Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Paper”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Discrete Element Method Analysis for Metal Powders Used in Additive Manufacturing, and DEM Simulation Tutorial Using LIGGGHTS-PUBLIC [PowerPoint and paper]

Discrete Element Method (DEM) is a method of analysis to evaluate the dynamic interactions between granular particles. This method has been used in the pharmaceutical industry to improve the powder compaction process for tablet manufacturing. There are also applications in agriculture, food industry, and manufacturing. Direct energy deposition is an additive manufacturing technique which uses metallic powders fed through a nozzle, melted using a directed laser, and transformed into a solid object layer by layer. One way of feeding metal particles into the system involves the use of a vibrating hopper. Given a specified amplitude and frequency input, the hopper will enable the powder to travel up a path, and inject through the system with assistance from a stream of gas. The mechanical properties of a printed object can vary, depending on the characteristics of the powder flow and the particles’ as-received properties. Improved understanding of dynamic interactions of flowing powders could enable additive manufacturing components with 2D or 3D variations in mechanical properties, e.g., density. This work uses DEM simulation software to investigate the effects of particle cohesion, friction, and density on the quality of the flow by performing an angle of repose simulation, which is often used as a metric to evaluate the flowability of powders.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection White Paper

The Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) system was identified during the Generation IV Technology Roadmap as a promising technology to perform the actinide management mission and, if enhanced economics for the system could be realized, also the electricity and heat production missions. The main characteristics of the SFR that make it especially suitable for the actinide management mission are: Consumption of transuranics in a closed fuel cycle, thus reducing the radiotoxicity and heat load which facilitates waste disposal and geologic isolation; Enhanced utilization of uranium resources through efficient management of fissile materials and multi-recycle; and, High level of safety achieved through inherent and passive means that accommodate transients and bounding events with significant safety margins.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

MSR Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection White Paper

Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs) have seen a resurgence of interest in the past decade around the world. Support for these activities is provided from both national and private sources. The largest difference from the 2011 GIF MSR PR&PP evaluation consequently is the transition from evaluating academic systems focused on exploring the technical potential of MSRs to those of companies and countries focusing on near-term deployment. A wide variety of designs currently exist ranging from solid to liquid-fueled designs, with salt processing on-site or off-site, and a variety of fuel choices. As such, the proliferation resistance and physical protection aspects will have significantly more variation depending on reactor design than the other advanced reactors. The rapid introduction and evolution of innovative MSR designs inevitably means that technology specific details of overview reports, such as this one, become rapidly outdated. Consequently, this report focuses on essential features required for any MSR rather than specific design aspects.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Copper Dendrites and Surface Engineering for Enhanced CO2 Reduction Research Report Paper

The electrocatalytic reduction of CO 2 (CO 2 R) into hydrocarbon fuels, such as ethylene and ethanol, provides an attractive pathway towards closing the industrial carbon cycle and producing chemicals using renewable electricity. Existing CO 2 R technologies can exhibit C 2+ product selectivity above 74% and operating current densities over 1.3 A/cm 2 , but none can achieve both simultaneously, limiting the commercial viability and scalability of this technology. Low CO 2 concentrations at the catalyst surface and competing side reactions such as the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) inhibit C 2+ faradaic efficiencies and operational current densities. Additionally, the use of high surface area cathode geometries to increase operational current densities is under-investigated. In this work, we electrodeposit a macroporous copper dendrite film to form high surface area cathodes. These structures are then coated with a combination of hydrophobic/hydrophilic ionomers to achieve high electrochemically active surface areas (ECSA), form regions of intrinsic porosity, and maximize catalytic availability of CO 2 . Using these techniques, we hope to maximize C 2+ faradaic efficiencies (FE) and geometric partial current densities. The treated cathode compound macrostructure (~10μm-sized pores, and ~μm-long dendrites) and concomitant surface area allows increased geometric current densities while the ionomer coating simultaneously inhibits HER and increases hydrogen availability to improve C 2+ selectivity. Our results show that careful engineering of the catalyst-electrolyte interface can enhance CO 2 reduction product selectivity and efficiency.

10 SYNTHETIC FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Rapid Quality Assessment in Additive Manufacturing: New Procedure Accelerates Build Quality Assessment. White paper

Accelerated growth of the additive manufacturing (AM) industry in recent years is accompanied by a rising need for methods to quickly assess quality at-scale. Current practices for quality inspection include nondestructive test methods and destructive testing of witness coupons, which are artifacts built alongside the actual part. However, these methods can be costly and time-consuming. Recognizing this need, the Additive Manufacturing Center of Excellence (AM CoE) initiated a project led by its partner, Auburn University, to develop rapid testing procedure using asbuilt samples tested in torsion to quantitatively assess build quality. The presented work developed a rapid testing procedure using as-built samples tested in torsion to quantify small variances for assessing build quality.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Idaho Falls Power Black Start Field Demonstration (Preliminary Outcomes Paper)

This April 2021 field demonstration builds upon a 2017 field demonstration in which it was determined IFP’s HPPs, on their own, can support islanded black start and operation up to 2.5 MW loading. Modeling and hardware-in-the-loop testing was used in the intervening period to design an energy storage solution, specifically using ultracapacitors, to reduce likelihood of generators tripping during the field demonstration. Overall, the 2021 field demonstration tested three different options for meeting IFP’s requirements: innovating the hydropower controls, synchronizing multiple HPPs on the system, and integrating an ultracapacitor energy storage system. This report documents the testing performed. Follow-on analysis will provide additional insights, for example, including a complete table of comparative results between the tests and scenarios. The analysis will also propose a refined design for an energy storage system to meet IFP’s grid islanded needs.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

SULI Research Report Paper

Hybrid-CMOS (hCMOS) nanosecond x-ray imagers are a powerful timeresolved HED (high-energy-density) diagnostic due to their sensitivity to visible light, x-rays, and charged particles. However, significant pseudosinusoidal background oscillations have been observed in these sensors when exposed to an early incident excitation, a phenomenon that has been experimentally linked the sensor’s bond wire inductance. We analyze the oscillations both in the time domain and spatially to account for variations on the pixel level. Both theoretical techniques and analysis of experimental data have shown that the oscillations are a global sensor phenomenon. In addition, we effectively describe the oscillations with a physics-based model, giving further insight into the processes affecting them. This technique allows the hCMOS user to subtract out the oscillations from their measurements and improve accuracy.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2021

Agile Strategy Living Laboratory Reflection Paper

Getting my team members to all agree that we needed to pursue possible solutions for our documentation review process was an idea that came across very well with the team. This specific topic has be something that as a team we have been having struggles with recently due to the shear amount of documents that have been flowing through the team’s hands to review. We all realized that the process had areas that we could change that would eliminate confusion for new employees, reduce backload, and improve efficiency and quality of the documentation reviews. The key personnel on our team that have the most direct control and impact over this process are the production control specialists, documentation preparation and review is their primary job function. They are denoted in the action pack as “doc spec 1” and this individual has 12 years of expertise in their role. The engineers are denoted as “engineer 1, 2, 3” respectively. Engineer 1 has 10 years of experience in this team, engineer 3 has 38 years of experience on the team, and engineer 2 is myself with 5 years of expertise with this team and 5 with the department of defense.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
DOE OSTI2020

Considerations for a New Solution Reactor for Nuclear Criticality Safety Applications-a White Paper

This document presents considerations for a new solution reactor as noted in the United States (US) Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) Five Year Plan. The solution reactor tasking is noted in collaboration with the French Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN). This document presents General Considerations (GC) and Specific Considerations (SC) that support the GCs.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

A White Paper on Design and Fabrication of SRF Deflecting Cavities for Elletra-2

Synchrotron Trieste (ST) operates an X-ray light source Elettra and plans to upgrade it to a low-emittance high-brightness X-ray source Elettra-2.0 based on a multi-bend achromat lattice. There is also a significant interest among Elettra users to pursue time-resolved studies of matter choosing the appropriate X-ray pulse duration in the range from 20 picoseconds to a few picoseconds FWHM. Recently, X. Huang (SLAC) and A. Zholents (ANL) performed a study sponsored by ST and proposed modifications to the Elettra-2.0 design that will allow production of picosecond x-ray pulses on many beamlines. They showed that two radio frequency deflecting cavities with slightly different frequencies can be installed in the ring’s sector 8 and produce time-dependent orbit deflection to a few dedicated electron bunches without affecting other regular bunches. These special bunches produce X-ray pulses in which transverse position or angle, or both, are correlated with time. The short X-ray pulse is then obtained by using a narrow slit positioned downstream in the beamline. Many technical details of the proposed modification to Elettra-2.0 are discussed in the supplemental report. We present here the design of a multicell superconducting deflecting cavity for the purpose of the ST Short Pulse X-ray (SPX) project.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Position Papers for the ASCR Workshop on Reimagining Codesign

On behalf of the Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) program in the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science, we are organizing a Workshop on Reimagining Codesign (ReCoDe). Codesign is the process of jointly designing interoperating components of a computing system—in particular: applications, algorithms, system software, programming models, and the hardware on which they run. The goal is to maximize the overall performance, efficiency, and other desirable qualities of the system as a whole. Codesign is a standard methodology in the embedded-systems community, where space, power, and cost constraints are commonly pitted against execution speed for a tightly constrained feature set. Over the last decade, the DOE has invested in codesign efforts to foster the development of exascale computing systems for broad classes of scientific and engineering applications. The ReCoDe workshop hopes to explore how scientific applications of interest to the DOE can be accelerated through close interactions with hardware designers and software-stack developers, in which all components adapt to each other’s requirements and constraints. We want to answer the question of what are the key tools and methodologies for accomplishing codesign in today’s computing landscape, and what will be the highest impact targets for meeting DOE’s emerging mission requirements. This workshop aims to bring together DOE, industry, and academia to identify opportunities to build on past codesign successes and identify new areas that are either emerging or that may need reimagining for the future. We want to continue to find opportunities that can be pursued as a joint effort and continue to break down the traditional customer/vendor dichotomy with true partnerships. From this work, DOE will benefit from increased application performance relative to what stock hardware or existing general-purpose roadmaps can provide, and vendors will benefit from expanding their hardware’s capabilities to address needs they might have not otherwise anticipated and thereby create more widespread interest in their products. The workshop will be structured around a set of breakout sessions, with every attendee expected to participate actively in the discussions. Afterward, workshop attendees—from DOE, industry, and academia—will produce a report for ASCR that summarizes the findings made during the workshop.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Position Papers for the ASCR Workshop on the Science of Scientific-Software Development and Use

Software is an increasingly important component in the pursuit of scientific discovery. Both its development and use are essential activities for many scientific teams. At the same time, very little scientific study has been conducted to understand, characterize, and improve the development and use of software for science. Computational science teams have diversified over time to include contributions from domain scientists who provide expertise in scientific and engineering disciplines, applied mathematicians and computer scientists who provide optimal algorithms and data structures, and software and data engineers who provide methodologies and tools adapted and adopted from other software domains. These diverse contributions have enabled tremendous advances in the pursuit of scientific discovery, even as models, computer architectures, and software environments have become more complicated. With this increasing diversity, we believe the next opportunity for qualitative improvement comes from applying the scientific method to understanding, characterizing, and improving how scientific software is developed and used. We believe that this pursuit requires expertise from computational scientists themselves, and from the cognitive and social sciences as well as the software engineering research community. As we look to increase the productivity and sustainability of the scientific-software-development-and-use cycle, a more systematic application of the scientific method to understand processes for software development and use will be a valuable tool to guide future work and result in more usable and sustainable software. This workshop will bring together computer scientists, software engineering researchers, computational scientists, applied mathematicians, social scientists, cognitive scientists, and others, to explore how we can conduct such systematic investigations, what can be learned, and how doing so will benefit the scientific enterprise. The workshop will be structured around a set of breakout sessions, with every attendee expected to participate actively in the discussions. Afterward, workshop attendees — from DOE, industry, and academia — will produce a report for ASCR that summarizes the findings of the workshop.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2021

White paper on Verification and Validation for Cyber Emulation Models

All disciplines that use models to predict the behavior of real-world systems need to determine the accuracy of the models’ results. Techniques for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ) focus on improving the credibility of computational models and assessing their predictive capability. VVUQ emphasizes rigorous evaluation of models and how they are applied to improve understanding of model limitations and quantify the accuracy of model predictions.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Cumulative Effects Analysis for Wind Energy Development: Current Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities (IEA Wind White Paper)

The increasing global deployment of wind energy has given rise to concerns about potential adverse effects on certain wildlife species and habitats. The United States and European nations use environmental impact assessments (EIAs) to evaluate the environmental effects of wind energy and inform wind energy planning, siting, and operational processes. A key component of the EIA is the cumulative effects analysis/assessment (CEA). CEAs consider the effects of a proposed development in the context of past, present, and future developments, as well as other (non-wind) activities. However, practitioners worldwide have struggled to implement cost-effective and consistent processes for CEAs. Further, there is no widely accepted scientific methodology to assess cumulative effects. As wind energy deployment continues to expand, developing a consistent and scientifically based approach to CEAs may provide a more comparable across assessments and cost-effective means of reducing risk during siting, operations, and decommissioning/repowering, while minimizing regulatory hurdles. This technical report evaluates the current state of CEA practices, covering both land-based and offshore wind energy development. It focuses on impacts from the preconstruction, construction, and operational phases of the wind farm, which are the phases where most research currently exists. Emerging research addresses impacts from the perspective of life cycle assessments (LCAs), including the impacts of manufacturing and preconstruction (May et al. 2020). The technical report also summarizes CEA processes and guidelines, analysis approaches, and current challenges. Finally, it highlights opportunities for further research and coordination, and includes a geographically organized CEA information resource bank.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Optimism is not a strategy: A white paper on how to give IFE a fighting chance to be real

With NIF shot N210808, we now have an existence proof of ignition (i.e. Lawson-like criteria exceeded and capsule gain well exceeding unity) in the laboratory and it has generated renewed interest in IFE. However, it is important to recognize that ignition on the NIF has been much more difficult than what was originally envisioned. Moreover, the design for the target that actually obtained burning plasma (Kritcher, Young, Robey, et al., Nature Phys. 2022; Zylstra, Hurricane, Callahan, et al., Nature, 601, 542, 2022) and ignition conditions is much different than the high gain design originally planned in the National Ignition Campaign (NIC; e.g. Lindl, Phys. Plasmas, 2, 3933, 1995; Lindl, Amendt, Berger, et al., Phys. Plasmas, 11, 339, 2004). In order to avoid squandering time and resources, the IFE community must learn the lessons of what happened on the NIF over the past decade.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

A Call to Arms Control: Synergies between Nonproliferation Applications of Neutrino Detectors and Large-Scale Fundamental Neutrino Physics Experiments (A Snowmass White Paper)

The High Energy Physics community can benefit from a natural synergy in research activities into next-generation large-scale water and scintillator neutrino detectors, now being studied for remote reactor monitoring, discovery and exclusion applications in cooperative nonproliferation contexts. Since approximately 2010, US nonproliferation researchers, supported by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), have been studying a range of possible applications of relatively large (100 ton) to very large (hundreds of kiloton) water and scintillator neutrino detectors. In parallel, the fundamental physics community has been developing detectors at similar scales and with similar design features for a range of high-priority physics topics, primarily in fundamental neutrino physics. These topics include neutrino oscillation studies at beams and reactors, solar, and geological neutrino measurements, supernova studies, and others. Examples of ongoing synergistic work at U.S. national laboratories and universities include prototype gadolinium-doped water and water-based and opaque scintillator test-beds and demonstrators, extensive testing and industry partnerships related to large area fast position-sensitive photomultiplier tubes, and the development of concepts for a possible underground kiloton-scale water-based detector for reactor monitoring and technology demonstrations. Some opportunities for engagement between the two communities include bi-annual Applied Antineutrino Physics conferences, collaboration with U.S. National Laboratories engaging in this research, and occasional NNSA funding opportunities supporting a blend of nonproliferation and basic science R&D, directed at the U.S. academic community.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗