Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “fuel elements”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12

Thermal Propulsion Capture System Heat Exchanger Design

One of the biggest challenges of manned spaceflight beyond low earth orbit and the moon is harmful radiation that astronauts would be exposed to on their long journey to Mars and further destinations. Using nuclear energy has the potential to be a more effective means of propulsion compared to traditional chemical engines (higher specific impulse). An upper stage nuclear engine would allow astronauts to reach their destination faster and more fuel efficiently. Testing these engines poses engineering challenges due to the need to totally capture the engine exhaust. The Thermal Propulsion Capture System is a concept for cost effectively and safely testing Nuclear Thermal Engines. Nominally, hydrogen exhausted from the engine is not radioactive, but is treated as such in case of fuel element failure. The Thermal Propulsion Capture System involves injecting liquid oxygen to convert the hydrogen exhaust into steam. The steam is then cooled and condensed into liquid water to allow for storage. The Thermal Propulsion Capture System concept for ground testing of a nuclear powered engine involves capturing the engine exhaust to be cooled and condensed before being stored. The hydrogen exhaust is injected with liquid oxygen and burned to form steam. That steam must be cooled to saturation temperatures before being condensed into liquid water. A crossflow heat exchanger using water as a working fluid will be designed to accomplish this goal. Design a cross flow heat exchanger for the Thermal Propulsion Capture System testing which: Eliminates the need for water injection cooling, Cools steam from 5800 F to saturation temperature, and Is efficient and minimizes water requirement.

Richard, Evan M.↗

Space Technology Mission Directorate: Game Changing Development Program: Nuclear Thermal Propulsion

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) can help enable detailed exploration of the solar system, extensive development and utilization of cis-lunar space, and robust human Mars architectures. To improve affordability and viability, NTP systems that utilize low-enriched uranium (LEU) instead of highly enriched uranium (HEU) are being devised. Advanced fuel manufacturing techniques will help enable the use of LEU in certain fission systems previously thought to require HEU. The current LEU NTP baseline engine relies on a fission reactor containing fuel elements made of uranium nitride and refractory metals.

testing and performance↗

Additive Manufacture of Porous ZrC for NTP In-Core Insulators

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) requires the use of in-core insulators to manage to thermal environment between high temperature fuel elements and lower temperature structural components. The unforgiving in-core operating conditions severely limit potential material candidates. Zirconium Carbide (ZrC) is a promising candidate due to a high melting temperature, high compressive strength, hardness, wear resistance, hydrogen compatibility, and low neutron absorption cross sections. However, fully dense ZrC is not an insulator but it has been found that the thermal conductivity of ZrC decreases by increasing porosity to approximately 60 % theoretical density (%TD). Previous methods for generating porous ZrC were difficult, expensive, and time consuming. Binder jet additive manufacture (AM) can print ceramic materials to near net shape. Binder jet AM is not utilized in many applications due to an inherently low post-sintering density on the order of 60 %TD. For this specific application the inherent lower density is leveraged as an advantage in production porous ZrC in order to control the thermal conductivity. A feasibility study was conducted to investigate binder jet AM parameter development for ZrC, heat treatment optimization (burn-out and sinter), microstructural characterization, mechanical testing, and thermal testing to generate near-net shape ZrC components with ~60 %TD with the desired thermal conductivity and mechanical strength.

Omar Mireles↗

Enabling Nuclear and Solar Thermal Propulsion with the Computational Laboratory: Faster and Cheaper Materials Characterization

Nuclear and solar thermal propulsion offer enhanced efficiencies for in-space travel which may open up the outer Solar System to both crewed and automated craft. However, these advanced propulsion systems require cutting-edge materials which are often not easily tested in the laboratory. Ab initio thermodynamics and other computational methods offer a way to test materials at high pressures and temperatures more quickly, and with reduced cost. Here, several case studies are presented which highlight the utility of modern simulation techniques. First, an extensive thermodynamic study was performed at the ab initio level to elucidate the role of hot hydrogen flow on the erosion of four refractory carbides to examine their appropriateness for use as channel coatings. A detailed analysis of reaction products informs estimates of erosion which are validated in comparison with heritage NERVA data. Specific material suggestions are made for both nuclear and solar designs. Secondly, we examined the mechanical behavior and chemical stability of various components of an idealized nuclear cermet core design using techniques spanning from the atomic to microscale. Next, the mechanical and chemical behavior of tungsten (a potential matrix material) and the stability of uranium mononitride (a potential ceramic fuel element), are characterized in the presence of hydrogen and at elevated temperatures with ab initio thermodynamics. Finally, the mechanical response and failure of tungsten under tensile strain is simulated at the micron scale with a combined finite element and dislocation dynamics approach. The resultant stress-strain data agrees well with experiments and leads to a workflow which can incorporate ab initio thermodynamic data into micron-scale simulations and thus provide real-world relevant estimates of erosion and stress-strain behavior. The power of this framework and our plans to use it in the future will be discussed.

William C Tucker↗

Additive Manufacture of Porous Zirconium Carbide for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion In-Core Insulators

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) requires the use of in-core insulators to manage to thermal environment between high temperature fuel elements and lower temperature structural components. The unforgiving in-core operating conditions severely limit potential material candidates. Zirconium Carbide (ZrC) is a promising candidate due to a high melting temperature, high compressive strength, hardness, wear resistance, hydrogen compatibility, and low neutron absorption cross sections. However, fully dense ZrC is not an insulator but it has been found that the thermal conductivity of ZrC decreases by increasing porosity to approximately 60 % theoretical density (%TD). Previous methods for generating porous ZrC were difficult, expensive, and time consuming. Binder jet additive manufacture (AM) can print ceramic materials to near net shape. Binder jet AM is not utilized in many applications due to an inherently low post-sintering density on the order of 60 %TD. For this specific application the inherent lower density is leveraged as an advantage in production porous ZrC in order to control the thermal conductivity. A feasibility study was conducted to investigate binder jet AM parameter development for ZrC, heat treatment optimization (burn-out and sinter), microstructural characterization, mechanical testing, and thermal testing to generate near-net shape ZrC components with ~60 %TD with the desired thermal conductivity and mechanical strength.

Zirconium Carbide Additive Manufacture↗

Additive Manufacture of Porous Zirconium Carbide for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion In-Core Insulators

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) requires the use of in-core insulators to manage to thermal environment between high temperature fuel elements and lower temperature structural components. The unforgiving in-core operating conditions severely limit potential material candidates. Zirconium Carbide (ZrC) is a promising candidate due to a high melting temperature, high compressive strength, hardness, wear resistance, hydrogen compatibility, and low neutron absorption cross sections. However, fully dense ZrC is not an insulator but it has been found that the thermal conductivity of ZrC decreases by increasing porosity to approximately 60 % theoretical density (%TD). Previous methods for generating porous ZrC were difficult, expensive, and time consuming. Binder jet additive manufacture (AM) can print ceramic materials to near net shape. Binder jet AM is not utilized in many applications due to an inherently low post-sintering density on the order of 60 %TD. For this specific application the inherent lower density is leveraged as an advantage in production porous ZrC in order to control the thermal conductivity. A feasibility study was conducted to investigate binder jet AM parameter development for ZrC, heat treatment optimization (burn-out and sinter), microstructural characterization, mechanical testing, and thermal testing to generate near-net shape ZrC components with ~60 %TD with the desired thermal conductivity and mechanical strength.

Zirconium Carbide Additive Manufacture↗

Ground Test Technology Demonstration for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Engines

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) engines have been deemed a key technology to enable human missions to Mars due to their high efficiency, also known as specific impulse (Isp). Ground testing the NTP engine is critical in maturing the technology and increasing the design’s Technology Readiness Level (TRL), thus mitigating risk from NTP engine performance/operations. NTP engine development began with open-air ground testing through the Rover/NERVA program back in the 1960s when regulatory requirements were not as stringent as they are today. Due to the formation of regulatory bodies, increase in oversight and environmental requirements, the exhaust gas released from NTP engines must be captured or processed to gain approval in the case that the exhaust gas contains fission products from the nuclear fuel elements within the reactor. Ground test campaigns following Rover/NERVA focused on the certification of a full scale NTP engine, which led to exhaust processing systems such as the Rocket Exhaust Capture System (RECS) and Real Time (RT) exhaust processing. These systems were deemed favorable for regulatory compliance but have a high initial investment cost. Reassurance on the feasibility of ground testing and the NTP engine technology likely need to be achieved before NASA invests in these systems. Recently the objectives for NTP engine ground testing have shifted from certification testing of a full scale engine to demonstration testing of a subscale engine. The shift to demonstration testing allows for a shorter testing duration and a lower operational thrust (for demo testing purposes only) to demonstrate the NTP engine (5k-12.5k lbf). Due to these factors, the infrastructure, consumables, total footprint, and exhaust system complexity are able to be drastically reduced, thus reducing cost significantly. The High-pressure Exhaust Capture System (HECS) concept was designed for a NTP engine ground test demonstration. The HECS concept greatly reduces cost compared to previous concepts and suggests favorable regulatory acceptance due to its ability to capture all of the exhaust gas from the NTP engine.

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion↗

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Engine Technology Demonstration Testing

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) engines have been deemed a key technology to enable human missions to Mars due to their high efficiency, also known as specific impulse (Isp). Ground testing the NTP engine is critical in maturing the technology and increasing the design’s Technology Readiness Level (TRL), thus mitigating risk from NTP engine performance/operations. NTP engine development began with open-air ground testing through the Rover/NERVA program back in the 1960s when regulatory requirements were not as stringent as they are today. Due to the formation of regulatory bodies, increase in oversight and environmental requirements, the exhaust gas released from NTP engines must be captured or processed to gain approval in the case that the exhaust gas contains fission products from the nuclear fuel elements within the reactor. Ground test campaigns following Rover/NERVA focused on the certification of a full scale NTP engine, which led to exhaust processing systems such as the Rocket Exhaust Capture System (RECS) and Real Time (RT) exhaust processing. These systems were deemed favorable for regulatory compliance but have a high initial investment cost. Reassurance on the feasibility of ground testing and the NTP engine technology likely need to be achieved before NASA invests in these systems. Recently the objectives for NTP engine ground testing have shifted from certification testing of a full scale engine to demonstration testing of a subscale engine. The shift to demonstration testing allows for a shorter testing duration and a lower operational thrust (for demo testing purposes only) to demonstrate the NTP engine (5k-12.5k lbf). Due to these factors, the infrastructure, consumables, total footprint, and exhaust system complexity are able to be drastically reduced, thus reducing cost significantly. The High-pressure Exhaust Capture System (HECS) concept was designed for a NTP engine ground test demonstration. The HECS concept greatly reduces cost compared to previous concepts and suggests favorable regulatory acceptance due to its ability to capture all of the exhaust gas from the NTP engine.

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion↗

Internal flow measurements of the SSME fuel preburner injector element using real time neutron radiography

Due to observations of unsteady flow in the Space Shuttle Main Engine fuel preburner injector element, several flow studies have been performed. Real time neutron radiography tests were recently completed. This technique provided real time images of MiL-c-7024 and Freon-22 flow through an aluminum liquid oxygen post model at three back pressures (0, 150, and 545 psig) and pressure drops up to 1000 psid. Separated flow appeared only while operating at back pressures of 0 and 150 psig. The behavior of separated flow was similar to that observed for water in a 3x acrylic model of the LOX post. On the average, separated flow appeared to reattach near the exit of the post when the ratio of pressure drop to supply pressure was about 0.75.

Lindsay, John T.↗

Reduced size fuel cell for portable applications

A flat pack type fuel cell includes a plurality of membrane electrode assemblies. Each membrane electrode assembly is formed of an anode, an electrolyte, and an cathode with appropriate catalysts thereon. The anode is directly into contact with fuel via a wicking element. The fuel reservoir may extend along the same axis as the membrane electrode assemblies, so that fuel can be applied to each of the anodes. Each of the fuel cell elements is interconnected together to provide the voltage outputs in series.

Narayanan, Sekharipuram R.↗

Numerical Simulation of Lean Blowout of Alternative Fuels in 7-element Lean Direct Injector

This research presents the result of numerically simulating 7-element swirl-venturi Lean Direct Injector (SV-LDI) lean blowout (LBO) experiments conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center in May of 2019. After simulating a cold flow case to confirm the pressure drop agrees well with the experiment, additional cases with two different fuels (an average jet fuel and a Gevo alcohol-to-jet fuel) from the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program (NJFCP) were computed to numerically determine the LBO condition. The procedure to approach the LBO follows the method used in the experiment where the air mass flow rate is gradually increased while the fuel supply is maintained. Transient history of global heat release rate as a function of air flow rate is presented, as well as temperature contours at different conditions to give a visual representation of the flame state. The Open National Combustion Code (OpenNCC) used in this research adopted reduced HyChem (Hybrid Chemistry) models along with k-LES turbulence model and a Lagrangian spray model that takes into account droplet internal temperature distribution affected by the shear force on the droplet surface. The transport equations and chemical reaction terms are integrated together to enhance conservation of chemical species that are especially important in the near LBO conditions. After showing the computed range of LBO agrees well with the experimental measurements, time averaged solutions of both fuels at their initial condition and at their limiting condition just before LBO are compared in detail to facilitate the understanding of LBO mechanism.

combustion↗

Assessment of Turbulence-Chemistry Interaction Models in the National Combustion Code (NCC) - Part I

This paper describes the implementations of the linear-eddy model (LEM) and an Eulerian FDF/PDF model in the National Combustion Code (NCC) for the simulation of turbulent combustion. The impacts of these two models, along with the so called laminar chemistry model, are then illustrated via the preliminary results from two combustion systems: a nine-element gas fueled combustor and a single-element liquid fueled combustor.

Wey, Thomas Changju↗

Apparatus for testing high pressure injector elements

An apparatus for testing and evaluating the spray pattern of high pressure fuel injector elements for use in supplying fuel to combustion engines is presented. Prior art fuel injector elements were normally tested by use of low pressure apparatuses which did not provide a purge to prevent mist from obscuring the injector element or to prevent frosting of the view windows; could utilize only one fluid during each test; and had their viewing ports positioned one hundred eighty (180 deg) apart, thus preventing optimum use of laser diagnostics. The high pressure fluid injector test apparatus includes an upper hub, an upper weldment or housing, a first clamp and stud/nut assembly for securing the upper hub to the upper weldment, a standoff assembly within the upper weldment, a pair of window housings having view glasses within the upper weldment, an injector block assembly and purge plate within the upper weldment for holding an injector element to be tested and evaluated, a lower weldment or housing, a second clamp and stud/nut assembly for securing the lower weldment to the upper weldment, a lower hub, a third clamp and stud/nut assembly for securing the lower hub to the lower weldment, mechanisms for introducing fluid under high pressure for testing an injector element, and mechanisms for purging the apparatus to prevent frosting of view glasses within the window housings and to permit unobstructed viewing of the injector element.

Myers, William Neill↗

Apparatus for testing high pressure injector elements

An apparatus for testing and evaluating the spray pattern of high pressure fuel injector elements for use in supplying fuel to combustion engines is presented. Prior art fuel injector elements were normally tested by use of low pressure apparatuses which did not provide a purge to prevent mist from obscuring the injector element or to prevent frosting of the view windows; could utilize only one fluid during each test; and had their viewing ports positioned one hundred eighty (180 deg) apart, thus preventing optimum use of laser diagnostics. The high pressure fluid injector test apparatus includes an upper hub, an upper weldment or housing, a first clamp and stud/nut assembly for securing the upper hub to the upper weldment, a standoff assembly within the upper weldment, a pair of window housings having view glasses within the upper weldment, an injector block assembly and purge plate within the upper weldment for holding an injector element to be tested and evaluated, a lower weldment or housing, a second clamp and stud/nut assembly for securing the lower weldment to the upper hub, a third clamp and stud/nut assembly for securing the lower hub to the lower weldment, mechanisms for introducing fluid under high pressure for testing an injector element, and mechanisms for purging the apparatus to prevent frosting of view glasses within the window housings and to permit unobstructed viewing of the injector element.

Myers, William Neill↗

Triaxial Swirl Injector Element for Liquid-Fueled Engines

A triaxial injector is a single bi-propellant injection element located at the center of the injector body. The injector element consists of three nested, hydraulic swirl injectors. A small portion of the total fuel is injected through the central hydraulic injector, all of the oxidizer is injected through the middle concentric hydraulic swirl injector, and the balance of the fuel is injected through an outer concentric injection system. The configuration has been shown to provide good flame stabilization and the desired fuel-rich wall boundary condition. The injector design is well suited for preburner applications. Preburner injectors operate at extreme oxygen-to-fuel mass ratios, either very rich or very lean. The goal of a preburner is to create a uniform drive gas for the turbomachinery, while carefully controlling the temperature so as not to stress or damage turbine blades. The triaxial injector concept permits the lean propellant to be sandwiched between two layers of the rich propellant, while the hydraulic atomization characteristics of the swirl injectors promote interpropellant mixing and, ultimately, good combustion efficiency. This innovation is suited to a wide range of liquid oxidizer and liquid fuels, including hydrogen, methane, and kerosene. Prototype testing with the triaxial swirl injector demonstrated excellent injector and combustion chamber thermal compatibility and good combustion performance, both at levels far superior to a pintle injector. Initial testing with the prototype injector demonstrated over 96-percent combustion efficiency. The design showed excellent high -frequency combustion stability characteristics with oxygen and kerosene propellants. Unlike the more conventional pintle injector, there is not a large bluff body that must be cooled. The absence of a protruding center body enhances the thermal durability of the triaxial swirl injector. The hydraulic atomization characteristics of the innovation allow the design to be rapidly scaled from small in-space applications [500-5,000 lbf (2.2 22.2 kN)] to large thrust engine applications [80,000 lbf (356 kN) and beyond]. The triaxial injector is also less sensitive to eccentricities, manufacturing tolerances, and gap width of many traditional coaxial and pintle injector designs. The triaxial-injector injection orifice configuration provides for high injection stiffness. The low parts count and relatively large injector design features are amenable to low-cost production.

Muss, Jeff↗

Characteristics of response factors of coaxial gaseous rocket injectors

The results of an experimental investigation undertaken to determine the frequency dependence of the response factors of various gaseous propellant rocket injectors subject to axial instabilities are presented. The injector response factors were determined, using the modified impedance-tube technique, under cold-flow conditions simulating those observed in unstable rocket motors. The tested injectors included a gaseous-fuel injector element, a gaseous-oxidizer injector element and a coaxial injector with both fuel and oxidizer elements. Emphasis was given to the determination of the dependence of the injector response factor upon the open-area ratio of the injector, the length of the injector orifice, and the pressure drop across the injector orifices. The measured data are shown to be in reasonable agreement with the corresponding injector response factor data predicted by the Feiler and Heidmann model.

Janardan, B. A.↗