Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Section III”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Drop Analysis of Department of Energy Standard Canister with Fort Saint Vrain SNF

DOE manages over 300 types of SNF, most of which are located at the INL site. The Idaho Cleanup Project and INL are collaborating on the Road-Ready Capability Demonstration Project, which will develop and demonstrate the designs, technology, processes, and regulatory framework for packaging DOE-managed SNF at the INL site for ?road-ready dry storage?. ?Road-ready dry storage? is a SNF management concept where SNF is packaged into dry and sealed canisters, which are then placed in on-site storage in anticipation of later transportation. The forward-looking goal of the Demonstration is establishing the foundation for a large-scale road-ready dry storage program at the INL site. The Demonstration will first package Fort Saint Vrain SNF currently stored at INL into several DOE Standard Canisters. These Standard Canisters will then be loaded into another commercial transportation or storage containment system (e.g., storage cask or transportation package). The Standard Canister is a class of standardized canisters designed for containing the large variety of DOE-managed SNF during interim storage, transportation and/or disposal at a geological repository. One critical aspect of road-ready dry storage is the ability to license the DOE Standard Canisters and its associated transportation package to 10 CFR 71. Depending on the SNF and transportation strategy, the Standard Canisters may have to maintain structural integrity under normal conditions of transport and hypothetical accident scenarios (i.e., drop events). The Standard Canisters have been tested and analyzed under various SNF loading configurations and accident drop events in support of the Idaho Spent Fuel Facility and other DOE programs. However, no analysis has been completed to support the recent Demonstration. This analysis will consider the Ø0.5 m × 5.1 m Standard Canister under drop scenario(s) considered in previous INL tests and analyses, including the 9 m drop at 80 degree off vertical. However, this analysis will consider the more recent Fort Saint Vrain loading configurations proposed for the Demonstration. This analysis will performed using strain-based acceptance criteria established by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 3. It will be compared to previous analyses and form the foundation of further formal calculations that will be used to support licensing efforts of the road-ready dry storage system at INL.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Drop Analysis of a Department of Energy Standard Canister Containing Fort Saint Vrain SNF

DOE manages over 300 types of SNF, many of which are located at the INL site. Managing this large variety of SNF for storage, transportation, and disposal poses a challenge to DOE. The Idaho Cleanup Project and INL are collaborating on the DOE SNF Road-Ready Demonstration (“Road-Ready Demonstration”), which will develop and demonstrate the designs, technology, processes, and regulatory framework for packaging DOE-managed SNF for “road-ready dry storage.” Road-ready dry storage (RRDS) is an SNF management concept in which SNF is packaged into dry, sealed canisters that are then placed in on-site storage in anticipation of later transport and disposition. The forward-looking goal of the Road-Ready Demonstration is to establish the foundation for a large-scale RRDS program at the INL site. One critical aspect of RRDS is the ability to certify the DOE Standard Canister and its associated transportation package in accordance with 10 CFR 71 for offsite transportation. Depending on the SNF type and transportation strategy, DOE Standard Canisters may be required to maintain structural integrity under hypothetical accident scenarios (e.g., drop events). The DOE Standard Canisters have been tested and analyzed under various SNF loading configurations and accident drop events in support of the Idaho Spent Fuel Facility and other DOE programs; however, no analysis has yet been completed in support of the recently initiated Road-Ready Demonstration. This paper presents preliminary results from a finite element analysis of the Ø45.7 cm × 4.6 m (Ø18 in. × 15 ft) DOE Standard Canister under the 9 m drop at 80 degrees off-vertical drop scenario considered in previous INL tests and analyses. It considers the Fort St. Vrain spent nuclear fuel loading configuration proposed for the Road-Ready Demonstration, uses updated material properties, and applies the strain-based acceptance criteria established in ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code’s Section III, Division 3 rules for storage and transportation spent nuclear fuel containments. This updated analysis is compared to previous DOE Standard Canister drop analyses. Preliminary results from the updated analysis show that certain regions of the containment exceed the allowable limits during the accidental drop event. However, these regions are limited to components performing a non-structural function. While further work on this analysis will be pursued, this analysis serves as the foundation for formal calculations used to support applicable certification efforts of the RRDS system at INL.

42 ENGINEERING↗

ASME – Grappling with the Concept of Component Failure

ASME concepts of component failure. Definition for failure, functionality, damage tolerance, including Magnox reactors and AGRs. How ASME is addressing damage tolerance, and Section III division 5 Design, Classification, Reliability Target for SRC-1 components, Basic analysis approach, simple assessment, and full assessments, Reference to reliability and integrity management and strategy for graphite components.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

ASME Design Code Rule Changes for Nuclear Graphite

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler Pressure and Vessel Code (ASME BPVC) Section III, Division 5, Article HHA-3000 outlines graphite core component and graphite core assembly design guidelines. Graphite core components are defined as ?components manufactured from graphite that are installed to form a graphite core assembly within the reactor pressure vessel of a high temperature, graphite moderated fission reactor.? (p. 413) Graphites? inherent defect distributions do not allow for deterministic material reliability. Rather, graphite has variable strength distributions which change by grade. Article HHA-3000 outlines two semi-probabilistic methods, the full and simplified assessments, which set design load limit targets for each of three component structural reliability classes. The Design Task Group was officially recognized as a specialized task group within ASME November of 2023, though we?ve been collaborating since 2022. The purpose of the Design Task Group is to correct, clarify, and make HHA-3000 function as intended. The Design Task Group will sunset once we?ve achieved our objectives. The Design Task Group was specifically told to not write new Code. While there may be more precise and more accurate methods to determine reliability targets, the current methods are conservative, relatively simple to implement, and have thus far been considered satisfactory for setting design reliability targets. Much of the ground-work to write proposal files and background documents for records to make the changes needed to achieve our objective have been completed. The Design Task Group has documented much of their work through papers, presentations, and memorandums. Three memorandums in which INL team members had substantial contributions are found in the Appendices: FEA Modeling for the Baseline Program, Evaluating the Effects on Margin of Updating the Threshold and Shape Parameters in the Full Assessment, and Interpretations of the Full and Simplified Assessments in ASME BPVC. Most of the on-going work to achieve the Design Task Group?s objective will be addressing comments on existing records and moving records through the balloting process. The Design Task Group met bi-weekly mostly through the end of FY2023. Since February 2024, the Design Task Group has mostly been completed with solving and documenting the technical issues associated with the assessments. Unless new tasks are identified, the remaining work of the Design Task Group will be political and editorial.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

FY24 progress report on A709 mechanical properties data development and A709 thermal aging status

The report provides the status of the creep, fatigue, and creep-fatigue testing to date conducted at Idaho National Laboratory to generate the data package. This data package evaluates the material performance from three commercial heats to support the Alloy 709 qualification in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5. First procured heat was manufactured by G.O. Carlson with heat number 58776. Second and third heats were fabricated by ATI Specialty Rolled Products with heat numbers 529900 and 530843, respectively. A series of creep and cyclic specimens were fabricated from these three heats and tests were performed. A list of finished, ongoing, and planned test are presented for creep, fatigue, and creep-fatigue tests. Cyclic properties of three commercial heats are compared.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Creep-Fatigue Properties of Additional 316H PM-HIP Materials Fabricated from Different Powder Compositions and Processing Routes

The process of powder metallurgy (PM) hot isostatic pressing (HIP) works by consolidating powdered materials at relatively high temperature and pressure to form near-net-shaped components. Ideally, PM-HIP production methods can reduce component lead time and improve designs for high-temperature reactors and/or microreactors. To introduce PM-HIP into Section III, Division 5 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, it is necessary to show adequate material properties regarding creep, high-temperature low-cycle fatigue, and creep fatigue. However, prior work has shown that the creep-fatigue cycles to failure for PM-HIP 316H stainless steel are greatly reduced compared to the conventional, wrought product. This work continued creep-fatigue analysis on a 316H stainless steel with lower oxygen and nitrogen contents and at different HIP parameters than previously analyzed. The objective was to better understand what is causing the reduced PM-HIP 316H performance so improvements can be made PM-HIP 316H creep-fatigue lifetimes.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Evaluation of the Simplified Assessment Peak Equivalent Stress Design Limit Probability of Failure

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III Division 5 Subsection HH Subpart A (HHA) outlines requirements and qualification methods for graphite core components in high temperature reactor environments. One such structural qualification method is the Simplified Assessment outlined in HHA-3220, which represents a comparison of service level specific equivalent stresses to allowable stress values derived from target probability of failures (POFs). The target POF is based on the structural reliability class (SRC) for the components and service condition of interest, and is used to establish design limits for combined membrane and peak equivalent stresses. Combined membrane stress limits are derived from two parameter Weibull distribution fits of the graphite grade specific tensile strength data and the target POF. The combined membrane stress limits are then scaled based on the ratio of flexural strength to tensile strength (referred hereinafter as Rtf) to establish the corresponding peak equivalent stress limits. It is desired that the target POF is at least maintained for both combined membrane and peak equivalent design limits, especially with the use of Rtf. The assessment presented herein examines tensile and flexural data for medium and fine grade graphites relative to the calculated combined membrane and peak equivalent stress limits per HHA-3220 and illustrates the simplified assessment method results in anticipated, or at least conservative, peak equivalent design stress limits.

36 - MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Summary report on the mechanical testing performed at INL for creep rupture, fatigue, creep-fatigue, and aging of A709 base material

The report provides the status of the creep, fatigue, and creep-fatigue testing to conducted at Idaho National Laboratory to generate a data package to support Alloy 709 qualification in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5. These tests were performed on three commercial heats of plate material. The first procured heat was manufactured by G.O. Carlson with heat number 58776. Second and third heats were fabricated by ATI Specialty Rolled Products, with heat numbers 529900 and 530843, respectively. A series of creep and cyclic specimens were fabricated from these three heats, and tests were performed. This report presents a master list of all completed and ongoing creep, fatigue, and creep fatigue tests. Cyclic properties of three commercial heats are compared. Thermal aging of three commercial heats for 3000 hours were completed in FY 2025. The thermal aging campaign to age plate material from three commercial heats up to 100,000 hours is ongoing.

36 - MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

FY24 progress report on A709 mechanical properties data development and A709 thermal aging status

The report provides the status of the creep, fatigue, and creep-fatigue testing to date conducted at Idaho National Laboratory to generate the data package. This data package evaluates the material performance from three commercial heats to support the Alloy 709 qualification in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5. First procured heat was manufactured by G.O. Carlson with heat number 58776. Second and third heats were fabricated by ATI Specialty Rolled Products with heat numbers 529900 and 530843, respectively. A series of creep and cyclic specimens were fabricated from these three heats and tests were performed. A list of finished, ongoing, and planned test are presented for creep, fatigue, and creep-fatigue tests. Cyclic properties of three commercial heats are compared.

36 - MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

SPC-70791 Rev 0 MARVEL Inert Gas Subsystem, Secondary Coolant Management Subsystem, and Secondary Coolant Cover Gas Subsystem Tubing and Valve Specification

This specification covers the requirements and details for the selection, testing, cleaning, marking, shipping, inspection and installation (including welding) of the Inert Gas Subsystem, Secondary Coolant Management Subsystem, and Secondary Cover Gas Management Subsystem from the Valve Panel up to the classification division, the patch panel of the upper confinement. Including NaK, argon, eutectic gallium indium tin (eGaInSn), and helium fill tubing, valves, and hangers. These systems consist of the necessary straight lengths, elbows, reducers, fittings, tube connections, instrument taps, and valves called for by applicable drawings. All components shall be procured as ASME Section III Class 2 unless otherwise modified hereinafter. Pressure relief valves have been sized to prevent overpressure in the event there is full regulator flow. This is documented in ECAR-7365.

21 - SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLAN↗

ECAR-6574 Rev 1 MARVEL Guard Vessel System FEA and ASME Analysis

This ECAR encompasses the design-by-equation requirements in ASME BPVC Section III Division 5 Subsection HCB, in addition to the service level and design-by-analysis requirements of Subsection HBB, as they apply to the Guard Vessel.

21 - SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLAN↗

ECAR-7365 Rev 0 MARVEL Over Pressure Protection Report

This ECAR encompasses and documents compliance to the pressure safety requirements of the Microreactor Applications Research Validation and Evaluation (MARVEL) Reactor Primary Coolant Boundary (referred to herein as the Primary Coolant System, or PCS, which includes the outer boundary of the Central Insurance Absorber (CIA)) as a Class A system (equivalent to a Section III Division 1 Class 1 system) for high temperature reactors subjected to elevated temperature service.

21 - SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLAN↗

SPC-70792 Rev 0 MARVEL Primary Coolant Management Subsystem Tubing Specification

This specification covers the requirements and details for the selection, fabrication, testing, cleaning, marking, shipping, inspection and installation of the Inert Gas System, and Primary Coolant Management System. This applies to tubing from the upper confinement patch panel to the upper plenum, including NaK and argon fill tubing, valves, and hangers. These systems consist of the necessary straight lengths, elbows, reducers, fittings, tube connections, instrument taps, and valves called for by applicable drawings. All components shall be procured as ASME Section III Class 1.

21 - SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLAN↗

Atomic data for opacity calculations. X - Oscillator strengths and photoionisation cross sections for O III

Energy levels and electric dipole radiative transitions were determined for O III. The wavefunctions for the bound and continuum states were derived by solving coupled integrodifferential equations in the close-coupling approximation with the aid of two methods, the R-matrix and linear algebraic methods. Configuration interaction wavefunctions are presented for eight states of the O IV target with configurations of 2s(x)sp(y) (x + y = 3). Oscillator strengths are calculated for the transitions between, and photoionization cross sections from, bound states of O III with configurations of 2s(x)2p(y)nl (for n of not greater than 10 and l of not greater than 3).

Luo, D.↗

Reducing beta functions in the NSLS-II long straight section for NEXT-III beamlines

The NSLS-II Experimental Tools III (NEXT-III) Project with the goal of building 8-12 new beamlines is ongoing. We were requested to explore the possibility of modifying the long straight section in Cell 26 to accommodate two new undulators for Advanced Nanoscale Imaging (ANI) Beamline and Tender X-ray Nanoprobe (TXN) Beamline. The scope of work includes: linear lattice matching; confirmation of the minimum ID gaps consistent with beam stay-clear limitations; calculation of the X-ray brightness; optimization of the dynamic aperture and momentum acceptance; multi-particle tracking to confirm the injection efficiency does not deteriorate significantly. The beam simulations have to be done using the most recent NSLS-II lattice model with all present insertion devices and realistic magnet errors, misalignments, and apertures. Originally two lattice options were considered for the assessment:1) with single -minimum beta functions and 2) NSLS-II with double-minimum beta functions. However, since the beamlines are not interested in the reduction of the horizontal beta function, just the vertical one, we decided to stop considering the single-minimum option because the current vertical beta is already low (3.3m) and further reducing it at the straight section center can increase it too much at the edge of a long ID, and limit the beam stay-clear. So, this report is focused on the double mini-beta scheme only.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗