Assessment of EPRI’s Tan Delta Approach to Manage Cables in Submerged Environments: Statistical Review of EPRI Data
Research conducted by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and other research institutions have concluded that water-trees are one of the leading degradation mechanisms that contribute to the loss of dielectric insulation strength in medium-voltage cable insulating materials in wet or submerged environments. The electrochemical reactions are caused by the combined effect of water presence and relatively high electrical stress. Records of cable failures provided by the licensees in response to Generic Letter (GL) 2007-01 (NRC 2007) have called into question the reliability of medium voltage cables in wetted or submerged environments. EPRI’s dissipation factor or Tan Delta testing guidelines and acceptance criteria have been adopted by most nuclear power plant operators as the primary tool for condition monitoring of medium voltage cables in wet or submerged environments. EPRI has been collecting member data since late 2009 to analyze and provide feedback to members, validate the EPRI-developed acceptance criteria guidelines, support analysis of test results, recommend appropriate actions for the "action required" category, and gather candidate cables for EPRI-sponsored forensic research on causes for insulation degradation. EPRI has collected data from 37 nuclear sites, which represent 44 operating units. The test results have been organized by insulation type, such as cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE); butyl rubber; black, pink, and brown ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR); and compact insulation (black and pink EPR)1. The data have been analyzed, and follow-up information was obtained from members for “action required” test results. EPRI has also performed correlations between Tan Delta tests and the information gathered under the EPRI forensic research on medium-voltage cables. In addition, EPRI has developed guidance by cable insulation type on how to systematically analyze Tan Delta test results. The analysis described here reviewed the two primary EPRI reports (EPRI 3002000557 and EPRI 3002005321) as well as two precedent EPRI reports (EPRI 1028262 and EPRI 1021070) that were cited in the primary reports. The principal results and conclusions from the project analyses are provided.