Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Aerodynamic Decelerator”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Parametric Studies of Human Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Systems

This paper will present a parametric analysis for entry, descent, and landing (EDL) concepts, enabling rapid systems assessment and tradespace exploration. The entry system uses a hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator (HIAD) technology. The baseline system includes elements for Mars aerocapture (AC) and EDL segments of the mission. The mission concept of operations (ConOps) begins at Mars arrival in a polar inclination. After performing an aerocapture (AC) maneuver into a pre-defined Mars parking orbit, the AC HIAD is jettisoned. The rest of thevehicle stays in the parking orbit for up to one year. The EDL sequence starts with a deorbit burn at the apoapsis of the parking orbit. After hypersonic entry with the EDL HIAD, the entry system uses a supersonic retropropulsion maneuver to slow the vehicle for the descent and landing segments of the mission. The vehicle will maintain a constant velocity of 2.5 m/s for 5 seconds prior to landing.The system includes a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), Mars Descent Module (MDM), and two HIADs. The MDM includes a primary structure, tanks, engines, and radiators. The primary structure is an aluminum-lithium (Al-Li)cruciform design similar to the structural design of the Apollo Lunar Module. The cruciform planform layout results in four outer bays, with adequate volume in the corners between outer bays to package four landing gears. The central bay is reserved for packaging the MAV and the recessed MAV engines. Two of the outer bays accommodate main propellant tanks, with one LOX and one CH4 tank in each bay. The two remaining outer bays each house four rocket engine systems and associated support structure. Each HIAD comprises an inflatable structure, flexible thermal protection system, gas, and gas generators. The HIAD design used in this study is a stacked-toroid concept with pairing loop straps and radial/chevron straps. The baseline system lands a 20-t payload on the Mars surface. It is assumed the vehicle arrives at 6.2 km/s relative velocity at 90° inclination and is captured to a 1-Sol parking orbit.The baseline design includes many assumptions such as margins, arrival state, ConOps options, parking orbit, physical dimensions, propellant options, and technology concepts. The impact of these parameters are quantified through systems-level sensitivity analyses, which capture the global impact—not at a component level—but at the systems level. The systems-level sensitivities expose major design drivers and importance of each assumption for a design.Through tradespace exploration, a wide range of systems parameters are examined and compared for several feasible design options. Studies have been completed for the following input parameters: payload mass, propellant options, AC/EDL ballistic coefficient, lander thrust to weight ratio (T/W) (surrogate for the maximum EDL g’s),engine specific impulse (Isp), parking orbit, and inclination.The final paper will present and discuss the parametric approach used in the study. It will also include the results of recent systems analyses, sensitivity analyses, and tradespace exploration

Jamshid Samareh↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Vulcan Reuse

This is an exciting time in the space launch market. We have providers developing various reuse concepts to help drive continued cost reductions in access to space. At the same time visions of a future marketplace in space are emerging that have energized the community to move toward economically viable space-based ventures. This paper explores the intersection of these two developments. Specifically, we focus on the underlying technologies developed for ULA’s Sensible, Modular, Autonomous Return Technology (SMART) approach to reuse and the intersection with needs in the cislunar marketplace. ULA has been working with NASA Langley Research Center on maturing their Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) technology into the Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) technology demonstration mission scheduled to fly with the JPSS-2 Launch in 2022, and have honed in on a 6m diameter HIAD for that application. These efforts, under the NASA Space Act Agreements (SAA), have helped identify elements requiring further development for SMART Reuse, which could also benefit other potential mission infusion opportunities. This has proved to be a very fruitful collaboration as these aspects have evolved. The paper further delves into applications across commercial space and NASA’s Space Exploration mandate, in addition to the reusable launch vehicle applications.

John G Reed↗
NASA NTRS2020

Terrain Relative Navigation for Guided Descent on Titan

Titan’s dense atmosphere, low gravity, and high winds at high altitudes create descent times of >90 minutes with standard entry/descent/landing (EDL) architectures and result in large unguided landing ellipses, with 99% values of 110x110 km and 149x72 km in recent Titan lander proposals. Enabling precision landing on Titan could increase science return for the types of missions proposed to date and make additional types of landing sites accessible, opening up new possibilities for science investigations. Precision landing on Titan has unique challenges, because the hazy atmosphere makes it difficult to see the surface and because it requires guided descent with divert ranges that are one to two orders of magnitude larger than needed for other target bodies, i.e. up to on the order of 100 km. It is conceivable that such a divert capability could be provided economically by a parafoil or other steerable aerodynamic decelerator deployed several 10s of km above the surface. The long descent times lead to large inertial navigation errors, hence a need for terrain relative navigation (TRN). This would require a TRN capability that can operate at such altitudes, despite challenges of seeing the surface sufficiently clearly and of depending on map products that are two orders of magnitude lower in spatial resolution than those for Mars and airless bodies. We then develop algorithms for map matching and feature tracking with descent images and test these with synthetic images created from Cassini/Huygens data sets and our radiative transfer model. We also introduce new possibilities for TRN based on the potential to discriminate some specific types of terrain onboard in descent imagery, such as lake vs adjacent ground and dune vs interdune. We use sensor measurement noise models in simulations of state estimation with an extended Kalman filter that includes coordinates of a set of tracked features in the state vector. Case studies were done for two notional landing sites, one in a site with only dry ground and one in a Titan lake district. In both cases, the filter error model shows 3 position error at touchdown on the order of 2 km. More work is needed to validate these results with higher fidelity camera models and larger data sets, but this is very promising.

Matthies, Larry↗
NASA NTRS2020

Challenges of Mars Sample Return Lander Entry, Descent, and Landing

The proposed Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign would be perhaps the most ambitious robotic mission ever attempted in space exploration. The notional cam-paign consists of three Flagship-class missions operating in cooperation for over a decade in order to return samples of the Martian surface and atmosphere to Earth for analysis. The Mars 2020 rover, scheduled to launch in July 2020, will cache samples and place them on the surface for possible return. The second mission would be a Sample Return Lander (SRL) that consists of a small Sample Fetch Rover (SFR) to gather the samples, a Sample Transfer Arm (STA) to load the samples into a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), and the MAV itself to launch the samples into orbit around Mars. The third mission would be an Earth Return Or-biter (ERO) designed to rendezvous and capture the Orbiting Sample (OS), return to Earth, and separate the Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) for Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) at a location to be determined. This paper will focus on the SRL mission concept, specifically the EDL phase. Given the ambitious SRL sample re-trieval baseline surface mission, including a rocket launch of the samples into Mars orbit, it is estimated that the EDL system may be required to deliver as much as 2100 kg of dry mass to the surface. This represents an approximate 20-25% in-crease in mass capability over previous landed Mars missions. Additionally, there is a high probability that SRL would have to land very close to the samples on the surface to expedite retrieval operations; therefore, Pin Point Landing (PPL) accu-racy may be required. To address these challenges, promising EDL configuration augmentations were studied to include larger forebody/higher drag entry capsules, hypersonic/supersonic inflatable/non-inflatable aerodynamic decelerators, hypersonic trim tabs, ballute drag devices, larger parachutes, higher Mach and higher dynamic pressure parachute deployments, lower parachute deployment altitudes having shorter chute timelines necessitating more efficient terrain sensor strategies, and ad-ditional fuel for longer powered descent diverts to the target landing site. Over-arching the entire trade study was an attempt to stay as close to the experience base of past successful missions as possible to reduce implementation cost and risk. This paper will discuss the entire SRL EDL trade study in detail. The information presented about the potential MSR campaign is pre-decisional and is provided for planning and discussion purposes only.

Ivanov, Mark C.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Langley Aerothermodynamics Laboratory: Hypersonic Testing Capabilities

A description of the NASA Langley Research Center’s Langley Aerothermodynamics Laboratory (LAL) will be presented in the paper, along with descriptions and details of the facility test techniques and recent upgrades. The LAL consists of three hypersonic blow-down wind tunnels covering Mach numbers of 6 and 10 and unit Reynolds number ranges of 0.5 to 8.3 million per foot as well as a 60-ft Vacuum Sphere Test Chamber. LAL facilities are used to study and define the aerodynamic performance and aeroheating characteristics of flight vehicle concepts. Data collected in the facilities have been used for design and optimization, anchoring computational predictions, generation of aerodynamic databases and design of Thermal Protection Systems. Over the years modifications and enhancements have been made to the facility hardware and instrumentation to increase efficiency, data quality, capabilities and reliability to better meet the programmatic requirements. Recent utilization information illustrates the need for the capabilities associated with these facilities. Recent test programs include the Space Shuttle Program, Crew Exploration Vehicle/Orion/Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation (HIFiRE), Mars Science Laboratory, Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator System (HIADS) and X-51 among others and usage has been split between NASA, Commercial Crew, Department of Defense and private company programs. Plans for future improvements to the facility infrastructure and instrumentation will also be presented.

Karen Berger↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Applications of PLIF within Supersonic/Hypersonic Flows relevant to Space Technology and Exploration

We summarize two recent applications of planar laser-induced fluorescence using seeded nitric oxide (NO-PLIF) within two different large-scale facilities for space technology and exploration. The first measurement campaign described is the NO-PLIF measurements performed within the 31-in Mach 10 air tunnel at NASA Langley Research Center for flow visualization, velocity, and temperature measurements of the wake produced by a hypersonic blunt-body. PLIF within this wake-flow was performed to support the developments of HIAD (hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator) technology, including the recent LOFTID flight mission. The second campaign is the NO-PLIF measurements performed within a 20-ft vacuum chamber at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center for flow visualization of a Mach 5 plume impinging on a flat plate under rarefied and continuum conditions. PLIF within this supersonic flow was performed to support future lunar and Martian lander missions by investigating the plume impingement behavior. While both of these measurement campaigns were performed using 10 Hz PLIF laser systems, current efforts include utilization of tunable high-repetition-rate lasers for NO-PLIF measurements up to kHz-MHz rates.

Planar laser-induced fluorescence↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Heritage to Flight: The Test Program that Brought an Inflation System Back to Life for LOFTID

Following the success of the Inflatable Reentry Vehicle Experiment-3 (IRVE-3) project, the Terrestrial Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) Orbital Reentry (THOR) project was stood up with a “built to print” Inflation System utilizing the IRVE-3 flight spares. When THOR was canceled, this Inflation System had already been tested and assembled, ready for use. Thus, when the Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) was spun up, the THOR system seemed like a good candidate to salvage flight ready hardware. There were, however, some key differences in the IRVE/THOR system and the LOFTID one. LOFTID’s HIAD was two times the size of IRVE for starters and would require much higher flows to accommodate inflating such an article within a specific timeframe. With new requirements and a tight schedule, the LOFTID Inflation team set to work to verify flight readiness under LOFTID conditions and eliminate the need to requalify new hardware. LOFTID, utilizing an Inflation System built primarily hardware from IRVE-3 spares, successfully flew in November of 2022. This paper will outline the mission differences, the test campaign used to prepare LOFTID’s Inflation System for flight, and some lessons learned in repurposing older hardware.

Inflation System↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Heritage to Flight: The Test Program that Brought an Inflation System Back to Life for LOFTID

Following the success of the Inflatable Reentry Vehicle Experiment-3 (IRVE-3) project, the Terrestrial Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) Orbital Reentry (THOR) project was stood up with a “built to print” Inflation System utilizing the IRVE-3 flight spares. When THOR was canceled, this Inflation System had already been tested and assembled, ready for use. Thus, when the Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) was spun up, the THOR system seemed like a good candidate to salvage flight ready hardware. There were, however, some key differences in the IRVE/THOR system and the LOFTID one. LOFTID’s HIAD was two times the size of IRVE for starters and would require much higher flows to accommodate inflating such an article within a specific timeframe. With new requirements and a tight schedule, the LOFTID Inflation team set to work to verify flight readiness under LOFTID conditions and eliminate the need to requalify new hardware. LOFTID, utilizing an Inflation System built primarily hardware from IRVE-3 spares, successfully flew in November of 2022. This paper will outline the mission differences, the test campaign used to prepare LOFTID’s Inflation System for flight, and some lessons learned in repurposing older hardware.

Inflation System↗
NASA NTRS1962

Aerodynamic Heating and Deceleration During Entry into Planetary Atmospheres

Dr. Chapman's lecture examines the physics behind spacecraft entry into planetary atmospheres. He explains how scientists determine if a planet has an atmosphere and how scientists can compute deceleration when the atmospheric conditions are unknown. Symbols and equations used for calculations for aerodynamic heating and deceleration are provided. He also explains heat transfer in bodies approaching an atmosphere, deceleration, and the use of ablation in protecting spacecraft from high temperatures during atmospheric entry.

Chapman, Dean R.↗
NASA NTRS2005

5.0 Aerodynamic and Propulsive Decelerator Systems

Contents include the following: Introduction. Capability Breakdown Structure. Decelerator Functions. Candidate Solutions. Performance and Technology. Capability State-of-the-Art. Performance Needs. Candidate Configurations. Possible Technology Roadmaps. Capability Roadmaps.

Cruz, Juan R.↗
NASA NTRS1966

State-of-the-Art Study for High-speed Deceleration and Stabilization Devices

Documented aerodynamic deployable decelerator performance data above Mach 1. 0 is presented. The state of the art of drag and stability characteristics for reentry and recovery applications is defined for a wide range of decelerator configurations. Structural and material data and other design information also are presented. Emphasis is given to presentation of basic aero, thermal, and structural design data, which points out basic problem areas and voids in existing technology. The basic problems and voids include supersonic "buzzing" of towed porous decelerators in the wake of the forebody, the complete lack of dynamic stability data, and the general lack of aerothermal data at speeds above Mach 5.

STABILIZATION↗
NASA NTRS2016

Aerodynamic Models for the Low Density Supersonic Decelerator (LDSD) Test Vehicles

An overview of aerodynamic models for the Low Density Supersonic Decelerator (LDSD) Supersonic Flight Dynamics Test (SFDT) campaign test vehicle is presented, with comparisons to reconstructed flight data and discussion of model updates. The SFDT campaign objective is to test Supersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (SIAD) and large supersonic parachute technologies at high altitude Earth conditions relevant to entry, descent, and landing (EDL) at Mars. Nominal SIAD test conditions are attained by lifting a test vehicle (TV) to 36 km altitude with a helium balloon, then accelerating the TV to Mach 4 and 53 km altitude with a solid rocket motor. Test flights conducted in June of 2014 (SFDT-1) and 2015 (SFDT-2) each successfully delivered a 6 meter diameter decelerator (SIAD-R) to test conditions and several seconds of flight, and were successful in demonstrating the SFDT flight system concept and SIAD-R technology. Aerodynamic models and uncertainties developed for the SFDT campaign are presented, including the methods used to generate them and their implementation within an aerodynamic database (ADB) routine for flight simulations. Pre- and post-flight aerodynamic models are compared against reconstructed flight data and model changes based upon knowledge gained from the flights are discussed. The pre-flight powered phase model is shown to have a significant contribution to off-nominal SFDT trajectory lofting, while coast and SIAD phase models behaved much as predicted.

Van Norman, John W.↗