Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “USER FACILITY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13

First ARM Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor Users’ Meeting Report

The first U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) users’ meeting was held on April 11-13, 2017, at Aerodyne Research, Inc. in Billerica, Massachusetts, to discuss the Southern Great Plains (SGP) atmospheric observatory ACSM data quality and establish best practices for data collection and processing. The participants examined six years of calibration and processed data. Specific issues raised by data users were addressed and case studies from two field experiments were examined. The most recent data from the ACSM installed in the newly commissioned SGP ARM Mobile Facility 7 (AMF7) were also evaluated. The participants recommended that the SGP ACSM data be reprocessed using calibration values averaged over the history of SGP ACSM calibrations. They also recommended that the data quality be evaluated by comparing (1) observed versus predicted particulate ammonium (NH 4 + ) mass loadings, and (2) ACSM mass loadings versus mass loadings calculated from particle size and light scattering data. The contents of the datastreams from the ACSM were defined based on ARM requirements and the necessary tasks to implement these recommendations were assigned to the mentor and the instrument manufacturer. Some of the recommendations were implemented for the SGP data and are presented in this report. Data from two ARM sites located in marine environments were also analyzed. These analyses as well as instrument intercomparisons have led to further questions about data treatment. These will be addresses in the second users’ meeting scheduled for the summer of 2018.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

BSU-8242 As-Run Thermal Analysis

This report contains the Engineering Calculations and Analysis Report (ECAR)-5510 documenting the thermal as-run analysis of the 1 and 3 DPA capsules that comprised the BSU-8242 Nuclear Science User Facilities Experiment.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, North Slope of Alaska Priorities Workshop, September 10–12, 2014

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Climate and Environmental Sciences Division (CESD) within the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), is hosting a series of workshops to solicit community feedback on how key scientific needs, gaps, and priorities in process model understanding and climate model prediction could be addressed through strategic deployment and operation of instruments and routine high resolution modeling. In particular, the use of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility—a DOE Office of Science user facility— is being reconfigured to better support the integration of observations and high-resolution modeling and to address these types of emerging science questions. As part of ARM’s reconfiguration, instruments are being concentrated to produce denser observational capabilities at fewer sites. In September 2014, the North Slope of Alaska (NSA) Priorities Workshop was held to obtain scientific input on priorities for observational and scientific research activities related to atmospheric processes in the North Slope region and to identify gaps or needs that limit the ability of the research community to address these scientific priorities. Topics of discussion included capabilities at the existing ARM NSA facilities in Barrow and Oliktok Point, additional observations that may supplement and/or link these facilities (e.g., aircraft, unmanned aerial systems, tethered balloons, scanning radar systems, surface stations), and modeling activities.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Berkeley Lab 2021 Annual Financial Report

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) continued to successfully operate during the ongoing COVID pandemic, providing world-class science facilities to both researchers and scientific users in its five national user facilities. The dedication and commitment of the Lab community to continuing the Lab’s mission has been unparalleled during this difficult time. Due to the diligence of the Lab’s Operations teams and each person who came on site, the Lab was able to safely operate these facilities. In December, the Lab received its annual appraisal from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The Lab received “A” grades for each of the performance goals which include mission accomplishment, leadership, health and safety, security and emergency management, business systems, and facilities. The University of California manages the Lab on behalf of the DOE.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

ESIF User Guide: Energy Systems Integration Facility

The ESIF User Guide provides information NREL's campus, safety, and ESIF user responsibilities while performing research at NREL's Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF). The ESIF is a U.S. Department of Energy user facility, available to the research community and open to qualified individuals from institutions around the world.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Operating advanced scientific instruments with AI agents that learn on the job

Advanced scientific user facilities, such as next generation X-ray light sources and self-driving laboratories, are revolutionizing scientific discovery by automating routine tasks and enabling rapid experimentation and characterizations. However, these facilities must continuously evolve to support new experimental workflows, adapt to diverse user projects, and meet growing demands for more intricate instruments and experiments. This continuous development introduces significant operational complexity, necessitating a focus on usability, reproducibility, and intuitive human-instrument interaction. In this work, we explore the integration of agentic AI, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), as a transformative tool to achieve this goal. We present our approach to developing a human-in-the-loop pipeline for operating advanced instruments including an X-ray nanoprobe beamline and an autonomous robotic station dedicated to the design and characterization of materials. Specifically, we evaluate the potential of various LLMs as trainable scientific assistants for orchestrating complex, multi-task workflows, which also include multimodal data, optimizing their performance through optional human input and iterative learning. We demonstrate the ability of AI agents to bridge the gap between advanced automation and user-friendly operation, paving the way for more adaptable and intelligent scientific facilities.

Large Language Models↗

HMPP Revise

The High Moisture Pelleting Process (HMPP), developed at Idaho National Lab is aimed at saving energy. At INL’s biomass feedstock national user facility, research teams are focused on solving critical feedstock challenges for biofuel applications.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

University Research Reactor & Infrastructure Awards

Presentation covering the FY2021 University Scientific Infrastructure funding program and the NSUF role in administering it. To be presented at the Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) annual program review on November 9, 2021.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

CoMET Project Status and Accomplishments

FY2020 status report on the 'Combined Materials Experiment Toolkit (CoMET)' software application for the annual program review of the Nuclear Science User Facilities.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

NSUF FY23 Annual Report

Annual report for work completed during FY-23 for the Nuclear Science User Facilities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

NSUF Annual Report

Annual report for work completed during FY-20 for the Nuclear Science User Facilities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

NSUF FY 2024 Annual Report: Microscopy and Characterization Suite (MaCS) and National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II)

The Microscopy and Characterization Suite (MaCS) laboratory at the Center for Advanced Energy Studies (CAES) and the National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) partner with the Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF). This partnership provides funding that allows researchers to access these facilities at no cost for studying irradiation effects on nuclear fuels and materials. Through NSUF, both MaCS and NSLS-II support post-irradiation examination (PIE) and irradiation activities for NSUF Rapid Turnaround Experiments (RTE) and NSUF Consolidated Innovative Nuclear Research (CINR) awards. This report details the work completed at these facilities for NSUF competitively selected awards during fiscal year 2024.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

NSUF Annual Report

Annual report for work completed during FY-21 for the Nuclear Science User Facilities

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

NSUF FY22 Annual Report

Annual report for work completed during FY-22 for the Nuclear Science User Facilities. Attached is document with final recommendations. Changes are nearly all grammatical errors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Experiments at Jefferson Lab

This chapter presents experiments conducted at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab), a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory in Newport News, Virginia. There, physicists exploring the nature of matter make use of the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF), a DOE Office of Science user facility that enables the research of more than 1,650 scientists worldwide. CEBAF’s precise electron beams can reach energies up to 12 billion electron-volts and exhibit high degrees of polarization. Jefferson Lab’s first experiment began taking data in 1995. Since then, the facility has become a world leader in the study of quantum chromodynamics. Today, experiments are carried out simultaneously in four experimental halls, each with specialized capabilities. The primary instruments in use are focusing or large-acceptance magnetic spectrometers, many of which feature superconducting elements. Jefferson Lab’s physics program provides unprecedented insight into the particles and forces that shape the visible universe.

Achenbach, Patrick [Thomas Jefferson National Acce↗

On the validity of the basis set superposition error and complete basis set limit extrapolations for the binding energy of the formic acid dimer

We report the variation of the binding energy of the Formic Acid Dimer with the size of the basis set at the Coupled Cluster with iterative Singles, Doubles and perturbatively connected Triple replacements [CCSD(T)] level of theory, estimate the Complete Basis Set (CBS) limit, and examine the validity of the Basis Set Superposition Error (BSSE)-correction for this quantity that was previously challenged by Kalescky, Kraka, and Cremer (KKC) [J. Chem. Phys. 140, 084315 (2014)]. Our results indicate that the BSSE correction, including terms that account for the substantial geometry change of the monomers due to the formation of two strong hydrogen bonds in the dimer, is indeed valid for obtaining accurate estimates for the binding energy of this system as it exhibits the expected decrease with increasing basis set size. We attribute the discrepancy between our current results and those of KKC to their use of a valence basis set in conjunction with the correlation of all electrons (i.e., including the 1s of C and O). We further show that the use of a core-valence set in conjunction with all electron correlation converges faster to the CBS limit as the BSSE correction is less than half than the valence electron/valence basis set case. The uncorrected and BSSE-corrected binding energies were found to produce the same (within 0.1 kcal/mol) CBS limits. We obtain CCSD(T)/CBS best estimates for D{sub e} = − 16.1 ± 0.1 kcal/mol and for D{sub 0} = − 14.3 ± 0.1 kcal/mol, the later in excellent agreement with the experimental value of −14.22 ± 0.12 kcal/mol.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗