Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “U”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Determination of Thermal Expansion, Defect Formation Energy, and Defect-Induced Strain of α-U Via ab Initio Molecular Dynamics

Uranium (U) is often alloyed with molybdenum (Mo) or zirconium (Zr) in order to stabilize its high-temperature body-centered cubic phase for use in nuclear reactors. However, in all metallic fuel forms, the α phase of U remains in some fraction. This phase decomposition due to temperature or compositional variance can play an outsized role on fuel performance and microstructural evolution. Relatively little is known about fundamental point defect properties in α -U at non-zero temperatures, from either computational or experimental studies. This work performs the first thorough evaluation of the α phase of U via ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD). A number of thermophysical properties are calculated as a function of temperature, including equilibrium lattice parameters, thermal expansion, and heat capacity. These results indicate a two-region behavior, with the transition at 400 K. The thermal expansion/contraction in the a / b direction occurs rapidly from 100 up to 400 K, after which a more linear and gradual change in the lattice constant takes place. The volumetric expansion matches experiments quantitatively, but the individual lattice constant expansion only matches experiments qualitatively. Point defect formation energies and induced lattice strains are also determined as a function of temperature, providing insight on defect populations and the fundamentals of irradiation growth in α -U. Interstitials induce significantly more strain than vacancies, and the nature of that strain is highly dependent on the individual lattice directions. The direction of point defect-induced lattice strain is contrary to the irradiation growth behavior of α -U. This work shows that isolated point defects cannot be the primary driving force responsible for the significant irradiation-induced growth of α -U observed experimentally.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Quantifying the Impact of LSST u -band Survey Strategy on Photometric Redshift Estimation and the Detection of Lyman-break Galaxies

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory will conduct the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), promising to discover billions of galaxies out to redshift 7, using six photometric bands (ugrizy) spanning the near-ultraviolet to the near-infrared. The exact number of and quality of information about these galaxies will depend on survey depth in these six bands, which in turn depends on the LSST survey strategy, i.e., how often and how long to expose in each band. u-band depth is especially important for photometric redshift (photo-z) estimation and for detection of high-redshift Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs). In this paper, we use a simulated galaxy catalog and an analytic model for the LBG population to study how recent updates and proposed changes to Rubin’s u-band throughput and LSST survey strategy impact photo-z accuracy and LBG detection. We find that proposed variations in u-band strategy have a small impact on photo-z accuracy for z < 1.5 galaxies, but the outlier fraction, scatter, and bias for higher-redshift galaxies vary by up to 50%, depending on the survey strategy considered. The number of u-band dropout LBGs at z ∼ 3 is also highly sensitive to the u-band depth, varying by up to 500%, while the number of griz-band dropouts is only modestly affected. Under the new u-band strategy recommended by the Rubin Survey Cadence Optimization Committee, we predict u-band dropout number densities of 110 deg −2 (3200 deg −2 ) in year 1 (10) of LSST. We discuss the implications of these results for LSST cosmology.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

U-Surf: a global 1 km spatially continuous urban surface property dataset for kilometer-scale urban-resolving Earth system modeling

High-resolution urban climate modeling has faced substantial challenges due to the absence of a globally consistent, spatially continuous, and accurate dataset to represent the spatial heterogeneity of urban surfaces and their biophysical properties. This deficiency has long obstructed the development of urban-resolving Earth system models (ESMs) and ultra-high-resolution urban climate modeling, over large domains. Here, we present U-Surf, a first-of-its-kind 1 km resolution present-day (circa 2020) global continuous urban surface parameter dataset. Using the urban canopy model (UCM) in the Community Earth System Model as a base model for satisfying dataset requirements, U-Surf leverages the latest advances in remote sensing, machine learning, and cloud computing to provide the most relevant urban surface biophysical parameters, including radiative, morphological, and thermal properties, for UCMs at the facet and canopy level. Generated using a systematically unified workflow, U-Surf ensures internal consistency among key parameters, making it the first globally coherent urban canopy surface dataset. U-Surf significantly improves the representation of the urban land heterogeneity both within and across cities globally; provides essential, high-fidelity surface biophysical constraints to urban-resolving ESMs; enables detailed city-to-city comparisons across the globe; and supports next-generation kilometer-resolution Earth system modeling across scales. U-Surf parameters can be easily converted or adapted to various types of UCMs, such as those embedded in weather and regional climate models, as well as air quality models. The fundamental urban surface constraints provided by U-Surf can also be used as features for machine learning models and can have other broad-scale applications for socioeconomic, public health, and urban planning contexts. We expect U-Surf to advance the research frontier of urban system science, climate-sensitive urban design, and coupled human–Earth systems in the future. The dataset is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11247598 (Cheng et al., 2024).

Cheng, Yifan [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaig↗

Tools for uranium characterization in carbonate samples: case studies of natural U–Pb geochronology reference materials

Laser ablation U–Pb analyses of carbonate (LAcarb) samples has greatly expanded the potential for U–Pb dating to a variety of carbonate-producing settings. Carbonates that were previously considered impossible to date using isotope dilution methods may preserve radiogenic domains that can be dated using spatially resolved laser ablation geochronology techniques. Work is ongoing to identify reference materials and to consider best practices for LAcarb. In this study we apply standard and emerging characterization tool sets on three natural samples with the dual goal of enhancing the study of carbonates and establishing a new set of well-characterized natural reference materials for LAcarb studies. We start with the existing carbonate reference material WC-1 from the Permian Reef Complex of Texas, building on the published description to offer a deeper look at U and associated trace elements. We consider a tufa sample from the Miocene Barstow Formation of the Mojave Block, California, as a possible secondary calcite reference material due to its well-behaved U–Pb systematics. There are currently no natural dolomite standards. We present an unusual dolomite sample with very well-behaved U–Pb systematics from the Miocene of the Turkana Basin of Kenya as a possible dolomite reference material for LAcarb dating. In addition to using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) mapping and spectroscopy to better understand U in these natural samples, we have analyzed multiple aliquots of each of them for 87 Sr/ 86 Sr by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS). The Sr isotope compositions are analytically homogeneous within petrographically homogeneous regions of all three samples, and thus these materials could be used as Sr isotope standards as well. While not part of the current contribution, this combination could streamline simultaneous LA analyses of 87 Sr/ 86 Sr and U–Pb geochronology.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Formation and Consolidation of UN Nanostructures in U-Mo Fuel via Mechanical Alloying and Spark Plasma Sintering

Uranium-molybdenum (U-Mo) alloys show promise as a nuclear fuel system due to their high thermal conductivity and high fuel loading capability. However, U-Mo systems suffer from irradiation induced swelling ultimately affecting the cladding via mechanical and chemical interaction. To address these shortcomings, this thesis investigated the formation of uranium mononitride (UN) nanoparticles within a U-10Mo matrix. To promote the formation of UN, U-10Mo powders were mechanically alloyed under a high purity nitrogen cover gas (99.9995%) atmosphere. Variations were made in stainless steel milling media size, duration of milling, and number of times the milling jar was re-aerated with nitrogen gas. UN nanoparticulates were successfully formed within the U-Mo matrix and was characterized utilizing light element analysis, X-ray diffractometry, scanning and transmission-electron microscopy, electron energy loss spectroscopy, and atom probe tomography. Presence of the UN nanoparticles was found as early as 1-hour into the mechanical alloying process, and significant iron contamination found after 10-hours of milling. The U-Mo/UN powders were compacted using spark plasma sintering techniques in order to stabilize the nanostructure. U-Mo/UN compacts containing small amounts of neodymium and helium were analyzed to observe the defect migration tendencies of fission products within the fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Impacts of annealing treatment on the microstructure of U-Mo monolithic fuel plates

The objective of this paper is to analyze the effect of different heat treatments on the fuel microstructure and texture in laboratory scale monolithic U-Mo fuel plates. Such analyses are relevant as they could possibly inform future fabrication methods for the optimization of microstructure and of material properties to ultimately improve fuel performance during irradiation. For this reason, detail characterization including Energy x-ray dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) techniques were applied on U-Mo plates fabricated with different heat treatments to understand the influence of fabrication on fuel microstructure. Here, U-Mo fresh fuel specimens with or without annealing treatments (homogenization and stress release annealing) after rolling were analyzed in this work. In this study for the first time EBSD was systematically used to analyze the heat treatments influence on texture present in fresh fuel monolithic U-Mo fuel plates. Such changes were connected to other known microstructural and chemical changes. In this work minimization of molybdenum concentration variation and gamma phase decomposition of the U-Mo fuel core after homogenization was observed. Also, an increase in the interaction layer of the U-Mo fuel core with the Zr interlayer diffusion barrier was observed with the UZr 2 growing up to 1 µm in thickness. Such microstructural changes were aligned to the changes in texture and grain structure. Indeed, common texture observed in body-centered cubic (BCC) metal after cold rolling (e.g., α, ξ, γ fibers) were minimized by the annealing/homogenization process. Moreover, grain structure was influenced by the fabrication route with elongated grains formed in the rolled sample and equiaxed grains found after annealing. Such features are relevant since the formation of microstructural features formed during fuel fabrication can impact fuel performance in reactor.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Materials Data on U(GePt)2 by Materials Project

U(PtGe)2 crystallizes in the tetragonal I4/mmm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to eight equivalent Pt and eight equivalent Ge atoms. All U–Pt bond lengths are 3.30 Å. All U–Ge bond lengths are 3.32 Å. Pt is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four equivalent U and four equivalent Ge atoms. All Pt–Ge bond lengths are 2.53 Å. Ge is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to four equivalent U, four equivalent Pt, and one Ge atom. The Ge–Ge bond length is 2.42 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(Ni2P)2 by Materials Project

U(Ni2P)2 crystallizes in the tetragonal P4_2/mnm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded to twelve equivalent Ni and six equivalent P atoms to form distorted face-sharing UNi12P6 octahedra. There are eight shorter (3.07 Å) and four longer (3.09 Å) U–Ni bond lengths. There are two shorter (2.80 Å) and four longer (2.83 Å) U–P bond lengths. Ni is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three equivalent U and three equivalent P atoms. There are two shorter (2.31 Å) and one longer (2.33 Å) Ni–P bond lengths. P is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to three equivalent U and six equivalent Ni atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(MnAl2)4 by Materials Project

UMn4Al8 crystallizes in the tetragonal I4/mmm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eight equivalent Mn and twelve Al atoms. All U–Mn bond lengths are 3.36 Å. There are four shorter (2.99 Å) and eight longer (3.20 Å) U–Al bond lengths. Mn is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent U, two equivalent Mn, and eight Al atoms. Both Mn–Mn bond lengths are 2.56 Å. There are four shorter (2.55 Å) and four longer (2.66 Å) Mn–Al bond lengths. There are two inequivalent Al sites. In the first Al site, Al is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to one U, four equivalent Mn, and five Al atoms. There are a spread of Al–Al bond distances ranging from 2.77–2.83 Å. In the second Al site, Al is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent U, four equivalent Mn, and six Al atoms. Both Al–Al bond lengths are 2.72 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(Cr3P2)2 by Materials Project

U(Cr3P2)2 crystallizes in the hexagonal P-6m2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded to six equivalent Cr and six equivalent P atoms to form distorted UCr6P6 cuboctahedra that share edges with six equivalent CrU2P4 tetrahedra and faces with two equivalent UCr6P6 cuboctahedra. All U–Cr bond lengths are 2.95 Å. All U–P bond lengths are 2.83 Å. There are two inequivalent Cr sites. In the first Cr site, Cr is bonded to two equivalent U and four P atoms to form distorted CrU2P4 tetrahedra that share corners with eight equivalent CrU2P4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent UCr6P6 cuboctahedra, edges with four equivalent CrU2P4 tetrahedra, and faces with two equivalent CrU2P4 tetrahedra. There are two shorter (2.33 Å) and two longer (2.37 Å) Cr–P bond lengths. In the second Cr site, Cr is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to five P atoms. There are four shorter (2.37 Å) and one longer (2.48 Å) Cr–P bond lengths. There are two inequivalent P sites. In the first P site, P is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to nine Cr atoms. In the second P site, P is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to two equivalent U and six Cr atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(Al2Fe)4 by Materials Project

UFe4Al8 crystallizes in the tetragonal I4/mmm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eight equivalent Fe and twelve Al atoms. All U–Fe bond lengths are 3.31 Å. There are four shorter (2.97 Å) and eight longer (3.14 Å) U–Al bond lengths. Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent U, two equivalent Fe, and eight Al atoms. Both Fe–Fe bond lengths are 2.50 Å. There are four shorter (2.52 Å) and four longer (2.63 Å) Fe–Al bond lengths. There are two inequivalent Al sites. In the first Al site, Al is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent U, four equivalent Fe, and six Al atoms. There are a spread of Al–Al bond distances ranging from 2.68–2.80 Å. In the second Al site, Al is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to one U, four equivalent Fe, and five Al atoms. The Al–Al bond length is 2.73 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(Al2Cr)4 by Materials Project

UCr4Al8 crystallizes in the tetragonal I4/mmm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eight equivalent Cr and twelve Al atoms. All U–Cr bond lengths are 3.38 Å. There are four shorter (3.03 Å) and eight longer (3.15 Å) U–Al bond lengths. Cr is bonded to two equivalent U, two equivalent Cr, and eight Al atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge, face, and corner-sharing CrU2Al8Cr2 cuboctahedra. Both Cr–Cr bond lengths are 2.50 Å. There are four shorter (2.56 Å) and four longer (2.67 Å) Cr–Al bond lengths. There are two inequivalent Al sites. In the first Al site, Al is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to one U, four equivalent Cr, and five Al atoms. There are a spread of Al–Al bond distances ranging from 2.73–2.88 Å. In the second Al site, Al is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent U, four equivalent Cr, and six Al atoms. Both Al–Al bond lengths are 2.72 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(FeP)2 by Materials Project

U(FeP)2 crystallizes in the tetragonal I4/mmm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to eight equivalent Fe and eight equivalent P atoms. All U–Fe bond lengths are 3.01 Å. All U–P bond lengths are 2.93 Å. Fe is bonded to four equivalent U and four equivalent P atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge, face, and corner-sharing FeU4P4 tetrahedra. All Fe–P bond lengths are 2.23 Å. P is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to four equivalent U, four equivalent Fe, and one P atom. The P–P bond length is 2.32 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(HO)8 by Materials Project

U(HO)8 crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded to eight O atoms to form distorted edge-sharing UO8 hexagonal bipyramids. There are a spread of U–O bond distances ranging from 1.83–2.43 Å. There are four inequivalent H sites. In the first H site, H is bonded in a distorted linear geometry to two O atoms. There is one shorter (1.01 Å) and one longer (1.66 Å) H–O bond length. In the second H site, H is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O atom. The H–O bond length is 0.99 Å. In the third H site, H is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O atom. The H–O bond length is 0.99 Å. In the fourth H site, H is bonded in a single-bond geometry to two O atoms. There is one shorter (1.00 Å) and one longer (1.75 Å) H–O bond length. There are four inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two equivalent U, one H, and one O atom. The O–O bond length is 1.45 Å. In the second O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one U atom. In the third O site, O is bonded in a distorted water-like geometry to one U and two H atoms. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a distorted water-like geometry to three H atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(NO7)2 by Materials Project

UNO7NO3(O2)2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Cmc2_1 space group. The structure is zero-dimensional and consists of eight molecular oxygen molecules, four nitric acid molecules, and four UNO7 clusters. In each UNO7 cluster, U is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to six O atoms. There are a spread of U–O bond distances ranging from 1.83–2.45 Å. N is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three O atoms. There is one shorter (1.22 Å) and two longer (1.29 Å) N–O bond length. There are five inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one U atom. In the second O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one U atom. In the third O site, O is bonded in a distorted single-bond geometry to one U and one N atom. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one N atom. In the fifth O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one U atom.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(Al10Cr)2 by Materials Project

U(CrAl10)2 crystallizes in the cubic Fd-3m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four equivalent Cr and twelve equivalent Al atoms. All U–Cr bond lengths are 3.17 Å. All U–Al bond lengths are 3.16 Å. Cr is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to two equivalent U and twelve equivalent Al atoms. All Cr–Al bond lengths are 3.08 Å. There are three inequivalent Al sites. In the first Al site, Al is bonded to twelve Al atoms to form a mixture of distorted face, edge, and corner-sharing AlAl12 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Al–Al bond distances ranging from 2.59–2.93 Å. In the second Al site, Al is bonded to twelve Al atoms to form a mixture of face, edge, and corner-sharing AlAl12 cuboctahedra. All Al–Al bond lengths are 2.91 Å. In the third Al site, Al is bonded to one U, two equivalent Cr, and nine Al atoms to form a mixture of distorted face, edge, and corner-sharing AlUAl9Cr2 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Al–Al bond distances ranging from 2.63–3.02 Å.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(H2O3)2 by Materials Project

UO2(OH)4 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pnma space group. The structure is three-dimensional. U is bonded to eight O atoms to form distorted edge-sharing UO8 hexagonal bipyramids. There are a spread of U–O bond distances ranging from 1.80–2.44 Å. There are two inequivalent H sites. In the first H site, H is bonded in a single-bond geometry to two O atoms. There is one shorter (1.00 Å) and one longer (1.76 Å) H–O bond length. In the second H site, H is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O atom. The H–O bond length is 0.99 Å. There are four inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one U atom. In the second O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one U atom. In the third O site, O is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two equivalent U, one H, and one O atom. The O–O bond length is 1.45 Å. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a distorted water-like geometry to one U and two H atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on U(NO7)2 by Materials Project

UO8(NO3)2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Cmc2_1 space group. The structure is zero-dimensional and consists of eight nitric acid molecules and four UO8 clusters. In each UO8 cluster, U is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to six O atoms. There are a spread of U–O bond distances ranging from 1.81–2.79 Å. There are five inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O atom. The O–O bond length is 1.24 Å. In the second O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one U atom. In the third O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one U atom. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one U atom. In the fifth O site, O is bonded in a water-like geometry to one U and one O atom.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗