the following topics: vadose zone features, events, and processes relevant to the development of the vadose zone conceptual model; hydrogeologic units and conditions; factors affecting moisture movement; and flow and transport properties of major units. The discussion concerning the groundwater flow and transport system in the vicinity of the active trenches of the 200 West Area and 200 East Area LLBGs includes the following topics: saturated zone features, events, and processes relevant to the saturated zone conceptual model; hydrogeologic units; groundwater flow conditions; and flow and transport properties.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

System Model Calculations for the Active Trenches of the Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Washington

Two lined trenches (Trench 31 and 34) located within the 200 West Low-Level Burial Ground (LLBG) area of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Site are designated for permanent disposal of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) and mixed low-level radioactive waste (MLLW). In accordance with DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, radioactive waste shall be managed and disposed in a manner that is protective of worker, public health and safety, and the environment. DOE O 435.1 requires a site-specific radiological performance assessment (PA) that includes calculations of potential releases and subsequent doses to members of the public for a period of 1,000 years after closure of a low-level waste (LLW) disposal facility. The purpose of this environmental calculation file (ECF) is to document the various dose calculations performed to support DOE’s LLBG PA. The dose assessments are performed to evaluate the potential exposure of an all-pathway representative person to radionuclide contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) that may be released from the LLBG Trenches 31 and 34 to the point of calculation (POC) located at the outer edge of a 100 m buffer zone surrounding the trench boundary. This ECF uses inputs from other ECFs and their associated model package reports (MPRs) supporting the LLBG PA. The five major objectives of this ECF are to present the results of the following: (1) Deterministic dose assessments for both groundwater and atmospheric exposure scenarios; (2) Radon-222 (Rn-222) flux emanating at the surface from the disposed wastes; (3) Uncertainty analyses of the groundwater pathway annual dose due to uncertainty in input parameters; (4) Sensitivity analyses of the input parameters that could potentially impact the fate and transport of the contaminants and doses; (5) Doses arising from inadvertent intruder exposure scenarios.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Understanding Building Energy Use in the Washington, D.C. to Philadelphia Area: Basic Building Stock Characterization

This report is part of a publication series that focuses on approximately 100 different local geographies, or "clusters." Each report provides commercial and multifamily building characteristic and energy data for a local geography, with the intention of helping policymakers at the city, county and state levels better understand building energy use. Specifically, this report breaks down the building stock in the counties shown in Figure 1 by building type, size, energy consumption, and emissions.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2023

Understanding Building Energy Use in Northern Arizona and Washington County Utah: Basic Building Stock Characterization

This report is part of a publication series that focuses on approximately 100 different local geographies, or "clusters." Each report provides commercial and multifamily building characteristic and energy data for a local geography, with the intention of helping policymakers at the city, county and state levels better understand building energy use. Specifically, this report breaks down the building stock in the counties shown in Figure 1 by building type, size, energy consumption, and emissions.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2024

Tree Canopy in Beacon Hill, Washington [Slides]

This technical assistance through the Communities LEAP program aims to provide the Solutions' Collaborative with information and geospatial analysis of tree canopy coverage in Beacon Hill, Seattle as a high priority environmental justice community with the goal of exploring the benefits of trees to improve air quality and mitigate extreme heat. It further provides information on tree-planting programs in Seattle and King County.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Maintenance Plan for the Composite Analysis of the Hanford Site, Southeast Washington

The objective of this document is to provide a maintenance plan (MP) that supports the Hanford Site composite analysis (CA). Maintenance consists of four activities: compliance and performance monitoring; research and development; planned reviews and analysis; and revisions to the CA. This MP will be reviewed annually by the site and updated as needed to address priorities based upon new information or proposed changes, the status of any disposal authorization statement (DAS) conditions/limitations and Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) issues. This revision supersedes Revision 4.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Understanding Commercial Building Energy Use in the Washington, D.C., to Philadelphia Area: Building Stock Segmentation for Retrofit Planning

This report is part of the second phase of a publication series focusing on approximately 100 different local geographies, or "clusters." Each report provides characteristic features and energy data for commercial buildings in a specific area to help policy makers at the city, county, and state level better understand building energy use and emissions. This report breaks down the energy consumption and emissions of the building stock in the counties shown in Figure 2 by building type, building size, end use, energy consumption, emissions, and segment.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗