Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “solid state battery”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Self-Stabilized LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 in thiophosphate-based all-solid-state batteries through extra LiOH

Nickle-rich LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 (NMC 811) cathode material exhibits engaging properties in high energy density and low cost, making it great potential for the next generation high-energy all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs). However, NMC 811 suffers from severe surface electrochemical, chemical, and voltage incompatibility towards solid-state electrolytes (SSE), especially thiophosphate-based electrolytes like Li 6 PS 5 Cl. Although diverse coating methods have been made to overcome this issue, they are typically cumbersome and expensive. A coating strategy that satisfied all the requirements of cost-efficiency, stability, uniformity, scalability, and easy-achieving is still challenging. Here, we developed a LiOH-based surface stabilization strategy that provides a ~10 nm stable permeable layer on NMC 811. After one-step sintering of NMC 811 precursor mixed with LiOH, which is commonly used for NMC 811 lithiation process, excessive LiOH simultaneously distributes on NMC 811 particles. Unlike other reported methods, this coating method can be easily controlled and fabricated without additional complicated processes. By simply controlling the thickness of LiOH layer, which protects the Li 6 PS 5 Cl solid electrolyte materials from being oxidized, optimized cycling stability can be obtained for 600 cycles with capacity of 130 mAh g – 1 on average at a wide electrochemical window of 2.50–4.20 V (vs. Li-In).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Deciphering Interfacial Chemical and Electrochemical Reactions of Sulfide-Based All-Solid-State Batteries

Large interfacial resistance resulting from interfacial reactions is widely acknowledged as one of the main challenges in sulfide electrolytes (SEs)-based all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs). However, the root cause of the large interfacial resistance between the SEs and typical layered oxide cathodes is not fully understood yet. Here we deciphered that interfacial oxygen loss from single-crystal LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 (SC-NMC532) chemically oxidizes Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 , generating oxygen-containing interfacial species. Meanwhile, the interfacial oxygen loss also induces a structural change of oxide cathodes (layered-to-rocksalt). Besides, the high operation voltage can electrochemically oxidize SEs to form non-oxygen species (e.g. polysulfides). These chemically and electrochemically oxidized species, together with the interfacial structural change, are responsible for the large interfacial resistance at the cathode interface. More importantly, the widely adopted interfacial coating strategy is effective in suppressing chemically oxidized oxygen-containing species and mitigating the coincident interfacial structural change but is unable to prevent electrochemically induced non-oxygen species. These findings provide a deeper insight into the large interfacial resistance between the typical SE and layered oxide cathodes, which may be of assistance for the rational interface design of SE-based ASSLBs in future.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Plasma Synthesis of Spherical Crystalline and Amorphous Electrolyte Nanopowders for Solid-State Batteries

Here, we demonstrate the theory-guided plasma synthesis of high purity nanocrystalline Li 3.5 Si 0.5 P 0.5 O 4 and fully amorphous Li 2.7 Si 0.7 P 0.3 O 3.17 N 0.22 . The synthesis involves the injection of single or mixed phase precursors directly into a plasma torch. As the material exits the plasma torch, it is quenched into spherical nanocrystalline or amorphous nanopowders. This process has virtually zero Li loss and allows for the inclusion of N, which is not accessible with traditional synthesis methods. Finally, we further demonstrate the ability to sinter the crystalline nanopowder into a dense electrolyte membrane at 800 °C, well below the traditional 1000 °C required for a conventional Li 3.5 Si 0.5 P 0.5 O 4 powder.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

The Riddle of Dark LLZO: Cobalt Diffusion in Garnet Separators of Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

Abstract Solid‐state batteries (SSBs) with a Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) garnet electrolyte are attracting much attention as robust and safe alternative to conventional lithium‐ion batteries. Technical challenges in the practical implementation of garnet SSBs are related to the need for high‐temperature sintering, which often leads to undesirable chemical reactions with the cathode material. While these reactions are well understood for composite cathodes, very little is known about similar processes between cathode and separator during battery fabrication. This work focuses on understanding the processes between the composite LiCoO 2 ‐LLZO cathode and the LLZO separator and how they affect the battery performance. The extensive diffusion of Co‐ions within LLZO, which leads to the often‐observed LLZO darkening, is shown to have a significant impact on ionic conductivity, electronic conductivity, and dendrite stability of the separator. Experimental data coupled with large‐scale molecular dynamics simulations uncover the diffusion mechanism for Co‐ions and identify secondary phases that form during these interactions. In addition to extensive Co‐ion diffusion within the grains, a non‐uniform segregation of Co‐ions at grain boundaries is found leading to the formation of three distinct Co‐containing phases. This work offers a general approach to studying the fundamental ion diffusion processes that occur during the fabrication of oxide SSBs.

electrochemical properties↗

Interface Design for High‐Performance All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

All‐solid‐state batteries suffer from high interface resistance and lithium dendrite growth leading to low Li plating/stripping Coulombic efficiency (CE) of <90% and low critical current density at high capacity. Here, in this work, both challenges are simultaneously addressed and the Li plating/stripping CE is significantly increased to 99.6% at 0.2 mA cm −2 /0.2 mAh cm −2 , and critical current density (CCD) of > 3.0 mA cm −2 /3.0 mAh cm −2 by inserting a mixed ionic‐electronic conductive (MIEC) and lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi nanocomposite interlayer between Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte and Li anode. The highly lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer with high ionic conductivity (10 −5 S cm −1 ) and low electronic conductivity (3.4×10 −7 S cm −1 ) enables Li to plate on the current collector (CC) surface rather than on Li 6 PS 5 Cl surface avoiding Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte reduction. During initial Li plating on CC, Li penetrates into porous LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer and lithiates Bi nanoparticles into Li 3 Bi. The lithiophilic Li 3 Bi and Li 3 N nanoparticles in LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi sub‐interlayer will move to CC along with plated Li, forming LiF‐C/Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi lithiophobic/lithiophilic sublayer during the following Li stripping. This interlayer enables Co 0.1 Fe 0.9 S 2 /Li 6 PS 5 Cl/Li cell with an areal capacity of 1.4 mAh cm −2 to achieve a cycle life of >850 cycles at 150 mA g −1 . The lithiophobic/lithiophilic interlayer enables solid‐state metal batteries to simultaneously achieve high energy and long cycle life.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Phase Stability of Garnet Solid-Electrolyte Interfacing with Various Cathodes in All Solid-State Batteries

Garnet-structured Li 6.75 La 3 Zr 1.75 Ta 0.25 O 12 (LLZTO) is one of the most promising electrolyte materials for solid-state Li batteries (SS-LiB). The design and fabrication of a good cathode/electrolyte interface is an important criterion for the SS-LiB. In this work, we performed a systematic study on the impact of cathode crystal structure and chemical compositions on their chemical stabilities against the LLZTO at elevated temperatures, which are required for their adhesion during cell fabrication processes. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Rietveld refinement analyses revealed the chemical stabilities of various cathode materials in contact with the LLZTO. While layered LiCoO 2 cathode showed good stability in contact with LLZTO to 900 °C, LiNiO 2 or Ni-rich LiNi x Mn y Co 1–x–y O 2 (NMC) cathodes suffered from the formation of La 4 NiLiO 8 due to La-diffusion from LLZTO. Furthermore, Mn-rich LiMn 2 O 4 spinel and layered LiNi 1/3 Mn 1/3 Co 1/3 O 2 cathodes suffered from the formation of La 2 Zr 2 O 7 due to Li-diffusion and production of Li 2 MnO 3 . As a result, LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 , having an ideal balance of Ni/Mn/Co composition, or Li 2 MnO 3 containing cathodes such as Li 1.2 Ni 0.15 Mn 0.55 Co 0.1 O 2 were found to have excellent phase stability as the cathodes for LLZTO-based SS-LiBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Metal infiltrated electrodes for solid state batteries

Disclosed are electrochemical devices and methods for making electrochemical devices such as metal infiltrated electrodes for solid state lithium ion and lithium metal batteries. In one method for forming an electrode, a metal is infiltrated into the pore space of the active material of the electrode providing improved electronic conductivity to the electrode. The electrode may also include a solid-state ion conducting material providing improved ion conductivity to the electrode. Before infiltration of the metal, a stabilization coating may be applied to the active material and/or the solid-state ion conducting material to the stabilize electrode interfaces by slowing, but not eliminating, the chemical reactions that occur at elevated temperatures during sintering of the active material and/or the solid-state ion conducting material forming the electrode.

Sakamoto, Jeffrey↗

The Impact of Lithium Anode Interface on Capacity Fade in Polymer Electrolyte-Based Solid-State Batteries

This study investigates the Li stripping-plating morphology and failure mechanisms in full cells consisting of a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) with two commercial Li anodes: Li chip and Li foil. The primary identified failure mechanism of the SPE cell is capacity fade, regardless of the Li manufacturer. While the cathode’s role in capacity fade is evident, the Li anode significantly influences cycling performance, with Li foil cells cycling 50% longer than Li chip cells, a statistical difference. Further, post-mortem scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results attribute the Li chip’s faster capacity fade to a loss of contact and continuous growth of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Conversely, Li foil maintains consistent contact with the solid polymer, displaying a thin and stable SEI. Additionally, failure mechanisms between a gel electrolyte in previous work and the dry SPE are compared.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Structural Degradation of High Voltage Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide (NMC) Cathodes in Solid-State Batteries and Implications for Next Generation Energy Storage

In this study, we report the stability of the layered high voltage cathode NMC622 with respect to a standard liquid electrolyte and in an all solid-state configuration. NMC622 cathodes with a (104) orientation were found to suffer from degradation at high voltage (4.5 V vs Li/Li + ) due to electrolyte-promoted degradation of the layered structure in a carbonate electrolyte. The lithium phosphorus oxynitride (LiPON) electrolyte was able to suppress the extent of this decomposition in solid-state cells but not totally prevent it from occurring. In the solid-state cells the capacity decreased from 203 to 93 mAh/g in the first cycle and from 93 to 79 mAh/g over the subsequent 99 cycles, whereas, after 20 cycles, the liquid cell charge capacity was dominated by the irreversible electrolyte degradation. Furthermore, the interfacial resistances of the solid-state cells were stable with cycling, suggesting minimal degradation of the NMC622/LiPON interface and incumbent losses due to structural evolution associated with cathode orientation. This data indicates that accessing stable high voltage capacity in NMCs will not be enabled by simply stabilizing the cathode–electrolyte interface. Optimizing cathode crystallographic orientation may be the key to accessing this high voltage regime.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Succinonitrile-Lithium Salt Complexes as Solid Catholytes for LLZO-Based Solid-State Batteries

The thermal and electrochemical properties of several succinonitrile (SN)-based organic ionic plastic crystals (OIPCs) containing lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), lithium bis(oxalate) borate (LiBOB) or mixtures of the two salts, were investigated with the goal of determining which is most promising for use as a catholyte in solid-state lithium batteries. The best combination of properties for this use was found for the mixture containing 3 mol% LiTFSI and 2 mol% LiBOB in SN. Based on these observations, several solid-state cells containing Al-substituted Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 separators with composite cathodes consisting of LiNi 0.33 Mn 0.33 Co 0.33 O 2 (NMC111), carbon black, and the succinonitrile-salt mixtures were assembled and cycled at room temperature, without exogenous pressure, using a simple design.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Dual Function Solid State Battery with Self-Forming Self-Healing Electrolyte and Separator (Final Scientific/Technical Report)

Over the course of this program, we have demonstrated an improved rechargeable Li/I2 battery with reduced impedance, improved cyclability, improved Coulombic Efficiency, and the ability to “self-heal” during shorting events. Multi-year efforts have led to the development and improvements in the composition, fabrication, and preparation of the solid state electrolyte, the role of the interface, and design of appropriate test conditions. These investigations have led to significant improvements in Coulombic efficiency. By systematic development of a composite solid state electrolyte, this system is able to self-form upon charge, thus lending itself to long shelf life before use. The initial project objective was to demonstrate a solid-state rechargeable battery based on a Li-metal anode and iodine cathode with a self-forming, self-healing electrolyte and separator with high gravimetric and volumetric energy density. The final deliverables of this project build on a multi-year effort beginning with materials development and design to generate a suitable solid state electrolyte composite with demonstrated higher ionic conductivity compared to the baseline (LiI). Development in cell design and interface modification leading to the generation of rechargeable solid electrolyte cells with Coulombic efficiency improvements of ~3X over initial tests, as well as demonstration of self-healing behavior, where the cells retained their ability to continue extended cycling after shorting events. The hypothesis put forward as part of the initial concept for the project was that the cell chemistry would be self-healing. For example, if a lithium dendrite formed during charge of the cell and reached the iodine cathode, the reaction of the lithium dendrite with the iodine would consume the tip of the dendrite to form lithium iodide, more of the solid electrolyte. The formation of the solid electrolyte would allow the cell to recover and continue to function. This type of self-healing during cycling has been demonstrated and has the potential to improve on safety considerations that stem from shorting events in other Li- containing systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Challenge-driven printing strategies toward high-performance solid-state lithium batteries

Solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) are promising candidates for replacing traditional liquid-based Li-ion batteries and revolutionizing battery systems for electric vehicles and portable devices. However, longstanding issues such as form factors, interfacial contact resistance, balance between ion conductivity and mechanical strength, and manufacturing processability limit their applications. In this review we present how advanced printing technologies can help to mitigate typical problems in main components of SSLBs and improve device performance. Here we first introduce the common printing techniques for energy storage devices, then focus on the issues and corresponding printing strategies for anodes, cathodes, and solid-state electrolytes to guide the construction of energy-dense, free-form SSLBs. The features and effects of the printed structures are emphasized, as well. We conclude by discussing the problems associated with printing technologies and the potential research directions for printed solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗