Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ICSBEP Benchmark”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

FY21 Progress of the Oak Ridge Health Physics Research Reactor CAAS Benchmark Evaluation [Slides]

The FY21 version of the evaluation, focusing on element 57 dose at 3 meters, was presented at the ICSBEP Technical Review Group meeting in October 2021 and was not accepted for 2022 publication in the handbook. The main issue was identified and replacement of the element 57 neutron dose benchmark metric by neutron fluence (closer to what was measured) is required. A subgroup was formed, confident for the updated neutron fluence evaluation to be accepted in the ICSBEP handbook. The updated evaluation will be presented again at the 2022 ICSBEP TRG for publication in the 2023 handbook.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

IER 498: Godiva-IV CAAS benchmark [Slides]

This presentation discusses the benchmark of the IER 498: Godiva-IV criticality accident alarm system (CAAS). It details the goal of the project which is to create a CAAS benchmark capability for Godiva-IV in order to create a shielding benchmark for NCSP software and data, to add geometrically diverse benchmark/benchmarks to the ICSBEP Handbook, to enable more precise measurements at NCERC, and to help assure CAAS performance is as-stated. It also states that work was completed on CED-1 in 2019 and that future work includes the completion of CED-2 in 2020.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2020

Enhancing nuclear data validation analysis by using machine learning

In this work, we demonstrate how machine learning (ML) techniques can be used as an auxiliary tool for nuclear data validation analysis. The output of the ML analysis can inform evaluators and validators on the quality, or lack thereof, of specific nuclear data and benchmark experiments with respect to simulating these experimental benchmark values. To this end, measured and simulated effective neutron multiplication factors, k eff , of 875 selected ICSBEP critical assemblies and the latter's sensitivities with respect to nuclear data as well as benchmarks' features (e.g., material nuclide, core geometry) are used as input for a random forest (RF) regression model. The RF is used to encode the complex inter-dependencies between thousands of nuclear data features (i.e., sensitivity profiles and aspects describing the measurements) and 875 simulated and experimental k eff values in order to understand what nuclear data features are most informative for predicting bias. The complexity of relationships and high-dimensional space is difficult-to-impossible to search fully using simply expert judgment. As a first proof-of-concept—step, it is demonstrated that this technique is able to correctly trace large discrepancies between simulated and experimental k eff back to fabricated shortcomings in nuclear data that were perturbed to simulated k eff values. In a second, real-case scenario, step, the RF algorithm is used to validate the ENDF/B-VIII.0 library in comparison to ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data. One case is showcased where the chosen ML algorithms highlighted nuclear data (the 19 F(n,inl) cross section from 0.4–0.9 MeV) that are shown to be problematic by comparing them to associated differential experimental data and nuclear data from other libraries. In addition to that, it is shown that the RF results point towards poor benchmark experiments and associated underestimated uncertainties (e.g., the PU-SOL-THERM-028 series). However, using the RF algorithm for validating nuclear data with respect to k eff is currently limited to pinpointing groups of questionable nuclear data due to the inherent correlations between features introduced by the nuclear data themselves and how k eff is simulated. Due to this, we recommend that the ML methods presented be used to augment—rather than replace—the expert knowledge of evaluators and validators.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
DOE OSTI2022

IER-297: TEX-HEU Baseline Assemblies Benchmark and Results [Slides]

The pending resolution of comments was accepted by the ICSBEP TRG in December 2021. Subgroup includes Catherine Percher, Dave Heinrichs, Michael Zerkle (NNL), and Jeffrey Favorite (LANL). The full resolution of comments is anticipated by March 31, 2022. Plans to execute TEX-HEU-Hf variant of experiment design are anticipated for FY22.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2014

LLNL Final Design for PDV Measurements of Godiva for Validation of Multi-Physics Simulation

This document is a Final Design (CED-2) Report for IER-268, “PDV Measurements of Godiva for Validation of Multi-Physics Simulation”. These measurements will measure surface velocities in several locations, the initial α and α-t curve as a function of fission yield using existing LLNL assets including: The portable Photonic Doppler Velocimeter (PDV) detector; The “alpha box”, and; Aluminum-encapsulated 235 U fission foils. These experiments will be simulated using multi-physics methods funded separately under LLNL-AM2. A supercritical benchmark specification will be developed; and, if funding permits, an ICSBEP (or classified equivalent) evaluation will be published.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Benched: Upgrading and Updating the Los Alamos Benchmark Suite for the 21st Century [Slides]

The presentation begins by stating that most organizations make choices to handle specific things when preparing input files for validation, such as which elemental abundance data to use, how to decompose specific elements, and setting calculation precision. It also discusses the consequences, which include differing calculation results between different organizations for the same case, even when using the same code. This is illustrated by the intercomparison exercise and input files that are prepared by one organization and are not necessarily correct for another. The presentation explains that the Los Alamos Benchmark Suite is a centralized repository of high-quality benchmark models currently under development at LANL. The objectives of the new repository are to remain up to date with the latest ICSBEP revision, to have a formal review and revision process, to (eventually) be an open-source repository, and to provide new tools for improved input and output file generation and review.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Experiments with HEU (93.14 wt.%) metal annuli with internal graphite cylinder

A variety of critical experiments were constructed of enriched uranium metal (oralloy ) during the 1960s and 1970s at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) in support of criticality safety operations at the Y-12 Plant. The purposes of these experiments included the evaluation of storage, casting, and handling limits for the Y-12 Plant and providing data for verification of calculation methods and cross-sections for nuclear criticality safety applications. These included solid cylinders of various diameters, annuli of various inner and outer diameters, two and three interacting cylinders of various diameters, and graphite and polyethylene reflected cylinders and annuli. Of the hundreds of delayed critical experiments, only three experimental configurations are described here. They are internal graphite reflected metal uranium assemblies with three different diameter HEU annuli (15-9 inches, 15-7 inches and 13-7 inches). These experiments can be found in Reference 1 and in their associated logbook

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data (VALID) Online Repository [Slides]

VALID continues to serve as a library of high-quality models used for evaluating SCALE and nuclear data. Large number of cases are in the pipeline. Online repository is available for use. Future plans include simplifying the process for adding cases, including additional models outside the ICSBEP Handbook (HTC models, DNCSH models, International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments [IRPhE], SINBAD, etc.), and increasing the availability of models and results for external users.

KENO↗
DOE OSTI2021

Questionable Benchmarks [Slides]

An investigation and initial review of ‘questionable benchmarks’ was performed at LANL. Multiple methods were used, including machine learning techniques, to identify 'questionable benchmarks' and/or benchmarks with low uncertainties. Those benchmarks were then reviewed for obvious errors. This is not a recommendation to ICSBEP, but can be used as a starting point for a more comprehensive review. A journal paper is being written on this work.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2013

The SCALE Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data - VALID

The Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data (VALID) at ORNL contains high quality, independently reviewed models and results that improve confidence in analysis. VALID is developed and maintained according to a procedure of the SCALE quality assurance (QA) plan. This paper reviews the origins of the procedure and its intended purpose, the philosophy of the procedure, some highlights of its implementation, and the future of the procedure and associated VALID library. The original focus of the procedure was the generation of high-quality models that could be archived at ORNL and applied to many studies. The review process associated with model generation minimized the chances of errors in these archived models. Subsequently, the scope of the library and procedure was expanded to provide high quality, reviewed sensitivity data files for deployment through the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (IHECSBE). Sensitivity data files for approximately 400 such models are currently available. The VALID procedure and library continue fulfilling these multiple roles. The VALID procedure is based on the quality assurance principles of ISO 9001 and nuclear safety analysis. Some of these key concepts include independent generation and review of information, generation and review by qualified individuals, use of appropriate references for design data and documentation, and retrievability of the models, results, and documentation associated with entries in the library. Some highlights of the detailed procedure are discussed to provide background on its implementation and to indicate limitations of data extracted from VALID for use by the broader community. Specifically, external users of data generated within VALID must take responsibility for ensuring that the files are used within the QA framework of their organization and that use is appropriate. The future plans for the VALID library include expansion to include additional experiments from the IHECSBE, to include experiments from areas beyond criticality safety, such as reactor physics and shielding, and to include application models. In the future, external SCALE users may also obtain qualification under the VALID procedure and be involved in expanding the library. The VALID library provides a pathway for the criticality safety community to leverage modeling and analysis expertise at ORNL.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2016

Verification of MCNP6.1, MCNP6.1.1, and MCNP6.2-pre for Criticality Safety Applications

Several suites of verification/validation benchmark problems were run in early 2016 to verify that MCNP6.1, MCNP6.1.1, and MCNP6.2-pre are performing correctly for nuclear criticality safety (NCS) applications. MCNP6.1 is the production version of MCNP{sup R} released in 2013; MCNP6.1.1 is the update released in 2014; MCNP6.2-pre is the pre-release development version of MCNP6.2, which is targeted for release in the near future. All versions of MCNP6 include all of the standard features for NCS calculations that have been available for the past 15 years, along with new features for sensitivity-uncertainty based methods for NCS validation. Results from the benchmark suites were compared with results from previous verification testing. Several standard criticality benchmark suites were used for the verification calculations: - VERIFICATION-KEFF - A suite of criticality problems for which exact analytical results are available, - VALIDATION-CRITICALITY - 31 ICSBEP problems, using ENDF/B-VII.1, - VALIDATION-CRIT-EXPANDED - 119 ICSBEP problems, using ENDF/B-VII.1. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

PMT-004 Validation Testing for Thermal Scattering Laws and Some Interesting Temperature-Dependent Implications [Slides]

This presentation finds that PMT-004 has four new benchmark cases highly sensitive to PE TSL (2 cases) and PMMA TSL (2 Cases). Additionally discovered was that the PE cases were well predicted using MCNP6.2 and ENDF/B-VIII.0. PMMA cases overpredicted by approximately 0.6-0.7% in k eff likely due to the lack of integral benchmarks sensitive to PMMA. The NCSU ENDF/B-VIII.1 PMMA TSL is an improvement over VIII.0. This was Accepted at last ICSBEP meeting pending comment resolution, should be published in 2024 version of the Handbook. It was found that temperature had a large impact on reactivity of the critical configuration. This has Implications for validation work for thermal cases- need to adjust TSL data to correct temperature as it can have hundreds of pcm effects for a few °C. Future thermal experiments should try and measure reactivity at multiple temperatures to add in data testing and benchmark adjustment.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2013

ORSphere: Critical, Bare, HEU(93.2)-Metal Sphere

In the early 1970’s Dr. John T. Mihalczo (team leader), J.J. Lynn, and J.R. Taylor performed experiments at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) with highly enriched uranium (HEU) metal (called Oak Ridge Alloy or ORALLOY) in an attempt to recreate GODIVA I results with greater accuracy than those performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory in the 1950s (HEU-MET-FAST-001). The purpose of the Oak Ridge ORALLOY Sphere (ORSphere) experiments was to estimate the unreflected and unmoderated critical mass of an idealized sphere of uranium metal corrected to a density, purity, and enrichment such that it could be compared with the GODIVA I experiments. “The very accurate description of this sphere, as assembled, establishes it as an ideal benchmark for calculational methods and cross-section data files.” (Reference 1) While performing the ORSphere experiments care was taken to accurately document component dimensions (±0. 0001 in. for non-spherical parts), masses (±0.01 g), and material data The experiment was also set up to minimize the amount of structural material in the sphere proximity. A three part sphere was initially assembled with an average radius of 3.4665 in. and was then machined down to an average radius of 3.4420 in. (3.4425 in. nominal). These two spherical configurations were evaluated and judged to be acceptable benchmark experiments; however, the two experiments are highly correlated.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Overview of Experiments for Physics of Fast Reactors from the International Handbooks of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments and Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments

Overview of Experiments to Study the Physics of Fast Reactors Represented in the International Directories of Critical and Reactor Experiments John D. Bess Idaho National Laboratory Jim Gulliford, Tatiana Ivanova Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development E.V.Rozhikhin, M.Yu.Sem?nov, A.M.Tsibulya Institute of Physics and Power Engineering The study the physics of fast reactors traditionally used the experiments presented in the manual labor of the Working Group on Evaluation of sections CSEWG (ENDF-202) issued by the Brookhaven National Laboratory in 1974. This handbook presents simplified homogeneous model experiments with relevant experimental data, as amended. The Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development coordinates the activities of two international projects on the collection, evaluation and documentation of experimental data - the International Project on the assessment of critical experiments (1994) and the International Project on the assessment of reactor experiments (since 2005). The result of the activities of these projects are replenished every year, an international directory of critical (ICSBEP Handbook) and reactor (IRPhEP Handbook) experiments. The handbooks present detailed models of experiments with minimal amendments. Such models are of particular interest in terms of the settlements modern programs. The directories contain a large number of experiments which are suitable for the study of physics of fast reactors. Many of these experiments were performed at specialized critical stands, such as BFS (Russia), ZPR and ZPPR (USA), the ZEBRA (UK) and the experimental reactor JOYO (Japan), FFTF (USA). Other experiments, such as compact metal assembly, is also of interest in terms of the physics of fast reactors, they have been carried out on the universal critical stands in Russian institutes (VNIITF and VNIIEF) and the US (LANL, LLNL, and others.). Also worth mentioning is the critical experiments with fast reactor fuel rods in water, interesting in terms of justification of nuclear safety during transportation and storage of fresh and spent fuel. These reports provide a detailed review of the experiment, designate the area of their application and include results of calculations on modern systems of constants in comparison with the estimated experimental data.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Comparison Study of Upper Subcritical Limits Derived Using Sensitivity/Uncertainty Tools Case Studies of Benchmarks and Applications

Neutron transport methods used to establish subcriticality require validation by comparison to critical experiments considered to be benchmarks. Whisper is a sensitivity/uncertainty analysis tool developed to assist with the task of validation in nuclear criticality safety. Details on the Whisper methodology can be found in References 1-3 on the MCNP ® reference collection website at https://mcnp.lanl.gov. Whisper-1.0 was originally developed in 2014 and used to assist with nuclear criticality safety validation at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Whisper was upgraded in 2016 to Whisper-1.1 and prepared for release with MCNP6.2. Whisper contains a library of over 1100 critical experiment benchmarks and quantifies neutronic similarity of an application to benchmarks in the library. Using highest similarity benchmarks, Whisper computes a calculational margin (CM) encompassing of the worst-case bias and bias uncertainty at a 99% confidence level for each application. In addition, portions of the margin of subcriticality (MOS) for nuclear data uncertainty and potential code errors are computed. The baseline upper subcritical limit (USL) computed by Whisper is comprised of the CM, MOS nuclear data , and MOS code errors . The Whisper baseline USL is absent a portion of the MOS due to the area of application, which is applied based upon judgment by the criticality safety analyst. An objective of this paper is to present the baseline USL, CM and portions of the MOS as computed by Whisper for comparison with similar sensitivity/uncertainty tools, such as those used by IRSN and ORNL. The initial comparison involves four critical experiment benchmarks: HEU-MET-FAST-013-001, HEU-SOLTHERM-001-008, PU-MET-FAST-022-001, AND PU-SOL-THERM-001-001, which have been: 1. modeled independently by LANL, IRSN, and ORNL based upon information provided in the ICSBEP Handbook, 2. are common in S/U libraries for LANL, IRSN, and ORNL, 3. span a range of energy spectrum and fissile material, and 4. taken as applications for the purposes of this study and therefore excluded from use as a benchmark for calculating the upper subcritical limit. Results presented in this paper have been computed using covariance data for all isotopes in ENDF/BVII.0 using a 44-group energy structure. Benchmarks in the Whisper library were run in MCNP6.2 using 100,000 neutrons per cycle, skipping 100 cycles for 500 active cycles. Reference 10 also compares the results for baseline USL with an order of magnitude greater neutrons, using the same total number of cycles with 1,000,000 neutrons per cycle. Subsequent to the results presented in Reference 10 changes were made to the benchmark library, as discussed in Reference 11. Newer results using the revised benchmark library are presented herein.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2025

TEX-Chlorine: Highly Enriched Uranium with Chloride Absorbers to Provide Validation Benchmarks for Y-12 Electrorefining Facility

This report documents the final benchmark of the TEX-Chlorine (IER-499) Thermal Epithermal eXperiments (TEX) with highly enriched uranium with chlorine absorbers and high-density polyethylene reflectors and moderators. TEX-Chlorine is a variation of the TEX-HEU baseline assembly with the addition of sodium chloride absorber plates. This evaluation contains three experimental configurations that were performed on Comet at NCERC between July and August 2024. The three configurations, which were acceptable as benchmark cases, spanned from thermal (first two configurations) to fast (third configuration). All three cases were reviewed and accepted by the ICSBEP TRG in April 2025 and was submitted to the ICSBEP in August 2025 after receiving subgroup approval.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2024

IER 480: TEX-Pu Benchmark (PU-MET-THERM-004) to Test Polyethylene and Lucite Thermal Scattering Laws [Slides]

This presentation finds that PMT-004 has four new benchmark cases highly sensitive to PE TSL (2 cases) and PMMA TSL (2 Cases). PE cases were well predicted using MCNP6.2 and ENDF/B-VIII.0. PMMA cases overpredicted by approximately 0.6-0.7% in k eff at 20°C. Accepted into 2023 version of the ICSBEP Handbook. Temperature had a large impact on reactivity of the critical configuration. Implications for validation work for thermal cases- need to adjust TSL data to correct temperature as it can have hundreds of pcm effects for a few °C. Future thermal experiments should try and measure reactivity at multiple temperatures to aid in data testing and benchmark adjustment.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Critical Experiment Benchmark Results using MCNP6.2 Unstructured Mesh

The purpose of this report is to document the results of five critical experiment benchmarks modeled using the unstructured mesh (UM) geometry capability in MCNP®1 code, version 6.2. LANL currently has a vast critical experiment benchmark library with over 1100 cases, modeled using constructive solid geometry (CSG) and packaged with Whisper-1.1. Validation efforts for the purposes of nuclear criticality safety typically focus on benchmark libraries built using CSG models. Results of UM geometry models are compared with CSG results and the critical experiment k-effective from the ICSBEP handbook. All computed k-effective results in this study are well within 1% of the experimental result.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗