Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Transient Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Results of the CHF-SERTTA In-Pile Transient Boiling Experiments at TREAT

To advance the current understanding of heat transfer between nuclear fuel rod cladding and the surrounding coolant under transient scenarios involving critical heat flux (CHF), the CHF-Static Environment Rodlet Transient Test Apparatus (CHFSERTTA), an in-pile experiment, was developed for and irradiated in the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility at Idaho National Laboratory. The CHF-SERTTA experiment consists of a hollow, borated stainless steel rod submerged in a static water pool. The rod, heated via the (n, a) reaction in boron-10, was designed for investigating in-pile transient heat transfer between the rod surface and the coolant, avoiding the complexity of including the heat transfer between the fuel, gas gap, and cladding in typical light-water reactor (LWR) fuel rods. The instrumentation package for CHF-SERTTA focused on capturing those data that best describe the heat transfer behaviour between the rod and coolant. This paper outlines the CHFSERTTA experiment design and presents the initial results of the experiment campaign.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Structure and Process of Managing the UO2 Dry In-Pile Fracture Test Irradiation Experiment

The management and structure of a novel research and development (R&D) project can be hard to navigate. This is especially true when it involves nuclear fuel. Familiarity with institutional safety and procedural requirements, a well defined scope, and accurate cost estimates can all help ensure successful project management from start to finish. The Dry In-Pile Fracture Test (DRIFT) experiments performed at the Transient Test Reactor Facility are an excellent example of managing an R&D project within its scope and budget constraints. The objective of the DRIFT test was to develop fracture propagation data in a manner consistent with light-water reactors to validate and improve the fracture propagation models of uranium oxide fuels in the MOOSE (Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment)-BISON-Marmot code framework [1].

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Westinghouse Accident Tolerant Fuel Program

The Westinghouse accident tolerant fuel (ATF) program is aimed at providing a significant increase in fuel robustness able to increase its tolerance to beyond design basis accidents at an economically attractive price to nuclear power providers. The Westinghouse ATF program, which began in 2004, advanced significantly during the current first phase (1A and 1B) begun in 2012 of this Department of Energy (DOE) program. Phase 1B will culminate in the manufacture of fuel rods that will undergo a 6 year exposure at steady state conditions in the Advanced Test Reactor and the Halden test reactor (Phase 2) and in transient tests in TREAT and Halden. The goal is to load lead test rods in a commercial reactor in 2022. In this paper, the current status of the ATF development and future irradiation plan is discussed in detail. Westinghouse has picked the most viable concepts that will provide maximum accident tolerance as well as economics, and those that will make the most sense for utility adoption. All three options appear to be feasible from a technical and economic point of view. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Mo-100 Disk Structural Integrity Tests II

This report is a continuation of the work performed in the report, Mo-100 Disk Structural Integrity Tests I [1]. The NorthStar pressed and sintered 29 mm diameter, 0.5 mm thick Mo-100 disks will be subjected to large temperature gradients when in-beam during production. These large temperature gradients cause high stress and deformation within the disks that could prove detrimental to the target assembly’s cooling performance. Disk fracture is also a possibility that must be understood. Therefore, disk structural integrity tests were performed to understand the thermal induced behavior of these disks. In order to replicate the in-beam conditions, the Mo-100 disks were subjected to large temperature gradients using a 30kW induction heater and coil. A series of transient tests were conducted in a similar fashion as the previous work, as well as an attempt to create steady state conditions for more accurate temperature gradients. The transient thermal test setup and results are described in this report.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Biodiesel Impact on Engine Lubricant Dilution During Active Regeneration of Aftertreatment Systems

Experiments were conducted with ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) and 20% biodiesel blends (B20) to compare lube oil dilution levels and lubricant properties for systems using late in-cylinder fuel injection for aftertreatment regeneration. Lube oil dilution was measured by gas chromatography (GC) following ASTM method D3524 to measure diesel content, by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry following a modified ASTM method D7371 to measure biodiesel content, and by a newly developed back-flush GC method that simultaneously measures both diesel and biodiesel. Heavy-duty (HD) engine testing was conducted on a 2008 6.7L Cummins ISB equipped with a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and diesel particle filter (DPF). Stage one of engine testing consisted of 10 consecutive repeats of a forced DPF regeneration event. This continuous operation with late in-cylinder fuel injection served as a method to accelerate lube-oil dilution. Stage two consisted of 16 hours of normal engine operation over a transient test cycle, which created an opportunity for any accumulated fuel in the oil sump to evaporate. Light duty (LD) vehicle testing was conducted on a 2010 VW Jetta equipped with DOC, DPF and a NOx storage catalyst (NSC). Vehicle testing comprised approximately 4,000 miles of operation on a mileage-accumulation dynamometer (MAD) using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Highway Fuel Economy Cycle because of the relatively low engine oil and exhaust temperatures, and high DPF regeneration frequency of this cycle relative to other cycles examined. Comparison of the lube oil dilution analysis methods suggests that D3524 does not measure dilution by biodiesel. The new back-flush GC method provided analysis for both diesel and biodiesel, in a shorter time and with lower detection limit. Thus all lube oil dilution results in this paper are based on this method. Analysis of the HD lube-oil samples showed only 1.5% to 1.6% fuel dilution for both fuels during continuous operation under DPF regeneration events. During the second stage of HD testing, the ULSD lube-oil dilution levels fell from 1.5% to 0.8%, while for B20, lube-oil dilution levels fell from 1.6% to 1.0%, but the fuel in the oil was 36% biodiesel. For the LD vehicle tests, the frequency of DPF regeneration events was observed to be the same for both ULSD and B20. No significant difference between the two fuels' estimated soot loading was detected by the engine control unit (ECU), although a 23% slower rate of increase in differential pressure across DPF was observed with B20. It appears that the ECU estimated soot loading is based on the engine map, not taking advantage of the lower engine-out particulate matter from the use of biodiesel. After 4,000 miles of LD vehicle operation with ULSD, fuel dilution in the lube-oil samples showed total dilution levels of 4.1% diesel. After 4,000 miles of operation with B20, total fuel in oil dilution levels were 6.7% consisting of 3.6% diesel fuel and 3.1% biodiesel. Extrapolation to the 10,000-mile oil drain interval with B20 suggests that the total fuel content in the oil could reach 12%, compared to 5% for operation on ULSD. Analysis of the oil samples also included measurement of total acid number, total base number, viscosity, soot, metals and wear scar; however, little difference in these parameters was noted.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Development Testing and Analysis of the Integrated Gateway-ESPRIT Bipropellant Refuelling System

The Gateway will be humanity’s first space station orbiting the Moon completed by NASA in partnership with ESA and other US and international partners. The Gateway will provide critical support to sustainable human exploration on the moon through the Artemis program. To enable the Lunar Gateway to complete its mission, on orbit refuelling is essential. The ESPRIT Refuelling Module (ERM) will provide the capability to transfer propellants, MMH and MON-3, through the Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO) to the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). The transfer of these propellants carries known risks and hazards. These hazards include overpressure of the propellant lines during priming sequences between modules and during refuelling pause operations. To support the early system development and to mitigate these risks, a collaborative test program between NASA, ESA and Thales Alenia Space was completed at the Thales Alenia Space test facility in Harwell, UK. This test program integrated fluidic breadboards of the ERM, HALO and PPE modules. The objectives of the test program were to demonstrate and characterise critical performance and transient operations, inform refuelling concept of operations and to calibrate and validate numerical models of the refuelling subsystem in EcosimPro. To support the completion of this final objective a detailed model of the integrated breadboard was developed in EcosimPro and key steady-state and transient test cases were simulated. As an industry first, a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database correlation for Hydrofluoroether (HFE-7000) was used as a mixed oxides of nitrogen (MON-3) simulant with EcosimPro and European Space Propulsion System Simulation (ESPSS) libraries to result in a more accurate analysis for transient phenomenon such as priming. The test and simulation data showed good agreement validating the model for further system analysis as the ERM design progresses.

Refuelling↗

Advanced Reactor Fuels Irradiation Experiment Design Objectives

This report summarizes the objectives of the current irradiation testing activities being undertaken by the Advanced Fuels Campaign relative to supporting the development and demonstration of innovative design features for metallic fuels in order to realize reliable performance to ultra-high burnups. The AFC-3 and AFC-4 test series are nearing completion; the experiments in this test series that have been completed or are in progress are reviewed and the objectives and test matrices for the final experiments in these two series are defined. The objectives, testing strategy, and test parameters associated with a future AFC test series, AFC-5, are documented. Finally, the future intersections and/or synergies of the AFC irradiation testing program with those of the TREAT transient testing program, emerging needs of proposed Versatile Test Reactor concepts, and the Joint Fuel Cycle Study program’s Integrated Recycle Test are discussed.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

NUMERICAL VERIFICATION OF THE RELAP-7 CORE CHANNEL SINGLE-PHASE MODEL

The RELAP-7 code is the next generation of nuclear reactor system safety analysis code being developed at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). All the physics in RELAP-7 are fully coupled and the errors resulted from the traditional operator-splitting approach are eliminated. By using 2nd order methods in both time and space and eliminating operator-splitting errors, the numerical error of RELAP-7 can be minimized. Numerical verification is the process to verify the orders of numerical methods. It is an important part of modern verification and validation process. The core channel component in RELAP-7 is designed to simulate coolant flow as well as the conjugated heat transfer between coolant flow and the fuel rod. A special treatment at fuel centerline to avoid numerical singularity for the cylindrical heat conduction in the continuous finite element mesh is discussed. One steady state test case and one fast power up transient test case are utilized for the verification of the core channel model with single-phase flow. Analytical solution for the fuel pin temperature and figures of merit such as peak clad temperature and peak fuel temperature are used to define numerical errors. These cases prove that the mass and energy are well conserved and 2nd order convergence rates for both time and space are achieved in the core channel model.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

FUEL PERFORMANCE STUDIES AT IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY MAKING USE OF THE BYRON FUEL SHIPMENT

In December of 2023 a shipment of commercially irradiated fuel rods from the Byron Generating Station in Illinois was successfully shipped to the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The make-up of the rods includes a mix of cladding types from traditional ZirloTM, advanced zirconium alloys, and chrome coated ZirloTM. Burnups range from regular end of life values to over 70 GWd/MTU rod average. The R&D plan for the rods involves multiple projects from developing licensing data for new claddings to integral transient tests to support burnup extension efforts in the United States. The R&D began in early 2024 with the nondestructive examinations of the rods after which they will be sectioned for microscopy, mechanical testing, and analytical chemistry. Additionally, many rod segments will be refabricated into new test pins and inserted into a static water capsule for integral Reactivity Initiated Accident (RIA) and Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) testing at the TREAT reactor.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

TREAT neutronics analysis and design support, Part I: Multi-SERTTA

Experiment vehicle design is necessary in preparation for Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility restart and the resumption of transient testing to support Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) characterization and other future fuels testing requirements. Currently the most mature vehicle design is the Multi-SERTTA (Static Environments Rodlet Transient Test Apparatuses), which can accommodate up to four concurrent rodlet-sized specimens under separate environmental conditions. Robust test vehicle design requires neutronics analyses to support design development, optimization of the power coupling factor (PCF) to efficiently maximize energy generation in the test fuel rodlets, and experiment safety analyses. Calculations were performed to support analysis of a near-final design of the Multi-SERTTA vehicle, the design process for future TREAT test vehicles, and establish analytical practices for upcoming transient test experiments. Models of the Multi-SERTTA vehicle containing typical PWR-fuel rodlets were prepared and neutronics calculations were performed using MCNP6.1 with ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data libraries. Calculation of the PCF for reference conditions of a PWR fuel rodlet in clean water at operational temperature and pressure provided results between 1.10 and 1.73 W/g-MW depending on the location of the four Multi-SERTTA units with the stack. Basic changes to the Multi-SERTTA secondary vessel containment and support have minimal impact on PCF; using materials with less neutron absorption can improve expected PCF values, especially in the primary containment. An optimized balance is needed between structural integrity, experiment safety, and energy deposition in the experiment. Type of medium and environmental conditions within the primary vessel surrounding the fuel rodlet can also have a significant impact on resultant PCF values. The estimated reactivity insertion worth into the TREAT core is impacted more by the primary and secondary Multi-SERTTA vehicle structure with the experiment content and contained environment having a near negligible impact on overall system reactivity. Additional calculations were performed to evaluate the peak-to-average assembly powers throughout the TREAT core, as well as the nuclear heat generation for the various structural components of the Multi-SERTTA assembly. Future efforts include the evaluation of flux collars to shape the PCF for individual Multi-SERTTA units during an experiment such as to achieve uniformity in test unit environmental conditions impacted by the non-uniform axial flux/power profile of TREAT. Upon resumption of transient testing, experimental results from both the Multi-SERTTA and Multi-SERTTA-CAL will be compared against calculational results and methods for further optimization and design strategies. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

TREAT Neutronics Analysis and Design Support, Part I: Multi-SERTTA

Experiment vehicle design is necessary in preparation for Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility restart and the resumption of transient testing to support Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) characterization and other future fuels testing requirements. Currently the most mature vehicle design is the Multi-SERTTA (Static Environments Rodlet Transient Test Apparatuses), which can accommodate up to four concurrent rodlet-sized specimens under separate environmental conditions. Robust test vehicle design requires neutronics analyses to support design development, optimization of the power coupling factor (PCF) to efficiently maximize energy generation in the test fuel rodlets, and experiment safety analyses. Calculations were performed to support analysis of a near-final design of the Multi-SERTTA vehicle, the design process for future TREAT test vehicles, and establish analytical practices for upcoming transient test experiments. Models of the Multi-SERTTA vehicle containing typical PWR-fuel rodlets were prepared and neutronics calculations were performed using MCNP6.1 with ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data libraries. Calculation of the PCF for reference conditions of a PWR fuel rodlet in clean water at operational temperature and pressure provided results between 1.10 and 1.74 W/g-MW depending on the location of the four Multi-SERTTA units with the stack. Basic changes to the Multi-SERTTA secondary vessel containment and support have minimal impact on PCF; using materials with less neutron absorption can improve expected PCF values, especially in the primary containment. An optimized balance is needed between structural integrity, experiment safety, and energy deposition in the experiment. Type of medium and environmental conditions within the primary vessel surrounding the fuel rodlet can also have a significant impact on resultant PCF values. The estimated reactivity insertion worth into the TREAT core is impacted more by the primary and secondary Multi-SERTTA vehicle structure with the experiment content and contained environment having a near negligible impact on overall system reactivity. Additional calculations were performed to evaluate the peak-to-average assembly powers throughout the TREAT core, as well as the nuclear heat generation for the various structural components of the Multi-SERTTA assembly. Future efforts include the evaluation of flux collars to shape the PCF for individual Multi-SERTTA units during an experiment such as to achieve uniformity in test unit environmental conditions impacted by the non-uniform axial flux/power profile of TREAT. Upon resumption of transient testing, experimental results from both the Multi-SERTTA and Multi-SERTTA-CAL will be compared against calculational results and methods for further optimization and design strategies.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

TREAT Neutronics Analysis and Design Support, Part II: Multi-SERTTA-CAL

Experiment vehicle design is necessary in preparation for Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility restart and the resumption of transient testing to support Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) characterization and other future fuels testing requirements. Currently the most mature vehicle design is the Multi-SERTTA (Static Environments Rodlet Transient Test Apparatuses), which can accommodate up to four concurrent rodlet-sized specimens under separate environmental conditions. Robust test vehicle design requires neutronics analyses to support design development, optimization of the power coupling factor (PCF) to efficiently maximize energy generation in the test fuel rodlets, and experiment safety analyses. In integral aspect of prior TREAT transient testing was the incorporation of calibration experiments to experimentally evaluate and validate test conditions in preparation of the actual fuel testing. The calibration experiment package established the test parameter conditions to support fine-tuning of the computational models to deliver the required energy deposition to the fuel samples. The calibration vehicle was designed to be as near neutronically equivalent to the experiment vehicle as possible to minimize errors between the calibration and final tests. The Multi-SERTTA-CAL vehicle was designed to serve as the calibration vehicle supporting Multi-SERTTA experimentation. Models of the Multi-SERTTA-CAL vehicle containing typical PWR-fuel rodlets were prepared and neutronics calculations were performed using MCNP6.1 with ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data libraries; these results were then compared against those performed for Multi-SERTTA to determine the similarity and possible design modification necessary prior to construction of these experiment vehicles. The estimated reactivity insertion worth into the TREAT core is very similar between the two vehicle designs, with the primary physical difference being a hollow Inconel tube running down the length of the calibration vehicle. Calculations of PCF indicate that on average there is a reduction of approximately 6.3 and 12.6%, respectively, for PWR fuel rodlets irradiated under wet and dry conditions. Changes to the primary or secondary vessel structure in the calibration vehicle can be performed to offset this discrepancy and maintain neutronic equivalency. Current possible modifications to the calibration vehicle include reduction of the primary vessel wall thickness, swapping Zircaloy-4 for stainless steel 316 in the secondary containment, or slight modification to the temperature and pressure of the water environment within the primary vessel. Removal of some of the instrumentation within the calibration vehicle can also serve to slightly increase the PCF. Future efforts include further modification and optimization of the Multi-SERTTA and Multi-SERTTA-CAL designs in preparation of actual TREAT transient testing. Experimental results from both test vehicles will be compared against calculational results and methods to provide validation and support additional neutronics analyses.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

TREAT neutronics analysis and design support, Part II: Multi-SERTTA-CAL

Experiment vehicle design is necessary in preparation for Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility restart and the resumption of transient testing to support Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) characterization and other future fuels testing requirements. Currently the most mature vehicle design is the Multi-SERTTA (Static Environments Rodlet Transient Test Apparatuses), which can accommodate up to four concurrent rodlet-sized specimens under separate environmental conditions. Robust test vehicle design requires neutronics analyses to support design development, optimization of the power coupling factor (PCF) to efficiently maximize energy generation in the test fuel rodlets, and experiment safety analyses. An integral aspect of prior TREAT transient testing was the incorporation of calibration experiments to experimentally evaluate and validate test conditions in preparation of the actual fuel testing. The calibration experiment package established the test parameter conditions to support fine-tuning of the computational models to deliver the required energy deposition to the fuel samples. The calibration vehicle was designed to be as near neutronically equivalent to the experiment vehicle as possible to minimize errors between the calibration and final tests. The Multi-SERTTA-CAL vehicle was designed to serve as the calibration vehicle supporting Multi-SERTTA experimentation. Models of the Multi-SERTTA-CAL vehicle containing typical PWR-fuel rodlets were prepared and neutronics calculations were performed using MCNP6.1 with ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data libraries; these results were then compared against those performed for Multi-SERTTA to determine the similarity and possible design modification necessary prior to construction of these experiment vehicles. The estimated reactivity insertion worth into the TREAT core is very similar between the two vehicle designs, with the primary physical difference being a hollow Inconel tube running down the length of the calibration vehicle. Calculations of PCF indicate that on average there is a reduction of approximately 6 % for PWR fuel rodlets irradiated under both wet and dry conditions. Changes to the primary or secondary vessel structure in the calibration vehicle can be performed to offset this discrepancy and maintain neutronic equivalency. Current possible modifications to the calibration vehicle include reduction of the primary vessel wall thickness, swapping Zircaloy-4 for stainless steel 316 in the secondary containment, or slight modification to the temperature and pressure of the water environment within the primary vessel. Removal of some of the instrumentation within the calibration vehicle can also serve to slightly increase the PCF. Future efforts include further modification and optimization of the Multi-SERTTA and Multi-SERTTA-CAL designs in preparation of actual TREAT transient testing. Experimental results from both test vehicles will be compared against calculational results and methods to provide validation and support additional neutronics analyses. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Study on the mechanism of diametral cladding strain and mixed-oxide fuel element breaching in slow-ramp extended overpower transients

Cladding strain caused by fuel/cladding mechanical interaction (FCMI) was evaluated for mixed-oxide fuel elements subjected to 70–90% slow-ramp extended overpower transient tests in the experimental breeder reactor II. Calculated transient-induced cladding strains were correlated with cumulative damage fractions (CDFs) using cladding strength correlations. In a breached high-smeared density solid fuel element with low strength cladding, cladding thermal creep strain was significantly increased to approximately half the transient-induced cladding strain that was considered to be caused by the tertiary creep when the CDF was close to the breach criterion (=1.0), with the remaining strain due to instantaneous plastic deformation. In low-smeared density annular fuel elements, FCMI load was significantly mitigated and resulted in little cladding strain. The CDFs of the annular fuel elements were lower than 0.01 at the end of the overpower transient, indicating a substantial margin to breach. A substantial margin to breach was also maintained in a high-smeared density fuel element with high strength cladding.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Design of separate-effects In-Pile transient boiling experiments at the $\mathrm{TREAT}$ Facility

The cladding-to-coolant heat transfer during rapid power excursions, such as reactivity-initiated accidents, remains a crucial area of uncertainty in nuclear reactor safety. This uncertainty impacts the ability to accurately predict fuel performance behavior for these conditions. Improving our understanding of transient cladding-to-coolant heat transfer will enhance our ability to model design basis accidents and could increase design and improve safety margins for the current commercial fleet and advanced reactors. To address these issues, the Critical Heat Flux Static Environment Rodlet Transient Test Apparatus (CHF-SERTTA) experiment uses a novel approach with a borated stainless-steel heater rodlet that can replicate cladding temperatures experienced during a design-basis reactivity-initiated accident. The rodlet and experiment is instrumented to provide temperature and thermal-hydraulic conditions throughout the transient. The design of the rodlet allows for separate effect testing that eliminates complexities with a fuel and cladding specimen. We report the experiments have provided data that will be used to improve our understanding of boiling behavior, specifically critical heat flux, under transient conditions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Preliminary Analysis of Damage to MPFDs Caused by Reactor Pulses

The need for next-generation, accident-tolerant fuels has generated significant interest in the restart of domestic fuels testing at the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility. The TREAT reactor is designed to produce large, transient fluxes that replicate the effects of a wide variety of accident conditions on an irradiated fuel sample. Peak powers generated during short pulses approach 20 GW with a neutron flux of approximately 10{sup 17} n cm{sup -2} s{sup -1}. As part of the restart effort, new vehicle designs are being explored for sample irradiation, including the Static Environment Rodlet Transient Test Apparatus (SERTTA) and variants. As part of the SERTTA designs, micro-pocket fission detectors (MPFDs) are being explored for localized flux measurements before, during, and after transient operations. These detectors are also being considered as part of future, core-wide instrumentation for the TREAT reactor. However, the high fluxes associated with the pulses in the TREAT core present certain thermodynamic concerns given their intensity and the amount of energy they will release within the MPFDs within such a short amount of time. Assuming each fission that occurs in a MPFD results in a fission fragment depositing 85 MeV of energy in the substrate on average and each MPFD has 0.5 μg of natural uranium deposited on it, a 100 ms long pulse in the TREAT reactor at 1017 n cm{sup -2} s{sup -1} flux will produce approximately 4.6 x 10{sup 6} fissions in an MPFD. This pulse deposits 6.3 x 10{sup -5} J in the substrate over a 100 ms duration. That amount of energy is sufficient to melt roughly 33% of the Pt under the UO{sub 2} deposition or a circular spot with a diameter of approximately 860 μm. Of course, the above estimate makes a number of simplifying assumptions and ignores heat transfer, but does serve to illustrate the point that this rapid heating effect could be detrimental to the integrity and life of these in-core MPFDs. To study how these layers are affected by large transient neutron fluxes, five samples were prepared, pre-analyzed, and then subjected to a pulse in the central thimble of the Kansas State University TRIGA Mark II reactor to a peak power of 1.58 GW. After being allowed to decay to safer radiation levels, the sample substrates and coatings were inspected using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to identify any changes to their surface morphology. Indeed, certain changes were found and are discussed in greater detail in this paper.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Implementation of Weighted Delta-Tracking with Scattering in the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code

Serpent 2, a continuous-energy Monte Carlo Reactor physics burnup code developed at the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, uses a common rejection sampling technique, known as Woodcock delta-tracking. This method improves the efficiency of Monte Carlo in the complicated geometric layout of nuclear reactors and is widely used despite drawbacks that make it inefficient in specific cases, such as in the presence of strong absorbers. At present, Serpent actively uses delta-tracking, falling back to a surface tracking option in situations where delta-tracking is inefficient to partially offset these weaknesses. Morgan and Kotlyar introduced a Weighted Delta Tracking (WDT) routine to address these issues, replacing the rejection sampling of absorption events with an implicit event. In this research, we examine the theoretical basis for rejection sampling and implicit events, and how they relate to WDT. We then discuss implementation of a routine that extends the WDT routine to include scattering events. The routine is implemented and tested within Serpent. We examine various test cases including a Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) pin cell, and homogenous fuel media based on the content of the fuel of the Transient Test Reactor (TREAT) at Idaho National Lab (INL)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗