Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2013

Flammability Control In A Nuclear Waste Vitrification System

The Defense Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site processes high-level radioactive waste from the processing of nuclear materials that contains dissolved and precipitated metals and radionuclides. Vitrification of this waste into borosilicate glass for ultimate disposal at a geologic repository involves chemically modifying the waste to make it compatible with the glass melter system. Pretreatment steps include removal of excess aluminum by dissolution and washing, and processing with formic and nitric acids to: 1) adjust the reduction-oxidation (redox) potential in the glass melter to reduce radionuclide volatility and improve melt rate; 2) adjust feed rheology; and 3) reduce by steam stripping the amount of mercury that must be processed in the melter. Elimination of formic acid in pretreatment has been studied to eliminate the production of hydrogen in the pretreatment systems, which requires nuclear grade monitoring equipment. An alternative reductant, glycolic acid, has been studied as a substitute for formic acid. However, in the melter, the potential for greater formation of flammable gases exists with glycolic acid. Melter flammability is difficult to control because flammable mixtures can be formed during surges in offgases that both increase the amount of flammable species and decrease the temperature in the vapor space of the melter. A flammable surge can exceed the 60% of the LFL with no way to mitigate it. Therefore, careful control of the melter feed composition based on scaled melter surge testing is required. The results of engineering scale melter tests with the formic-nitric flowsheet and the use of these data in the melter flammability model are presented.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Integrated sampling and data flow for Hanford vitrification - 15337

The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) is a one-of-a-kind nuclear facility being designed, built, and commissioned for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by Bechtel National, Inc. and its subcontractor URS Corporation. The WTP facilities are under construction to complete the design and construction, as well as planning to support the startup, commissioning, and operation for vitrifying the radioactive waste stored in aging underground tanks at the Hanford Site. The work progress includes development of waste feed acceptance and qualification program, including methodologies for processing feed batches. Qualification data from staged feed samples will support the verification that waste acceptance criteria (WAC) and processability requirements are met. This verification is required to ensure safe operation of WTP processes for vitrifying the waste, while establishing specific campaign and batch sheets to comply with glass form acceptance requirements. Sampling and data integration are critical for process control and monitoring of the feed through unit operations. Data collection begins with process knowledge of staged feed for determining the required WAC analyses and testing for unit operations. The waste feed qualification data form the baseline information for WTP operation. The qualification data will be tracked and compared with sample analyses at different steps in vitrification operation. All aspects of data life cycle will be managed by the WTP Plant Engineering organization. The data management approach is established in this manner to allow maintaining campaign traceability through glass production records, while safely processing the corresponding feed campaigns and complying with permitting requirements. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Reconfirmation of frit 803 based on the January 2016 sludge batch 9 reprojection

On January 11, 2016, Savannah River Remediation (SRR) provided the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) with a Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) reprojection that was developed from the analyzed composition of a Tank 51 sample. This sample was collected after field washing had been completed in Tank 51 to support the alternate reductant task. Based on this reprojection, Frit 803 is still a viable option for the processing of SB9 under sludge-only operations and coupled (Actinide Removal Process (ARP) product with and without monosodium titanate (MST)) operations. The maximum projected volumes of ARP product that can be transferred from the Precipitate Reactor Feed Tank (PRFT) per Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) batch and the resulting Na 2 O concentrations in the SRAT for coupled operations were determined. The Na 2 O concentrations in the SRAT resulting from the maximum projected ARP product transfer volumes are consistent with those from the previous assessments that were based on the August 2015 projections. Regardless of the presence or absence of MST in the ARP product, the contribution of Na 2 O to the resulting glass will be similar at the same waste loading (WL). These projected volumes of ARP product are not anticipated to be an issue for SB9. The actual transfer volumes from the PRFT to the SRAT are determined based upon the analyzed Na 2 O concentrations in the PRFT samples, which has resulted in larger transfer volumes than those allowed by the projections for Sludge Batch 8 (SB8). An operating window of 32-40% WL around the nominal WL of 36% is achievable for both sludge-only and coupled operations; however, each of the glass systems studied does become limited by waste form affecting constraints (durability) at higher volumes of ARP product and WLs of 41-42%.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

Exploring Engineering Control through Process Manipulation of Radioactive Liquid Waste Tank Chemical Cleaning

One method of remediating legacy liquid radioactive waste produced during the cold war, is aggressive in-tank chemical cleaning. Chemical cleaning has successfully reduced the curie content of residual waste heels in large underground storage tanks; however this process generates significant chemical hazards. Mercury is often the bounding hazard due to its extensive use in the separations process that produced the waste. This paper explores how variations in controllable process factors, tank level and temperature, may be manipulated to reduce the hazard potential related to mercury vapor generation. When compared using a multivariate regression analysis, findings indicated that there was a significant relationship between both tank level (p value of 1.65x10 -23 ) and temperature (p value of 6.39x10 -6 ) to the mercury vapor concentration in the tank ventilation system. Tank temperature showed the most promise as a controllable parameter for future tank cleaning endeavors. Despite statistically significant relationships, there may not be confidence in the ability to control accident scenarios to below mercury’s IDLH or PAC-III levels for future cleaning initiatives.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Instrumentation for Hanford Direct-Feed Low-Activity Waste Real-Time, In-Line Process Monitoring - 18339

The direct-feed low-activity waste (DFLAW) process will utilize facilities in the Hanford tank farms to stage tank waste feed, a new facility to pretreat the tank waste feed, and facilities in the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) to immobilize the low-activity waste (LAW) and disposition effluents from the vitrification process. Process sampling is used extensively throughout the DFLAW process to qualify waste feeds, control the process, and demonstrate compliance with regulatory and contractual commitments. The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of River Protection (ORP) has started a program to evaluate the potential benefits of replacing some sample collection requirements with realtime, in-line monitoring (RTIM). The program will identify, develop, and evaluate technologies that can reduce the number of samples required for WTP operation. Potential benefits of RTIM include elimination of process holds for sample analysis, a reduction in worker exposure to radiation and chemical hazards, decreased secondary waste volume, reducing the cost for sample collection and analysis, an improvement in product quality, and timely indication of process anomalies. In order to incorporate RTIM, the process control strategy for the overall process, as well as each unit operation, was reviewed and revisions to the strategies proposed. The following items were identified for incorporation of RTIM: - Real-time material balance calculations linked to the process control system; - Use of RTIM instruments to validate the material balance for selected analytes; - Anion analysis for determination of selected semi-volatile species (e.g., chlorine, sulfur, and fluorine) in the recycle stream. Based on the proposed process control strategy, a preliminary list of potential analytical equipment was developed. This was followed by a preliminary survey of instrument technologies currently on the market building on surveys performed for ORP, literature reviews, vendor web sites, and subject matter experts from the Savannah River National Laboratory and other U.S. Department of Energy national laboratories. Each technology was evaluated for measurement capability, operations and maintenance requirements, space requirements, and potential for application as process control instrumentation. The instrument technologies were chosen based on the following criteria: - Ability to perform analyses needed; - Potential to be used or adapted for use as process control instruments; - Potential to be adapted to size and operational constraints of standard WTP sample cabinets; - Operational and maintenance requirements. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Application of Process Chemical Modeling to Optimize Radioactive Waste Disposal at the Savannah River Site – 24242

The Liquid Waste Program (LWP) managed by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is responsible for the treatment and disposal of waste at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Radioactive waste at SRS is stored and processed at four key facilities – each with their respective functions to store, blend, grout, or vitrify waste. The tank farm, where waste is stored, consists primarily of legacy waste with new material incoming from the Accelerated Basin De-inventory program (ABD), which is managed by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS). System planning is done by SRNS and SRMC to optimize ABD and LWP operations, respectively.

Georgiou, Andreas↗
DOE OSTI2018

Application of SIAL{sup R} Solidification Technology for Processing of Problematic Waste Streams - 18267

SIAL{sup R} is a proven, safe, cost-effective and licensed waste solidification technology that has been used successfully for 20 years in Slovakia and the Czech Republic for processing of various problematic radioactive waste streams. This abstract presents and summarises the most interesting performance records of the SIAL{sup R} geopolymer solidification technology, the applied mobile devices as well as the characteristics of final products. Radioactive waste solidification into matrix SIAL{sup R} is based on polycondensation of inorganic aluminosilicate components with chemical composition similar to average cement. The main components of matrix SIAL{sup R} are natural inorganic raw materials containing SiO{sub 2}, Al{sub 2}O{sub 3}, CaO, MgO, Na{sub 2}O, K{sub 2}O, Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3}, and TiO{sub 2}. The treatment/solidification process is modified for individual radioactive streams with different compositions. To determine the most appropriate composition, the SIAL{sup R} application technology is laboratory tested on real samples of each individual waste stream identified for solidification. Then an appropriate mixture of aluminosilicate composition and other inorganic compounds is defined for a given solidification application. When determining the most appropriate mixture, other requirements are taken into consideration: maximum dose rate on the drum with solidified product, mass, volume, alpha radionuclide content in the final product, need for a waste's dewatering before solidification, dry matter content in the solidification product as well as other specific waste acceptance criteria (i.e., compressive strength, leachability, diffusion coefficients, radiation stability, biodegradability of matrix, distribution and partition coefficients, influence of frost and water presence to the product stability including long term physical stability in water, dustiness, flammability, time dependence of compression strength and water reduction, product homogeneity and also radiolytic G-value for hydrogen release, GH{sub 2}). The Amec Foster Wheeler baseline approach to implementing the SIAL{sup R} waste treatment process is structured on three steps - waste characterization, waste retrieval and pre-treatment and at last the solidification of pre-treated waste itself. The equipment used for the solidification process is relatively small, lightweight and designed for the specific application on site, directly 'in situ' or local to the tanks storing the sludge's/resins/other waste streams. This mitigates the problems normally experienced by transferring sticky, tight waste through long pipes. The equipment is normally 'tailor-made' to take into account the real space conditions and other existing facility requirements. At Bohunice and Dukovany sites, the facilities for encapsulation were designed to occupy existing areas of the plants in close proximity to the tanks where the waste was being stored. This allowed for the removal of the waste using Remote Operated Vehicles and for the waste to be immediately treated on site without the need for transportation thus saving both, time and resource. To date, SIAL{sup R} has been used successfully to immobilize approximately 2 x 10{sup 6} kg of waste which includes sludge, resin, crystalline borates and contaminated organic waste from Bohunice and Mochovce, Slovakia and approximately 300 m{sup 3} of spent ion exchange resins and sludge from tanks on site at the Dukovany NPP (Nuclear Power Plant) in the Czech Republic. The technology now has a track record of over 20 years which includes on-going research and development. The International missions WANO (the World Association of Nuclear Operators) and OSART (the Operational Safety Review Team) evaluated the SIAL{sup R} matrix technology at Dukovany NPP as an example of good practice. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Virtual and Augmented Realities to Support Development, Training, Deployment, and Operations of Remote Systems - 20516

Throughout the U.S. Department of Energy complex, there is a need to deploy new, unique equipment and systems for cleanup activities, waste processing, infrastructure repair, and decommissioning and demolition in radioactive and hazardous environments. The new equipment often consists of custom systems created by integrating and modifying commercial technologies. In addition, the systems are deployed in unique environments due to limited access, waste properties, and the presence of previously installed equipment or infrastructure that has been left in place. The deployment of custom systems that are 'turnkey' ready for first-time installation and application has its risks. Use of test platforms and mockups for cold (i.e., non-radioactive) testing is one method to mitigate that risk: however, full-scale test mockups for operations such as waste retrieval and tank inspection can be expensive and must be modified to incorporate the uniqueness of each application. An alternative to full-scale mockups is to use three-dimensional (3D) virtual environments and virtual reality (VR) technology to develop interactive virtual test beds. These can be used throughout the down-selection, development, system integration, operational planning, operator training, and mission execution phases of a task. Virtual test beds are readily reconfigured, can be used for multiple tasks, support multiple users in parallel, and can accommodate enhancements and changes not originally planned or conceived in the initial design. Virtual test beds also provide a platform for developing and testing augmented reality (AR) tools for improving operator efficiency. A VR experience has been generated for waste retrieval from a Hanford waste tank to present the potential applications of a virtual test bed. Features of the VR experience are presented, potential applications of VR and AR for remote applications are discussed, and development areas for improving future application are considered. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Salt Waste Processing Facility project lessons learned: Acquisition through construction - 15518

The Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), located at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina, is a multi-billion dollar Liquid Radioactive Waste (LRW) processing facility that represents the keystone for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-EM clean-up mission at SRS. The SWPF facilitates DOE-EM clean-up at SRS by decontaminating the salt waste, which is the dominant volumetric component in the LRW tanks, thereby allowing the cleaned salt waste to be removed from the tanks and stabilized into an approved grout-based final waste form. The small volume of removed radionuclides is sent to the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) for vitrification. Emptied LRW storage tanks are then grouted into an approved configuration for final closure. The SWPF project is currently 100% complete with design, 80% complete with construction, and 10% complete with commissioning. To date there have been numerous lessons learned with regard to project acquisition, design, procurement, construction, and quality assurance (QA) approaches (both good practices and mistakes) that are considered to be of significant value in improving the state of major project execution within the DOE-EM clean-up program as well as to the wider DOE enterprise. An overview of the current SWPF project status is provided and key lessons learned in the aforementioned areas are presented relative to improving future DOE major project execution performance. Specific areas to be addressed include strategies to optimize integration of design and nuclear safety, constructability tools for design and construction synchronization, commercial grade dedication (CGD) approaches to mitigate atrophy in the nuclear supply chain, and QA perspectives to facilitate effective and efficient project execution. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Nuclear Decontamination Evolution and Revolution - 20349

Decontamination, one of the oldest practices in the nuclear industry, is about to change. While no single approach to decontamination is appropriate in all situations, decontamination of highly contaminated surfaces is historically viewed as difficult and/or marginally effective and fixatives and strippable coatings are often called on to manage time sensitive contamination control issues. The deferral of proper decontamination can lead to accumulated concentrations of radioactive material increasing the risk of cross-contamination of workers and equipment while also increasing radiation levels, which further discourages decontamination. The results of the subject testing demonstrate that superior decontamination factors are readily achievable and the ALARA benefit of decontamination is viable through advanced decontamination technologies in conjunction with innovative application techniques. The collateral benefits will save countless radiological man-hours and personnel radiological exposure. The appropriate use of radiological decontamination techniques can prevent or limit the adverse effects of highly radioactive contamination in the work area. High levels of radiological contamination are typically associated with some of the most physically demanding work in the nuclear industry. Additionally, working in highly contaminated environments increases the risk of exposure to elevated levels of airborne radioactivity and radiation from the source term of the contamination, particularly in hard to reach areas or complex equipment. Veolia's Alaron Nuclear Services (Alaron), a fully integrated nuclear facility, has provided the nuclear industry waste treatment, consolidation, repackaging, and broad decontamination services for almost 35 years. In looking at solutions for its customers, as well as for their own facility, Alaron has recently collaborated with Environmental Alternatives, Inc. (EAI), which has provided innovative solutions addressing difficult nuclear decontamination and industrial cleaning challenges since 1989. This broad range of experience along with the products to support the work created an ideal partner for Alaron's needs at their facility. The benefits of collaboration were immediately recognizable to the management of both companies although the decontamination challenge was significant. Due to the nature of the services offered, contamination at the Alaron facility is routine. The recent decontamination experience at Alaron utilized an innovative surfactant process that quickly produces remarkably higher decontamination factors for both removable surface contamination and fixed contamination. Considering the time to decontaminate areas historically designated for high radiological hazard work, the results from this decontamination effort not only reduced contamination levels but also significantly lowered exposure rates in the working environment. The relative ease with which the surfactant is applied, combined with extraordinary decontamination test results, indicates the potential to alter current radiological work processes in a way that improves worker comfort, and removes radiological engineering barriers, allowing Alaron to complete complex radiological tasks more efficiently and effectively. In a series of two simple applications of the decontamination agent to contaminated high bay vertical surfaces, as well as a variety of horizontal and vertical surfaces with variable porousness and surface sealants, there was an overall reduction in removable contamination of approximately 73% with a reduction in area dose of approximately 93%. The results indicate additional reduction in fixed contamination with application of the surfactant. These values are much higher than experienced with more traditional decontamination agents. In conjunction with demonstrating EAI's surfactant on room surfaces, additional studies were conducted on complex geometry equipment including waste processing equipment, tools, and heavily contaminated parts normally handled from Alaron's customers. Evaluations were made with straight application of EAI's surfactant as well as adding additional techniques to the treatment which afforded revolutionary improvements in the levels of contamination removed. Successful decontamination with up to 95% reduction in removable contamination with just one application were demonstrated in several of the trials. This paper outlines the planned approach to use this technology, the variety of surfaces and equipment treated, and the results of the decontamination efforts. Furthermore, this paper discusses options for pretreatment of certain heavily contaminated equipment prior to employees handling and/or working with the equipment. The potential for dose saving and the reduced risk of cross-contamination with the added benefit of lower PPE requirements, produces an enormous potential for cost and time savings. Attendees will benefit from Alaron's experiences and more fully understand the capabilities of EAI's decontamination process. With the variety of contamination agents, forms and surfaces on which the technology was demonstrated, the information will be valuable to a broad cross-section of industry users. The significance of this report demonstrates superior decontamination factors are achievable utilizing the next evolution of decontamination technology and that the ALARA benefits of decontamination are available through advanced and modern decontamination efforts. The collateral benefits will save countless radiological man-hours and valuable personnel radiological exposure. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Addressing an aging facility: improving reliability of the defense waste processing facility at the Savannah River Site - 15539

The High Level Waste program at the Savannah River Site significantly reduces environmental risks associated with the storage of radioactive waste from legacy efforts to separate fissionable nuclear material from irradiated targets and fuels. The Defense Waste Processing Facility treats and immobilizes High Level Waste into a durable borosilicate glass for safe, permanent storage. Construction of the facility began in 1983 and radioactive operations commenced in 1996. In an effort to support the disposition of radioactive waste and accelerate tank closure for the balance of the Savannah River Site mission, the Defense Waste Processing Facility recently underwent an extensive reliability review in 2013 to understand future needs as well as to address aging infrastructure. As a product of this review, a Performance Improvement Plan was developed to systematically address three major focus areas including, a) asset preservation, b) facility housekeeping, and 3) process improvements. Since issuance of the plan, significant progress has been made in each of these areas to improve the reliability and predictability of the Defense Waste Processing Facility. Providing consistent, constructive, and concise communications is vital in the face of a changing budgetary environment. The Savannah River Site case study provides an example of the U.S. Department of Energy - Savannah River (DOE-SR) and SRR partnering to inform stakeholders about cleanup progress at the site. DOE-SR and SRR periodically and consistently provide both annual written progress reports under the Federal Facility Agreement and quarterly written progress reports under the landfill permit to the government regulators. Through the Liquid Waste System Plans, DOE-SR and SRR constructively and concisely summarize both the significant progress made and explain how a changed budget can impact the goals moving forward. Furthermore, DOE-SR and SRR informs the community and general public about the Site's progress and future during Citizens Advisory Board meetings. In addition, through the new proposed model for complex-wide communications, stakeholders can better understand how budget constraints will affect them. The set-aside program would also encourage stakeholder participation and involvement in helping each state and site obtain extra funding through performance evaluations. Waste management organizations can benefit in a number of ways from an effective partnership approach to communicate with stakeholders about available funding. Keeping an open and honest dialogue with regulatory agencies can help preserve confidence, thus mitigating or completely avoiding costly and distracting fines and penalties. Informing the public not only promotes trust, but also spurs the public to exercise its right to demand more information and voice any concerns to elected or DOE officials. With this approach, DOE can receive better understanding and cooperation from stakeholders in a changing budgetary landscape. Furthermore, a set-aside competitive program would encourage efficiency and innovation that could lead to further cost savings for the government while providing extra funding for cleanup efforts. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Scenario development for safety assessment in deep geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel: A review

Radiation and radioactive substances result in the production of radioactive wastes which require safe management and disposal to avoid risks to human health and the environment. To ensure permanent safe disposal, the performance of a deep geological repository for radioactive waste is assessed against internationally agreed risk-based standards. Assessing postclosure safety of the future system's evolution includes screening of features, events, and processes (FEPs) relevant to the situation, their subsequent development into scenarios, and finally the development and execution of safety assessment (SA) models. Global FEP catalogs describe important natural and man-made repository system features and identify events and processes that may affect these features into the future. By combining FEPs, many of which are uncertain, different possible future system evolution scenarios are derived. Repository licensing should consider both the reference or “base” evolution as well as alternative futures that may lead to radiation release, pollution, or exposures. Scenarios are used to derive and consider both base and alternative evolutions, often through production of scenario-specific SA models and the recombination of their results into an assessment of the risk of harm. Furthermore, while the FEP-based scenario development process outlined here has evolved somewhat since its development in the 1980s, the fundamental ideas remain unchanged. A spectrum of common approaches is given here (e.g., bottom–up vs. top–down scenario development, probabilistic vs. bounding handling of uncertainty), related to how individual numerical models for possible futures are converted into a determination as to whether the system is safe (i.e., how aleatoric uncertainty and scenarios are integrated through bounding or Monte Carlo approaches).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 61: Challenges in the US DOE HLW Tank Management Program

Approximately 50 people attended this panel session which focused on the successes and challenges in DOE high-level radioactive tank waste management with special emphasis on tank waste processing and waste disposition. Panelists discussed approaches, results, and lessons learned in addressing challenges in construction, start-up, and processing of tank waste and its ultimate disposition that is critical to tank waste management at Hanford, Savannah River, and Idaho sites. Presentations proposed include: 1 - Liquid Waste Program at the Savannah River Site (James Folk, US DOE (USA)); 2 - Progress on Hanford's Tank Waste Treatment Mission (Tom Fletcher, US DOE (USA)); 3 - Idaho Tank Waste Program (Joel Case, US DOE (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Savannah River Site High Level Radioactive Waste Tank Sample Thermolytic Hydrogen Generation - 20346

To support the revision of flammability calculations and controls for the Savannah River Site (SRS) High-Level Radioactive Waste (HLW) tanks, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) conducted laboratory measurements with the goal of quantifying hydrogen produced in HLW by non-radiolytic chemical reactions (i.e., thermolysis). Testing was performed with HLW tank supernate samples that represented a cross section of types of waste at SRS, including tanks that store typical evaporator concentrate, dissolved salt-cake, dilute recycle stream from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), evaporator concentrate of the recycle stream from DWPF, fresh waste from the canyon separations facility, and waste that has been through salt processing cesium removal. Non-radioactive simulant testing included the classes of organic compounds historically introduced into the HLW tanks that were recently shown to be the most active toward the thermolytic generation of hydrogen. The reaction rate equations developed for thermolytic hydrogen generation from each class of organic compound showed direct proportionality to organic compound concentration and hydroxide concentration. Simulant testing identified that highly concentrated waste with high hydroxide concentration had the highest rates of thermolytic hydrogen generation. Using the radioactive tank sample thermolysis measurements at high temperatures and the mechanistic salt dependence of the simulant models, a global model was developed for tank waste thermolytic hydrogen generation as a function of total organic carbon content of SRS HLW. Through the primary functionality of the global model (organic carbon and free hydroxide concentration), the relative reactivity of the organic carbon in the waste was quantified. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

Site Environmental Report for Calendar Year 2013: DOE Operations at The Boeing Company, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Area IV

This Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER) for 2013 describes the environmental conditions related to work performed for the Department of Energy (DOE) at Area IV of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). The Energy Technology Engineering Center (ETEC), a government-owned, company-operated test facility, was located in Area IV. The operations in Area IV included development, fabrication, operation and disassembly of nuclear reactors, reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials. Other activities in the area involved the operation of large-scale liquid metal facilities that were used for testing non-nuclear liquid metal fast breeder reactor components. All nuclear work was terminated in 1988, and all subsequent radiological work has been directed toward environmental restoration and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the former nuclear facilities and their associated sites. Liquid metal research and development ended in 2002. Since May 2007, the D&D operations in Area IV have been suspended by the DOE, but the environmental monitoring and characterization programs have continued. Results of the radiological monitoring program for the calendar year 2013 continue to indicate that there are no significant releases of radioactive material from Area IV of SSFL. All potential exposure pathways are sampled and/or monitored, including air, soil, surface water, groundwater, direct radiation, transfer of property (land, structures, waste), and recycling. Due to the suspension of D&D activities in Area IV, no effluents were released into the atmosphere during 2013. Therefore, the potential radiation dose to the general public through airborne release was zero. Similarly, the radiation dose to an offsite member of the public (maximally exposed individual) due to direct radiation from SSFL is indistinguishable from background. All radioactive wastes are processed for disposal at DOE disposal sites and/or other licensed sites approved by DOE for radioactive waste disposal. No liquid radioactive wastes were released into the environment in 2013.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2015

Installation and operation of GeoMelt{sup R} in container vitrification in NNL Central Lab active rig hall at Sellafield - 15328

Cleanup and subsequent immobilization of wastes on the UK's NDA estate brings major challenges. With the exception of HLW where vitrification is utilized for immobilization, cement is typically used in the management and immobilization of non-heat generating wastes. However some legacy feeds such as those containing reactive metals can be incompatible with cementation technologies, and the application of engineered cement encapsulating product to raw wastes increases wasteform volume. Cementation has also been developed to be compatible with the repository concept, which provides it with a level of protection from the environment. Potential delays in repository implementation and as yet to be determined repository waste form acceptance criteria for some wastes may require the duration of above ground storage of immobilized wastes to be extended with potential effect on the integrity of the wasteform. Vitrification is a treatment option which destroys organics and hazardous inorganics such as asbestos, reduces wasteform volume, and produces a robust leach resistant wasteform. Kurion's GeoMelt{sup R} In-container Vitrification (ICV){sup TM} is a vitrification process wherein the treatment vessel can serve as an interim-storage, transport, and final long-term storage vessel - thus negating the need to pour glass into a separate container, effectively leading to a much simpler system than traditional waste melters. The inherent volume reduction from vitrification results in a dense product with self-shielding properties, and the GeoMelt treatment process has been demonstrated to homogenize elemental metals and radionuclide contaminants of concern, eliminating hot spots and mitigating criticality concerns. All of which opens up alternatives strategies for storage and disposal. GeoMelt has been proven in the commercial and US DOE waste treatment environment with over 26,000 tonnes of hazardous waste treated to date (half of this radioactive). Kurion and the UK's National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) plan to demonstrate its application to Sellafield radioactive wastes. A small (engineering) scale demonstrator is being installed in the active rig hall at NNL's Central Laboratory at Sellafield UK with a twofold mission; 1) demonstration of the vitrification of ILW/LLW, and 2) processing of smaller volume orphan wastes that currently have no treatment path. The NNL facility will allow the handling of uranium containing materials which form a substantial component of ILW currently stored on the Sellafield site. Accurate DFs across the melter and off gas system are often difficult to obtain using inactive materials at the low concentrations present in radioactive wastes. Installation in the NNL facility will allow trace quantities of active species such as Cs-137 and Tc-99 to be processed as part of a simulant ILW stream and monitoring will allow accurate decontamination factors (DFs) to be established to support future vitrification facility design. In addition to underpinning melter operation and obtaining DFs across the system, the facility will allow the processing of radioactive waste arisings of low activity which may either be typical of larger waste volumes or may present as orphans without a disposition route. In either case the melter facility will be able to vitrify these wastes into a form that will be suitable for interim storage and disposal. Among the feeds envisaged for processing will be asbestos from power stations, contaminated soils, feeds containing uranium metals, ponds solids, sludge, and miscellaneous active laboratory wastes. The NNL Central Lab capability will be used to analyze the active product to support disposal requirements whether through letters of compliance for the Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) or waste acceptance criteria for the Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR). (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Savannah River Remediation Liquid Waste Operations Lifecycle Savings through a Lean Business System at the Savannah River Site - 17245

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) was contracted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to manage its liquid waste project at the Savannah River Site. The liquid waste project is a unique, high hazard nuclear waste treatment and disposal facility consisting of 51 one million-gallon underground waste tanks, a solvent extraction processing unit, a vitrification facility for the highest radioactive waste, and a grout solidification and disposal facility for lower radioactive decontaminated salt solution. Our Project mission is to treat the nuclear waste and close the associated storage and treatment facilities, of which, 8 tanks have been closed to date. The Lean philosophy took root decades ago in the manufacturing sector and started with the work of W. Edwards Deming and his contemporaries. In more recent years the process has matured in the Toyota Production System and migrated into fields as diverse as services industries, health-care, and now the DOE complex. At SRR, a Lean business management system was adopted to address site inefficiencies, aging infrastructure concerns and budget constraints. With yearly escalation and flat budgets, continuous improvement is taking on a larger role - improving the work accomplished for each dollar. This paper focuses on the program results achieved to date, including the lifecycle savings identified through the Rapid Improvement Event (RIE) process. The RIE process is a Lean tool which creates a cross-functional team to analyze, develop and implement improvements for a given process. DOE-EM has recently emphasized the value of contractor's continuous improvement programs through their implementation of Plan of Action and Milestone (POAM): Goal 2 (Increase Efficiency/Improve Performance) Reduce EM Operations Cost in FY16. POAM Goal 2 was a FY 16 effort to achieve 5% cost savings across most programs. This past year's cost savings initiatives will likely become a trend as DOE and its contractors look to do more with less. In support of our own business objectives, as well as, DOE's motivation to improve efficiencies, SRR has held over one hundred formal Lean events and dozens of 5S events that have driven improvement across the Project, including tank closure and production facilities. These improvements have significantly reduced the time required to process material and achieve the overall goal of hazard reduction and tank closure. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗