SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “STORAGE FACILITIES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2021

An Assessment of the Materials of Construction for the Transfer Lines and Unit Operations Equipment Associated with the Recycle Diversion Process

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) processes and vitrifies radioactive waste that it receives from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) and Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). As a result of the evaporation of water during both the melter feed preparation and the melter feed vitrification steps in DWPF, a recycle waste stream is generated, neutralized, and sent back to the CSTF. The recycle waste is a dilute water stream originating from the collection of condensate liquids containing some minor sludge and frit solids and other waste components primarily resulting from entrainment into the condensate during foam-over events. The recycle stream volume is significant and is expected to approach 3 million gallons per year once the SWPF reaches full operation. Diverting the bulk of the recycle waste stream from the CSTF is essential for the eventual closure of the waste tanks, and hence the completion of the SRS liquid waste mission.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Exploring Future Storage Options for ATLAS at the BNL/SDCC facility

The ATLAS experiment is expected to deliver an unprecedented amount of scientific data in the High Luminosity(HL-LHC) era. As the demand for disk storage capacity in ATLAS continues to rise steadily, the BNL Scientific Data and Computing Center (SDCC) faces challenges in terms of cost implications for maintaining multiple disk copies and adapting to the coming ATLAS storage requirements. To address these challenges, the SDCC Storage team has undertaken a thorough analysis of the ATLAS experiment's requirements, matching them to suitable storage options and strategies, and has explored alternatives to enhance or replace the current storage solution. This paper aims to present the main challenges encountered while supporting big data experiments such as ATLAS. We describe the experiment's specific requirements and priorities, particularly focusing on the critical storage system characteristics of the high-luminosity run and how the key storage components provided by the Storage team work together: the dCache disk storage system; its archival back-end, HPSS; and its OS-level backend Storage. Specifically, we investigate a novel approach to integrate Lustre and XRootD. In this setup, Lustre serves as backend storage and XRootD acts as an access layer frontend, supporting various grid access protocols. Additionally, we also describe the validation and commissioning tests, including the performance comparison between dCache and XRootd. Furthermore, we provide a performance and cost analysis comparing OpenZFS and LINUX MD RAID, evaluate different storage software stacks, and showcase stress tests conducted to validate Third Party Copy (TPC) functionality.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 134: Stakeholder Involvement in Consolidated ISF Storage, Disposal, and Transportation Initiatives

Planning of activities related to waste storage, transportation, and disposal requires involvement and engagement on the parts of both regulators and stakeholders. There have been challenges felt by both parties, which has led to discussions about how to best proceed with projects not just from a technical perspective, but how to create better relationships between the general public and scientific community. This panel was designed to highlight lessons learned, best practices, and next steps in anticipated projects. This panel focused on the current efforts undertaken by initiatives to involve stakeholders for the success of ISF Storage and Disposal facilities. For example, two license applications were submitted to the US NRC by two private entities - Interim Storage Partners (WCS, Inc, and Orano) and Holtec, Inc./ELLA - for consolidated ISF in West Texas and in NM (respectively). This panel discussed elements needed for success in engaging various stakeholders at all levels of the project life cycle, and can include lessons learned from previous projects. Panelists with presentations: Stakeholder Engagement in SNF Storage and Disposal (Miriam Juckett); Stakeholders, Siting and Nuclear Waste Disposal -Thoughts on a Path Forward (Jim Hamilton)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

TWF Waste Container Receipt, Inspection and Transfer to Storage

This procedure provides instructions for the receipt, inspection, and transfer to storage of Transuranic (TRU) Waste Containers and Pipe Overpack Containers (POC) within the Transuranic Waste Facility (TWF) (Waste Storage Buildings [WSBs] and Characterization and Waste Storage Building [CWSB]). Performance of this procedure meets the requirements of AC 5.8.9, AC 5.8.13 2nd Bullet, SAC 5.9.1, SAC 5.9.3, SR 4.2.1.1, 4.2.1.2, 4.2.1.5, 4.2.1.6, 4.2.2.1, 4.2.2.2, 4.2.2.3, 4.2.2.4, 4.2.3.1, 4.2.3.2, 4.2.3.3, 4.3.4.1, 4.4.1.1, 4.4.1.2 and 4.4.1.3.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

A review of energy storage technologies for demand-side management in industrial facilities

Demand-side management (DSM) in industrial facilities provides an opportunity for substantial amounts of energy cost savings, since industrial facilities are the largest energy consuming sectors globally. In this work, energy storage (ES) technologies are critically reviewed and compared with industrial DSM in mind. ES technologies reviewed herein include lithium-ion battery energy storage (BES), sodium-sulfur BES, lead-acid BES, flow BES, supercapacitor ES, superconducting magnetic ES, thermal ES, flywheel ES, pumped hydro ES, and compressed air ES. The fundamentals of these energy storage technologies are reviewed in detail including recent developments, followed by case studies and extensive comparisons. These comparisons include, but are not limited to cost per cycle analyses, levelized cost of energy analyses, and comparisons between performance, transient, and cost characteristics. Here, some key properties analyzed include the rated power, power density, efficiency, lifetime, discharge time, capital costs, and O&M costs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2024

Impacts of Fast Critical Assembly Fuel Discards on Liquid Waste Processes

The Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) Fast Critical Assembly (FCA) mission is reestablishing the electrolytic dissolver for processing of Pu and Pu-U materials clad in stainless steel (SS). H-Canyon is planning to dissolve and neutralize FCA fuel without recovering the special nuclear material (i.e., Pu) prior to discarding to the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) operated by the Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) Liquid Waste (LW) Organization. The FCA discards will be combined with sludge in the CSTF after Low Temperature Aluminum Dissolution (LTAD) if needed. The combined waste will be washed, concentrated, and vitrified at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). The high level waste canisters produced will be temporarily stored in the Glass Waste Storage Buildings prior to transfer to a future federal repository. Decants from LTAD and sludge washing will be combined with DWPF recycle and dissolved salt cake to prepare salt batches for processing in the Salt Waste Processing Facility. The resulting decontaminated salt solution will be processed in the Saltstone Production Facility.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2025

Corral Summit Pumped Storage Hydropower Hybrid: Site Suitability Assessment

In 2024, Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) initiated a technical-assistance project to support Cat Creek Energy, LLC, (CCE) in evaluating site suitability for the proposed Corral Summit Pumped Storage Hydropower (PSH) project in south-central Idaho near Mackay Reservoir. The Corral Summit facility incorporates battery storage and photovoltaic (PV) solar arrays in a Trybrid configuration to deliver large-volume long-duration (LVLD) storage solutions for rural electric cooperatives in eastern Idaho. The evaluation process focused on determining the most-suitable location for the upper reservoir of the PSH system, guided by a comprehensive assessment framework spanning multiple categories, including physical characteristics, environmental constraints, building infrastructure, regulatory constraints, cultural resources and sensitivity, social factors, and power market and grid integration. Each site was analyzed based on a ranking scale (0–1), which scores ranging from “severely disfavored” to “highly favored,” allowing detailed comparisons of site-specific conditions. Categories such as hydraulic head, utilities corridor, land ownership, and transmission-grid limitations emerged as key contributors to the overall assessment. Site 2 (Idaho Trust) demonstrated a slight advantage over Site 1 (Bureau of Land Management) primarily due to favorable outcomes in regulatory constraints, building infrastructure, and power-market integration. However, Site 1 outperformed Site 2 in factors related to physical characteristics and social factors. The report emphasizes the need for further evaluation of both sites before clear determination of which site is preferred, due to the limited information available on either site at the time of this report. Key areas of evaluation to clearly define the preferred site are ecological impacts, cultural-resource surveys, and economic-feasibility assessments. For successful project execution, recommended follow-up actions include seismic and geotechnical surveys, groundwater and habitat monitoring, regulatory reviews of water rights and right-of-way agreements, cultural engagement with local tribal governments, and enhanced stakeholder strategies. These efforts will ensure the Corral Summit Trybrid facility meets local energy needs while balancing environmental, social, and regulatory responsibilities.

13 - HYDRO ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2025

Corral Summit Pumped Storage Hydropower Hybrid Site Suitability Assessment (Rev.1)

13 - HYDRO ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2020

TWF Waste Container Intra-Facility Transfer and Outgoing Shipment

This procedure provides instructions for the inspection and transfer of Transuranic (TRU) Waste containers within the Transuranic Waste Facility (TWF) (Waste Storage Buildings [WSBs], Characterization Waste Storage Building [CWSB]) and Characterization Trailers. This also includes the preparation to transfer to other LANL facilities. Performance of this procedure meets the requirements of SR 4.2.1.1, 4.2.1.2, 4.2.1.4, 4.2.1.5, 4.3.4.1, SAC 5.9.1, SAC 5.9.3 and AC 5.8.13 2nd bullet, as well as requirements set forth in the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (HWFP).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Evaluation of Commercially Available Precursors for Obscuring Wet Industrial Irradiator Facility Pools to Delay Adversarial Source Removal (Part 2)

The behavior of commercially available potential obscurants for cobalt-60 ( 60 Co) wet-source storage industrial irradiator facilities (IRFs) were further evaluated for corrosive behavior of Nordion C-188 pencil stubs and obscurant properties under radiation exposure ( 60 Co). The potential obscurants studied included: titania aqueous dispersions (TAD - water soluble white paint), Chlorazol Black (CBOD - Chlorazol Black organic dye), powdered milk (COW - calcium obscurant in water), diatomaceous earth (DEA - diatomaceous earth additive), and rhodamine 6G (R6G). For corrosion efforts, stubs from an inert C-188 pencil-source rod were soaked in obscurant solutions and visually inspected. For radiation stability, obscurant samples were exposed to 60 Co radiation sources at 207 rad/s. The results from these studies reveal: the obscurants had no impact on the surrogate samples and may assist in terms of corrosion resistance; materials that did not rely on organic compounds to provide obscurance performed the best, as the organic compounds decomposed too rapidly in the high radiation environment, whereas the materials survived.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

DOE OSTI2023

Baseline Hypothetical Facility for the Production of 131 I, 99 Mo, and 133 Xe from HALEU Fission Targets

The report describes the development of a hypothetical facility to produce the pharmaceutical radioisotope 131 I at an amount of 60 curies per week via the fission of a High Assay Low Enriched Uranium (HALEU) target, along with the chemical and physical processes and equipment needed to separate the 131 I and co-produced 99 Mo and 133 Xe. The hypothetical design was carried out using a 10 MWt research reactor. The irradiation calculation determined that three HALEU targets with aluminum cladding can be used to produce 60 Ci/week of 131 I, 750 Ci/week of 99 Mo and 560 Ci/week of 133 Xe. The process selected for the baseline design uses caustic dissolution of the target material with ion exchange processes to separate and purify the iodine and molybdenum. The xenon is processed using a cryogenic carbon bed separation process. Target processing occurs in seven shielded hot cells with a total footprint of 16m 2 and waste management occurs in an eight hot cell with a 2.5 m 2 footprint. Waste generated from the processing of the three targets per week would generate less than 4 shielded drums of waste annually. These hot cells would need varying levels of shielding due to the amount of fission products being handled in the unit. Hot cell facilities also require support services including QA/QC, health physics, administrative staff, operator changing room, radiological buffer areas, and waste storage. The overall facility would require a footprint of 1050 m 2 with 20.25 m 2 of shielded hot cells.

62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE↗

DOE OSTI2020

Modeling the Destruction of Glycolate in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Recycle Stream and Concentration Factors for Glycolate in the 2H Evaporator

Two models were developed to predict maximum glycolate concentrations in the Savannah River Site (SRS) Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) from implementation of the Nitric-Glycolic flowsheet at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). One model describes the kinetics of glycolate destruction via chemical oxidation with sodium permanganate. This model conservatively predicts glycolate concentration delivered to the CSTF with a high probability the actual glycolate concentration is lower than predicted. The second model describes the potential concentration of said residual glycolate within the 242-16H (i.e., “2H”) Evaporator system.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2026

Energy Storage Siting and Permitting Outreach Workshop Report

On March 24th, 2026, under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Electricity, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) staff hosted the Energy Storage Siting & Permitting Outreach Workshop at PNNL’s Grid Storage Launchpad (GSL) facility in Richland, Washington. The workshop convened a cohort of state and regional stakeholders from across the country to build a shared understanding of energy storage technologies, regulatory frameworks, and best practices for engaging in the permitting process. Participants left with a deeper understanding of energy storage technologies, grid uses and benefits, interconnection and regulatory processes, battery safety standards and risk management, and local engagement strategies and approaches. The workshop concluded with a guided tour of the GSL for hands-on exposure to energy storage research and development. The workshop had 17 external participants. The attendees represented a range of backgrounds, including state and local governments, nonprofits or other local organizations, project developers, and utility stakeholders.

Battery Energy Storage↗

DOE OSTI2020

New Designed Containers for Activated ILW from NPP Decommissioning - 20208

The paper focuses on packaging of dismantled and fragmented reactor components into containers and their transport to their storage and/or disposal facility within the immediate dismantling strategy applied on decommissioning of nuclear power plant (NPP) finally shutdown after standard operation. The main purpose of the paper is to present the process of design, manufacture, testing and use of new transport and storage containers for activated intermediate level waste (ILW) from V1 NPP decommissioning at Jaslovske Bohunice site. Legislation conditions, container selection process, requirements on their design and manufacture, scope of associated licensing documentation and technical procedures applied up to their use on site are described in detail. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Exploring sustainable electricity system development pathways in South America’s MERCOSUR sub-region

South America has abundant natural water and energy resources, and exploiting these resources to achieve a clean energy future is central to the continent’s economic and sustainable development objectives for the next several decades. Designing pathways to achieving this clean energy future requires better understanding the structural, techno-economic, and policy forces that may influence the future development of the electricity sector in the region. Here, we focus on an interconnected electricity system of five South American countries – Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay – which represent major electricity generation, consumption, and trade dynamics in the region. We explore the implications of various forces that could shape the future composition of the power sector in the sub-region, including: evolving renewable energy cost and performance, natural gas prices, cross-border interconnection facilities, early retirement of installed hydropower, and different decarbonization goals. We use a model framework based on a power system planning platform (GridPath) to co-optimize investment and operations of generation, storage, and transmission facilities out to 2050. Our results in a Reference scenario indicate that the electricity system can maintain a relatively clean energy portfolio by leveraging existing hydropower capacity and integrating increasingly cost-competitive wind and solar power. However, dependence on natural gas in the region is likely to remain high. A low-carbon electricity system can cost-effectively be achieved through policy interventions (e.g., renewable portfolio standards) and by diversifying investments in wind, solar, battery storage, and some new hydropower capacity. We also find that existing hydropower is critical for maintaining reliable future grid operations. Enhanced regional electricity trade, mostly based on existing interconnection capacities with nominal investment in new transmission, can significantly benefit the clean energy transition in the region.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

DOE OSTI2020

Critical Design Elements for an On-Site Mercury Concentration and Holding Facility - 20175

Administrative changes and funding issues have delayed the Department of Energy (DOE) from establishing and commissioning a National Repository for mercury as required under the Mercury Export Ban Act (MEBA) of 2008. In the interim, a few hazardous waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) have been authorized to accept mercury classified as a hazardous waste as under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Waste generators are charged (either by weight or by volume) for the waste they manifest to these TSDFs. In many cases, mercury and mercury compounds have chemically sorbed to (or physically lodged into) the interstitial spaces of a substrate material. This almost always causes the amount of waste generated to be unnecessarily large, due to the extra volume (or weight) of the accompanying, non-mercury materials. Depending on a multitude of factors, it could be financially beneficial for waste generators to take greater control of their mercury affairs by separating these substrate materials from the mercury and mercury compounds that have become associated with them. Building and operating an on-site mercury Concentration and Holding Facility (CHF) could help relieve a waste generator's overall cost burden. The purpose of such CHFs is not to treat or dispose of mercury, but to recover and concentrate mercury from bulky mercury-laden materials to the extent that the host substrate to which the mercury may have previously been sorbed could pass a Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test and either be disposed of at a conventional landfill, or be disposed of at a hazardous waste landfill, but absent additional restrictions specifically for mercury. A CHF represents a way for waste generators to save money by separating mercury from common host materials, concentrating it, and then safely storing it until transportation to an authorized TSDF takes place This paper focuses on the critical design elements waste generators should consider when designing and operating a mercury CHF. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2024

Baseload Hydrogen Production Using Nuclear and Renewable Energy: A Comparative Analysis

As the global push towards net zero carbon gains momentum, the demand for clean hydrogen is expected to grow rapidly across various sectors, including transportation, industries and electrical grids. To meet this growing hydrogen demand, baseload hydrogen production facilities capable of providing a continuous and reliable supply of hydrogen will be necessary throughout the world. This paper explores the technoeconomic feasibility of establishing baseload electrolytic hydrogen production facilities in the United States, utilizing different clean generation resources. The key criteria include maintaining a consistent supply of clean hydrogen without putting baseload demand stress to already vulnerable power grid. In order to do that, the proposed facilities will host onsite clean power generation and energy storage technologies. The proposed facilities can capitalize on available investment and production incentives and have ability to export excess electricity to the utility at a bulk price. Several scenarios are considered based on the clean energy resources to support the electrolysis process including light water reactors (LWRs) currently evaluating retirement options, wind, solar PVs, and advanced small modular reactors (SMRs). For each scenario, a hypothetical hydrogen production facility is considered in a location in the US where the primary generation resource is at its peak strength. Comparative analysis in this paper reveal that the nuclear power plants are most economically viable for baseload hydrogen production facilities, outperforming renewable-based facilities with significantly lower levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH). Even under best-case scenarios for resource availability, incentives and export prices, renewable-based facilities face challenges due to daily and seasonal generation variability, resulting in large installation sizes and lower capacity factors. Among renewable-based facilities, complementarity hybrids, providing more stable power supply, demonstrate superior economics compared to facilities based on a single renewable technology. While LWR-powered facility can achieve a negative LCOH with incentives, SMR-powered facilities can provide economic hydrogen supply with LCOH below $1/kg with high temperature electrolysis option. The analysis in this paper underscores the pivotal role of nuclear energy in the future hydrogen economy.

08 - HYDROGEN↗

DOE OSTI2021

Demonstration of Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Higher Fissile Content Glass

The Accelerated Basin De-inventory (ABD) Program has been proposed as an alternative for future spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and nuclear material processing at the Savannah River Site (SRS). This approach would change the baseline H-Canyon (HCAN), Concentrate, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF), and Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) operations. The ABD Program would require that all domestic and foreign research reactor SNF currently at SRS be dissolved, stored, and then transferred to CSTF without the recovery of uranium. Preliminary assessments in the ABD Program plan have shown that ~5000 extra SRS high-level waste (HLW) canisters would be produced if the fissile mass loading remains at the current 897 g/m 3 limit; however, increasing the limit to 2500 g/m 3 would result in ~520 extra canisters. Thus, the ABD Program plan requires an increase of the DWPF fissile mass loading limit to 2500 g/m 3 to minimize canister production. DWPF considers the following isotopes in the calculation of fissile mass loading: U-233, U-235, Pu-239 and Pu-241.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗