Coordination in Large Collectives
Finding the subset of a set of imperfect devices (e.g., nano or micro devices) that results in the best aggregate device is a challenging problem. It is an abstraction of what will likely be a major difficulty in designing and controlling systems of nano or micro-scale components, particularly when a large fraction of those components may be unreliable. Rather than approaching this as a passive search problem, we transform the problem into one of coordination in a complex system by imbuing each device with simple decision making ability. In doing so we face the challenge of determining what each component should attempt to do so that the collective behavior solves the overall problem. Furthermore, in this padicular instance, we face problems of scaling (number of components in the thousands to tens of thousands), observability (components have limited sensing capabilities), and reliability (the components are faulty). We present an approach based on deriving component goals that are aligned with the overall system goal (e.g., forming best aggregate device), and can be computed using information readily (e.g., locally) available to the components. Then, each component in such a collective uses a simple reinforcement learning algorithm to selfishly pursue its own goals. Because those goals are derived in a principled manner, there is no need to use external mechanisms to force collaboration or coordination among the components to ensure that the system reaches a globally desirable solution. The results show that not only this approach provides improvements of over an order of magnitude over both traditional search methods and traditional multi-agent methods, but that the gains increase with the size of the system. This latter result makes this method ideal for domains where the number of components is currently in the thousands and will reach millions in the near future.