Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “EXASCALE COMPUTING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2014

Evaluation of Low Power ARM Processors for Monte Carlo Particle Transport: MCNP6 on the ARM Cortex-A8 - Paper 83

In the push towards exascale computing, the limiting factors are power requirements and heat dissipation. Using current technology, the power required to drive an exascale supercomputer would near 400-MW. Clearly, future computing hardware will have to be more energy efficient in order to achieve exascale performance. Most of the current research in advanced computing architectures is in the use of standard CPUs with accelerators. However, these accelerators are not generally supported by the traditional scientific programming languages (C, C++, and Fortran) and the scientific software must be tailored specifically to take advantage of the accelerators. Large scale scientific software (hundreds-of-thousand to millions of lines of code) can not be easily ported to the computing platform du jour. The widespread use of low power ARM based processors in the mobile computing market offer a low power alternative to accelerators that are also supported by the traditional scientific programming languages and programming paradigms such as MPI and OpenMP. Computing architectures for scientific computing are often assessed using standard benchmarks such as LINPACK benchmark or using suites of mini-applications that are greatly simplified stand-ins for scientific software. Often the real applications that will deployed on the scientific supercomputers are not ported or tested until delivery of the machines. In order to evaluate the use of ARM processors for scientific computing the Monte Carlo particle transport code, MCNP version 6 was compiled on the ARM Cortex-A8 and a set of benchmark problems were used to assess performance in comparison to an Intel Xeon E5-2670 and the low power Intel Atom N270. MCNP is a continuous energy Monte Carlo particle transport code in development at Los Alamos National Laboratory since 1977. MCNP is used to transport neutrons, photon, electrons, and charged particles using continuous energy interaction data. It is commonly used in fields of nuclear power, nuclear medicine, radiation protection, and high-energy physics through-out the world. MCNP version 6 is approximately 450 thousand lines of code, written primary in Fortran90, with some C and C++. MCNP supports distributed multiprocessing using MPI and threading with OpenMP. The ARM Cortex-A8 executes MCNP6 using about twice as much power as the Intel Xeon E5-2670 and about the same amount of power as the Intel Atom N270. However, these results are encouraging for the use of low-power ARM chips in future supercomputers. The ARM Cortex-A8 is a 32-bit CPU and it's NEON general-purpose SIMD (single-instruction multiple data) engine does not support double-precision floating-point arithmetic. More recent ARM processors (ARM Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57) support 64-bit addressing and have NEON co-processors that support double-precision floating-point arithmetic. ARM claims that the A50 series delivers a performance increase of 15 times the Cortex-A8 performance for similar power usage. (authors)

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2022

ExaCA: A performance portable exascale cellular automata application for alloy solidification modeling

Modeling the as-solidified grain structures that form during alloy processing is a critical component in understanding process-property relationships, particularly for additive manufacturing (AM) where grain structure is very sensitive to processing conditions. While cellular automata (CA)-based models have proven able to predict aspects of microstructure for several alloys and AM process conditions, long run times and large resource sets required limit the utility and the problem size to which existing CA models can be applied. As part of the ExaAM project, an initiative within the Exascale Computing Project (ECP) to develop, test, and optimize an exascale-capable coupled and self-consistent model of AM parts, we developed ExaCA (https://github.com/LLNL/ExaCA) for the liquid–solid phase transformation in the wake of AM melt pools. The CA-based code is parallelized using MPI and the Kokkos programming model, the latter enabling simulation on both CPUs and GPUs within a single-source implementation. Here, we detail the steps taken to transform a baseline, MPI-based CA code into one that is performant on CPUs and GPUs. Performance testing of ExaCA on Summit (a pre-exascale machine at Oak Ridge National Laboratory) was used to quantify CPU–GPU speedup comparing with equal numbers of nodes. Testing showed comparable CPU performance to the MPI-only CA code and a 5-20x speedup when running AM-based test problems using GPUs. The improved performance of CA through GPU utilization and the performance portable nature of ExaCA will enable accurate part-scale modeling by harnessing the power of current and future generations of high performance computing resources. Future work will include improving the strong scaling of ExaCA on GPUs by reducing load imbalance associated with the locality of the problem, and continuing performance optimization across exascale hardware.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2019

Resilient Computing with Dynamical Systems

We reformulate fundamental numerical problems to run on novel hardware inspired by the brain. Such "neuromorphie hardware consumes less energy per computation, promising a means to augment next-generation exascale computers. However, their programming model is radically different from floating-point machines, with fewer guarantees about precision and communication. The approach is to pass each given problem through a sequence of transformations (algorithmic "reductions") which change it from conventional form into a dynamical system, then ultimately into a spiking neural network. Results for the eigenvalue problem are presented, showing that the dynamical system formulation is feasible.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2020

An Adaptive-Mesh-Refinement Based Computational Tool for Simulating Catalysis at Mesoscale

In this work, we present a computational tool for mesoscale applications using open-source exascale- computing compatible adaptive-mesh-refinement (AMR) library, AMReX [2]. AMReX is software library that enables development of application solvers with block-structured Cartesian AMR. Our tool has capabilities to include realistic geometry representation, chemical species transport, reactions and thermodynamics that are critical for capturing mesoscale physics. A significant achievement is the ability of our solver to automatically import electron microscopy data in the form of a stereolithography (STL) or pixelated file format (mrc, tiff) without undergoing the tedious task of unstructured mesh generation. This feature allows for rapid simulation of catalyst particles with complex morphologies using an immersed-boundary formulation. The use of AMR allows for higher resolutions at catalyst surface interfaces, which in turn provides an accurate description of surface reactions and transport. Our solver uses a hybrid distributed and shared memory parallelism (OpenMP/GPU-based) with which strong scaling up to 10,000 processors for realistic catalyst particle simulations have been demonstrated.

BIOMASS FUELS,MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2016

2016 High Performance Computing Annual Report

Sandia National Laboratories’ California site is celebrating its 60th anniversary (1956 to 2016), and high performance computing has been a key enabler for its scientists and engineers throughout much of its history. Since its founding, Sandia California has helped pioneer the use of HPC platforms including hosting Sandia’s first Cray-1 supercomputer in the 1970s and supporting development of scalable cluster computing platforms to create a new paradigm for cost-effective supercomputing in the 1990s. Recent decades of investment in creation of scalable application frameworks for scientific computing have also enabled new generations of modeling and simulation codes. These resources have facilitated computational analysis of complex phenomena in diverse applications spanning national defense, energy, and homeland security. Today, Sandia California researchers work with partners in academia, industry, and national labs to evolve the state-of-the-art in HPC, modeling, and data analysis (including foundational capabilities for exascale computing platforms) and apply them in transformational ways. Research efforts include mitigating the effects of silent hardware failures that can jeopardize the results of large-scale computations, developing exascale-capable asynchronous task-parallel programming models and runtime systems, formulating new techniques to better explore and analyze extreme-scale data sets, and increasing our understanding of materials and chemical sciences which has applications spanning nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship to more efficient automobile engines. The following section highlights some of these research and applications projects and further illustrates the breadth of our HPC capabilities.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2017

XPRESS: eXascale PRogramming Environment and System Software

The XPRESS project is the research and development of a complete software architecture for Exascale computing. The four major R&D thrusts include: 1) an Exascale lightweight kernel operating system (LXK), based on the Kitten operating system (OS), to manage billion way hardware parallelism, management of faults and power, management of global virtual name space, and other features of future system architectures; 2) a runtime system (HPX-5), co-designed with LXK, based on the ParalleX execution model that supports dynamic resource management and task scheduling; 3) system interfaces for interoperability between the runtime system and both the OS and the runtime system (RIOS); 4) compilation strategies and systems to translate MPI and OpenMP legacy codes to a form that can be run with performance at least as good as a native code implementation. The software architecture development has been driven by performance evaluation of mini-applications developed at Department of Energy Co-Design Centers as well as ancillary in-house developed applications and benchmarks. Research on the ParalleX execution model has been driven by the development of formal semantics and model checkers for the execution model. The major components of the software architecture are: ParalleX execution model – guiding principles for co-design of components of the system stack with advances in locality management and task prioritization through introspection; HPX runtime system – support of application dynamic adaptive resource management, task scheduling, and introspective control policies; LXK operating system – lightweight kernel operating system for order-constant scalability and low/no noise to manage resources; RIOS – a realm of Exascale system operation unique in the XPRESS project that includes the relationship between the new generation of lightweight kernel operating systems and runtime system software; XPI advanced programming model – intermediate form and low-level (readable) programming interface reflecting the ParalleX model, providing a target for source-to- source high level parallel language translation, and supporting early direct programming experimentation and measurement; Performance models & metrics – providing parameters and their mutual sensitivities to guide co-design and quantify operational behavior; Legacy migration – ensuring seamless transition of legacy codes and programming methods to the future generation of ParalleX-based Exascale systems; . Experiments and evaluation – critical to determining degree of effectiveness and likelihood of ultimate success as well as guiding corrective design changes to achieve DOE objectives; and Applications – collaborations with Co-Design Centers and other mission critical codes. The exemplar implementation of the ParalleX execution model, HPX-5, has been released along with five fully ported applications (LULESH, HPCG, SSSP, WAMR, and DASHMM) and multiple microbenchmarks. Using these applications, the system architecture demonstrated dynamic load balancing through active migration, legacy code migration, and data-driven approaches to for graph-like applications. Crucially for Exascale and billion way parallelism, the needs and patterns of irregular applications in HPX-5 were addressed using local flow control rather than relying on globally synchronized data structures.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2017

Quantum Testbeds Stakeholder Workshop (QTSW) Report meeting purpose and agenda.

Quantum computing (QC) is a promising early-stage technology with the potential to provide scientific computing capabilities far beyond what is possible with even an Exascale computer in specific problems of relevance to the Office of Science. These include (but are not limited to) materials modeling, molecular dynamics, and quantum chromodynamics. However, commercial QC systems are not yet available and the technical maturity of current QC hardware, software, algorithms, and systems integration is woefully incomplete. Thus, there is a significant opportunity for DOE to define the technology building blocks, and solve the system integration issues to enable a revolutionary tool. Once realized, QC will have world changing impact on economic competitiveness, the scientific enterprise, and citizen well-being. Prior to this workshop, DOE / Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) hosted a workshop in 2015 to explore QC scientific applications. The goal of that workshop was to assess the viability of QC technologies to meet the computational requirements in support of DOE’s science and energy mission and to identify the potential impact of these technologies.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Non-Proprietary Companion to the Q1 CY2021 PathForward Final Assessment (WBS 2.4.1, Milestone PM-HI-1040)

The PathForward element of the Exascale Computing Project (ECP) Hardware and Integration (HI) focus area has met its goals of preparing the US industry for exascale system procurements and generally improving US competitiveness in the worldwide computing market. This report is a companion to the deliverable for the ECP milestone PM-HI-1040, Assess PathForward Impact Against Exascale Hardware Challenges, which gives a summary of the final status of each PathForward project, describes progress achieved against PathForward contract milestones, and includes a final assessment of each vendor’s progress on key exascale challenges. This companion document details the results of the PathForward research to the extent possible without disclosing proprietary information and the impact on products and US exascale systems. In addition, it captures lessons learned in order to inform future projects in general and in high-performance computing in particular.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Coupling of regional geophysics and local soil-structure models in the EQSIM fault-to-structure earthquake simulation framework

Accurate understanding and quantification of the risk to critical infrastructure posed by future large earthquakes continues to be a very challenging problem. Earthquake phenomena are quite complex and traditional approaches to predicting ground motions for future earthquake events have historically been empirically based whereby measured ground motion data from historical earthquakes are homogenized into a common data set and the ground motions for future postulated earthquakes are probabilistically derived based on the historical observations. This procedure has recognized significant limitations, principally due to the fact that earthquake ground motions tend to be dictated by the particular earthquake fault rupture and geologic conditions at a given site and are thus very site-specific. Historical earthquakes recorded at different locations are often only marginally representative. There has been strong and increasing interest in utilizing large-scale, physics-based regional simulations to advance the ability to accurately predict ground motions and associated infrastructure response. However, the computational requirements for simulations at frequencies of engineering interest have proven a major barrier to employing regional scale simulations. In a U.S. Department of Energy Exascale Computing Initiative project, the EQSIM application development is underway to create a framework for fault-to-structure simulations. This framework is being prepared to exploit emerging exascale platforms in order to overcome computational limitations. This article presents the essential methodology and computational workflow employed in EQSIM to couple regional-scale geophysics models with local soil-structure models to achieve a fully integrated, complete fault-to-structure simulation framework. Here, the computational workflow, accuracy and performance of the coupling methodology are illustrated through example fault-to-structure simulations.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Revealing power, energy and thermal dynamics of a 200PF pre-exascale supercomputer

As we approach the exascale computing era, the focused understanding of power consumption and its overall constraint on HPC architectures and applications are becoming increasingly paramount. Summit, located at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF), is one of the fastest and largest pre-exascale platforms in operation today. This paper provides a first-order examination and analysis of power consumption at the component-level, node-level, and system-level, from all 4,626 Summit compute nodes, each with over 100 metrics at 1Hz frequency over the entire year of 2020. We also investigate the power characteristics and energy efficiency of over 840k Summit jobs and 250k GPU failure logs for further operational insights. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic analysis of power data of HPC system at this scale.

Shin, Woong↗
DOE OSTI2018

Performance and Energy Usage of Workloads on KNL and Haswell Architectures. In: High Performance Computing Systems. Performance Modeling, Benchmarking, and Simulation

Manycore architectures are an energy-efficient step towards exascale computing within a constrained power budget. The Intel Knights Landing (KNL) manycore chip is a specific example of this and has seen early adoption by a number of HPC facilities. It is therefore important to understand the performance and energy usage characteristics of KNL. In this paper, we evaluate the performance and energy efficiency of KNL in contrast to the Xeon (Haswell) architecture for applications representative of the workload of users at NERSC. We consider the optimal MPI/OpenMP configuration of each application and use the results to characterize KNL in contrast to Haswell. As well as traditional DDR memory, KNL contains MCDRAM and we also evaluate its efficacy. Our results show that, averaged over our benchmarks, KNL is 1.84 × more energy efficient than Haswell and has 1.27 × greater performance.

Benchmarking↗
DOE OSTI2021

The PetscSF Scalable Communication Layer

PetscSF, the communication component of the Portable, Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation (PETSc), is designed to provide PETSc's communication infrastructure suitable for exascale computers that utilize GPUs and other accelerators. PetscSF provides a simple application programming interface (API) for managing common communication patterns in scientific computations by using a star-forest graph representation. PetscSF supports several implementations based on MPI and NVSHMEM, whose selection is based on the characteristics of the application or the target architecture. An efficient and portable model for network and intra-node communication is essential for implementing large-scale applications. The Message Passing Interface, which has been the de facto standard for distributed memory systems, has developed into a large complex API that does not yet provide high performance on the emerging heterogeneous CPU-GPU-based exascale systems. Here, we discuss the design of PetscSF, how it can overcome some difficulties of working directly with MPI on GPUs, and we demonstrate its performance, scalability, and novel features.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2020

ECP Software Technology Capability Assessment Report

The Exascale Computing Project Software Technology (ECP ST) focus area represents the key bridge between Exascale systems and the scientists developing applications that will run on those platforms. ECP offers a unique opportunity to build a coherent set of software (often referred to as the "software stack") that will allow application developers to maximize their ability to write highly parallel applications, targeting multiple Exascale architectures with runtime environments that will provide high performance and resilience. But applications are only useful if they can provide scientific insight, and the unprecedented data produced by these applications require a complete analysis work ow that includes new technology to scalably collect, reduce, organize, curate, and analyze the data into actionable decisions. This requires approaching scientific computing in a holistic manner, encompassing the entire user workflow - from conception of a problem, setting up the problem with validated inputs, performing high-fidelity simulations, to the application of uncertainty quantification to the final analysis. The software stack plan defined here aims to address all of these needs by extending current technologies to Exascale where possible, by performing the research required to conceive of new approaches necessary to address unique problems where current approaches will not suffice, and by deploying high-quality and robust software products on the platforms developed in the Exascale systems project. The ECP ST portfolio has established a set of interdependent projects that will allow for the research, development, and delivery of a comprehensive software stack,

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Towards performance portability in the Spark astrophysical magnetohydrodynamics solver in the Flash-X simulation framework

Simulations of core-collapse supernovae, and other astrophysical phenomena, are quintessential extreme-scale computing challenges. For core-collapse supernova simulations to be carried out by the ExaStar project under the Exascale Computing Project umbrella, a robust, efficient, and state-of-the-art magnetohydrodynamics solver is a critical requirement. In Flash-X, the primary software instrument for ExaStar, a new magnetohydrodynamics solver has been designed and implemented from the ground up to achieve accuracy and efficiency for simulations of complex astrophysical flows. This new solver, dubbed Spark, uses high-order spatial reconstruction, Runge-Kutta time integration, and an efficient cell-centered approach to satisfying the divergence-free condition for the magnetic fields. Spark was written to be optimized for data locality in cache hierarchy of CPUs. Since data locality optimizations for cache hierarchy are not directly compatible with those of accelerators, we have taken the approach of using program synthesis to avoid massive amounts of code replication that would be necessary if we were to maintain two different versions of the solver. Our program synthesis relies on a simple key-dictionary approach, implemented in python, that enables us to assemble the version of the solver suitable for the target hardware from code fragments identified by specific keys. In this work, we describe the data locality optimizations of the solver for CPUs and accelerators and the program synthesis tools that enable this portability. We also detail the parallel performance of Spark for both CPUs and accelerators.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2014

FOX: A Fault Oblivious Extreme-Scale Execution Environment

The FOX project, funded under the ASCR X-stack I program, developed systems software and runtime libraries for a new approach to the data and work distribution for massively parallel, fault oblivious application execution. Our work was motivated by the premise that exascale computing systems will provide a thousand-fold increase in parallelism and a proportional increase in failure rate relative to today’s machines. To deliver the capability of exascale hardware, the systems software must provide the infrastructure to support existing applications while simultaneously enabling efficient execution of new programming models that naturally express dynamic, adaptive, irregular computation; coupled simulations; and massive data analysis in a highly unreliable hardware environment with billions of threads of execution. Our OS research has prototyped new methods to provide efficient resource sharing, synchronization, and protection in a many-core compute node. We have experimented with alternative task/dataflow programming models and shown scalability in some cases to hundreds of thousands of cores. Much of our software is in active development through open source projects. Concepts from FOX are being pursued in next generation exascale operating systems. Our OS work focused on adaptive, application tailored OS services optimized for multi → many core processors. We developed a new operating system NIX that supports role-based allocation of cores to processes which was released to open source. We contributed to the IBM FusedOS project, which promoted the concept of latency-optimized and throughput-optimized cores. We built a task queue library based on distributed, fault tolerant key-value store and identified scaling issues. A second fault tolerant task parallel library was developed, based on the Linda tuple space model, that used low level interconnect primitives for optimized communication. We designed fault tolerance mechanisms for task parallel computations employing work stealing for load balancing that scaled to the largest existing supercomputers. Finally, we implemented the Elastic Building Blocks runtime, a library to manage object-oriented distributed software components. To support the research, we won two INCITE awards for time on Intrepid (BG/P) and Mira (BG/Q). Much of our work has had impact in the OS and runtime community through the ASCR Exascale OS/R workshop and report, leading to the research agenda of the Exascale OS/R program. Our project was, however, also affected by attrition of multiple PIs. While the PIs continued to participate and offer guidance as time permitted, losing these key individuals was unfortunate both for the project and for the DOE HPC community.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2020

ECP ST Project 2.3.1.06-STPM08-RAJA (Final Report)

Modern high-performance computing architectures are diverse, with hardware designs that feature multicore CPUs and CPUs plus accelerators, such as GPUs or FPGAs. Achieving good application performance often requires using a programming model and managing application data in ways that are best suited to a particular platform. For large codes that are used daily in production, and are under continual development, architecture-specific ports are untenable. Maintainability requires single-source code that is performance portable across a range of architectures and programming model back-ends. This report describes RAJA, Umpire, and CHAI, three software libraries that provide complementary capabilities to enable application portability for high performance computing (HPC) platforms. In particular, these libraries provide software abstractions that insulate application source code from hardware architecture and programming model-specific implementation details. These development of these libraries was motivated by the needs of multiphysics applications in the Weapons Simulation and Computing Program (WSC) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Funding though the Exascale Computing Project (ECP) Software Technology (ST) project 2.3.1.06 RAJA has fostered outreach and collaboration with the ECP application and software technology development communities. In this report, we describe ECP adoption and integration of these tools to this point. The larger goal of the report is to describe to the ECP community what these projects offer, how they are used, and how to approach adoption and integration of them.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Research Directions on AI for Science, Energy, and Security: Report on Summer 2022 Workshops

Over the past decade, fundamental changes in artificial intelligence (AI)—from foundational to applied—have delivered dramatic insights across a wide breadth of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) mission space. AI is helping to augment and improve scientific and engineering workflows (e.g., for control, design, and dramatic performance gains through surrogate models) in national security, the Office of Science, and DOE’s applied energy programs. The progress and potential for AI in DOE science was captured in the 2020 “AI for Science” report from the DOE laboratory community in collaboration with academia and industry. Specific scientific areas ready to further leverage the power of AI ranged from the scale and performance of computational models to data analysis to creating new classes of observations using computer vision. Since that report, the scale and scope of scientific AI have accelerated, revealing new, emergent properties that yield insights that go beyond enabling opportunities to being potentially transformative in the way that scientific problems are posed and solved. Thus, under the guidance of both the Office of Science (SC) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the DOE national laboratories organized a series of workshops in 2022 to gather input on new and rapidly emerging opportunities and challenges of scientific AI. This 2023 report is a synthesis of those workshops. The scientific community believes AI can have a foundational impact on a broad range of DOE missions, including science, energy, and national security. Further, DOE has unique capabilities that enable the community to drive progress in scientific use of AI, building on long-standing DOE strengths and investments in computation, data, and communications infrastructure, spanning the Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), the Exascale Computing Project (ECP), and integrative programs such as the NNSA Office of Defense Programs Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASC) and the SC Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) programs.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗