Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Status Report”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Licensing Modernization Project for Advanced Reactor Technologies: FY 2018 Project Status Report

The promise of new nuclear technology and the future of commercial power in the United States (U.S.) are linked to the existence of an efficient and safety-focused regulatory review and licensing process. With an appropriate regulatory framework, reactor suppliers and regulators can design, license, build, and export advanced reactor units more effectively and efficiently and thereby help meet the growing need for clean and reliable energy. To help address the challenge of maintaining compatibility between the regulatory environment and new commercial nuclear plant designs, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is supporting an industry-led effort called the Licensing Modernization Project (LMP). This cost-shared initiative, started in 2016 and scheduled to continue through mid-2019, targets amendment to key elements of the U.S. nuclear power reactor regulatory framework to specifically address licensing barriers in advanced-reactor concepts. The project is focused on updating guidance for certain technical licensing requirements that are largely incompatible with non-light-water reactors (non-LWR) and establish a new pathway for design-safety evaluations and license-application development. Upon completion, the project will have created a new pathway, founded on modern probabilistic assessment techniques, that offers developers, suppliers, regulators, and owner/operatorowner-operators greater clarity and assurance in design and licensing decisions. The LMP employs a team of advanced reactor technology and licensing subject matter experts working closely with U.S. regulators, affected industries, and interested members of the public. The project is managed by Southern Company and supported through a cost share arrangement with DOE. Technical contributions are also provided to the project from the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Regulatory Development area, the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The LMP identified a suite of high priority issues that provided significant uncertainty within the regulated non-LWR community. It was determined that much of this uncertainty could be retired by issuing updated licensing guidance founded on safety performance demonstrations and modern probabilistic methodologies. The success criteria for the project were established as: • Generate sets of technology inclusive (TI), risk-informed, and performance-based (TI-RIPB) technical requirements, recommendations, and proposals that could be reviewed, amended, and adopted for use by both NRC staff and industry. The proposals would create an optional-use regulatory framework without imposing additional (i.e., mandatory) requirements. • Support LMP the recommended updates of LMP such that they can be finalized, endorsed by NRC, and used by applicants within 5 years. This also supports the DOE advanced- reactor development and deployment goal of completing licensing reviews for technically mature non-LWR concepts sufficient to allow construction to proceed by the early 2030’s. • Further overall programmatic objectives established by DOE’s Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) initiative by resolving technology-inclusive policy issues that adversely impact regulatory reviews, siting, permitting, and/or licensing of non-LWRs. This would provide significantly more regulatory certainty for advanced reactor developers.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Mars 2020 Risk Integration and Uncertainty Working Group Status Report, FY 2017

This report provides a list of accomplishments of the Mars 2020 Risk Integration and Uncertainty Working Group for the fiscal year 2017 which includes participation in the Technical Information Meeting #2, review and comments on the methodologies and results provided in the Mars 2020 Safety Analysis Report (SAR) Draft Databook, development of a Probabilistic Risk Assessment model in the risk assessment program SAPHIRE using the data provided in the SAR Databook, and an independent launch risk analysis based on the Mars 2020 launch vehicle’s lineage and design similarity to other launch vehicles.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Accident Tolerant Fuels Series 1 (ATF-1) Irradiation Testing FY 2017 Status Report

This report contains a summary of irradiation testing of FCRD ATF-1 experiments performed at the INL in FY 2017. ATF-1 irradiation testing work performed in FY 2017 included fabrication of one ATF-1B drop in capsule ATF-1 series experiment and irradiation testing of ATF-1 capsules in the ATR. Additionally, five capsules met the sponsor-specified burnup targets, three of which were shipped from the ATR to the HFEF at INL.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Status Report for NEET In-Pile Sensor Irradiation Capabilities at TREAT

The recently-established in-pile sensor development project under the Nuclear Energy Enabling Technology (NEET) program is focused on the development of measurement technologies to enable acquisition of data focused on the performance, properties, and boundary conditions of nuclear fuels/materials under irradiation in nuclear reactors. These sensors can be used in steady state irradiation tests to measure parameters of interest under conditions representing normal nuclear plant operation, or in transient irradiation tests to determine specimen performance under postulated unplanned conditions. In either case, development of suitable sensor technologies must include instrument irradiations to help guide sensor material/design selection, verify instrument performance, and demonstrate deployment viability. The Transient Reactor Test facility (TREAT) while just a part of the overall capabilities portfolio needed to enable this sensor development mission, has unique capabilities and characteristics that make it well poised for a number of instrument irradiation data objectives including sensor survivability screening, response characterization, qualification tests, and in-situ properties measurements. TREAT’s brilliantly-basic design, when married with appropriate irradiation hardware and analytic capabilities, fills a crucial capability gap between out-of-pile testing and irradiation in steady state high power research reactors. Leveraging a recently developed approach to irradiation testing in TREAT, the present work demonstrates that cost-effective and scientifically-impactful instrument irradiation capabilities for TREAT are a well-placed capability in the NEET in-pile sensor development project.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Status Report on Activities of the Systems Assessment Task Force, OECD-NEA Expert Group on Accident Tolerant Fuels for LWRs

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development /Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA) Nuclear Science Committee approved the formation of an Expert Group on Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) for LWRs (EGATFL) in 2014. Chaired by Kemal Pasamehmetoglu, INL Associate Laboratory Director for Nuclear Science and Technology, the mandate for the EGATFL defines work under three task forces: (1) Systems Assessment, (2) Cladding and Core Materials, and (3) Fuel Concepts. Scope for the Systems Assessment task force (TF1) includes definition of evaluation metrics for ATF, technology readiness level definition, definition of illustrative scenarios for ATF evaluation, and identification of fuel performance and system codes applicable to ATF evaluation. The identification of irradiation facilities around the world that are being used, or are planned to be used, for the irradiation testing of ATF cladding and fuel materials was later added to the TF1 scope (April 2017). The Cladding and Core Materials (TF2) and Fuel Concepts (TF3) task forces have worked to identify gaps and needs for modeling and experimental demonstration; define key properties of interest; identify the data necessary to perform concept evaluation under normal conditions and illustrative scenarios; identify available infrastructure (internationally) to support experimental needs; and make recommendations on priorities. Where possible, considering proprietary and other export restrictions (e.g., International Traffic in Arms Regulations), the Expert Group has facilitated the sharing of data and lessons learned across the international group membership. The Systems Assessment task force is chaired by Shannon Bragg-Sitton (Idaho National Laboratory [INL], U.S.), the Cladding Task Force is chaired by Marie Moatti (Electricite de France [EdF], France), and the Fuels Task Force is chaired by a Masaki Kurata (Japan Atomic Energy Agency [JAEA], Japan). The original Expert Group mandate was established for June 2014 to June 2016. In April 2016 the Expert Group voted to extend the mandate one additional year to June 2017 in order to complete the task force deliverables; this request was subsequently approved by the Nuclear Science Committee. All reports are currently in final draft and will be submitted to NEA for final formatting/editing in October 2017. A final EGATFL meeting will be held at NEA Headquarters in Paris, France on November 2-3, 2017 to resolve any final comments on the task force reports. This report provides brief summary of the Systems Assessment Task Force deliverable report.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

FY17 Status Report for the Development of Infrared Thermography for In-Pile Fuel Behavior Applications

Under a Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) initiative to develop in-pile instrumentation, an activity has been initiated to develop an infrared thermography (IRT) approach for in-reactor monitoring of fuel behaviors. The project will focus on leveraging mature, mainstream IRT techniques for use on nuclear fuel systems inside a nuclear reactor through unique adaptations for remote applications – an extremely challenging engineering and measurement objective – never before accomplished in-pile. To this end, some of the most important issues to be addressed include identifying an optimal IRT configuration (of many possible) and components for detecting specific structural evolutions such as fuel cracking and fuel void formation and migration; developing a long distance imaging system to transmit high resolution infrared images from a small specimen surface in the harsh environment of a reactor core to a IR camera or other detector array; and ultimately, integrating a complete experimental system to create a full in-reactor experiment. This document provides an overview of potential in-pile applications of IRT, a brief overview of IRT techniques, a detailed research plan and schedule for the project, and a summary of activities that have been initiated in the closing months of fiscal year 2017.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

FY18 Status Report: SNL Research into Stress Corrosion Cracking of SNF Interim Storage Canisters

This progress report describes work done in FY18 at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) to assess the localized corrosion performance of container/cask materials used in the interim storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF). The work focuses on stress corrosion cracking (SCC), the only mechanism by which a through-wall crack could potentially form in a canister outer wall over time intervals that are shorter than possible dry storage times. Work in FY18 continued several studies initiated in FY17 that are aimed at refining the understanding of the chemical and physical environment on canister surfaces, and evaluating the relationship between chemical and physical environment and the form and extent of corrosion that occurs. The SNL canister environment work focused on evaluating the stability of sea-salt deliquescent brines on the heated canister surface; an additional opportunity to analyze dusts sampled from an inservice spent nuclear fuel storage canister also arose. The SNL corrosion work focused predominantly on pitting corrosion, a necessary precursor for SCC, and process of pit-to-crack transition. SNL is collaborating with several university partners to investigate SCC crack growth experimentally, providing guidance for design and interpretation of experiments. The scope of these efforts targets near-marine Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation environments which are generally considered to be most aggressive for pitting and SCC. Work to define the chemical and physical environment that could develop on storage canister surfaces in near-marine environments included experiments to evaluate the thermal stability of magnesium chloride brines, representative of the first brines to form when sea-salts deliquesce, with the specific goal of understanding and interpreting results of sea-salt and magnesium chloride corrosion experiments carried out under accelerated conditions. The experiments showed that magnesium chloride brines, and by extension, low RH sea-salt deliquescent brines, are not stable at elevated temperatures, losing chloride via degassing of HC1 and conversion to Mg-hydroxychlorides and carbonates. The experiments were carried out on an inert substrate to eliminate the effects of corrosion reactions, simulating brine stabilities in the absence of, or prior to, corrosion. Moreover, analysis of salts recovered from actively corroding metal samples shows that corrosion also supports or drives conversion of magnesium chloride or sea-salt brines to less deliquescent salts. This process has significant implications on corrosion, as the secondary phases are less deliquescent than magnesium chloride; the conversion reaction results in decreases in brine volume, and potentially results in brine dry-out. The deliquescence properties of these reaction products will be a topic of active research in FY19.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Discharge Permit-1845 Quarterly Status Report October 2018

Trichloroethene (TCE) and nitrate have been identified as constituents of concern in groundwater at the Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM) Technical Area (TA)-V Groundwater (TAVG) Area of Concern (AOC) based on detections above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maximum contaminant level (MCL) in samples collected from monitoring wells. The EPA MCLs and the State of New Mexico drinking water standards for TCE and nitrate are 5 micrograms per liter and 10 milligrams per liter (as nitrogen), respectively. A phased Treatability Study/Interim Measure (TS/IM) of in-situ bioremediation (ISB) is being implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of ISB as a potential technology to treat the groundwater contamination at the TAVG AOC (New Mexico Environment Department [NMED] April 2016). The NMED Hazardous Waste Bureau (HWB) approved the Revised Treatability Study Work Plan (TSWP) (SNL/NM March 2016) in May 2016 (NMED May 2016). The SNL/NM Environmental Restoration Operations personnel are responsible for implementing the TS/IM of ISB at TAVG AOC in accordance with the Revised TSWP. Per the Revised TSWP, up to three injection wells (TAV-INJ1, TAV-INJ2, and TAV-INJ3) would be installed at TA-V in the vicinity of the highest contaminant concentrations detected in groundwater at monitoring wells LWDS-MW1, TAV-MW6, and TAV-MW10. The injection wells would be used to gravity-inject substrate solution and biodegradation bacteria to groundwater. The substrate solution consists of an inert tracer as well as essential food and nutrients for biostimulation. The substrate solution would be prepared in aboveground tanks. The TS/IM would be conducted in two phases: Phase I includes a pilot test followed by full-scale injection at the first injection well (TAV-INJ1); Phase II includes full-scale injections at the second and third injection wells (TAV-INJ2 and TAV-INJ3). The NMED Ground Water Quality Bureau (GWQB) requires a groundwater Discharge Permit (DP) for the operation of injection wells. NMED GWQB issued the DP-1845 to the U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) for the SNL/NM TA-V Treatability Study injection wells on May 26, 2017 (NMED May 2017). The DP-1845 term started on May 30, 2017 and ends on May 30, 2022. Attachment A provides a copy of DP-1845. This quarterly report provides responses to DP-1845 Operating Conditions Terms and Conditions #3 through #8 and Monitoring and Reporting Terms and Conditions #10 through #17 for the April 1 to June 30, 2018 reporting period. The other Terms and Conditions are NMED statements of fact and do not require a response.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Evaluation of Perched Water Post-Extraction Remedy Technologies: Interim Status Report

In the 200-DV-1 Operable Unit at Hanford, a perched water zone is located in a fine-grained unit a few meters above the water table within the B, BX, and BY Tank Farms area. The perched water contains elevated concentrations of uranium (U), technetium-99 ( 99 Tc), and nitrate (NO 3 ), and serves as a future flux of contaminated water into the groundwater. Currently, a pumping system is used for removal of contaminant mass from the perched water zone to decrease the total contaminant mass transported into the groundwater. As the perched water zone is desaturated through pumping, removal of the contaminated perched water will become more difficult over time. Water extraction cannot remove all of the contaminant mass from this zone, nor can it stop the recharge-driven flux of remaining contaminants toward the groundwater because the flux will continue under unsaturated conditions. Thus, contamination that will remain after pumping needs to be addressed with post-extraction mitigation approaches along with appropriate monitoring and selection of a suitable remediation endpoint.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Evaluation of Central Plateau Remediation Alternatives: Interim Status Report

Several comingled groundwater contaminant plumes exist in the Hanford Central Plateau and are currently targeted by ongoing remedy efforts (i.e., pump-and-treat [P&T]). However, across much of the Central Plateau, the deep vadose zone is also expected to serve as a long-term source of contaminant flux to the groundwater. Contaminant transport in the groundwater and vadose zone often occurs at vastly different time scales. Remedial action is needed in the near term to address existing groundwater contamination, but for some waste sites, long-term vadose zone source control may be needed. The overall remediation strategy for the Central Plateau will require the development of remedial alternatives that consider the coupled groundwater and vadose zone system.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Advanced Monitoring Systems for Deep Vadose Zone Applications Interim Status Report

The vadose zone within the Hanford Central Plateau contains large quantities of mobile contaminants that have not yet reached the groundwater. Deep vadose zone (DVZ) contamination is located below the depth of direct contaminant exposure potential, but may be a current and/or potential future source of groundwater contamination. Monitoring to observe subsurface processes and driving forces related to contaminant transport or to directly observe contaminant movement in the DVZ provide remedy performance information prior to contaminants reaching the groundwater and thereby are important elements of a remedy implementation.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Complete Status Report Documenting the Development of Friction Stir Welding for Producing a Butt Joint in Thin Wall Tubing of ODS Alloys

A challenging attempt using friction stir welding to produce a butt joint between two 1.0 mm thick plates of 14YWT was nearly successful. The modified tool pin mostly penetrated the thickness of the adjoined thin plate samples resulting in a small blunt notch on the bottom surface of the butt joint. A bend occurred in the thin plate sample due to formation of stresses from clamping the thin plate sample during FSW. The peak displacement of the bend occurred along the center line of the butt joint. The weld zone showed good microstructure mixing with some flashing mostly on the retreating side that suggested excess heat input by friction between the traveling and spinning tool pin and thin plates of 14YWT. Neutron diffraction experiments were performed on the bent sample of 14YWT to measure the residual stresses in the butt joint on the HB-2B beam line at the Neutron Residual Stress Facility at HFIR. However, the neutron scattering to background noise ratio was very low during data acquisition. Measurements of lattice strains were obtained in the rolling (RD) and normal (ND) directions but not in the extrusion direction (ED) of the thin plate sample. Unfortunately, the quality of the data was not sufficient for determining the residual stresses in the butt joint. From the previous neutron scattering experiments conducted on four hot rolled plates (R1, R2, R3 and R4) of 14YWT, the residual stresses were calculated from lattice strain data and plotted in 2-D color contour maps for ED, RD and ND. The results showed variations in the magnitude and spatial position of residual stresses in the microstructure of the four plates. The magnitude in residual stresses in ED and RD increased gradually with increasing rolling deformation for R1 (50%) to R2 (76%), followed by larger increases in R3 (89%) and R4 (95%). The maximum peaks in residual stresses for R4 was ~710-730 MPa in ED and RD. The residual stresses in ND were below ~300 MPa for each of the 4 rolled plates, with a maximum residual stress in R4 (95%) of ~400 MPa. These results indicated that significant residual stresses representing ~57% of the yield stress of 14YWT (SM13) had accumulated in the 14YWT plate after hot rolling to the 1 mm thickness, which was used in the FSW experiments. The microstructure analysis of the 1.0 mm thick plate of 14YWT containing the butt joint produced by FSW revealed significant changes in the grain structure and texture between the unaffected zone (UZ) of the rolled plate and the butt joint weld. In the UZ, the grains were severely elongated after 95% deformation and mainly possessed the {101} texture component in the ED. Two predominant grain misorientation angles were observed: one consisting of small misorientations of <5º between highly elongated grains and the other consisting of large misorientations of >15º in pockets of small grains that might have formed by dynamic recrystallization processes during rolling of the plate at 1000ºC. The morphology and texture of grains in the heat affected zone (HAZ) were similar to those in UZ, except the grains had coarsened due to excess heat input during FSZ. A population of pores formed and the grains both coarsened and changed to isotropic morphology in the microstructure of the butt joint on both the advancing and retreating sides. The texture of grains in both regions were randomly orientated between the 3 poles {001}, {101} and {111}. The main difference in texture of grains between the advancing side and retreating side was with the misorientation angles of neighboring grains. Most of the grains in the advancing side had misorientation angles of >5º indicating that these grains experienced recrystallization. On the retreating side, areas containing larger grains showed high misorientation angles of >15º compared to areas appearing as bands of grains with misorientation angles of <5º and between 5º-15º. Numerous small pockets of grains with low misorientation angles of <5º were distributed in the microstructure among the grains showing high misorientation angles of >15º. It was determined that the grains associated with low misorientation angles contained sub-grain structures, which was consistent with both recrystallization and recovery mechanisms for grains located on the retreating side of the butt joint. These results demonstrate the complex microstructure that evolves in the microstructure of 14YWT resulting from the input of high temperatures and severe deformations during FSW.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

North Slope of Alaska ARM Facilities Monthly Status Report- January 2019

During the month of January 2019, the TBS crew made progress revamping the equipment to prepare for upcoming 2019 flights. Both winches were upgraded using a SE encore E43 59.3:1 gearbox coupled with a Leeson Permanent magnet motor. This increased the torque capability by approximately 3x and the rotational speed by ~30%. The existing electronics system on one winch was repurposed to power four 3,500 lb ATV winches. These winches will automate the retrieval of the balloons allowing for retrieval during faster winds, and thus increasing potential operating conditions, while also improving crew safety. The ATV winches are expected to be added to the second winch in February. Finally, a new electronics box was designed which will be used to power the new winch motor. The new winch motors are variable speed, meaning they accept 0-180V and the speed correlates to the input voltage. The new electronics boxes will be mounted directly to the winches to allow the winches to be removed from the trailers in case of size/weight operating limitations. The winches will instead be powered directly by 220V generators vs the lead acid battery banks used by the previous systems.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Gear Test Assembly - Status Report FY2018

The gear test assembly completed testing in air and distilled water successfully under a range of loading conditions. An external torque sensor assembly was designed and added to confirm the torque readings provided by the Parker control system. Hand calculations were performed to determine the time range that the heaters could be turned on without exceeding the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code Fatigue Stress Limits for 1,000,000 cycles. Transient computational fluid dynamics analyses were performed to determine the heater cycle on/off time. Steady state computational fluid dynamics analyses were performed to determine the final temperature distribution throughout the insulated assembly using a thinner but more effective insulation configuration. The initial heating tests were completed (without insulation installed) to check the heater control system. Testing of the argon pressurized seal chambers were performed and indicated the need for re-machining of several components to eliminate some leaks. Nondestructive examination of the gears continued successfully using eddy current and ultrasonic inspection techniques.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Annual Status Report (FY 2018): Composite Analysis for Low Level Waste Disposal in the Central Plateau of the Hanford Site

In accordance with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) requirements in DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 11, and as implemented by DOE/RL-2000-292, the DOE Richland Operations Office has prepared this annual summary of the Hanford Site Composite Analysis for fiscal year (FY) 2018. The Hanford Site Composite Analysis was originally reported in PNNL-118003 and PNNL-11800, Addendum 14 (hereinafter referred to collectively as the Hanford Site Composite Analysis). The Hanford Site Composite Analysis was approved by a 2002 memorandum. As required by DOE/RL-2000-29, an annual evaluation of new information and data developed by a number of onsite programs was completed. The reporting period for this annual evaluation is FY 2018 (October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Annual Status Report (FY 2018): Performance Assessment for the Disposal of Low-Level Waste in the 200 West Area Burial Grounds (Rev. 0)

This annual review provides the projected dose estimates of radionuclide inventories disposed in the active 200 West Area Low-Level Waste Burial Grounds (LLBGs) since September 26, 1988. These estimates are calculated using the original dose methodology developed in the performance assessment (PA) analysis. The estimates are compared with performance objectives defined in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) requirements (DOE 435.1 Chg 1 and its companion documents DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 1 and DOE G 435.1-1). All performance objectives are currently satisfied, and operational waste acceptance criteria and waste acceptance practices continue to be sufficient to maintain compliance with performance objectives. Inventory estimates and associated dose estimates from future waste disposal actions are unchanged from previous years' evaluations that indicate potential impacts well below performance objectives; therefore, future compliance with DOE O 435.1 Chg 1 is expected. Within the active burial grounds, low-level waste and mixed low-level waste currently may be disposed only in two lined trenches in the 218-W-5 Burial Ground (Trenches 31 and 34) until they are either filled or a decision is made to close these trenches. Some mixed low-level waste is also disposed at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility in the 200 West Area (which is covered under a separate PA). During this reporting period (fiscal year 2018, from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018), waste was disposed to the 200 West Area LLBGs. Results from the multi-year diffusion experiments are summarized for this reporting period to quantify the efficacy of concrete waste forms in retaining key radionuclides (e.g., uranium-238, technetium-99, and iodine-123). The results of sorption experiments initiated in FY 2017 to evaluate sorption coefficients for iodine and technetium are also summarized. The test durations ranged from 1 to 6 months. Continued groundwater monitoring of the 200 West Area LLBGs indicates no groundwater contamination due to LLBG waste. Current assumptions about future land use at the Hanford Site are consistent with PA analysis1 assumptions of a post-closure facility that will not be degraded by human activity. The LLBGs are located in an area identified for waste management and containment of residual contamination. Overall, there are no substantive changes to primary PA assumptions and no changes to the PA analysis conclusion; therefore, compliance with DOE O 435.1 Chg 1 is being maintained.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Annual Status Report (FY 2018): Performance Assessment for the Disposal of Low-Level Waste in the 200 East Area Burial Grounds (Rev. 0)

This annual review provides the projected dose estimates of radionuclide inventories disposed in the active 200 East Area Low-Level Waste Burial Grounds (LLBGs) since September 26, 1988. These estimates are calculated using the original dose methodology developed in the performance assessment (PA) analysis. The estimates are compared with performance objectives defined in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) requirements (DOE O 435.1 Chg 1 and companion documents DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 1 and DOE G 435.1-1). All performance objectives are currently satisfied, and operational waste acceptance criteria and waste acceptance practices continue to be sufficient to maintain compliance with performance objectives. Inventory estimates and associated dose estimates from future waste disposal actions are unchanged from previous years' evaluations that indicate potential impacts well below performance objectives; therefore, future compliance with DOE O 435.1 Chg 1 is expected. Within the active burial grounds, low-level waste and mixed low-level waste currently may be disposed only in the dedicated U.S. Navy reactor compartment trench in the 218-E-12B Burial Ground (Trench 94). Naval reactor compartment disposal at Trench 94 will continue. During this reporting period (fiscal year 2018, from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018), two reactor compartments were disposed in Trench 94. Results from multi-year diffusion experiments are summarized for this reporting period to quantify the efficacy of concrete waste forms in retaining key radionuclides (e.g., uranium-238, technetium-99, and iodine-129). The results of sorption experiments initiated in FY 2017 to evaluate sorption coefficients for iodine and technetium are also summarized. The test durations ranged from 1 to 6 months. Continued groundwater monitoring of the 200 East Area LLBGs indicates no groundwater contamination due to LLBG waste. Current assumptions about future land use at the Hanford Site are consistent with PA analysis assumptions of a post-closure facility that will not be degraded by human activity. The LLBGs are located in an area identified for waste management and containment of residual contamination. This area will remain after final environmental remediation and the proposed shrinkage of Hanford Site boundaries to small sections within the 200 East Area and 200 West Area in the Central Plateau. Overall, there are no substantive changes to primary PA assumptions and no changes to the PA analysis conclusion; therefore, compliance with DOE O 435.1 Chg 1 is being maintained.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗