Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “solid state battery”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Status and prospect of in situ and operando characterization of solid-state batteries

Electrification of the transportation sector relies on radical re-imagining of energy storage technologies to provide affordable, high energy density, durable and safe systems. Next generation energy storage systems will need to leverage high energy density anodes and high voltage cathodes to achieve the required performance metrics (longer vehicle range, long life, production costs, safety). Solid-state batteries (SSBs) are promising materials technology for achieving these metrics by enabling these electrode systems due to the underlying material properties of the solid electrolyte (viz. mechanical strength, electrochemical stability, ionic conductivity). Electro-chemo-mechanical degradation in SSBs detrimentally impact the Coulombic efficiencies, capacity retention, durability and safety in SSBs restricting their practical implementation. Solid|solid interfaces in SSBs are hot-spots of dynamics that contribute to the degradation of SSBs. Characterizing and understanding the processes at the solid|solid interfaces in SSBs is crucial towards designing of resilient, durable, high energy density SSBs. This work provides a comprehensive and critical summary of the SSB characterization with a focus on in situ and operando studies. Additionally, perspectives on experimental design, emerging characterization techniques and data analysis methods are provided. Furthermore, this work provides a thorough analysis of current status of SSB characterization as well as highlights important avenues for future work.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

LiAlO 2 /LiAl 5 O 8 Membranes Derived from Flame-Synthesized Nanopowders as a Potential Electrolyte and Coating Material for All-Solid-State Batteries

Recently, γ-LiAlO 2 has attracted considerable attention as a coating in Li-ion battery electrodes. However, its potential as a Li + ceramic electrolyte is limited due to its poor ionic conductivity (<10 –10 S cm –1 ). Here, we demonstrate an effective method of processing LiAlO 2 membranes (<50 μm) using nanopowders (NPs) produced via liquid-feed flame spray pyrolysis (LF-FSP). Here, membranes consisting of selected mixtures of lithium aluminate polymorphs and Li contents were processed by conventional tape casting of NPs followed by thermocompression of the green films (100 °C/10 kpsi/10 min). The sintered green films (1100 °C/2 h/air) present a mixture of LiAlO 2 (~72 wt %) and LiAl 5 O 8 (~27 wt %) phases, offering ionic conductivities (>10 –6 S cm –1 ) at ambient with an activation energy of 0.5 eV. This greatly increases their potential utility as ceramic electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries, which could simplify battery designs, significantly reduce costs, and increase their safety. Furthermore, a solid-state Li/Li 3.1 AlO 2 /Li symmetric cell was assembled and galvanostatically cycled at 0.375 mA cm –2 current density, exhibiting a transference number ≈ 1.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Multiscale simulations of novel lithium electrolytes for improved processability and performance of solid-state batteries

In FY23, we performed atomic-scale simulations and developed analysis tools to understand the dynamic behaviors of Li ions and cation/anion components and predict mechanical properties in a new class of Li-ion solid electrolytes (SEs) developed by TRINA. Specifically, we revealed the transport characteristics of Li ions in anion sublattice, rotational dynamics of anion and cation components, and the effect of cation and anion on Li transport as well as interactions between cation and anions. The results imply that the transport characteristics in these soft materials may be affected by processing conditions significantly, which will offer the necessary insights to optimize these future SEs and accelerate the deployment of practical and easily processable Solid-state batteries (SSBs).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Stable Lithium Plating in “Lithium Metal-Free” Solid-State Batteries Enabled by Seeded Lithium Nucleation

In the “Li 0 -free” architecture, cells are manufactured with a bare anode current collector and the Li metal anode is plated in situ during the first charging step. While this architecture has many attractive qualities from manufacturing and energy density perspectives, stable Li plating in solid-state “Li 0 -free” cells can be challenging. It is generally accepted that the Li overpotential affects Li homogeneity in “Li 0 -free” cells. We demonstrate that the nucleation overpotential for Li plating in solid-state “Li 0 -free” cells using commercial current collectors can be eliminated by introducing metal clusters that guide Li nucleation. Au is used as model alloying metal cluster. Here, we demonstrate stable Li plating with thickness 16.5 μ m (3.3 mAh cm −2 ) in oxide solid-state electrolyte “Li 0 -free” cells enabled by Au metal clusters. It is shown that 97% of the in situ plated Li can be reversibly stripped at 60 °C and 2.5 MPa. Conversely, Au interlayers which are flat and continuous instead of clustered in morphology consistently showed short-circuiting during in situ Li plating, limiting Li electrodeposition to <0.1 mAh cm −2 . These results can help guide future studies of Li nucleation and growth at solid/solid interfaces, as well as offer alternative manufacturing pathways for “Li 0 -free” solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Understanding Electrochemical Reaction Mechanisms of Sulfur in All‐Solid‐State Batteries through Operando and Theoretical Studies **

Abstract Due to its outstanding safety and high energy density, all‐solid‐state lithium‐sulfur batteries (ASLSBs) are considered as a potential future energy storage technology. The electrochemical reaction pathway in ASLSBs with inorganic solid‐state electrolytes is different from Li‐S batteries with liquid electrolytes, but the mechanism remains unclear. By combining operando Raman spectroscopy and ex situ X‐ray absorption spectroscopy, we investigated the reaction mechanism of sulfur (S 8 ) in ASLSBs. Our results revealed that no Li 2 S 8, Li 2 S 6, and Li 2 S 4 were formed, yet Li 2 S 2 was detected. Furthermore, first‐principles structural calculations were employed to disclose the formation energy of solid state Li 2 S n (1≤ n ≤8), in which Li 2 S 2 was a metastable phase, consistent with experimental observations. Meanwhile, partial S 8 and Li 2 S 2 remained at the full lithiation stage, suggesting incomplete reaction due to sluggish reaction kinetics in ASLSBs.

Cao, Daxian↗
DOE OSTI2021

Solid-state batteries and the critical role of interfaces

The Grand Challenge for the next generation of energy storage technologies is no longer the identification of electroactive cathode or anode materials thanks to extensive worldwide synthesis efforts along with theory and modeling like the Materials Project.1 Instead, the critical challenges revolve around assembling materials in the right architecture to achieve maximum performance and cell life at reasonable temperatures and pressures. Nowhere is this more critical than on the next generation of energy storage technologies revolving around all solid-state batteries. These batteries are the ultimate challenge for materials science requiring new ways to assemble multiple dissimilar materials such that: (1) interfaces are optimized to facilitate ion motion across the different compounds while (2) maintaining chemical stability and (3) simultaneously preserving the crystal structures of each phase during (4) large volume changes due to shuttling of lithium, at (5) room temperature and under (6) atmospheric pressure. To address these requirements will require insights and expertise from research fields outside the traditional lithium-ion battery community such as solid oxide fuel cells, synthesis science, barrier layers, interface formers, sintering, and mechanical properties.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Nasicon dual ion conductors for all solid-state batteries

A super ion conductor composition is disclosed. The super ion conductor composition has the general formula: A 1+x M x/2 Zr 2−x/2 (PO 4 ) 3 , where each A is independently Na or Li, M is Mn or Mg, and subscript x is from 0.5 to 3. A solid electrolyte comprising the super ion conductor composition, and a method of preparing the solid electrolyte, are also disclosed. The method comprises combining a zirconium compound, a manganese or magnesium compound, a sodium compound, and a phosphate compound to give a mixture; and calcining the mixture to give the super ion conductor composition, thereby preparing the solid electrolyte. Functional materials and devices comprising the super ion conductor composition are also disclosed, including a catholyte composition, an ion conducting solid electrolyte membrane, as well as all-solid-state batteries.

Amin, Ruhul↗
DOE OSTI2021

Self-Stabilized LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 in thiophosphate-based all-solid-state batteries through extra LiOH

Nickle-rich LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 (NMC 811) cathode material exhibits engaging properties in high energy density and low cost, making it great potential for the next generation high-energy all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs). However, NMC 811 suffers from severe surface electrochemical, chemical, and voltage incompatibility towards solid-state electrolytes (SSE), especially thiophosphate-based electrolytes like Li 6 PS 5 Cl. Although diverse coating methods have been made to overcome this issue, they are typically cumbersome and expensive. A coating strategy that satisfied all the requirements of cost-efficiency, stability, uniformity, scalability, and easy-achieving is still challenging. Here, we developed a LiOH-based surface stabilization strategy that provides a ~10 nm stable permeable layer on NMC 811. After one-step sintering of NMC 811 precursor mixed with LiOH, which is commonly used for NMC 811 lithiation process, excessive LiOH simultaneously distributes on NMC 811 particles. Unlike other reported methods, this coating method can be easily controlled and fabricated without additional complicated processes. By simply controlling the thickness of LiOH layer, which protects the Li 6 PS 5 Cl solid electrolyte materials from being oxidized, optimized cycling stability can be obtained for 600 cycles with capacity of 130 mAh g – 1 on average at a wide electrochemical window of 2.50–4.20 V (vs. Li-In).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Deciphering Interfacial Chemical and Electrochemical Reactions of Sulfide-Based All-Solid-State Batteries

Large interfacial resistance resulting from interfacial reactions is widely acknowledged as one of the main challenges in sulfide electrolytes (SEs)-based all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs). However, the root cause of the large interfacial resistance between the SEs and typical layered oxide cathodes is not fully understood yet. Here we deciphered that interfacial oxygen loss from single-crystal LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 (SC-NMC532) chemically oxidizes Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 , generating oxygen-containing interfacial species. Meanwhile, the interfacial oxygen loss also induces a structural change of oxide cathodes (layered-to-rocksalt). Besides, the high operation voltage can electrochemically oxidize SEs to form non-oxygen species (e.g. polysulfides). These chemically and electrochemically oxidized species, together with the interfacial structural change, are responsible for the large interfacial resistance at the cathode interface. More importantly, the widely adopted interfacial coating strategy is effective in suppressing chemically oxidized oxygen-containing species and mitigating the coincident interfacial structural change but is unable to prevent electrochemically induced non-oxygen species. These findings provide a deeper insight into the large interfacial resistance between the typical SE and layered oxide cathodes, which may be of assistance for the rational interface design of SE-based ASSLBs in future.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Plasma Synthesis of Spherical Crystalline and Amorphous Electrolyte Nanopowders for Solid-State Batteries

Here, we demonstrate the theory-guided plasma synthesis of high purity nanocrystalline Li 3.5 Si 0.5 P 0.5 O 4 and fully amorphous Li 2.7 Si 0.7 P 0.3 O 3.17 N 0.22 . The synthesis involves the injection of single or mixed phase precursors directly into a plasma torch. As the material exits the plasma torch, it is quenched into spherical nanocrystalline or amorphous nanopowders. This process has virtually zero Li loss and allows for the inclusion of N, which is not accessible with traditional synthesis methods. Finally, we further demonstrate the ability to sinter the crystalline nanopowder into a dense electrolyte membrane at 800 °C, well below the traditional 1000 °C required for a conventional Li 3.5 Si 0.5 P 0.5 O 4 powder.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

The Riddle of Dark LLZO: Cobalt Diffusion in Garnet Separators of Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

Abstract Solid‐state batteries (SSBs) with a Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) garnet electrolyte are attracting much attention as robust and safe alternative to conventional lithium‐ion batteries. Technical challenges in the practical implementation of garnet SSBs are related to the need for high‐temperature sintering, which often leads to undesirable chemical reactions with the cathode material. While these reactions are well understood for composite cathodes, very little is known about similar processes between cathode and separator during battery fabrication. This work focuses on understanding the processes between the composite LiCoO 2 ‐LLZO cathode and the LLZO separator and how they affect the battery performance. The extensive diffusion of Co‐ions within LLZO, which leads to the often‐observed LLZO darkening, is shown to have a significant impact on ionic conductivity, electronic conductivity, and dendrite stability of the separator. Experimental data coupled with large‐scale molecular dynamics simulations uncover the diffusion mechanism for Co‐ions and identify secondary phases that form during these interactions. In addition to extensive Co‐ion diffusion within the grains, a non‐uniform segregation of Co‐ions at grain boundaries is found leading to the formation of three distinct Co‐containing phases. This work offers a general approach to studying the fundamental ion diffusion processes that occur during the fabrication of oxide SSBs.

electrochemical properties↗
DOE OSTI2023

Interface Design for High‐Performance All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

All‐solid‐state batteries suffer from high interface resistance and lithium dendrite growth leading to low Li plating/stripping Coulombic efficiency (CE) of <90% and low critical current density at high capacity. Here, in this work, both challenges are simultaneously addressed and the Li plating/stripping CE is significantly increased to 99.6% at 0.2 mA cm −2 /0.2 mAh cm −2 , and critical current density (CCD) of > 3.0 mA cm −2 /3.0 mAh cm −2 by inserting a mixed ionic‐electronic conductive (MIEC) and lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi nanocomposite interlayer between Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte and Li anode. The highly lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer with high ionic conductivity (10 −5 S cm −1 ) and low electronic conductivity (3.4×10 −7 S cm −1 ) enables Li to plate on the current collector (CC) surface rather than on Li 6 PS 5 Cl surface avoiding Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte reduction. During initial Li plating on CC, Li penetrates into porous LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer and lithiates Bi nanoparticles into Li 3 Bi. The lithiophilic Li 3 Bi and Li 3 N nanoparticles in LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi sub‐interlayer will move to CC along with plated Li, forming LiF‐C/Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi lithiophobic/lithiophilic sublayer during the following Li stripping. This interlayer enables Co 0.1 Fe 0.9 S 2 /Li 6 PS 5 Cl/Li cell with an areal capacity of 1.4 mAh cm −2 to achieve a cycle life of >850 cycles at 150 mA g −1 . The lithiophobic/lithiophilic interlayer enables solid‐state metal batteries to simultaneously achieve high energy and long cycle life.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗