Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Additively Manufacturing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13

Flow in additively manufactured super-rough channels

Metal additive manufacturing has enabled geometrically complex internal cooling channels for turbine and heat exchanger applications, but the process gives rise to large-scale roughness whose size is comparable to the channel height (which is 500 $\mathrm {\mu }$ m). These super-rough channels pose previously unseen challenges for experimental measurements, data interpretation and roughness modelling. First, it is not clear if measurements at a particular streamwise and spanwise location still provide accurate representation of the mean (time- and plane-averaged) flow. Second, we do not know if the logarithmic layer survives. Third, it is unknown how well previously developed rough-wall models work for these large-scale roughnesses. To answer the above practical questions, we conduct direct numerical simulations of flow in additively manufactured super-rough channels. Three rough surfaces are considered, all of which are obtained from computed tomography scans of additively manufactured surfaces. The roughness’ trough to peak sizes are 0.1 $h$ , 0.3 $h$ and 0.8 $h$ , respectively, where $h$ is the intended half-channel height. Each rough surface is placed opposite a smooth wall and the other two rough surfaces, leading to six rough-wall channel configurations. Two Reynolds numbers are considered, namely $Re_\tau =180$ and $Re_\tau =395$ . We show first that measurements at one streamwise and spanwise location are insufficient due to strong mean flow inhomogeneity across the entire channel, second that the logarithmic law of the wall survives despite the mean flow inhomogeneity and third that the established roughness sheltering model remains accurate.

Altland, Samuel↗

Microstructure-sensitive mechanical behavior of an additively manufactured psuedoelastic shape memory alloy

The additive manufacturing of shape memory alloys into complex geometries enables fabrication of advanced functional systems across a variety of fields and domains. This work presents results focused on the mechanical behavior of additively manufactured shape memory pseudoelastic NiTi. The deformation induced solid state phase transformation from austenite to martensite allows this system to accommodate large recoverable strains. This deformation behavior is fundamentally driven by crystal-scale transformation physics. Laser powder bed fusion processing reveals that the resulting microstructure, both grain morphology and crystallographic texture, is strongly dependent on the manufacturing processing history. Exhaustive mechanical testing demonstrates that these microstructural factors strongly impact both tensile and cyclic stress–strain behavior. Cyclic dissipative behavior, however, is similar across all tested microstructures following an initial transient period. Remarkably, analysis of spatial strain fields during tensile loading reveals two distinctly different localization “modes”. The first is initiation of localized deformation bands which continuously propagate through the tensile bar during loading. In the second mode localization is observed but lacks propagation; instead additional localization cites nucleate during subsequent loading. The latter phenomena is suspected to be driven by grain-scale deformation physics as the localized band morphologies coincide with grain morphologies. These phenomena strongly impact the resulting aggregate stress–strain behavior. Hence, manufacturers and designers of psuedoelastic functional components must at the very least consider the potential variability in properties when considering additive manufacturing processing. More ideally the process–structure–property relations can be used to further tailor and optimize final functional performance.

Additive manufacturing↗

Development of transparent, particle‐loaded photoresins for volumetric additive manufacturing of silica glass

Abstract Additive manufacturing of glass aims to change the paradigm of glass manufacturing by allowing for improved customization coupled with lower energy and post‐processing needs. Fabrication of glass via volumetric additive manufacturing (VAM) involves printing in a silica‐loaded photopolymer resin with subsequent thermal processing and adds additional advantages by allowing for rapid printing of parts with smooth surfaces and no supports. Previous work in glass VAM has demonstrated fabrication of optical quality microoptics with overall dimensions on the scale of tens of cubic millimeters. For applications requiring glass printed on the scale of cubic centimeters the rheology, scattering, and green part strength must be controlled via resin formulation. Here, we present insight into a novel glass photopolymer resin suitable for VAM and in the effect of tuning formulation on the ability to produce dense glass parts with volumes on the scale of cubic centimeters.

Myers, Luke A.↗

Modeling Time-Dependent Surrogates of Additive-Manufactured Nuclear Fuels Processes

Additive manufacturing (AM) technology is being increasingly adopted in a wide variety of application areas for its ability to rapidly produce, prototype, and customize designs. Recently, a hybrid AM technique was successfully developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to manufacture nuclear fuels [1]. Despite the advantages, this AM technique needs optimization due to defects from a highly complex melting and sintering process. The complex metallurgical phenomena during AM processes are strongly related to parameters such as applied laser power, traveling speed, and scan style, which could lead to differences in density, residual stress, crystallographic texture, and mechanical properties. In addition, stochastic variations in laser energy interaction and associated multiscale/multiphysics phenomena cause variations in microstructure evolution and mechanical properties. Currently, researchers at INL are focusing on developing a comprehensive modeling framework, leveraging INL’s simulation tools MOOSE/MARMOT/BISON/RAVEN [2-4] to describe all steps of this AM process across multiple length scales. Although this advanced framework plays a critical role in enabling enhancements to traditional trial and error approaches for design and optimization of nuclear fuel materials, it remains computationally intense, limiting its use in sensitivity and optimization analysis. In this case, an accurate and inexpensive surrogate becomes an effective tool for providing a tractable approximation of the underlying underline physics. Surrogate models generally not based on the physics of a system are purely mathematical models used to capture the relationships between specific system inputs and outputs. Popular approaches, including neural networks [5], response surfaces [6], and subspace-based reduced order models [7], have been applied to a wide range of disciplines, such as nuclear reactor design, aerospace design and automotive design. In this summary, we employ advanced time-dependent surrogate models such as high-dimensional model representation (HDMR) [8] and physics-informed deep neural network (PINNs) [9] to accelerate the design and optimization of AM process.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Additive manufacturing system with at least one electronic nose

An additive manufacturing system comprising at least one electronic nose (e-nose) is provided. The e-nose may comprise a housing and gas sensors. The housing may have an air channel. The active sensor portion of the sensors are positioned in the air channel. The housing may be mounted to an extruder head of an additive manufacturing device. The system may also comprise a processor. The processor may determine whether there is an abnormality in an additive manufacturing process based on one or more combinations of outputs from the gas sensors received during the additive manufacturing process input into a deployed machine learning model; and generate a report for the additive manufacturing process containing the determination.

Ivanov, Ilia N.↗

Effect of N 2 - and CO 2 -containing shielding gases on composition modification and carbonitride precipitation in wire arc additive manufactured grade 91 steel

Additive manufacturing (AM) represents a promising technique to fabricate metallic alloys with greater control of the resulting material features as compared to traditional manufacturing routes. Recently, there is greater interest in AM research on 9 wt% Cr ferritic/martensitic (F/M) steels, which are commonly studied for use in the nuclear energy industry. This work aims to prove that wire arc AM can manufacture F/M steels with adequate mechanical properties in multiple processing atmospheres and aims to study how shielding gas composition can be leveraged during fabrication to induce specific precipitation pathways. The effect of shielding gas composition on MX (M=Nb and/or V, Xdouble bondC and/or N) carbonitride precipitation in a 9 wt% Cr ferritic/martensitic (F/M) steel alloy known as Grade 91 was studied using N 2 and CO 2 gas additions to an inert Ar shielding gas atmosphere during wire arc AM. The N and C atoms present in the processing atmospheres were absorbed into the melt pools during fabrication. Due to their differing affinities for precipitate-forming reactions, the varying levels of C and N between the samples contributed to differences in final carbonitride composition and morphologies. Such precipitate behavior is of interest as carbonitrides have been shown to contribute to increased mechanical performance. This increased performance was studied via electron microscopy and tested for strength, ductility, and fracture properties.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Additive Manufacturing for Human Space Exploration

NASA’s In Space Manufacturing Initiative (ISM): The Case for ISM - Why; ISM Path to Exploration; In Space Robotic Manufacturing and Assembly (IRMA). Additive Manufacturing (AM) Development For Liquid Rocket Engine Space Flight Hardware. MSFC (Marshall Space Flight Center) Standard and Specification For Additively Manufactured Space Flight Hardware.

Additive Manufacturing Exploration↗

Metal Additive Manufacturing for Spaceflight

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) is changing how complex aerospace parts are being designed and manufactured for rocket engines and launch vehicles. NASA has been leading AM efforts since the late 2000’s to mature specialty alloys for AM, advance AM processes, develop standards and infuse AM into rocket engines and the commercial supply chain. There are many types of AM processes and alloys in-use and this presentation will provide an overview of how NASA is applying these for rocket engines and the potential opportunities for AM in the future.

Additive Manufacturing↗

Overall Cooling Effectiveness of Internally Cooled Additively Manufactured Blades

By utilizing additive manufacturing, novel internal cooling designs can be quickly and cheaply vetted to enhance blade cooling performance. This improvement allows for higher turbine inlet temperatures while reducing the amount of coolant needed, therefore increasing the overall efficiency of small industrial gas turbines.

additive manufacturing↗

Scaling electrospray based additive manufacturing of polyamide membranes

Additive manufacturing based on electrospray printing has been demonstrated to fabricate polyamide membranes with separation properties similar to commercial membranes while also offering exceptional control of membrane thickness and roughness. In this work, we report on the scalability of the electrospray process to produce membrane leaves that are 10 times the area of membranes fabricated in literature through electrospray printing. The large membrane leaves exhibited salt rejection of >90% (at 2000 ppm feed salt concentration) and ∼0.7 LMH/bar flux, which is comparable to smaller printed membranes using the same process.

Additive manufacturing↗

Ultrasonic Testing (UT) Reference Standard for Additive Manufacturing Quality Control

Many additive manufacturing (AM) reference standards for build quality verification concentrate primarily on external features. In contrast, EPRI proposes a pair of AM reference blocks that feature only internal and embedded forms. This report presents, collates, and discusses quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) results from various techniques, including visual testing (VT), radiographic testing (RT), conventional ultrasonic testing (UT), and full matrix capture/total focusing method (FMC/TFM) scanning. The blocks are intended, as part of a larger series of blocks, to evaluate build quality and the relative performance of different NDE techniques in detecting various features. The limits of detectability and the closeness of the as-built shape to the intended form for certain features are quantified, facilitating direct comparison. Upon analysis of the results of this testing, it was found that FMC/TFM was consistently superior in detection, followed by conventional UT, then VT, and lastly RT.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Assessment of critical flaw sizes and crack driving forces during additive manufacturing of metallic materials

Additive manufacturing (AM) of complex engineering components is often plagued by a high susceptibility to cracking, particularly in high-strength metallic materials. While alloy design efforts have made progress in mitigating solidification defects, there remains a need for mechanistic guidelines to predict susceptibility to solid-state cracking. To address this gap, driving forces for the growth of melt pool cracks are calculated across a wide range of alloys using an efficient computational framework. Calculations are coupled with rapid single track laser experiments to elucidate trends in cracking from laser melting. The analyses conducted here highlight the important role of material properties in susceptibility to cracking, notably fracture toughness and elastic modulus. An important finding is that residual stresses that are limited in magnitude to the yield stress of the material are likely insufficient to drive cracking during cooling. Furthermore, the implications of these results are discussed in the context of alloy design for AM and residual stress accumulation during AM.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Dielectric Barrier Discharge Electrothermal Heating and Additive Manufacturing of Thermoset Parts

Additive manufacturing of thermosets requires a mechanism for solidifying deposited layers in order to prevent part collapse. To accomplish this, non‐equilibrium plasma is proposed for its ability to target, heat, and cure printed thermosetting resin. Non‐equilibrium plasmas have not been used for the curing of liquid thermoset composites, and so their impact on an uncured resin is unknown. Here this work investigates the mechanism through which dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) heats an epoxy/carbon nanotube (CNT) composite under atmospheric conditions. Plasma applied to resin surfaces is found to cause rapid heating, with heating rate controlled by adjusting the applied power. Heating is localized to within the top 0.5 mm of the sample surface and maximum temperature is found to depend on sample conductivity, indicating the heating reaction occurs through a combination of electron conduction and ion bombardment. Characterization of composites cured using plasma shows oxidation and roughening of the surface. Based on the heating and surface studies, several demonstrative prints are performed using in situ plasma curing. This work shows the potential of DBD plasma to rapidly heat liquid substrates and demonstrates how plasma curing expands the capability of existing direct ink write (DIW) printer technologies.

3D printing↗

Establishing model credibility for process-microstructure-property relationships in additive manufacturing using exascale computing

Additive Manufacturing (AM) of alloys holds significant promise as a disruptive technology in various industries, yet its adoption is often hindered by challenges in achieving consistent part quality. These issues are primarily due to the complex process-microstructure-property (PSP) relationships inherent to AM. Computational models can greatly aid in understanding these relationships, but their widespread impact and adoption has been limited by a lack of validated, open-source, and computationally efficient PSP modeling frameworks and hardware limitations. Here, this study leverages the ExaAM software suite and data from the AMBench-2018 series of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) benchmark experiments to perform a comprehensive model assessment, including verification, validation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification. The RADICAL-EnTK workflow manager was used to perform an ensemble of heat transport, solidification, and mechanical response simulations on the exascale computer Frontier, considering uncertainties in critical model inputs such as laser spot size and nucleation parameters, and consisting of 125 explicit grain structure simulations and 7875 crystal plasticity simulations. For a selected location within the Inconel 625 AMBench-2018 test artifact, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification were performed using the predicted distributions of grain structure and mechanical properties. Qualitative agreement was found between the predicted grain size and texture and the observed AMBench-2018 microstructure, the mean predicted yield stress was within 5% of the experimental measurement mean, and the mean predicted engineering stress at 5% strain was within 10% of the experimental measurement mean. The insights gained from development and validation of the ExaAM PSP modeling framework will help guide future directions for enhancing the credibility and reliability of PSP models in AM, thereby accelerating the adoption of AM technologies in various industries.

Additive manufacturing↗

Laser spot welding of additive manufactured 304L stainless steel

Here, the goal of this work is to understand if an additively manufactured 304L stainless steel exhibits similar spot-welding behavior as wrought 304L stainless steel. Due to the many differences between an additively manufactured component and wrought product, it is important to determine how the material interacts with the laser and how it affects the weld bead morphology. In this paper, the laser coupling efficiency, weld size, and solidification of spot welds produced in wrought and additively manufactured 304L stainless steel were investigated. The coupling efficiency of wrought and additively manufactured 304L stainless steel of similar surface condition were approximately the same over a range of applied laser energies. Laser welding of the untreated (rougher) surface of additively manufactured 304L, however, showed improved coupling efficiency ranging between 3.3 and 100%. The rougher surface traps the incoming light and increases the coupling efficiency at lower laser energies, while at higher energy, the absorption efficiency is dominated by intrinsic absorption from the keyhole formation rather than surface roughness. The resulting spot weld microstructures differed from welds made in wrought 304L and additively manufactured 304L. Welds made in wrought 304L were fully austenitic containing what is suspected to be massive austenite, which suggests that these welds solidified as primary ferrite. Welds made in additively manufactured 304L were also fully austenitic and contained both cellular austenite and what is suspected to be massive austenite. These observations mean that welds made in additively manufactured 304L solidified as primary ferrite and primary austenite. The differences in weld microstructures made in wrought and AM 304L can be attributed to differences in the composition and solidification rate.

304L stainless steel↗

SiC Receiver/Reactor by Additive Manufacturing for Concentrated Solar Thermocatalysis with Thermal Energy Storage (Final Technical Report - Public)

The direct use of solar thermal energy provides opportunities for low-cost heating sources for a variety of applications. Ultra-high temperatures around 1000°C are high value and highly useful for energy-demanding industries. Many materials cannot withstand these conditions. In the area of Sustainable Chemicals, further limitations on material stability exist. Combining state-of-the-art materials with new designs provides a promising pathway for harvesting solar thermal energy and performing high temperature chemical processes. However, conventional manufacturing limits the potential for design flexibility. In this project, Additive Manufacturing was combined with advanced materials and new chemical reactor designs. In addition, 24/7 energy is necessary for chemical processing, and designs for ultra-high temperature thermal storage were devised. Specifically, preliminary design of a novel solar thermal receiver was developed in this project and designed to work with thermocatalytic reactors for producing sustainable chemicals and fuels. An ultra-high temperature particle storage system and heat exchangers were proposed to transport ultra-hot air as thermal fluid for the system. On a broader scale, this system could be used to tap solar thermal energy for a centralized facility with capability of transferring that heat to various segments at a full range of temperatures to 1000°C. The project pushed the temperature boundaries past those in current use, and Additive Manufacturing was envisaged for fabricating the receiver to meet requirements of extreme environments. An extensive analysis of silicon carbide additive manufacturing was performed to compare the thermal and mechanical properties of complex geometries compared to conventional material and those manufactured via other methods. The Additive Manufacturing via Binder-Jet printing was optimized and characterized to provide high quality and reproducible components capable of withstanding the proposed extreme environments. The designs for the concentrating solar thermal cavity with ultra-hot air thermal fluid showed high performance in simulations, attributable to the complex optimized geometries of the 3D printed systems. The bright future of Additive Manufacturing with advanced materials developments should provide more options and even higher quality as the technology further develops. Current costs for Additive Manufacturing of advanced ceramics is relatively low, however post-processing of the materials for extreme environments is currently high. There is little industrial-scale infrastructure for these, but it is growing as niche applications become more mainstream. The results of the project can be translated into similar extreme environments for concentrating solar thermal energy as well as its integration with ultra-hot air thermal fluids. A number of industries that require ultra-high temperatures need to electrify or otherwise decarbonize for climate goals, and this project showed that theoretically there is a pathway to do so with direct concentrated solar thermal power.

10 SYNTHETIC FUELS↗

Comparison of three measurement modalities for 3D characterization of manufactured features and process-induced porosity in titanium alloy additively manufactured parts

Nondestructive characterization of internal features and defects within complex components is vital for many industrial applications, particularly with the advent of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. However, community understanding of the limitations of nondestructive methods such as X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) can be limited in certain industrial sectors as these may be emergent applications. In this paper, we investigate the limits of X-ray CT measurements and compare extracted data with mechanical polishing serial sectioning (MPSS) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The test object is an additively manufactured titanium alloy disk that contains both process-induced porosity and machined features, including focused ion beam milled features designed to probe the resolution limits of X-ray CT. Results show that each of these characterization techniques has advantages and disadvantages. We compare data acquisition times, spatial resolution, geometric measurement accuracy and defect visualization fidelity across these modalities to establish a practical framework.

Additive manufacturing↗

Advanced CMCs, Additive Manufacturing, and Joining/Integration Technologies

An overview of ceramic matrix composite (CMC) and additive manufacturing capabilities at GRC is provided. The additive manufacturing methods include laminated object manufacturing (LOM), binder jetting, 3-D printing, extrusion, direct writing and multi-materials additive manufacturing. Examples are given of GRC's extensive experience in the development and implementation of CMCs in various aerospace systems. Additive manufacturing offers significant advantages in fabricating preforms, ceramics, and CMCs. They will have to be selectively applied to "traditional" components but can also enable new applications. Additive manufacturing of lightweight and multifunctional polymer composites can provide wide ranging properties. Multi-material printing approaches could provide new opportunities to explore and expand the design envelope. Joining and Integration technologies, gaskets and sealants, as well as repair and refurbishment are also keys for Hypersonic applications.

Grady, Joseph E.↗