Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “rot”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

167 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2001

Monitoring the Stable Pulsar PSR B1509-5B

The monitoring of this pulsar is still on-going, and hopefully will be for years to come. It has proved to be possible to fit the timing ephemeris for PSR B1509-59 for the entire monitoring period to date (five and a half years) with a single quintic polynomial. In order to establish its significance, we need at least one more year of monitoring data (for which we have proposed), but if this result is confirmed, it appears that two significant results may emerge: 1) well-determined values for the first and second braking indices; the first is well-established, but the second still needs a longer time base for a significant value 2) there seems to be a periodic variation in the pulse arrival times that can be fit with harmonic sinusoids with periods of approximately 790 and 395 days; if this result holds up on a longer time base it would be very exciting. Note that we are in position now to generate a timing ephemeris on the basis of the x-ray data that is more accurate than the radio ephemeris. In the meantime we have also determined a position for the pulsar that is more accurate than the ones derived from radio and Chandra observations. These results were reported at the 2000 HEAD meeting in Honolulu, HI. Travel was partly out of this grant. The remainder was applied toward the acquisition of a laptop computer that allows independent and fast analysis of all monitoring observations.

Rots, Arnold H.↗
NASA NTRS2004

Absolute Timing of the Crab Pulsar with RXTE

We have monitored the phase of the main X-ray pulse of the Crab pulsar with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) for almost eight years, since the start of the mission in January 1996. The absolute time of RXTE's clock is sufficiently accurate to allow this phase to be compared directly with the radio profile. Our monitoring observations of the pulsar took place bi-weekly (during the periods when it was at least 30 degrees from the Sun) and we correlated the data with radio timing ephemerides derived from observations made at Jodrell Bank. We have determined the phase of the X-ray main pulse for each observation with a typical error in the individual data points of 50 microseconds. The total ensemble is consistent with a phase that is constant over the monitoring period, with the X-ray pulse leading the radio pulse by 0.01025 plus or minus 0.00120 period in phase, or 344 plus or minus 40 microseconds in time. The error estimate is dominated by a systematic error of 40 microseconds, most likely constant, arising from uncertainties in the instrumental calibration of the radio data. The statistical error is 0.00015 period, or 5 microseconds. The separation of the main pulse and interpulse appears to be unchanging at time scales of a year or less, with an average value of 0.4001 plus or minus 0.0002 period. There is no apparent variation in these values with energy over the 2-30 keV range. The lag between the radio and X-ray pulses ma be constant in phase (i.e., rotational in nature) or constant in time (i.e., due to a pathlength difference). We are not (yet) able to distinguish between these two interpretations.

Rots, Arnold H.↗
NASA NTRS2004

Calibration of the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer Proportional Counter Array

We present the calibration and background model for the Proportional Counter Array (PCA) aboard the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE). The energy calibration is systematics limited below 10 keV with deviations from a power law fit to the Crab nebula plus pulsar loss than 1%. Unmodelled variations in the instrument background amount to less than 2% of the observed background below 10 keV and less than 1% between 10 and 20 keV. Individual photon arrival times are accurate to 4.4 microseconds at all times during the mission and to 2.5 microseconds after 29 April 1997. The peak pointing direction of the five collimators is known at few arcsecond precision.

Jahoda, Keith↗
NASA NTRS2012

The Crab Pulsar Observed by RXTE: Monitoring the X-Ray to Radio Delay for 16 Years

In 2004 we published the results of monitoring the Crab Pulsar by RXTE. At that time we determined that the primary pulse of the pulsar at X-ray energies precedes its radio counterpart by about 0.01 period in phase or approximately 330 micro seconds. However, we could not establish unambiguously whether the delay is in phase or due to a difference in pathlength. At this time we have twice the time baseline we had in 2004 and we present the same analysis, but now over a period of 16 years, which will represent almost the full mission and the best that will be available from RXTE. The full dataset shows that the phase delay has been decreasing faster than the pulse frequency over the 16 year baseline and that there are variations in the delay on a variety of timescales.

Rots, Arnold↗
NASA NTRS2011

Sky Event Reporting Metadata (VOEvent) Version 2.0

VOEvent [20] defines the content and meaning of a standard information packet for representing, transmitting, publishing and archiving information about a transient celestial event, with the implication that timely follow-up is of interest. The objective is to motivate the observation of targets-of-opportunity, to drive robotic telescopes, to trigger archive searches, and to alert the community. VOEvent is focused on the reporting of photon events, but events mediated by disparate phenomena such as neutrinos, gravitational waves, and solar or atmospheric particle bursts may also be reported. Structured data is used, rather than natural language, so that automated systems can effectively interpret VOEvent packets. Each packet may contain zero or more of the "who, what, where, when & how" of a detected event, but in addition, may contain a hypothesis (a "why") regarding the nature of the underlying physical cause of the event.

Seaman, Rob↗