SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Saltstone”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2019

Methylmercury and Ethylmercury Analytical Performance in SRR Samples Measured by SRNL and Eurofins Frontier Global Sciences

Existing models and simulants of tank disposition media at the Savannah River Site (SRS) have presumed the presence of high concentrations of inorganic mercury. However, quarterly Tank 50 analyses have shown that mercury is present as organomercurial species at concentrations that may present challenges to its remediation and disposition and may challenge the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) for Saltstone. Todate, methylmercury analyses for Savannah River Remediation (SRR) have been performed at an off-site laboratory by Eurofins Frontier Global Sciences (FGS) in Bothell, WA. Savannah River Remediation requested the development of methylmercury and ethylmercury determination capabilities at the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to support the Liquid Waste Operations at SRS. As part of that method development, SRR requested that SRNL Analytical Development (AD) compare their results with those obtained from their outside contract laboratory, Eurofins FGS. This document reports on this method development work as well as the comparative analyses conducted between the two laboratories. A series of optimization and validation experiments has been performed at SRNL, which has resulted in the development of on-site methylmercury and ethylmercury speciation capabilities using purge and trap (P&T) gas chromatography (GC) coupled with thermal desorption (TD) cold vapor – atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (CVAFS). Speciation has been achieved for both species, with a methylmercury method reporting limit (MRL) value of 1.13 pg and an overall uncertainty (1σ) of 5.1%. An ethylmercury MRL of 11.5 pg and an overall uncertainty (1σ) of 4.8% were obtained. These analytical parameters compare favorably with Eurofins FGS, which demonstrates uncertainties (1σ) for methylmercury and ethylmercury of 13% and 9.1%, respectively. Results obtained by SRNL from the routine analysis of Tanks 21, 40, 50, and 51 samples have provided statistically indistinguishable results compared with Eurofins FGS. Based upon the work performed by SRNL-AD and the data currently available, the following recommendations can be made: Further work should be performed to determine a “best practices” for sample holding time prior to analysis (both preserved and non-preserved samples), as well as any detrimental effects sample age may have on data quality. Analysis of ethylmercury is only recommended for tank samples that are reasonably expected to have significant quantities of ethylmercury, such as from the DWPF SMECT. Trace levels of ethylmercury in the presence of large quantities of methylmercury can be difficult or impossible to quantify. SRNL-AD development of methods for total mercury, purgeable mercury (which includes Hg(0) and dimethylmercury), inorganic mercury (Hg(I) and Hg(II)), dissolved mercury, and particulate mercury are underway and will be reported upon separately.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Analysis of the Sludge Batch 8 (Macrobatch 10) DWPF Pour Stream Glass Sample

To meet the objectives of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Glass Product Control Program, DWPF and Saltstone Facility Engineering (D&S-FE) requested that Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyze a radioactive glass pour stream (PS) sample collected during the processing of Sludge Batch 8 (SB8), also known as Macrobatch 10 (MB10). The analyses requested by D&S-FE (listed as tasks one through five in the Technical Task Request (TTR) included determination of the chemical and radionuclide composition, performance of the Product Consistency Test (PCT), and measurement of glass density and REDOX state. The tasks associated with accomplishing these analyses were controlled under a Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP) and Analytical Study Plan. This report provides results from the requested analyses and satisfies deliverable number five of the TTR.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

FY2020 Savannah River Site Composite Analysis Annual Summary Review

This document provides the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1 and its manual, Radioactive Waste Management (DOE 2021a, 2021b) required Annual Review for the Savannah River Site (SRS) Composite Analysis (CA). Progress made to-date toward addressing the secondary issue from the LFRG review of the 2010 SRS CA has focused primarily upon inventory estimate improvements. Inventory impacts dose in a linear fashion and reduces the uncertainty with the CA conclusions. Maintenance items are addressed, as funding allows, based on the relative risk associated with meeting the performance objectives. Currently, there is minimal risk in exceeding the DOE 100 mrem/yr CA primary dose limit or the DOE 30 mrem/yr dose constraint (administrative limit). Proposed activities, discoveries, new information and changes potentially affecting the 2010 SRS CA are documented in this and earlier Annual Summary reports, and a consolidated list of changes since the 2010 CA is documented in this report. The impact to the CA of changes arising from updated performance assessment (PA) baselines [i.e., Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF), E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility (ELLWF), and F & H Tank Farm (FTF & HTF) closures] is expected to be minor for the following reasons: The primary contributors to the SRS CA dose impact at the Upper Three Runs (UTR) point of assessment (POA) are the H-Canyon and Mixed Waste Management Facility (MWMF), contributing 68% and 9%, respectively, to the dose impact at that POA. The combined contribution to the UTR dose impact from all PA’s (SDF, ELLWF, FTF and HTF) is ~2% of this total. The 2010 SRS CA model validation performed indicates that the CA projected dose, while generally conservative, provides a reasonable representation of the maximum annual doses. Doses evaluated are well below the SRS established 15 mrem/yr administrative limit (Crapse et al. 2011). Based on the assessment presented within this annual review and collective engineering judgement, the conclusions of the 2010 SRS CA remain valid and there is reasonable assurance that SRS will meet the performance objectives delineated in DOE Manual 435.1-1. The 2010 SRS CA should be updated to incorporate PA changes, proposed changes to inventories and sources and model improvements accumulated since the 2010 CA. The timing will be dependent on the completion of the ongoing E-Area PA revision.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Antifoam Development for Eliminating Flammability Hazards and Decreasing Cycle Time in the Defense Waste Processing Facility

Foam, due to the high gas generation rates of boiling and chemical reaction offgasing, requires control measures to prevent the foam from contaminating the condensate and to facilitate efficient plant operation. Antifoam was utilized to minimize foam production during chemical processing in the DWPF and during High-Level Waste (HLW) evaporation at SRS and Hanford. However, the current antifoam used in the SRS DWPF increases flammability risk during chemical processing (generates three flammable degradation products) and while feeding the melter (can decompose to CO/hydrogen). It is also the likely source of methyl functional groups for the organo-mercury present in the tank farm and excessive mercury in Saltstone. Additionally, the planned startup of Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), with much higher throughput, will challenge DWPF to process at higher gas generation rates. DWPF employs Antifoam 747, a superspreader produced by Momentive Performance Materials, as an antifoaming agent during waste processing. During DWPF chemical processing, antifoam must be effective up to boiling (i.e., up to 103°C) and between a pH of 3-13. Antifoam 747 is most effective at a pH range of 6-8 and degrades as pH deviates. In addition, SRNL identified three flammable antifoam degradation products using mass spectrometer (MS) and fourier transform infrared (FTIR) offgas analyzers during simulations. A new antifoam or a new method to control foam is needed to minimize DWPF processing time and reduce the risk of contamination. In addition, testing should be completed to ensure that other antifoams used in HLW processing do not have similar flammability hazards or cause unintended impacts in downstream processing.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Vapor-Liquid Partitioning of Methylmercury Compounds: Fundamental Data to Support the Savannah River Site Liquid Waste System: Henry's Law, Solubility and Vapor Pressure Determination for Representative Methylmercury Compounds

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) contains approximately 66 tons of mercury within the liquids, salts, and sludges that are currently being processed into final wasteforms for disposal. Mercury concentrations within the system exceed those typically experienced in environmental or industrial systems; thus, management of mercury compounds continues to be a priority for SRS. In the LWS, waste is vitrified into a borosilicate glass wasteform that contains most of the radioactivity, while the lower activity solutions are dispositioned in a low-level grout wasteform, or “saltstone”. The alkaline, high ionic strength caustic wastes are pumped, evaporated, and otherwise managed throughout the LWS and Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) as they are stored and prepared for conversion to the final wasteforms. Because of the complexity of this system, a key component of effective mercury management in the LWS requires analysis of mercury in various physical phases. The high concentration of mercury within the SRS LWS has the potential to generate vapor-phase contamination. Elemental mercury (Hg 0 ), dimethylmercury ((CH 3 ) 2 Hg), and methylmercury (CH 3 Hg + ) are among species known or suspected to contribute to the flux of mercury from liquid to vapor phase (Iverfeldt and Lindquist, 1982). Chemical speciation affects not only mercury behavior in LWS operations but may also affect the performance of mercury treatment and removal technologies in the LWS.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Analysis in Support of Disposition of Tank 48 Legacy Material

This report contains the characterization of six 200-mL Tank 48H samples: HTF-48-21-74, HTF-48-21-75, HTF-48-21-76, HTF-48-21-81, HTF-48-21-82, and HTF-48-21-83. The effort supports a Systems Engineering Evaluation (SEE) recommendation involving a Tank 48H decantation strategy that would remove liquid volume and grout the solids. The first three Tank 48H samples were surface samples taken after a quiescent period in the tank. The quiescent period allowed settling of the solids, these being mostly potassium tetraphenylborate. These three surface samples had no measurable solids, though a settling haze could be seen. The latter three samples were taken at 48, 25, and 10 inches from the bottom of Tank 48H immediately after tank mixing pumps had been run. Those samples contained measurable insoluble solids that were readily visible. All six samples were analyzed to provide chemical and radionuclide concentrations as defined as the "Limit" and "Target" in the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF) Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) and per the compliance strategy in the Tank Farm Waste Compliance Plan (WCP). Samples were analyzed by many methods to determine pH, density/specific gravity, radioactive isotopes, soluble and insoluble elements, total solids, total insoluble solids, organic and inorganic mercury, volatile and semi-volatile chemicals, and anions. Photographs of the settling of small samples were taken over time and are displayed in this report. The extent of settling was very significant, showing that surface sample liquids are similar to filtrates. However, Cs-137 measurements exceeded WAC limits in all surface samples (1.1E+07 vs. 1.3E+06). The solids were found to contain very high cesium activity, measured as high as 1.1E+10 dpm/gram. Sodium was in the range of 4.24 to 4.74 M for all samples, so the solids would tend to settle with time and would not be at risk of floating without air entrainment. No organic mercury was detected in this work.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Analysis in Support of Disposition of Tank 48 Legacy Material

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

SDU 7 Shotcrete Sample Characterization

On 12/26/2021, pieces of the outer layer of shotcrete (Layer 8) fell off bottom of SDU7. The affected area was about 5 ft by 40 ft. The non-conforming condition was documented in 2021-NCR-05-0042 on 12/27/2021. Subsequently, additional shotcrete sections delaminated. Savannah River National Laboratory was requested to characterize the delaminated shotcrete by Saltstone Engineering in Technical Assistance Request U-TAR-Z-00003, Rev. 0. After the initial collection of delaminated pieces of Layer 8 on January 7 , 2022, additional questions arose related to the bond integrity between SDU 7 Layers 6, 7, and 8 and through layer cracking. As a result, two additional sampling efforts were conducted which resulted in additional characterization.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2024

Impacts of Fast Critical Assembly Fuel Discards on Liquid Waste Processes

The Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) Fast Critical Assembly (FCA) mission is reestablishing the electrolytic dissolver for processing of Pu and Pu-U materials clad in stainless steel (SS). H-Canyon is planning to dissolve and neutralize FCA fuel without recovering the special nuclear material (i.e., Pu) prior to discarding to the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) operated by the Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) Liquid Waste (LW) Organization. The FCA discards will be combined with sludge in the CSTF after Low Temperature Aluminum Dissolution (LTAD) if needed. The combined waste will be washed, concentrated, and vitrified at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). The high level waste canisters produced will be temporarily stored in the Glass Waste Storage Buildings prior to transfer to a future federal repository. Decants from LTAD and sludge washing will be combined with DWPF recycle and dissolved salt cake to prepare salt batches for processing in the Salt Waste Processing Facility. The resulting decontaminated salt solution will be processed in the Saltstone Production Facility.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2024

Coal Ash Beneficial Use at Savannah River Site

The Savannah River Site (SRS) has over 1.4 million cubic meters of coal ash and coal fines left over from coal-burning power plants that operated on site. Currently, the coal ash must be disposed of in an approved landfill or the coal ash-containing basins must be closed in place (i.e. consolidation, appropriate cover and liner system). Potential beneficial uses of the coal ash include geotechnical fill, such as backfill needed in the closure cap of the Z-area Saltstone Disposal Units (SDU), and use in cementitious material applications like thermal beneficiation or cement kiln feed, thereby reducing the environmental footprint of SRS. In this study, samples of coal ash from SRS were obtained and characterized for chemical and physical properties. Coal ash samples did not leach sulfates or heavy metals, so the coal ash is a candidate for geotechnical fill use. The samples also did not increase the acidity of the leachate during leaching tests, so it would not be detrimental to use as geotechnical fill near cementitious materials. The composition and energy potential of the coal ash makes it favorable for use as feed for external/off-site cement kilns or thermal beneficiation plants

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

DOE OSTI2024

New Tank Mapping Method Improves Waste Removal Process

Savannah River Mission Completion is the Liquid Waste (LW) contractor at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The LW mission is tasked with treating and disposing of legacy nuclear waste. There are multiple facilities involved in this work, including the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF), the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), and the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). The CSTF includes 43 underground waste tanks used to store and support processing of radioactive liquid waste. Waste removal activities, such as salt dissolution campaigns and sludge agitation, are conducted within the CSTF waste tanks to convert the waste into a form that allows for downstream processing at other LW facilities. While performing these waste removal campaigns, camera inspections are performed to assess the quantity and distribution of the remaining waste within the waste tank (i.e. saltcake or sludge). Understanding the quantity and distribution of the salt/sludge within the waste tanks allows for improved waste removal strategies (e.g. mixing pump operation) and refined safety controls. Typically, several camera inspections are performed during a waste removal transfer to verify the elevation of the visible salt/sludge mounds against the known elevation of the liquid surface. The camera inspection footage must then be interpreted by a trained engineer who will develop a 2-D map that depicts the waste distribution at various elevations within the waste tank. This tank mapping is then used in conjunction with conservative assumptions to evaluate the volume of saltcake or sludge that is present within the waste tank.

Mini, Melany↗

DOE OSTI2025

Evaluation of Pozzolan-substituted Cast Stone for Pretreated Hanford Tank Waste

Portland cement. The future availability of quality Class F fly ash has come into question as coal-fired power plants are being converted to gas or taken offline. Consequently, alternative pozzolanic reagents are being evaluated for fly ash replacement in cementitious matrices for treating radioactive waste and debris. In 2023 and 2024, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was funded to evaluate natural pozzolans for the replacement of Class F fly in the Savannah River Site (SRS) Saltstone formulation. Based on the promising results and uncertain availability of Class F fly ash in the northwestern US, Hanford Tank Waste Operations & Closure, LLC (H2C) requested SRNL to evaluate the potential for substituting natural pozzolans in the Hanford West Area Pretreated Low Activity Tank Waste (PTW/LAW) Cast Stone formulation1 . Task 1 in this request was to determine the change in Cast Stone volume resulting from stabilization/solidification of 1 L of PTW/LAW tank waste. The densities of three (Hess Pumice, tephra pumice, and clinoptilolite zeolite) pozzolan-substituted Baseline Cast Stone mixes were determined, and volume changes relative to the fly ash-Baseline Mix with a water-to-dry mix = 0.40 were calculated.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2025

LDR Inorganic Spiked Simulants in Pozzolan-Substituted Cast Stone for Hanford Pretreated Low-Activity Tank Waste

Pretreated Low Activity Waste (PTW/LAW) at the Hanford Site, is currently projected for disposition through a cementitious waste form. The current standard formulation, Cast Stone, uses Class F fly ash, blast furnace slag, and Portland cement. However, the future availability of Class F fly ash is uncertain, as many coal-fired power plants—the source of this byproduct—are being decommissioned or converted to natural gas. This issue has prompted research into identifying and evaluating suitable alternative materials to replace fly ash in the cementitious waste forms used by the Department of Energy (DOE). The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) successfully identified four natural pozzolans for the replacement of Class F fly ash in the current Savannah River Site (SRS) low-level waste (LLW) form, Saltstone.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2025

Reduction of Porosity in Cementitious Waste Forms to Reduce Effective Diffusivity

Although current practices meet regulations for grout waste forms, development of sequestration materials and techniques for contaminants of concern could expand the use of grout waste forms and reduce risk to established processes from future compositional changes. There are contaminants in waste streams that are not permanently and completely sequestered in current grout waste forms under certain conditions. These contaminants include methyl mercury, 129 I, 99 Tc, and nitrate. Each of these species have minor fractions that are not permanently and completely isolated from the environment and therefore potentially contribute to long-term environmental impacts. An approach of interest includes the technique of reducing porosity to result in reduced leachability of all contaminants simultaneously. The current Savannah River Site (SRS) saltstone formulation was used to evaluate the relationship between leachability and porosity reduced waste forms by altering the water-to-binder ratio. Results indicated decreasing the water-to-binder directly reduced porosity and resulted in the waste form’s ability to more effectively immobilize nitrate. This work was funded by the Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Technology Operations Office (TOO) Project # HQ221818.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2025

Characterization Results for the August 2025 Tank Farm 2H Evaporator Overhead Sample

On an annual basis, Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) provides 2H and 3H evaporator overhead samples to Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) to be analyzed per Section 5.2 of the Effluent Treatment Project (ETP) Waste Compliance Plan (WCP) and the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). This report presents the average characterization results for the August 2025 2H evaporator overhead sample. The sample was clear and colorless with no visible solids. The results provide measurements for cesium-137 ( 137 Cs), strontium-90 ( 90 Sr), and iodine-129 ( 129 I) with the radionuclide concentration limits specified by the WAC. These analyses were performed in duplicate, and all three measured radionuclide concentrations were within ETP WAC limits. A summary of the analytical results for this 2H evaporator overhead sample includes the following: The measured cesium-137 activity in the 2H evaporator overhead sample averaged 3.02E+02 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.30E+03 dpm/mL. The strontium-90 activity in the 2H evaporator overhead sample averaged 3.33E+00 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.76E+02 dpm/mL. The iodine-129 activity in the 2H evaporator overhead sample averaged 1.20E-01 dpm/mL, which is below the ETP WAC limit of 1.00E+00 dpm/mL. Although the measurements for Cs-137 and Sr-90 are lower compared to previous years, the results remain within a similar range to past measurements and are well below the WAC limits. Iodine-129 indicates detectable results compared to previous years, which can be attributed to recent salt batch processing trending close to the WAC limit for saltstone production. However, these results are still below the ETP WAC limit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2015

The Cementitious Barriers Partnership Experimental Programs and Software Advancing DOE’s Waste Disposal/Tank Closure Efforts – 15436

The U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Office of Tank Waste Management-sponsored Cementitious Barriers Partnership (CBP) is chartered with providing the technical basis for implementing cement-based waste forms and radioactive waste containment structures for long-term disposal. DOE needs in this area include the following to support progress in final treatment and disposal of legacy waste and closure of High-Level Waste (HLW) tanks in the DOE complex: long-term performance predictions, flow sheet development and flow sheet enhancements, and conceptual designs for new disposal facilities. The DOE-EM Cementitious Barriers Partnership is producing software and experimental programs resulting in new methods and data needed for end-users involved with environmental cleanup and waste disposal. Both the modeling tools and the experimental data have already benefited the DOE sites in the areas of performance assessments by increasing confidence backed up with modeling support, leaching methods, and transport properties developed for actual DOE materials. In 2014, the CBP Partnership released the CBP Software Toolbox –“Version 2.0” which provides concrete degradation models for 1) sulfate attack, 2) carbonation, and 3) chloride initiated rebar corrosion, and includes constituent leaching. These models are applicable and can be used by both DOE and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for service life and long-term performance evaluations and predictions of nuclear and radioactive waste containment structures across the DOE complex, including future SRS Saltstone and HLW tank performance assessments and special analyses, Hanford site HLW tank closure projects and other projects in which cementitious barriers are required, the Advanced Simulation Capability for Environmental Management (ASCEM) project which requires source terms from cementitious containment structures as input to their flow simulations, regulatory reviews of DOE performance assessments, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission reviews of commercial nuclear power plant (NPP) structures which are part of the overall US Energy Security program to extend the service life of NPPs. In addition, the CBP experimental programs have had a significant impact on the DOE complex by providing specific data unique to DOE sodium salt wastes at Hanford and SRS which are not readily available in the literature. Two recent experimental programs on cementitious phase characterization and on technetium (Tc) mobility have provided significant conclusions as follows: recent mineralogy characterization discussed in this paper illustrates that sodium salt waste form matrices are somewhat similar to but not the same as those found in blended cement matrices which to date have been used in long-term thermodynamic modeling and contaminant sequestration as a first approximation. Utilizing the CBP generated data in long-term performance predictions provides for a more defensible technical basis in performance evaluations. In addition, recent experimental studies related to technetium mobility indicate that conventional leaching protocols may not be conservative for direct disposal of Tc-containing waste forms in vadose zone environments. These results have the potential to influence the current Hanford supplemental waste treatment flow sheet and disposal conceptual design.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2013

NRC Perspectives on Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Consultations and Monitoring - 13398

Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA) requires the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to consult with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for certain non-high level waste (HLW) determinations. The NDAA also requires NRC to monitor DOE's disposal actions related to those determinations to assess compliance with NRC regulations in 10 CFR Part 61, Subpart C. The NDAA applies to DOE activities that will remain within the States of South Carolina and Idaho. DOE has chosen to, under DOE Order 435.1, engage in consultation with NRC for similar activities in the State of Washington and New York, however, the NRC has no monitoring responsibilities. In 2007, the NRC developed a draft Final Report for Interim Use entitled, NUREG-1854: NRC Staff Guidance for Activities Related to U.S. Department of Energy Waste Determinations. Since the law was enacted, the DOE and NRC have consulted on three waste determinations within the affected States: (1) the Saltstone Disposal Facility at the Savannah River Site (SRS) within the State of South Carolina in 2005, (2) the INTEC Tank Farm at the Idaho National Laboratory within the State of Idaho in 2006, and (3) the F Tank Farm at SRS in 2011. After the end of consultation and issuance by DOE of the final waste determination, monitoring began at each of these sites, including the development of monitoring plans. In addition to the NDAA sites, DOE has requested NRC consultation support on both individual tanks and the entire C Tank Farm at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in the State of Washington. DOE also requested consultation of waste determinations performed on the melter and related feed tanks at the West Valley site in New York that would be disposed offsite. In the next few years, NRC and DOE will consult on the last of the NDAA waste determinations for a while, the H Tank Farm waste determination at SRS. DOE may identify other activities in the future but largely NRC's role will change from doing both consultation and monitoring to being focused on monitoring activities within NDAA. DOE has identified other activities at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation that would continue consultation activities but outside of the NDAA in the future. During the past seven years of consultations and monitoring a number of lessons learned about the process, communication issues, and technical guidance have been identified. With the change in focus from reviewing initial performance assessments and draft waste determinations to long-term monitoring (e.g., individual waste tank closure, at F Tank Farm or complete tank farm closure at INTEC expected in the near future), the NRC is going to revise and update its guidance over the next few years to reflect the lessons learned and the change in focus. In addition to the lessons learned, improvements in the guidance will have to account possible rule and guidance changes underway within Part 61. This paper will discuss the initial plans, approaches, and time lines to revise the guidance within NUREG-1854, including opportunities for public involvement. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2013

NRC Monitoring of Salt Waste Disposal at the Savannah River Site - 13147

As part of monitoring required under Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA), the NRC staff reviewed an updated DOE performance assessment (PA) for salt waste disposal at the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF). The NRC staff concluded that it has reasonable assurance that waste disposal at the SDF meets the 10 CFR 61 performance objectives for protection of individuals against intrusion (chap.61.42), protection of individuals during operations (chap.61.43), and site stability (chap.61.44). However, based on its evaluation of DOE's results and independent sensitivity analyses conducted with DOE's models, the NRC staff concluded that it did not have reasonable assurance that DOE's disposal activities at the SDF meet the performance objective for protection of the general population from releases of radioactivity (chap.61.41) evaluated at a dose limit of 0.25 mSv/yr (25 mrem/yr) total effective dose equivalent (TEDE). NRC staff also concluded that the potential dose to a member of the public is expected to be limited (i.e., is expected to be similar to or less than the public dose limit in chap.20.1301 of 1 mSv/yr [100 mrem/yr] TEDE) and is expected to occur many years after site closure. The NRC staff used risk insights gained from review of the SDF PA, its experience monitoring DOE disposal actions at the SDF over the last 5 years, as well as independent analysis and modeling to identify factors that are important to assessing whether DOE's disposal actions meet the performance objectives. Many of these factors are similar to factors identified in the NRC staff's 2005 review of salt waste disposal at the SDF. Key areas of interest continue to be waste form and disposal unit degradation, the effectiveness of infiltration and erosion controls, and estimation of the radiological inventory. Based on these factors, NRC is revising its plan for monitoring salt waste disposal at the SDF in coordination with South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC). DOE has completed or begun additional work related to salt waste disposal to address these factors. NRC staff continues to evaluate information related to the performance of the SDF and has been working with DOE and SCDHEC to resolve NRC staff's technical concerns. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗