Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Ru”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

216 records · Page 12

NASA Analysis of Alternatives Study for Icing Research

In 2020, NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate commissioned a study of the icing research area to provide a broad and comprehensive assessment of priority needs for NASA and enduring needs for the aviation community. Priority needs were those that supported four key focus areas for NASA Aeronautics—Transonic Truss-Braced Wing, Electrified Aircraft Propulsion, Small-Core Turbine Engine, and High-Rate Composite Manufacturing—as well as other priority areas, such as Advanced Air Mobility, Certification by Analysis, and Commercial Supersonic Technology. Enduring needs were the additional long-term capabilities and expertise identified by the aviation community as being critical for NASA to provide. This study is called an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) because a large number of icing research needs were identified and analyzed to determine the highest priorities for NASA key focus areas and those that will endure into the future. This report offers a detailed description and results of the AoA study for icing research.

Aircraft Icing, Aircraft Icing, Rotorcraft Icing, ↗

NASA Icing Update

NASA icing research summarizes work in the following areas: facility updates for the Icing Research Tunnel and Propulsion Systems Laboratory, engine icing, and simulation & experimental tools.

Icing↗

Impact Ice Adhesion at NASA Glenn: Current Experimental Methods and Supporting Measurements

When examining the literature on the adhesion strength of impact ice, there have been a wide range of methodologies tried to measure the required stresses to induce interfacial delamination. Utilizing the Icing Research Tunnel at the NASA Glenn Research Center to generate the impact ice required for this work, several different mechanical tests have been and are being developed to determine the stresses along the interface between ice and coupon. This set of tests includes the technical mature modified lap joint test which has been used to conduct ice adhesion studies through a wide sweep of icing conditions. To conduct in situ ice adhesion measurements inside of the Icing Research Tunnel, several new experiments are currently being developed to make ice adhesion measurements during and immediately after ice accretion. In addition to these experimental methods, several supporting measurement techniques have been developed to allow for a better understanding on the influence of icing cloud conditions on the mechanical behavior of impact ice. Digital image correlation has been successfully implemented to augment the data generated by the modified lap joint test with full field surface displacement and strain measurements which allow for insight into the deformation processes present during a test. Both optical microscopy of impact ice samples along with ice replication techniques have been used to study the grain structure of the impact ice. This has led to a deeper understanding of the results from the modified lap joint method and how the structure of impact ice changes as it is accreted during an icing spray. The freezing process of impact ice generated by supercooled liquid water is not a volume conserving process, which leads to the presence of residual strains along the interface between ice and substrate. These strains have been observed using both a simplified flat geometry and a representative airfoil. The data gathered by these experimental adhesion methods and supporting measurements allows for a comprehensive understanding on the behavior of impact ice which will be critical to the development of future ice shedding models.

Ice Adhesion↗

Impact Ice Microstructure Segmentation Using Transfer Learned Model

A process of using machine learning to segment impact ice microstructure is presented and analyzed. The segmentation was conducted with the goal of obtaining average grain size estimations. The model was trained on a set of micrographs of impact ice grown at NASA Glenn’s Icing Research Tunnel. The model leveraged a model pre-trained on a large set of micrographs of various materials as a starting point. Post-processing of the segmented images was done to connect broken boundaries. An automatic method of determining grain size following an ASTM standard was implemented. Segmentation results using different training sets as well as different encoder and decoder pairs are presented. Calculated sizes are compared to manual grain size measurement methods. Results show promise in accuracy as well as a possible improvement in repeatability and consistency. Next steps for improving the model are suggested.

Machine learning↗

Impact Ice Adhesion at NASA Glenn: Current Experimental Methods and Supporting Measurements

When examining the literature on the adhesion strength of impact ice, there have been a wide range of methodologies tried to measure the required stresses to induce interfacial delamination. Utilizing the Icing Research Tunnel at the NASA Glenn Research Center to generate the impact ice required for this work, several different mechanical tests have been and are being developed to determine the stresses along the interface between ice and coupon. This set of tests includes the technical mature modified lap joint test which has been used to conduct ice adhesion studies through a wide sweep of icing conditions. To conduct in situ ice adhesion measurements inside of the Icing Research Tunnel, several new experiments are currently being developed to make ice adhesion measurements during and immediately after ice accretion. In addition to these experimental methods, several supporting measurement techniques have been developed to allow for a better understanding on the influence of icing cloud conditions on the mechanical behavior of impact ice. Digital image correlation has been successfully implemented to augment the data generated by the modified lap joint test with full field surface displacement and strain measurements which allow for insight into the deformation processes present during a test. Both optical microscopy of impact ice samples along with ice replication techniques have been used to study the grain structure of the impact ice. This has led to a deeper understanding of the results from the modified lap join method and how the structure of impact ice changes as it is accreted during an icing spray. The freezing process of impact ice generated by supercooled liquid water is not a volume conserving process, which leads to the presence of residual strains along the interface between ice and substrate. These strains have been observed using both a simplified flat geometry and a representative airfoil. The data gathered by these experimental adhesion methods and supporting measurements allows for a compressive understanding on the behavior of impact ice which will be critical to the development of future ice shedding models.

Ice Adhesion↗

NASA Icing Update – May 2024

This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on May 6, 2024. The updates include the following topics: (1) Propulsion Systems Lab (PSL), (2) Adaptive Icing Tunnel (AIT), (3) Ice Adhesion / Deformed Skin Adhesion Test, (4) GlennICE, (5) Efficient Quiet Integrated Propulsor, (6) Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) CFD Characterization, and (7) Supercooled Large Droplet (SLD) Research.

Icing↗

Air Data Probe Anomalies in Flight through Measured High Ice Water Content Conditions

High concentrations of ice crystals in convective storms have caused anomalous air temperature and airspeed readings during commercial and research flight operations. These anomalies occur when ice crystals are ingested in the heated probe inlet, melt or partially melt to liquid water, and then refreeze or remain in a liquid state depending on the probe heat and cloud conditions. In pitot probes, the refreezing may cause complete blockage of the total pressure, which causes airspeed anomalies. In total air temperature probes, the melted ice water may flow near the temperature sensing element and cause the total air temperature reading to approach 0 degree Celsius. During the High Ice Water Content (HIWC) RADAR and HIWC-2022 flight campaigns and the Convective Process Experiment (CPEX-CV) flight campaign, a total of 71 anomalies were recorded on the NASA DC-8 pitot probes when subjected to specific flight and cloud conditions. Similarly, a research TAT probe mounted near the pitot probes had 19 anomalies. This paper presents analyses of the measured natural conditions that led to these TAT and pitot anomalies, identifies two types of pitot probe anomalies, applies a concentration factor to estimate local TWC conditions near the TAT and pitot probes, and identifies the static air temperature and pressure altitude where the anomalies occurred on the Part 33 Appendix D envelope.

Aircraft Icing↗

Analysis of Hot-Wire Probe Ice Water Content Measurements in High Ice Water Content Conditions

During the 2022 High Ice Water Content (HIWC) Flight Campaign, ice water content (IWC) measurements were made at various locations on the NASA DC-8 Airborne Science Laboratory using the Isokinetic Probe Version 2 (IKP2), Ice Crystal Detectors (ICD), and Robust Probe. Correlations of a wing mounted ICD to IKP2 were made to determine the collision/retention efficiency of the ICD total water content (TWC) element in glaciated conditions. Similarly, correlations of a nose mounted ICD near the pitot probes were made to the IKP2 and to the wing-mounted ICD to estimate the ice concentration factor near the DC-8 pitot probes. Results from the 2022 flight campaign were compared to results from the HIWC RADAR II flight campaign in 2018. There was an apparent reduction in the ICD TWC collision/retention efficiency during the 2022 flight campaign. Although reasons for this discrepancy were explored, more analyses are needed to fully understand the causes. However, it was concluded that an estimated ice concentration factor at the nose of 2.5 was consistent between the two flight campaigns. Additionally, a correlation model was developed to relate measurements from a Nose ICD to freestream IWC as measured by the IKP2 to support IWC measurements from the 2022 Convective Processes Experiment - Cabo Verde (CPEX-CV) flight campaign.

Icing↗

Airborne Observations of Particle Density in High Ice Water Content (HWC) Cloud Systems

A series of airborne field campaigns has been conducted since 2014 to measure the microphysical properties of high ice-water content (HIWC) clouds in maritime mesoscale convective systems (MCS) and tropical storms. Two of these, the HIWC RADAR-2 campaign (2018) targeting cloud systems in the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific Ocean, and the HIWC-2022 campaign targeting cloud systems in the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea, and Atlantic Ocean, have been analyzed to investigate graupel encounters at typical jet aircraft cruise altitudes. In-situ cloud observations from these two campaigns confirmed results from the prior studies, indicating that high concentrations of small ice particles exist in areas of HIWC. However, in the 2022 campaign, 90% of the cloud regions with ice water content (IWC) above 2.0 g/m3 also contained significant amounts of graupel and/or frozen drops. Using a mass-size parameterization that accounts for both small ice and larger high-density particles, we show that the mass distributions in cloud regions above 2.0 g/m3 are often strongly bimodal, with the small particle mode containing roughly half of the collective cloud mass, and the graupel mode containing the other half. In contrast, HIWC cloud passes in a 2018 tropical cyclone contained less relative graupel mass than the MCS cloud systems of 2018 and 2022. We present two different methods of estimating particle mass for mixed populations of small-ice and graupel particles, one using a hybrid two-class approach, and another using a single-class approach that takes both particle size and shape metrics into account. Derived IWC using these methods are compared to bulk IWC measurements collected during the campaigns. We also show the relative occurrence of graupel at various IWC levels and discuss the potential application of these results in evaluating density-aware microphysical schemes in cloud and weather models.

Aircraft Icing↗

Analysis of Hot-Wire Probe Ice Water Content Measurements in High Ice Water Content Conditions

During the 2022 High Ice Water Content (HIWC) Flight Campaign, ice water content (IWC) measurements were made at various locations on the NASA DC-8 Airborne Science Laboratory using the Isokinetic Probe Version 2 (IKP2), Ice Crystal Detectors (ICD), and Robust Probe. Correlations of a wing mounted ICD to IKP2 were made to determine the collision/retention efficiency of the ICD total water content (TWC) element in glaciated conditions. Similarly, correlations of a nose mounted ICD near the pitot probes were made to the IKP2 and to the wing-mounted ICD to estimate the ice concentration factor near the DC-8 pitot probes. Results from the 2022 flight campaign were compared to results from the HIWC RADAR II flight campaign in 2018. There was an apparent reduction in the ICD TWC collision/retention efficiency during the 2022 flight campaign. Although reasons for this discrepancy were explored, more analyses are needed to fully understand the causes. However, it was concluded that an estimated ice concentration factor at the nose of 2.5 was consistent between the two flight campaigns. Additionally, a correlation model was developed to relate measurements from a Nose ICD to freestream IWC as measured by the IKP2 to support IWC measurements from the 2022 Convective Processes Experiment - Cabo Verde (CPEX-CV) flight campaign.

Icing↗

Air Data Probe Anomalies in Flight through Measured High Ice Water Content Conditions

High concentrations of ice crystals in convective storms have caused anomalous air temperature and airspeed readings during commercial and research flight operations. These anomalies occur when ice crystals are ingested in the heated probe inlet, melt or partially melt to liquid water, and then refreeze or remain in a liquid state depending on the probe heat and cloud conditions. In pitot probes, the refreezing may cause complete blockage of the total pressure, which causes airspeed anomalies. In total air temperature probes, the melted ice water may flow near the temperature sensing element and cause the total air temperature reading to approach 0 degree Celsius. During the High Ice Water Content (HIWC) RADAR and HIWC-2022 flight campaigns and the Convective Process Experiment (CPEX-CV) flight campaign, a total of 71 anomalies were recorded on the NASA DC-8 pitot probes when subjected to specific flight and cloud conditions. Similarly, a research TAT probe mounted near the pitot probes had 19 anomalies. This paper presents analyses of the measured natural conditions that led to these TAT and pitot anomalies, identifies two types of pitot probe anomalies, applies a concentration factor to estimate local TWC conditions near the TAT and pitot probes, and identifies the static air temperature and pressure altitude where the anomalies occurred on the Part 33 Appendix D envelope.

Aircraft Icing↗

NASA Icing Update – Oct 2024

This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on Oct 21, 2024. The updates include the following topics: (1) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Icing, (2) High-Lift Common Research Model Icing (3) Adaptive Icing Tunnel (AIT), (4) Advanced Air Mobility Icing, (5) GlennICE, (6) List of NASA Icing papers/presentations from 2024 AIAA Aviation Conference.

Icing↗