Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “control strategy”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Filtering as a reasoning-control strategy: An experimental assessment

In dynamic environments, optimal deliberation about what actions to perform is impossible. Instead, it is sometimes necessary to trade potential decision quality for decision timeliness. One approach to achieving this trade-off is to endow intelligent agents with meta-level strategies that provide them guidance about when to reason (and what to reason about) and when to act. We describe our investigations of a particular meta-level reasoning strategy, filtering, in which an agent commits to the goals it has already adopted, and then filters from consideration new options that would conflict with the successful completion of existing goals. To investigate the utility of filtering, a series of experiments was conducted using the Tileworld testbed. Previous experiments conducted by Kinny and Georgeff used an earlier version of the Tileworld to demonstrate the feasibility of filtering. Results are presented that replicate and extend those of Kinny and Georgeff and demonstrate some significant environmental influences on the value of filtering.

Pollack, Martha E.↗

Human-like Compliance for Dexterous Robot Hands

This paper describes the Active Electromechanical Compliance (AEC) system that was developed for the Jau-JPL anthropomorphic robot. The AEC system imitates the functionality of the human muscle's secondary function, which is to control the joint's stiffness: AEC is implemented through servo controlling the joint drive train's stiffness. The control strategy, controlling compliant joints in teleoperation, is described. It enables automatic hybrid position and force control through utilizing sensory feedback from joint and compliance sensors. This compliant control strategy is adaptable for autonomous robot control as well. Active compliance enables dual arm manipulations, human-like soft grasping by the robot hand, and opens the way to many new robotics applications.

Compliant Control↗

Mixed-Strategy Chance Constrained Optimal Control

This paper presents a novel chance constrained optimal control (CCOC) algorithm that chooses a control action probabilistically. A CCOC problem is to find a control input that minimizes the expected cost while guaranteeing that the probability of violating a set of constraints is below a user-specified threshold. We show that a probabilistic control approach, which we refer to as a mixed control strategy, enables us to obtain a cost that is better than what deterministic control strategies can achieve when the CCOC problem is nonconvex. The resulting mixed-strategy CCOC problem turns out to be a convexification of the original nonconvex CCOC problem. Furthermore, we also show that a mixed control strategy only needs to "mix" up to two deterministic control actions in order to achieve optimality. Building upon an iterative dual optimization, the proposed algorithm quickly converges to the optimal mixed control strategy with a user-specified tolerance.

Ono, Masahiro↗

Chilled water temperature set-point reset based on outdoor air temperature and its cooling energy performance in an office building

Here, in this study, the cooling energy performance of two strategies for controlling ChWT (chilled water temperature) are compared: the conventional control strategy of constantly fixing ChWT and the OAT (outdoor air temperature) compensation control strategy that adjusts ChWT according to the changes in OAT. OAT compensation control strategy was modeled and realized based on Appendix G of ASHRAE Standard 90.1. It was confirmed that applying OAT compensation control strategy can significantly reduce chiller energy consumption, which accounts for the largest portion of total cooling energy consumption. It was found that the difference in total cooling energy consumption between applying the conventional control of constantly fixing ChWT to 6 °C and applying the OAT compensation control was approximately 8 % and 3 % during spring (March to May) and summer (June to August), respectively. Additionally, during the fall (September–November) period, about 7 % of total cooling energy consumption could be saved.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗