Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “fast reactors”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1971

Flow tests of a single fuel element coolant channel for a compact fast reactor for space power

Water flow tests were conducted on a single-fuel-element cooling channel for a nuclear concept to be used for space power. The tests established a method for measuring coolant flow rate which is applicable to water flow testing of a complete mockup of the reference reactor. The inlet plenum-to-outlet plenum pressure drop, which approximates the overall core pressure drop, was measured and correlated with flow rate. This information can be used for reactor coolant flow and heat transfer calculations. An analytical study of the flow characteristics was also conducted.

Springborn, R. H.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Analysis of dashpot performance for rotating control drums of a lithium cooled fast reactor concept

A dashpot was incorporated in the design of the drive train of the rotating control drum to prevent shock damage to the control drum and drive train at the termination of a scram action. A rotating vane dashpot using reactor coolant lithium as a damping fluid appears to be the best candidate of the various damping devices explored. A performance analysis, results and discussion of vane type dashpots are presented.

Wenzler, C. J.↗
DOE OSTI2021

Modeling a Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor with Thermal Energy Storage using Optimal Dispatch and SAM

Increased contributions from wind and solar energy have helped set the United States on an attainable pathway towards carbon-free energy production. Though renewable energy is pivotal for this goal, saturating the grid with these variable energy sources has its challenges. Resources for wind and solar vary from factors beyond human control, hence the power output from these energy generators doesn’t necessarily match power demand for a specific region at a given moment in time. Solar photovoltaic production has a drastic mismatch since the peaks for power demand and power production are often out of phase: production peaks with available irradiance while demand peaks during the morning and evening hours. This “duck curve” in energy demand, the difference between high and low demand, grows as the grid becomes more saturated with renewable energy providers.

Soto, Gabriel J.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Fast Reactor Materials R&D Update

Focus on materials and design methods to support advanced reactors deployment Design, construction, licensing and operations

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

COUPLED GRIFFIN AND PRONGHORN SIMULATION OF THE MOLTEN SALT FAST REACTOR (MSFR) FOR THE VIRTUAL TEST BED

The Virtual Test Bed (VTB) repository hosts a wide range of challenge problems to showcase modeling and simulation capabilities to support advanced reactor demonstration. An overview of a coupled multiphysics model for Molten Salt Reactors (MSR) is presented here. The analysis leverages MOOSE-based tools (notably Griffin and Pronghorn) for neutronic and thermal hydraulic simulation. Neutron precursor drifting capability is showcased, along with some initial turbulence models. Both steady-state and transient coupled multiphysics results for an MSR concept are discussed.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Removal and Deactivation of Bond Sodium from Fast Reactor Blanket Materials

The disposition of sodium-bonded spent nuclear fuel and blanket materials in a repository is complicated by the presence of sodium metal that is used as a thermal bond between the uranium metal fuel and blanket slugs and their cladding. The concern is that the metallic sodium could react with water, producing explosive hydrogen gas, or could exhibit a pyrophoric character. Thus, experimental studies were performed to investigate and demonstrate the removal and deactivation of bond sodium from blanket material in a dry environment. Specifically, bond sodium was removed from unirradiated Fermi-1 blanket elements and an assembly via a melt-drain-evaporate process using elevated temperature and reduced pressure. The effectiveness of sodium metal removal from the blanket materials and their associated cladding was =99.9998%, based on post-test quantitative analyses. The separated sodium metal was collected and subsequently deactivated by reacting it in a molten state with a controlled addition of ammonium chloride particles atop a molten salt medium. In this process sodium chloride is formed and assimilates into the salt pool. The subsequent deactivation of the bond sodium produced a solid ingot of sodium chloride, potassium chloride, lithium chloride, and cesium chloride that was devoid of sodium metal based on post-test analyses of the salt product. Both the sodium removal and deactivation operations were conducted within a dry inert atmosphere enclosure. The results of this study substantiate a path forward for the disposition of sodium-bonded blanket materials, including 34 metric tons heavy metal in irradiated Fermi-1 blanket material currently stored at Idaho National Laboratory.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Irradiation Damages of Structural Materials under Different Irradiation Environments

For the advancement and development of nuclear systems used in heavy irradiation environments such as fusion DEMO reactors, fission reactors, fast reactors, and accelerator driven target systems, it is necessary to fully understand the changes of mechanical properties and the other properties of the materials induced by irradiation and to clarify the synergistic effect of displacement damage and helium generation. In this study the mechanical property changes and microstructural development induce by displacement damage and helium production have been mainly examined in austenitic stainless steels, 316FR and type304, and ferritic/martensitic steel, HCM12A, irradiated at around 550oC in JRR-3M reactor and/or JOYO fast reactor. At 550°C, 316FR steel was superior to 304 steel in terms of the amount of ductility and strength with respect to irradiation resistance. It is noteworthy that at 550 °C as well as room temperature, the higher fracture strength of the 316FR steels is a remarkable result. It is found that helium atoms strongly influenced on creep lifetime of the irradiated austenitic stainless steel, 316FR. It was found that the ratio of creep rupture time is slightly lower than the lower limit of previous study’s Miyaji and co-workers in the region from 0.01 appm to 1 appm. It is also found that the lower limit of reduction ratio of creep rupture time (irradiation specimen to unirradiation one) does not decrease linearly with the helium production above 10 appm up to about 33 appm. dpa enhanced the reduction of creep lifetime. Recent R&D of high-energy accelerator driven target systems used under heavy irradiation environment is also introduced and discussed for high radiation resistance materials such as Ti alloys with very high number density of nano size precipitate, which have been studying under RaDIATE collaboration, from points of view of irradiation damage and materials development.

radiation damage, structural alloys, neutron irrad↗
DOE OSTI2021

The Fast Modular Reactor (FMR) - Development Plan of a New 50 MWe Gas-cooled Fast Reactor

General Atomics Electromagnetic Systems (GA-EMS) will be developing a new 50-megawatt electric (MWe) fast modular reactor (FMR), under the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP), Advanced Reactor Concepts 2020 (ARC-20) development pathway, that provides safe, carbon free electricity, capable of incremental capacity additions. A modular design allows it to be factory-built and assembled on-site to keep the cost of capital low, while the dry-cooling facilitates siting to complement renewables in nearly any location. GA-EMS is committed to commercialization of the proposed reactor, with a demonstration by 2030, and deployment by the mid-2030s. The ultimate goal of the design is to develop flexible and dispatchable carbon-free power source for the 2035 US electricity market. The GAEMS- led team will verify that simplified characteristics (e.g., inert helium gas coolant, pellet-loaded fuel rod, installation-free of heat sink requirements, small and passive heat removal systems) of the FMR will result in a safe, maintainable, cost-effective, distributed, nuclear energygenerating station. Three key specific project objectives for the next three years include: Development of the conceptual design of the 50- MWe FMR plant, Achievement of Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 4 for key system and component technologies through in-pile tests, out-of-pile tests, and numerical experiments; and Development of robust techno-economic analysis (TEA) and pre-application licensing approach necessary for timely demonstration and eventual commercialization.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Advanced Materials Program Summary

Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Advanced Materials Program: Provide material solutions to enable design, construction, and operation of licensable advanced reactors Including Gas-cooled Reactors, Fast Reactors, Molten Salt Reactors (solid or liquid fuel) Could be of modular design, and from 350 to 1 Mwe Conduct developmental R&D on structural materials that are best addressed by the national program Integrate program-directed work at national labs & universities and collaboration with international partners to address advanced reactor developer needs Provide qualification data (to NQA-1 or equivalent) on structural materials and develop & validate improved high temperature design methodology Utilize consensus standards organizations when appropriate (e.g., ASME, ASTM, etc.) Target resolution of issues needed for near to mid-term deployment of advanced reactors

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Progress in Fast Modular Reactor Conceptual Design

The Fast Modular Reactor (FMR) is a 100-MW(thermal) gas-cooled fast reactor being developed by General Atomics Electromagnetic System with the goal of developing a FMR for flexible and dispatchable power to the U.S. electricity market in the mid-2030s. The conceptual design aims to develop and verify simplified design features. These include an inert helium gas coolant, pellet-loaded fuel rods, installations with air cooling as ultimate heat sink, and small and passive heat removal systems. The goal is to ensure the development of a safe, maintainable, cost-effective, and distributed nuclear energy-generating station. The baseline technologies selected to achieve this goal are a helium coolant that is an inert gas with no chemical reaction with structural components, not activated, single phase, enabling high-temperature operation and a high thermal efficiency Brayton cycle; conventional uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) fuel, which is the most widely used and well-known fuel material, capable of high burnup (100 MWd/kg) and a long fuel life; and silicon carbide composite (SiGA®) cladding and internal structures that are chemically inert in the helium environment, exceptionally radiation tolerant, and being derisked by accident tolerant fuel technology development. Further, the reactor was specifically designed with passive safety features, including high-temperature in-core materials and a reactor vessel cooling system consisting of cooling panels of naturally circulating water. The passive safety of the core was confirmed for the depressurized loss-of–forced cooling accident, which showed the peak cladding temperature at ~1600°C during the transient, which is below the current design limit of 1800°C. The conceptual design of the FMR has been conducted for the reactor system, vessel system, generator and turbomachine, instrumentation and control, residual heat removal system, plant service system, and containment, as well as pre-application licensing documents.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Multi-cycle reload analysis of a long cycle gas-cooled fast modular reactor

There is currently significant interest in deploying HALEU-fueled fast reactors, including the General Atomics (GA) Fast Modular Reactor (FMR). Such reactors can achieve very long fuel cycles, but with multi-batch loading will take decades to reach equilibrium. This motivates design and analysis of both the initial core and multi-cycle reload, which is typically performed using fast-running, deterministic fast reactor codes such as the Argonne Reactor Computation (ARC) codes. In this paper, multicycle reload of the GA FMR is analyzed using the ARC codes. The GA FMR utilizes 19.75 % enriched fuel in a 16 year cycle with a three-batch strategy, with twice-burned fuel placed on the core periphery. The GA FMR has a softened neutron spectrum due to reflecting elements in the core, so the neutronic solution is first benchmarked against the OpenMC Monte Carlo code. Discrepancy on k eff is 400–600 pcm, likely due to the softened neutron spectrum, heterogeneous fuel assembly design and central reflector. However, the rms discrepancy on the assembly power distribution is only 0.6 %, despite the presence of the central reflector. A reload strategy is devised for the first three cycles of such a reactor, ultimately spanning the first 45–48 years of its operation. The fresh core uses 19.75 %, 19.25 % and 16.75 % enriched fuel in place of fresh, once-burned and twice-burned and is then subsequently refueled with only 19.75 % enriched fuel. The cycle length is varied over 3 cycles of operation to balance fuel utilization and reactor availability, specifically with use of an extended 18-year Cycle 1, followed by a shortened 11-year Cycle 2. Cycle 3 is close to the target 16-year length. Finally, placing twice burned assemblies next to the GA FMR central reflector can reduce power peaking by 3 %, at the expense of slightly reducing the cycle length.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Informing and Engaging the Future Workforce on Generation IV International Forum Reactor Systems

Generation IV reactors are six nuclear reactor designs, Sodium Fast reactor (SFR), Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR), Gas cooled Fast Reactor (GFR), Molten Salt Reactor (MSR), Lead Fast Reactor (LFR), and Supercritical Water Reactor (SCWR), that are considered to be the most promising in light of various criteria based on the following objectives: • continuation of the progress made by Generation III water reactors in terms of competitiveness and safety; • more effective use of uranium resources; • less radioactive waste, especially high-level, long-lived waste; • greater protection against malicious acts and the diversion or theft of nuclear materials. The GIF Education and Training Working Group (ETWG) launched two major initiatives in 2016 and in 2021 to not only inform and educate but also to engage the future workforce in support of these reactor systems. This paper will present an overview of the GIF EWTG webinar series as well as the 2021 Pitch your Gen IV Research Competition which is followed by the 2023 Pitch your Gen IV Research. Competition

Paviet, Patricia D.↗