Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “GUIDANCE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Measure Guideline: Ventilation Guidance for Residential High-Performance New Construction - Multifamily

The measure guideline provides ventilation guidance for residential high performance multifamily construction that incorporates the requirements of the ASHRAE 62.2 ventilation and indoor air quality standard. The measure guideline focus is on the decision criteria for weighing cost and performance of various ventilation systems. The measure guideline is intended for contractors, builders, developers, designers and building code officials. The guide may also be helpful to building owners wishing to learn more about ventilation strategies available for their buildings. The measure guideline includes specific design and installation instructions for the most cost effective and performance effective solutions for ventilation in multifamily units that satisfies the requirements of ASHRAE 62.2-2016.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

2005 ACGIH Lifting TLV: Employee-Friendly Presentation and Guidance for Professional Judgment

The American Council of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Lifting Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) provide a tool to reduce incidence of low back and shoulder injuries. However, application of the TLV is too complicated for floor-level workers and relies on professional judgment to assess commonly encountered tasks. This paper presents an Employee-Friendly Simplified Format of the TLV that has been adapted from Table 1 of the Lifting TLV presented in the 2005 TLVs and BEIs Based on the Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices. This simplified format can be employed by floor-level workers to self-assess lifting tasks. The Ergonomics Project Team also provides research-based guidance for applying professional judgment consistent with standard industry practice: Extended Work Shifts – Reduce weight by 20% for shifts lasting 8 to 12 hours; Constrained Lower Body Posture – Reduce weight by 25% when lifting in such postures; Infrequently Performed Lifts – Lift up to 15 lbs. ≤3 lifts per hour within the zones marked “No safe limit for repetitive lifting” in the TLVs Table 1; Asymmetry beyond 30° – Reduce weight by 10 lbs. for lifts with up to 60° asymmetry from sagittal plane.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗

Guidance on the Technology Performance Level (TPL) Assessment Methodology

This document presents the revised Technology Performance Level (TPL) assessment methodology. There are three parts to this revised methodology 1) the Stakeholder Needs and Assessment Guidance (this document), 2) the Technical Submission form, 3) the TPL scoring spreadsheet. The TPL assessment is designed to give a technology neutral or agnostic assessment of any wave energy converter technology. The focus of the TPL is on the performance of the technology in meeting the customer’s needs. The original TPL is described in [1, 2] and those references also detail the critical differences in the nature of the TPL when compared to the more widely used technology readiness level (TRL). (Wave energy TRL is described in [3]). The revised TPL is particularly intended to be useful to investors and also to assist technology developers to conduct comprehensive assessments in a way that is meaningful and attractive to investors. The revised TPL assessment methodology has been derived through a structured Systems Engineering approach. This was a formal process which involved analyzing customer and stakeholder needs through the discipline of Systems Engineering. The results of the process confirmed the high level of completeness of the original methodology presented in [1] (as used in the Wave Energy Prize judging) and now add a significantly increased level of detail in the assessment and an improved more investment focused structure. The revised TPL also incorporates the feedback of the Wave Energy Prize judges.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Proposed Guidance for Preparing and Reviewing Molten Salt Nonpower Reactor Licence Applications (NUREG-1537)

Development of non-power molten salt reactor (MSR) test facilities is under consideration to support the analyses needed for development of a full-scale MSR. These non-power MSR test facilities will require review by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff. This report proposes chapter adaptations for NUREG-1537 in the form of interim staff guidance to address preparation and review of molten salt non-power reactor license applications. The proposed adaptations are based on a previous regulatory gap analysis of select chapters from NUREG-1537 for their applicability to non-power MSRs operating with a homogeneous fuel salt mixture.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Guidance on Hazard and Safety Analyses of LPG Spills on Water

In 2004, at the request of the Department of Energy, Sandia National Laboratories (Sandia) prepared a report, "Guidance on the Risk and Safety Analysis of Large Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Spills Over Water". That report provided a framework for assessing hazards and identifying approaches to minimize the consequences to people and property from an LNG spill over water. Because of increasing domestic U.S. supplies of natural gas and associated by products, such as liquefied propane gas (LPG), the United states Coast Guard requested that Sandia assess the general scale of possible hazards for a breach and spill of an LPG carrier. Because of the broad range of LPG carriers types -- refrigerated and pressurized, ships and barges, Sandia chose to focus this analysis on the larger LPG refrigerated systems. With cargo capacities ranging up to 100,000 m 3 , these types of ships can be expected to support potential increased LPG exports. Sandia assessed potential accidental and intentional threats, and based on LPG carrier configurations and designs, estimated potential breach sizes, spill rates and volumes, and conducted fire, vapor dispersion, and detonation hazard analyses. This report summarizes the analyses conducted, the expected range of potential hazards from an associated refrigerated LPG carrier spill over water, and risk management approaches to minimize consequences to people and property from such a spill.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

Sampling for Confidence: Guidance for Evaluating the Quality of Canister Sampling Plans

There is a need for an inspection frequency that demonstrates reasonable assurance that the confinement function of dual-purpose-canisters (DPCs) is maintained as these DPCs are returned to storage service following transportation. The DPCs contain spent fuel from shutdown reactor sites. The currently-proposed 100% DPC inspection frequency is overly conservative and unnecessary to demonstrate reasonable assurance that the confinement function of all DPCs is maintained for return to storage service. Testing all DPCs does not appropriately reflect the very low risk of leakage (i.e., low probability based on design and low consequences based on analysis). Currently, there are 1066 DPCs forecast to be loaded at reactor sites which either are shutdown or plan to cease operations by 2025. These DPCs may be transported by rail in sets of 3 to 5 DPCs per shipment. Assuming each rail consist originates at a single reactor site, an alternative proposal to test one canister/consist/site would result in 356 to 214 canisters, respectively, being tested given the population of 1,066 canisters This Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) report outlines statistically-based, random sampling plans that provide guidance on the number of samples of these canisters that are needed to establish bounds on the quality of the outcome of such sampling. The quality of each proposed sampling plan is expressed in the form of a statement that the number of undetected, unacceptable canisters in the population is less than some number, call it D, at a high level of confidence. In addition, evaluations using a similar approach for random sampling at the proposed levels of 214 and 356 canisters are provided.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Underground Test Area Activity Preemptive Review Guidance Nevada National Security Site, Nevada

This report is a revision to the preemptive review (PER) guidance originally released as U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) document DOE/NV--1552 in 2016 (NNSA/NFO, 2016). PER committees review various products, including data, documents, software/codes, analyses, and models. PER committees provide technical recommendations to support regulatory decisions that are the responsibility of the DOE Environmental Management (EM) Nevada Program and NDEP. PERs are designed to be adaptable to the varying requirements of individual CAU studies. Their goals include the following: Maintaining high technical standards; ensuring work is technically adequate, competently performed, and documented consistent with other programmatic documents; and verifying that established quality requirements are satisfied. Helping focus CAU studies on UGTA Activity objectives identified in the FFACO by implementing Section 3 of Appendix VI, which includes the UGTA Strategy Flowchart (Figure 3-2) and Process Flow Diagram Dictionary for the UGTA CAUs (Table 3-1). Providing a mechanism for early identification of technical and/or strategy issues that could affect successfully implementing the UGTA strategy. Providing assurance to NDEP that work in progress and final reports are technically sound. Providing independent reviews that allow for a better understanding of the technical work, and result in products that are transparent and sufficient to allow the DOE EM Nevada Program to meet regulatory objectives.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Sampling for Confidence: Guidance for Evaluating the Quality of Canister Sampling Plans

There is a need for an inspection frequency that demonstrates reasonable assurance that the confinement function of dual-purpose-canisters (DPCs) is maintained as these DPCs are returned to storage service following transportation. The DPCs contain spent fuel from shutdown reactor sites. The currently-proposed 100% DPC inspection frequency is overly conservative and unnecessary to demonstrate reasonable assurance that the confinement function of all DPCs is maintained for return to storage service. Testing all DPCs does not appropriately reflect the very low risk of leakage (i.e., low probability based on design and low consequences based on analysis). Currently, there are 1066 DPCs forecast to be loaded at reactor sites which either are shutdown or plan to cease operations by 2025. These DPCs may be transported by rail in sets of 3 to 5 DPCs per shipment. Assuming each rail consist originates at a single reactor site, an alternative proposal to test one canister/consist/site would result in 356 to 214 canisters, respectively, being tested given the population of 1,066 canisters This Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) report outlines statistically-based, random sampling plans that provide guidance on the number of samples of these canisters that are needed to establish bounds on the quality of the outcome of such sampling. The quality of each proposed sampling plan is expressed in the form of a statement that the number of undetected, unacceptable canisters in the population is less than some number, call it D, at a high level of confidence. In addition, evaluations using a similar approach for random sampling at the proposed levels of 214 and 356 canisters are provided. This is a technical report that does not take into account the contractual limitations under the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (Standard Contract) (10 CFR Part 961). Under the provisions of the Standard Contract, DOE does not consider spent nuclear fuel in multi-assembly canisters to be an acceptable waste form, absent a mutually agreed upon contract amendment. To the extent discussions or recommendations in this report conflict with the provisions of the Standard Contract, the Standard Contract provisions prevail.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Risk-Informed Performance-Based Technology. Inclusive Guidance for Advanced Reactor Licensing Basis Development (NEI 18-04)

This guideline presents a modern, technology-inclusive, risk-informed, and performance-based (TI-RIPB) process for selection of Licensing Basis Events (LBEs); safety classification of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) and associated risk-informed special treatments; and determination of defense-in-depth (DID) adequacy for non-LWRs. This guidance document provides one acceptable means for addressing the aforementioned topics as part of demonstrating a specific design provides reasonable assurance of adequate radiological protection.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Design Guidance for High Temperature Concentrating Solar Power Components

This report provides guidance for the design of components for concentrating power facilities operating at high temperatures and undergoing high, secondary thermal stresses relative to the applied primary pressure stress. The design rules were developed for the design of Generation 3 CSP tubular receivers manufactured from Alloy 740H, but are generally applicable to a wide range of component types undergoing similar loads. Part 1 of the report provides procedural design rules for components to be used in conjunction with the 2019 edition of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code. Part 2 provides corresponding design data for Alloy 740H. Part 3 of the report is a commentary describing the rationale behind the design rules and the data underlying the design material properties. Finally, Part 4 provides an extensive set of worked sample problems detailing the application of the rules to CSP components.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

Energy Intensity Baselining and Tracking Guidance

Each company joining the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Better Buildings, Better Plants Program (Better Plants) commits to establishing an energy consumption and energy intensity (EI) baseline and to tracking its energy performance over a 10-year period against that baseline. The baseline must reflect a company’s energy consumption over a 12-month period, covering all its U.S.-based operations. Energy consumption is calculated by fuel type in terms of primary energy (also known as source energy). EI is broadly defined as the amount of energy consumed per unit of output produced. For this guidance document and for the program, the term energy performance represents an evaluation of a facility’s capacity to use energy efficiently. Metrics used to assess a facility’s energy performance can include EI, energy consumption, improvements in EI, etc. Establishing an energy baseline and tracking system is a critical first step in effectively managing energy use. Developing a baseline can help a company understand energy use within the corporation and give it a point of comparison to evaluate future efforts to improve energy performance. It can also support efforts to validate a company’s energy management activities, improve comparative analyses when using benchmarks, and help in predicting future energy needs. In addition, a company that normalizes its performance data can determine highly defensible measures of energy savings generated through implemented energy efficiency projects. Establishing a baseline and tracking energy performance is also a requirement for ISO 50001 certification. Although basic energy data can be collected through utility bills, most manufacturers will have to perform additional analyses to develop accurate and robust energy baselines and tracking systems. Energy is consumed in many ways within the manufacturing sector and can come from multiple sources. Energy is sometimes generated and sold to other parties or captured and reused on-site. External events can exert a significant impact on a facility or company’s energy use independent of any purposeful efforts to improve energy efficiency. Operational changes, such as production shifts—which may be inevitable for some companies over the 10-year period covered by the program—can also make a big difference in energy use. Since Better Plants asks companies to account for all their U.S.-based operations, mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures can also have significant implications for a company’s energy metrics. This document aims to demystify the sometimes complex baselining process. It devotes special attention to the task of normalizing and adjusting energy consumption to account for external factors, such as weather and production changes. A key recommendation is that companies use regression analysis to normalize their energy consumption data whenever possible. Regression analysis is a statistical technique that estimates the dependence of a variable (i.e., energy use in the context of Better Plants) on one or more independent variables such as ambient temperature, while controlling for the influence of other variables at the same time. A properly developed regression analysis can provide a reliable estimate of energy savings resulting from energy improvement strategies and projects by accounting for the effects of variables such as annual production levels and weather. DOE has developed a companion Energy Performance Indicator software tool (EnPI) to simplify the baselining process. This tool can run regression models, calculate changes in EI at the facility level, and automatically compile facility-level data into a corporate-wide metric. Note that although the relevant equations used to calculate EI are provided in this document, the EnPI tool will automatically perform most calculations for the user. Additionally, Better Plants Partners (Partners) can call on their Technical Account Manager (TAM) to help them establish a baseline and assist with the necessary calculations to track progress.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Boosting Energy Efficiency of Heterogeneous Connected Automated Vehicle (CAV) Fleets via Anticipative and Cooperative Vehicle Guidance

In 2017, the Department of Energy funded a team at Clemson University and Argonne National Laboratory to develop collaborative perception and anticipative/predictive vehicle guidance schemes for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) and to quantify the energy saving potential of this technology in large scale traffic microsimulations at different levels of technology penetration and also experimentally. The project goal was demonstrating up to a 10% energy saving potential from different aspects of the implementation with a focus on reducing unnecessary braking events by anticipatory speed and lane selection. This project introduced novel anticipative car following and lane selection schemes for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs). Our control schemes benefited from prediction of human driver behavior, information exchange between CAVs, and sometimes from collaboration to save energy, reduce braking events, and harmonize traffic. The energy savings was first demonstrated by traffic micro-simulations and then via a novel Vehicle-In-the-Loop (VIL) experimental testbed.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Guidance on Demand-Controlled Kitchen Ventilation

This report provides guidance on Demand Control Kitchen Ventilation (DCKV) systems in commercial food service facilities. The report explains how DCKV works and describes the components of a typical system.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Development of Standardized Property Requirements, Measurement Methods, and Reporting Guidance for Coatings

The diverse research programs presently in progress around the world have advanced a large number of coated cladding concepts to various stages of maturity. Industry teams have developed leading coating compositions and geometries, but significant disparity exists in the importance placed on different coating properties, as well as the applicability and standardization of the various methods used to measure these properties. This milestone report provides an initial assessment of the most important coating properties and the experimental methods available for their determination to lay the foundation for standardized reporting and development of comprehensive datasets for modeling efforts. This report has determined that the residual stress of the coating is the most crucial property to investigate, yet it has received minimal attention to date due to a knowledge gap about the growth and formation of the brittle Laves phase under reactor conditions. The significance of residual stress of the coating is further enhanced by its connection and interdependence with other important properties like creep and coating failure mechanisms. This milestone proposes an importance rating for residual stress properties and their associated measurement techniques to fill in knowledge. Furthermore, techniques to investigate the outlined properties are discussed, and their capabilities and limitations are illustrated to provide guidance on their use.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Grid Architecture Guidance Specification for FAST-DERMS (V.1.0)

This document provides grid architecture guidance to support the Grid Modernization Laboratory Consortium (GMLC) Federated Architecture for Secure and Transactive Distributed Energy Resource Management Solution (FAST-DERMS) project. The FAST-DERMS project seeks to develop an architecture and reference implementation solution that enables the provision of reliable, resilient, and secure transmission and distribution (T&D) grid services through the scalable aggregation and near-real-time management of utility-scale and small-scale distributed energy resources (DERs).

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

Molten Salt Reactor Technical and Safety Considerations Outside of Guidance Documents

This document provides information on distinctive characteristics of liquid salt–fueled molten salt reactors (MSRs) for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consideration as it seeks to achieve effective and efficient advanced reactor mission readiness. The NRC has requested that Oak Ridge National Laboratory provide advice regarding technical and safety considerations that might be advantageous to address via policy, rulemaking, or license conditions (i.e., beyond the scope of guidance documents) for accommodating MSRs. It is recognized that MSRs could be regulated based on existing rules, with exceptions, to reflect their distinctive characteristics and technologies. However, directly applying the existing regulatory processes that evolved with the light water reactor fleet to MSRs could be unduly burdensome to the point that their application would inhibit deployment of MSRs in the United States.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Success Path Method: Implementation Guidance

This document provides a guide regarding the application of the Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) Success Path Method (SPM) for the management of risk(s) of processes associated with organizational objectives. The current work provides an approach to implement the set of standard (higher level) requirements for the SPM. A companion document for Process Specific Applications, which is current under development, provides additional guidance regarding how the general implementation description detailed here can be adapted to the evaluation of specific processes.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Findings during Incorporation of the Federal Guidance Report No. 15 External Dose Coefficients into the RESRAD Family of Codes

Argonne National Laboratory was tasked by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to incorporate the recently published Federal Guidance Report No. 15 (FGR 15) (EPA 2019) external dose rate coefficients into the database of the RESRAD family of codes. FGR 15 is one of two publications that contain age-specific external effective dose rate coefficients that are based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 103 (ICRP-103) methodology (ICRP 2007) and the ICRP-107 (ICRP 2008) nuclear decay data; ICRP-144 (ICRP 2020) is the other publication.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗