DOE OSTI2022
Storytelling has been the primary means of knowledge transfer over human history. The effectiveness and reach of stories are improved when the message is appropriate for the target audience. Oftentimes, the stories that are most well received and recounted are those that have a clear purpose and that are told from a variety of perspectives that touch on the varied interests of the target audience. Whether scientists realize or not, they are accustomed to telling stories of their own scientific discoveries through the preparation of manuscripts, presentations, and lectures. Perhaps less frequently, scientists prepare review articles or book chapters that summarize a body of knowledge on a given subject matter, meant to be more holistic recounts of a body of literature. Yet, by necessity, such summaries are often still narrow in their scope and are told from the perspective of a particular discipline. In other words, interdisciplinary reviews or book chapters tend to be the rarity rather than the norm. Naturalists are scientists that tell stories of organisms and their natural environment within a historical context and from an interdisciplinary perspective. Such stories interweave observations of biological subjects from disparate disciplines into a cohesive story. To this end, the success of naturalists in recounting compelling natural history stories is enhanced when they allow themselves to become vulnerable by knowingly entering a literature base full of unfamiliar ways of observing and describing such subjects. When successful, this approach can broaden the scope of the story, making it of interest to a larger audience and attracting further recounting of that story (e.g., citations). To this end, when we look into our crystal ball, we see a need to tell more holistic stories of microorganisms and their functions from an interdisciplinary, naturalist perspective that combines what is known of their contemporary ecology, physiology, and biochemistry with their evolutionary history thereby placing them within a historical Earth context. With this conviction in mind, we take the opportunity to look back on the natural history of methanogens to identify some of their most profound biochemical innovations and their impact on the trajectory of life and the planet. Our approach was to integrate knowledge from the fields of biochemistry, physiology, ecology, evolution, geochemistry, and atmospheric sciences. We start with the origin of the first autotrophic cells and how this set Earth on a path towards biomass expansion and functional diversification. Next, we discuss the importance of iron and sulfur in methanogen metabolism, and how their innovative ways of accessing these elements allowed for expanded use of iron-sulfur clusters ([Fe-S]) as nanoscale catalysts that power(ed) Earth’s biochemical cycles. We next discuss the origin and evolution of [NiFe]-hydrogenase and how this versatile enzyme chassis was co-opted by a variety of anaerobes and aerobes as the foundation for respiratory complexes capable of sustaining higher forms of life, including humans. Lastly, we discuss the evolution of the enzyme molybdenum nitrogenase, and how this allowed the biosphere to overcome fixed nitrogen limitation by tapping the seemingly endless reserve of atmospheric dinitrogen (N 2 ). In telling these stories, we aimed to generate template(s) to motivate future interdisciplinary natural history studies focused on other organisms and processes. Further, we hope to stimulate scientific discourse and provide impetus to become vulnerable and peruse literature of relevance to understanding the causes and consequences of the evolution of your favorite microorganism or biochemical process.
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗