Efficient Thermal Energy Storage with Radial Flow in Packed Beds
Thermal energy storage (TES) is a way to store excess heat in order to generate power later. These types of systems are valuable in the solar industry, where power production can still occur when sunlight is not available. This not only increases system flexibility, it drives down the cost of electricity. One option to store thermal energy is with a packed bed where the storage media resides in a cylindrical container. Flow from one end of the cylinder to the other deposits or recovers heat (axial flow). While a promising technology in terms of energy storage, it exhibits a high pressure drop that lowers overall system efficiency. This project seeks to flow the heat transfer fluid through the storage media in the radial direction. This system offers the potential to retain reasonable thermal performance while substantially lowering the pressure drop. The overall goal was to assess the performance of radial flow experimentally and numerically. Three main designs were considered in this work. The first system utilized a central pipe and four receiving pipes near the wall. The second system utilized a central pipe and an annulus with holes near the wall. The last approach considered segmenting the bed so only select zones would receive flow in the radial direction. In a high-aspect ratio system, the hole patterns in the piping are important for ensuring even flow into the bed, and a major design effort was testing holes patterns to promote even flow. The four pipe system was shown to be not feasible, as preferential flow paths occur that do not allow even and full heating of the packed bed. The annular system can lead to even flow, but the results show this is better accomplished through larger piping instead of considering variations in the hole pattern along the axial length of the pipe. Segmenting the bed can lead to similar exergetic performance when compared to axial or radial flow. However, the pressure drop in the segmented design is likely too high for practical implementation. A baseline commercial design showed exergetic efficiencies for axial, radial, and radial segments of 81.6%, 82.8%, and 80.2%, respectively. Pressure drop for the axial and radial results were 2.36 psi and 2.45 psi, respectively, with segments being nearly an order of magnitude higher. At these large scales, the aspect ratio of the system is important. From a baseline of 0.64, an aspect ratio of 0.32 for radial flow showed an exergetic efficiency of 86% but a pressure drop of 5.39 psi. All of these results provide new insights into packed bed thermal energy storage with radial flow. Competing effects must be considered when designing a radial system, and results show a radial design can show strong thermal results at the expense of system efficiencies from pressure drop. The COMSOL models used in this analysis are available to the public and other researchers. Public benefits include a potential increase in the efficiency of packed bed thermal energy storage. Higher efficiency in storage promotes green energy technologies while reducing costs.