SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The project established a Tight Oil Field Laboratory to address technical challenges in developing stacked unconventional reservoirs in the Powder River Basin. Key activities included data compilation, subsurface mapping, drilling, logging, coring, deployment of fiber optics and microseismic, completion and stimulation optimization, and well performance evaluation.
Instructions are given for using the DRILL computer program which converts data contained in an Interactive Computer Graphics System (IGDS) design file to production of a paper tape for driving a numerically controlled drilling machine.
Cape Thompson, Alaska, is located approximately 120 miles north of Kotzebue, Alaska, within the Ogotoruk Creek valley. The remote Alaskan location is also home to the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) Project Chariot study area. Project Chariot was part of the Plowshare Program, created in 1957 by the AEC to study peaceful uses for atomic energy. Project Chariot began in 1958 when a scientific field team chose Cape Thompson as a potential site to excavate a harbor using a series of nuclear explosions. Between 1959 and 1962, AEC was responsible for over 40 pretest bio-environmental and geotechnical studies of the Cape Thompson area. Strong public opposition to the tests developed, which caused the project to be cancelled with no nuclear explosions ever conducted at the site. In the early 1960's, several deep boreholes were drilled to obtain subsurface, temperature, and high-explosive testing data. Refrigerated diesel was used as a drilling fluid to keep the boreholes open so that thermistors could measure subsurface temperatures. The test boreholes were named Able, Baker, Charlie, Dog, and X-1. In the summer of 2014, the US Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management (LM) completed the remediation of remnant diesel at these sites. Prior to the 2014 remediation activities, LM conducted two separate characterization field studies to determine the nature and extent of the contamination from the 1960's drilling activities. In 2013, LM developed a remediation plan that was submitted and approved by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). The 2014 Project Chariot remediation had some unique logistical challenges and historic issues with stakeholders to overcome. Many of the historic issues centered on previous AEC scientific actions and a general mistrust of the government by the local stakeholders. Prior to and during the 2014 remediation work, an outreach campaign was implemented to discuss prior activities at the site and include stakeholders from Point Hope, Alaska, in the remediation-planning process. The remoteness of the region also provided unique logistical challenges. Because of the short field season, LM initiated several subcontracts over a year in advance. The field camp, heavy equipment, and soil storage containers were shipped by barge to the site. Personnel, food, and small materials were flown in by bush plane from Kotzebue, Alaska. Previous site characterization had identified diesel-range organics (DROs) as the primary contaminant. The cleanup levels for the site were provided by the Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) for the Arctic Zone region. The AAC cleanup level for DROs on gravel pads is 500 mg/kg and 12,500 mg/kg tundra in the arctic-zone region. To help determine the extent and direct soil excavation in the field, photoionization detectors (PIDs) were used for field screening. While the PID results provided rough limits for excavation, laboratory confirmation sampling was required to provide actual excavation guidance. All excavation locations remained open until laboratory results met AAC criteria and ADEC approved closure. The laboratory sample protocol required the bush plane to pick up samples almost daily and transfer them to Anchorage for analysis. In order to meet holding time requirements, all laboratory samples were analyzed on an expedited basis. Analytical results and ADEC approval notifications were e-mailed back to the site via satellite connection. A total of 202 laboratory analyses were needed to complete the remediation effort. At each location (Able, Baker, Charlie, Dog, and X-1), the boreholes were plugged and abandoned in accordance with ADEC regulations. Contaminated soil was excavated, and the material was placed in super-sacks and hauled to connex boxes located near the sea shore. Approximately 786 tons of material was removed and shipped by barge to the Columbia Ridge Landfill in Arlington, Oregon, for disposal. The well casings were cut and sealed below ground surface. Each location was graded to its original contours and reclaimed with native vegetation, and a geodetic survey was conducted. Tours with leaders of the Village of Point Hope and the land owner (Arctic Slope Regional Corporation) were conducted prior to the final demobilization. All remediation equipment and camp facilities were removed at the completion of the project. (authors)
The Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) represents the Government of Canada's commitment to the cleanup and safe, local, long-term management of historic low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) in two Southern Ontario municipalities - Port Hope. The PHAI is based on community-recommended solutions for the cleanup and safe long-term management of approximately 1.7 million cubic meters of LLRW. It is currently one of Canada's largest environmental remediation projects at a cost of over one billion dollars. The PHAI is being implemented by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) on behalf of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, a federal Crown corporation. The waste is the result of radium and uranium processing in Port Hope by the former federal crown corporation Eldorado Nuclear Limited between 1933 and 1988. The waste has been distributed in the Municipality of Port Hope through placement of contaminated materials (e.g. fill), reuse of contaminated objects (e.g. tailings use in concrete, steel posts, structural wood) and air-borne deposition. Signature contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) are Ra-226, Th-230, uranium and arsenic; however, there are an additional 17 COPCs that also need to be considered. A very large amount of information has been collected during the survey and effectively managing and analyzing this information is critical to the success for the property owners, CNL's implementation of the PHAI, and Arcadis. Data collected during the survey includes information pertaining to long-term interior radon gas measurements, interior gamma radiation surveys, contaminated objects and surfaces, exterior gamma radiation and subsurface investigations. exterior gamma radiation surveys. The information management (IM) is structured with SharePoint as a focal point supported by an EQuIS database, mobile data collection and GIS support. The IM process for this project is being advanced using recent software developments to assist with internal activities (e.g. QA) and interactions with CNL including notifications and scheduling and status of property completion. Different applications have been developed to help automate, visualize, actively track, and QA different processes using recent software developments by Microsoft. We have used SharePoint to organize and track our data. Power BI has been used to actively track and visualize our data from Interior gamma surveying to exterior drilling. The creation of dynamic/advanced visualizations in Power BI gathers data daily from our multiple sources and analyzes it for anomalous data and trends. Microsoft Flow syncs with Power BI and has been implemented to automate many processes including the QA of surveys and soil results for identification of LLRW. To tie everything together, our GIS and EQuIS systems are our primary data compilation source that makes our advanced analytics/visualization and automation/tracking our data possible. Specific examples will be discussed, as will challenges encountered during the continuing development of the IM system. The incorporation of software advancements to the existing IM system for Port Hope characterization has improved the quality of the surveys, the tracking of completion, meeting schedule requirements and providing the required data for tracking, report preparation and supporting remediation of contamination on the properties. (authors)
Utah FORGE has been established to develop, test, and improve the technologies and techniques required to develop EGS-type geothermal resources. Drilling of the first of two deep deviated wells, 16A(78)-32, will begin in the second half of 2020. This well will serve as the injection well for the injection-production well pair that will form the heart of the laboratory. This submission contains an archive of well location data within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area. An Excel spreadsheet is included containing updated GPS data for Utah FORGE wells drilled during Phase 2C (56-32, 68-32, 78-32). This data was collected over time by the Utah Geological Survey and contains all coordinates collected and the final averaged XY coordinates in both Longitude and Latitude and UTM Zone 12, NAD83. Elevation is also included. GIS shapefiles with well points are provided in the archive.
The Compact Drilling and Sample System (CDSS) was developed to drill into terrestrial, cometary, and asteroid material in a cryogenic, vacuum environment in order to acquire subsurface samples. Although drills were used by the Apollo astronauts some 20 years ago, this drill is a fraction of the mass and power and operates completely autonomously, able to drill, acquire, transport, dock, and release sample containers in science instruments. The CDSS has incorporated into its control system the ability to gather science data about the material being drilled by measuring drilling rate per force applied and torque. This drill will be able to optimize rotation and thrust in order to achieve the highest drilling rate possible in any given sample. The drill can be commanded to drill at a specified force, so that force imparted on the rover or lander is limited. This paper will discuss the cryo dc brush motors, carbide gears, cryogenic lubrication, quick-release interchangeable sampling drill bits, percussion drilling and the control system developed to achieve autonomous, cryogenic, vacuum, lightweight drilling.
OM300 – Geothermal Direction Drilling Navigation Tool: Design and produce a prototype directional drilling navigation tool capable of high temperature operation in geothermal drilling Accuracies of 0.1° Inclination and Tool Face, 0.5° Azimuth Environmental Ruggedness typical of existing oil/gas drilling Multiple Selectable Sensor Ranges High accuracy for navigation, low bandwidth High G-range & bandwidth for Stick-Slip and Chirp detection Selectable serial data communications Reduce cost of drilling in high temperature Geothermal reservoirs Innovative aspects of project Honeywell MEMS* Vibrating Beam Accelerometers (VBA) APS Flux-gate Magnetometers Honeywell Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) High-temperature electronics Rugged High-temperature capable package and assembly process
Polymer-bonded explosive (PBX) 9502 (95% TATB, 5% Kel-F 800 by weight) is dry-drilled on a CNC milling machine and its thermomechanical response to varying feed rates, drilling speeds, and peck depths with 4 mm and 5 mm diameter drill bits is investigated. The tested samples are affixed to a force sensor that enables recording temporally resolved cutting forces and torques, and a drill-embedded thermocouple yields local temperature data. From the data, an empirical relationship between temperature changes and feed per revolution is developed, which reveals reduced temperatures in higher feed per revolution regimes for PBX 9502. The observed relationship allows extrapolating to temperatures for other hole diameters, indicating increased temperature for smaller diameter drilling across the board. Additional testing was performed with PBX 9501 (95% HMX, 2.5% Estane®, 2.5% BDNPA/BDNPF by weight), albeit over a reduced parameter space, which revealed the opposite behavior for the feed per revolution temperature dependence. It is concluded that both PBX 9502 and PBX 9501 can be dry-drilled efficiently beyond the limits of presently applicable US-DOE standards, where cutting interface temperatures remain far below material critical temperatures. Finally, data reveals that coolant usage in the drilling process for these materials provides a wide safety margin.
Flowing fluid electrical conductivity (FFEC) logging is a hydrogeologic testing method that is usually conducted in an existing borehole. However, for the 2,500-m deep COSC-1 borehole, drilled at Åre, central Sweden, it was done within the drilling period during a scheduled 1-day break, thus having a negligible impact on the drilling schedule, yet providing important information on depths of hydraulically conductive zones and their transmissivities and salinities. In this paper, we present a reanalysis of this set of data together with a new FFEC logging data set obtained soon after drilling was completed, also over a period of 1 day, but with a different pumping rate and water-level drawdown. Their joint analysis not only results in better estimates of transmissivity and salinity in the conducting fractures intercepted by the borehole, but also yields the hydraulic head values of these fractures, an important piece of information for the understanding of hydraulic structure of the subsurface. Two additional FFEC logging tests were done about 1 year later, and are used to confirm and refine this analysis. Results show that from 250 to 2,000 m depths, there are seven distinct hydraulically conductive zones with different hydraulic heads and low transmissivity values. For the final test, conducted with a much smaller water-level drawdown, inflow ceased from some of the conductive zones, confirming that their hydraulic heads are below the hydraulic head measured in the wellbore under non-pumped conditions. Lastly, the challenges accompanying 1-day FFEC logging are summarized, along with lessons learned in addressing them.
The objective of this short report is to document the application of our 3D geologic modeling workflow to an argillite (shale) host rock. Over the past four years, our team at Los Alamos National Laboratory has developed a geologic modeling workflow that can be applied to generic alluvial basins such as those found in the western United States. In “frontier” or “exploratory” basins where data are sparse, the first steps are to collect, evaluate and integrate available subsurface data into conceptual geologic models. Those models form the basis for constructing the geologic framework model, a 3D geocellular model ideally constrained by seismic and borehole data. To date we have constructed our models using “synthetic” well data derived from conceptual models, without the prospect of validating our workflow using “real” subsurface data. We were tasked to investigate whether our workflow designed for alluvial basin sediments could be applied to other potential repository host rocks. This task also provided the opportunity to work with high-quality subsurface data collected specifically for siting and evaluating a nuclear waste repository. Nagra, the Swiss governmental agency responsible for the disposal of the nation’s radioactive waste, generously provided us with data from two deep boreholes drilled through their argillaceous target formation. The aim of our proof-of-concept demonstration is to evaluate whether geostatistical methods offer a viable approach to property modeling in argillaceous rocks. Nagra provided us with the well data on the condition that we maintain confidentiality with all transferred information and results. Fortunately, Nagra posts numerous technical reports on its public website that describe the subsurface geology in great detail. All of the information and illustrations in this report related to the Swiss repository enterprise are taken from the Nagra public website.
The One Earth Energy site is one of two sites in the Illinois Storage Corridor (ISC) project. The objectives of the ISC project is to accelerate commercial deployment of carbon capture utilization and storage at two individual sites and receive approvals for Underground Injection Control (UIC) Class VI permits for construction at each site. At the One Earth Energy site, an extensive data collection program was undertaken, which included the drilling of a test well (One Earth Energy #1 [OEE #1]), four 2D seismic lines, and a small 3D seismic survey. The OEE #1 well was drilled in 2022 and acquired extensive core, log, and testing data to characterize the subsurface geology of the site. Coring was focused on the storage interval, the Mt. Simon Sandstone, and the confining interval, the Eau Claire Formation. The core and log data were used to evaluate the sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy, as well as to develop the conceptual geologic model. This report includes the geological summaries of the Mt. Simon Sandstone and the Eau Claire Formation. The extensive analysis of the log data is included in the petrophysical section, showing ranges of porosity, estimated pore size, and the mineral content of selected zones in the well. The separate petrographic technical report entitled “Petrographic and Advanced Geologic Characterization Report on One Earth Energy #1 (API# 1211325373)”, report number DOE-UIUC-0031892-04, details thin section point-counting analysis that includes mineralogical and pore space analysis, including grain size analysis, annotated thin section photomicrographs, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and statistics of grain size analysis on Mt. Simon thin sections from OEE #1. The final OEE #1 well data to be included in this geology report is the routine core analysis of both whole core plugs and rotary sidewall core plugs. In addition to the OEE #1 well, four 2D seismic lines and a small 3D survey were acquired as part of the overall subsurface geological characterization. This geology report references the seismic interpretation report, entitled “One Earth Energy Site Seismic Interpretation Task 5.0”, report number DOE-UIUC-0031892-07. This report details the stratigraphic and structural interpretation of the 2D and 3D seismic data acquired at the One Earth Energy site. The 2D seismic data was acquired in 2019 and 2021, and the 3D survey was acquired in 2022. The objectives of the seismic programs were to contribute to the subsurface characterization of the Mt. Simon-Eau Claire Storage Complex by evaluating the continuity of potential storage reservoirs and containment intervals across the project area, and to determine if any geologic features are present that would increase containment risk to the proposed carbon storage project.
Formation fluid influxes (i.e. kicks) pose persistent challenges and operational costs during drilling operations. Implications of kicks range in scale but cumulatively result in substantial costs that affect drilling safety, environment, schedule, and infrastructure. Early kick detection presents a low-cost, easily adopted solution for avoiding well control challenges associated with kicks near the bit. Borehole geophysical tools used during the drilling process as part of the logging-while-drilling (LWD) and measurement-while-drilling (MWD) provide the advantage of offering real-time downhole data. LWD/MWD collect data on both the annulus and borehole wall. The annular data are normally treated as background, and are filtered out to isolate the formation measurements. Because kicks will change the local physical properties of annular fluids, bottom-hole measurements are among the first indicators that a formation fluid has invaded the wellbore. This report describes and validates a technique for using the annular portion of LWD/MWD data to facilitate early kick detection using first order principles. The detection technique leverages data from standard and cost-effective technologies that are typically implemented during well drilling, such as MWD/LWD data in combination with mud-pulse telemetry for data transmission.
We compare results from six AOMIP model simulations with estimates of sea ice thickness obtained from ICESat, moored and submarine-based upward looking sensors, airborne electromagnetic measurements and drill holes. Our goal is to find patterns of model performance to guide model improvement. The satellite data is pan-arctic from 2004-2008, ice-draft data is from moored instruments in Fram Strait, the Greenland Sea and the Beaufort Sea from 1992-2008 and from submarines from 1975-2000. The drill hole data are from the Laptev and East Siberian marginal seas from 1982-1986 and from coastal stations from 1998-2009. While there are important caveats when comparing modeled results with measurements from different platforms and time periods such as these, the models agree well with moored ULS data. In general, the AOMIP models underestimate the thickness of measured ice thicker than about 2 m and overestimate thickness of ice thinner than 2 m. The simulated results are poor over the fast ice and marginal seas of the Siberian shelves. Averaging over all observational data sets, the better correlations and smaller differences from observed thickness are from the ECCO2 and UW models.
Data from high temperature dynamic sealing tests for various fracture widths, at various temperatures (degrees F), with 5 wt.% bentonite-based mud containing various material fiber contents, at 100 to 400 psi differential pressure. Data from pressure test and evaluation of the dynamic lost circulation materials (LCM) testing unit to reflect the condition of open and sealed fracture using fracture width of 1000 microns at 120 degrees F. Links to two papers based on the data - "Loss circulation prevention in geothermal drilling by shape memory polymer" which was published in Geothermics 89 (2021) 101943) as well as "Evaluating sealability of blended smart polymer and fiber additive for geothermal drilling with the effect of fracture opening size", published in the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 206 (2021) 108998.
Thermal conductivity (TC) data taken for different wells at a specified drill depth. This is an abridged version of the complete SMU heat flow database, downloaded from the SMU node of the NGDS at the beginning of INGENIOUS (approximately April 2021), and filtered to the INGENIOUS study area. This National Geothermal Data System (NGDS) project aggregates geothermal data collected and curated by the SMU Geothermal Laboratory and its partner organizations. All columns in this database are the same as the SMU database, except for 2 additions associated with this project. Repeated columns are for data correlation purposes. Column descriptions and data types are the same as previous iterations of the SMU database. The new values that are the addition are two new columns developed as part of the INGENIOUS project: INGENIOUS TC Value | INGENIOUS notes INGENIOUS notes are individual notes that were written for specific data points during the analysis process. There are not always notes associated with each input value. INGENIOUS TC Value includes 4 values: 1. Assumed Measured These are values that are assumed to be measured thermal conductivity values, either within a specific well or within the same study region. Many of these have either a published reference, a reported standard deviation, or a unique thermal conductivity value. 2. Data release - assumed measured These are values in the SMU database that are from proprietary data that were added to the SMU database and are labeled as data release for their reference. These values were searched for in person at the SMU Geothermal Laboratory as well as virtual examination of data available on the NGDS. For many of these, there are reported thermal conductivity values associated with the heat flow data in the database, but no specific table or reference to measurements in the original data release files. 3. Known measured These are values that have a reported measurement, either as an original file in the SMU data files on the NGDS or a reported table in a publication. In the rare circumstances, Maria Richards or David Blackwell confirmed measurement. Confirmation of measurement would be written in the INGENIOUS notes column. 4. Unmeasured Unmeasured values are those that are known to be unmeasured, either estimated from another report or no information given. In the SMU database, there are wells that have a heat flow but no thermal conductivity. These are categorized as unmeasured. There are also heat flow values that are stated to have estimated or generalized average thermal conductivity values for the region and rock type. Because these are known to be unmeasured, they are categorized as such. 5. Blank Blank values are either A quality or X quality. These quality values are stated in the INGENIOUS notes. These values were not going to change associated with the heat flow analysis, so these were not examined.
Daily drilling reports and surveys, deviation data, and gyroscopic surveys from wells CFU31F1, CFU31F2, and CFU31F3 collected from Cranfield oil field in Mississippi as part of SECARB project.
This document represents a compilation of location, construction, and hydrologic information relating to boreholes, groundwater monitoring wells, and surface water locations that have been installed/established at the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) through August 2013. To date, a total of 1422 boreholes and wells have been installed in and around the Y-12 area. Of those, 835 existing boreholes and wells continue to be utilized for groundwater monitoring programs, research, remedial investigations, plume characterization and delineation studies, and various other hydrogeologic endeavors. In addition, 215 surface water locations, such as rivers, streams, seeps, springs, lakes, ponds, and building sumps are included in this database. General data about boreholes and wells included in the database are survey coordinates, survey system, elevations, alternative names and well status. Surface water location information (Appendix I) includes name, alias, functional area, northing and easting coordinates, survey system, map number and sampling history. Tabulated construction data include total depth, completion method, borehole diameter, casing and screen materials, casing and screen diameters, casing and screen depths, filter pack depths, open-hole intervals, and open-hole diameters. Hydrogeological data summarized in this document include the aquifer monitored by the completion interval, depth to weathered and fresh bedrock, formations penetrated, well sampling history, and whether rock core and geophysical logs were obtained. This document (which is the sixth revision to Y/TS–881 and the ninth overall update of a previous compilation) is published on a regular basis by the Y-12 Groundwater Protection Program (GWPP), which serves as custodian of drilling records and well construction data for the network of wells and other groundwater monitoring stations at Y-12. The tabulations in this database are arranged in appendices of like information. An example application of the data compiled in this document would be the evaluation of the suitability of wells for continued use in groundwater investigations and monitoring studies. Other uses may include: the siting of hydrogeological characterization activities, background evaluations of sites prior to initiation of new drilling activities, and hydrogeological review of selected sites prior to the initiation of remedial actions or new construction activity. Existing boreholes, wells, and surface water locations are presented on a series of maps (Appendix K). Boreholes and wells that have been plugged and abandoned, destroyed, could not be located, or otherwise are of unknown status/condition appear on a second series of maps of identical coverage (Appendix L).
A productive geothermal well drilled into super-hot rock (SHR) with a temperature above 400°C will produce super-critical fluid. At a flow rate of 60 kg/s, a SHR well could produce 50 MWe compared to 5-7 MWe for the same flow at 200°C. Even though these deeper, super-hot wells will cost more, the high energy density means power produced by engineered geothermal systems (EGS) can meet the market ($46 MW-hr) by directly tapping the heat source. We propose a proof of concept where hot rock is close to the surface (~5 km), and the cost of drilling and EGS stimulation will be lowest. A suitable, ready-to-go SHR site is on Newberry Volcano, Oregon, one of the largest geothermal heat reservoirs in the USA, extensively studied for the last 40 years. Millions of dollars have already been invested in the site by private geothermal developers and the US Department of Energy (DOE), resulting in a ready-to-use facility with the necessary infrastructure, environmental permits, land commitments, and monitoring plans. The Newberry Deep Drilling Project (NDDP) will be located at an idle geothermal exploration well, NWG 46-16, drilled in 2008, 3500 m deep and 320°C at bottom, which will be deepened another 1000 to 1300 m to reach 500 °C. The original well was drilled with few lost circulation zones and the temperature profile indicates conductive heat flow. Compared to other SHR projects world-wide, this well would return more materials (cuttings, core and fluids) with more predictable drilling conditions, thus providing a suite of data near and across the brittle-ductile transition in silicarich rocks. After drilling, a hydraulic well stimulation will both change the pore pressure in fractures and cool the fracture walls resulting in permeability enhancement through both thermal fracturing, and hydro-shearing. The first step for the NDDP was an International Continental Drilling Program (ICDP) sponsored workshop held at the OSU-Cascades campus in Bend from Sept. 10-14, 2017. The workshop concluded by setting ambitious goals for NDDP: 1) test EGS above the critical point of water, 2) collect samples of rocks within the brittle-ductile transition, 3) investigate volcanic hazards, 4) study magmatic geomechanics, 5) calibrate geophysical imaging techniques, and 6) test technology for drilling, well completion, and geophysical monitoring in a very high temperature environment. The second step, completed January 15, 2018, was submitting a proposal to ICDP for 46-16 deepening. The next steps will be to continue building a team with project, technology, and investment partners to make NDDP a reality.