Sustainable Remediation of Radionuclides By a Common Sense Approach to Enhanced Attenuation - 16441
Development of in situ and relatively passive remedies for treatment of groundwater contaminated by metals and radionuclides is becoming more important because of the difficulty and cost - both to the environment and financially -- of removing these types of contaminants from the subsurface by pump-and-treat or excavation. In situ technologies rely on reactions that tend to remove contaminants from groundwater by partitioning them to solid phases in the aquifer. Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) relies solely on natural reactions to achieve remedial goals. Enhanced attenuation (EA) uses engineered approaches to supplement remediation when MNA is not sufficient to meet remedial goals. Both approaches leave contaminants in the subsurface and require a high burden of proof that contaminants will not be mobilized and become a risk in the future. Proof of the sustained effectiveness of an EA remedy is made much easier by strategic design. In multi-contaminant plumes, it is important to prioritize contaminants according to the risk they pose, with the recognition that one remedy rarely treats all contaminants. The goal for the engineered portion of the remedy should be maximum risk reduction with minimal engineering. Natural attenuation or negotiated alternate concentration levels will often allow low risk contaminants to go untreated. Whenever possible, the remedy should be consistent with the geochemical evolution of the waste site, insuring that the treated immobilized contaminants are likely to remain relatively immobile for long time frames. Finally, use what nature provides geologically, hydrologically, geochemically, or microbiologically in the remedy design. One of the impediments faced by waste site managers in implementing EA remedies is paralysis by perceived complexity. There are things that must be known to design an effective EA remedy, but there is always the temptation to know everything to eliminate the possibility of failure. Furthermore, there are plenty of people warning of failure if all is not known and they are usually willing to help the design team know all, for a price. Yet, the price of trying to eliminate all risk is never implementing an innovative remedy. All parties involved -- scientists/engineers, waste site managers, regulators and stakeholders must assume some degree of risk to deploy an EA remedy. If all parties are to assume some risk, then trust built through close communication from the start is required. The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management has funded an applied field research initiative for several years focused, in part, on developing EA remedies for metals and radionuclides using these guiding principles. This approach to EA remedies grew out of developing and deploying a remediation strategy to replace a pump-and-treat system at the F-Area Seepage Basins on the Savannah River Site. The pump-and-treat system was energy intensive, produced several thousand cubic feet of solid radioactive waste per year, and cost $ 1 million per month to operate. The EA remedy that replaced the pump-and-treat is energy efficient, produces no waste, and costs approximately $1 million per year to maintain. At the F-Area Seepage Basins approximately 7 billion liters of low level radioactive waste solutions were disposed in three unlined basins resulting in contaminated groundwater containing various radionuclides and other contaminants. The primary contaminants of concern are tritium, strontium-90, uranium, and iodine-129. Other key features of the contaminant plume are its acidic nature with pH values as low as 3.2, its vertical stratification in the water table aquifer, and the tendency of the most contaminated portions to follow troughs in the top of the clay separating the upper aquifer zone from the lower aquifer zone. The geology was exploited by installing a funnel-and-gate system into the clay with the barrier portion blocking contaminant flow paths in the troughs in the clay. This forces the most contaminated water to flow through the gates where it encounters an in situ treatment zone created by periodic injections of alkaline solution. The flux of tritium has been reduced significantly by the barrier walls. Strontium-90 and uranium are treated by enhanced sorption in the circum-neutral pH treatment zone, consistent with natural geochemical evolution of the waste site from acidic to more neutral pH. An additional in situ treatment zone was created up-gradient of the one of the gates to treat iodine-129. Sub-micrometer diameter silver chloride particles were injected into the aquifer by direct push methods to create the treatment zone. In the laboratory and in a field pilot test the poorly soluble silver chloride particles reacted with iodide to form much less soluble silver iodide. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the silver chloride is ongoing. (authors)