Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “UO2 fuel”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Status Report on Development of TREAT Water Loop

The Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility is a graphite based transient test reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). TREAT started operation in 1959 and performed thousands of transient irradiations for the primary purpose of nuclear fuel safety research. TREAT operations were suspended in 1994, and then, several years later, resumed reactor operations in 2017 to support development of advanced nuclear fuels. TREAT’s more recent historic focus had been for transients with relevance to sodium cooled fast spectrum reactors. TREAT’s first year of modern experiment work performed in 2018, however, saw the demonstration of new kinds of transients focused on light water reactor (LWR) needs including reactivity initiated accidents (RIA) and loss of coolant accidents (LOCA). The successful outcome of these efforts confirmed TREAT’s viability as a transient neutron source for LWR safety research. Since TREAT’s core is air cooled and provides no “built-in” thermal hydraulic boundary conditions for tests specimens, efforts have been underway to establish water-environment capabilities for testing specimens. Small static water capsules have been established to support single rod RIA testing where transient heating is brief. Similarly, deployment of enhanced water capsules with blowdown capability is nearing completion to support single rod LOCA testing. With careful experiment design these capsules can provide representative temperature response histories and water phase transitions for some experiment parameters. The capsule approach is appropriate for cost-effective early phase phenomena identification studies on novel fuels, or when the important test variables are thought to be fairly well understood so that they can be precisely targeted (such as they are for current fleet fuels with moderate burnup UO2 in uncoated zirconium alloy cladding). Due to lack of forced convection, however, the capsule approach cannot achieve representative temperature histories in all regions of the test fuel simultaneously (e.g. cladding and fuel centerline temperatures) while providing representative timing in water phase transitions. Nor can the capsule approach provide appropriate hydraulic conditions for multi-rod bundle testing. For these reasons, design and development has been undertaken for the TREAT Water-Environment Recirculating Loop (TWERL).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Statistical fracture behavior of doped UO 2 using a ball-on-ring equibiaxial flexure test method

Metal oxide dopants, such as titanium and chromium oxides, have garnered considerable attention for their potential to increase grain size (≥ 30 µm) in UO 2 fuel, purportedly enhancing fission gas retention during reactor operation. Fuel performance is significantly impacted by fuel fracture behavior, so it is important to understand the effects of enhanced grain size and dopant content on UO 2 fuel fracture. UO 2 pellets were doped with 0.1 wt% TiO 2 and 0.3 wt% Cr 2 O 3 to alter density and grain size. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy measured dopant levels pre- and post-sintering. X-ray diffraction revealed lattice changes and microstrain via Rietveld refinement. Field emission scanning electron microscopy determined grain sizes of approximately 30 µm for TiO 2 doping and 7 µm for Cr 2 O 3 doping. Transverse rupture strength tests were performed on over 30 samples per dataset to obtain characteristic strength and Weibull modulus. Results indicate no statistical difference in fracture strength between 0.1 wt% TiO 2 doped UO 2 and undoped UO 2 , while 0.3 wt% Cr 2 O 3 doped UO 2 exhibited a 20% decrease in fracture strength. Doped UO 2 samples also showed reduced Weibull modulus compared to undoped UO 2 , suggesting increased scatter in fracture strength. This study's findings suggest that titanium and chromium oxide doping in UO 2 , regardless of grain size, induce residual stresses, decreasing fracture strength and increasing variability in fracture behavior.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

On the mechanical stability of uranyl peroxide hydrates: Implications for nuclear fuel degradation

The mechanical properties and stability of studtite, (UO 2 )(O 2 )(H 2 O) 2 ·2H 2 O, and metastudtite, (UO 2 )(O 2 )(H 2 O) 2 , two important corrosion phases observed on spent nuclear fuel exposed to water, have been investigated using density functional perturbation theory. While (UO 2 )(O 2 )(H 2 O) 2 satisfies the necessary and sufficient Born criteria for mechanical stability, (UO 2 )(O 2 )(H 2 O) 2 ·2H 2 O is found to be mechanically metastable, which might be the underlying cause of the irreversibility of the studtite to metastudtite transformation. According to Pugh's and Poisson's ratios and the Cauchy pressure, both phases are considered ductile and shear modulus is the parameter limiting their mechanical stability. Furthermore, debye temperatures of 294 and 271 K are predicted for polycrystalline (UO 2 )(O 2 )(H 2 O) 2 ·2H 2 O and (UO 2 )(O 2 )(H 2 O) 2 , suggesting a lower micro-hardness of metastudtite.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROACH FOR DOWNBLENDING AND DISPOSITION OF IRRADIATED GRAPHITE FUEL

The IGR reactor, a pulse-type test experimental reactor, reached full power in 1961. The reactor contains a center axial experimental ampoule that is subjected to a large pulse of neutrons (neutron flux maximum density of 7×1016 n/cm2·s, peak power 10GW) when the reactor is operated. The fuel form for the IGR reactor is graphite cubes and rods impregnated with highly enriched (90%) uranyl-dinitrate (UO2(NO3)2·6H2O). This fuel is eligible for return to Russia for reprocessing under the Russian Research Reactor Fuel Return program. However due to some technical and licensing issues it was decided to immobilize this fuel in Kazakhstan. The disposition approach thus selected for the spent HEU fuel involves down-blending of the fuel followed by cementation. Development of the process for down-blending and subsequent cementation requires a process that satisfies many criteria, including fissile content, compressive strength, permeability, and containment of radioactivity, among others. One key goal of the final product is to meet the criteria for termination of safeguards. This paper will describe the overall challenge associated with disposition of irradiated HEU graphite spent fuel, the identification of the objectives of the disposition process, and the constraints associated with development of the process and the waste form.

Gaines, Kris↗
DOE OSTI2016

Development of Macroscale Models of UO 2 Fuel Sintering and Densification using Multiscale Modeling and Simulation

Light water reactor fuel pellets are fabricated using sintering to final densities of 95% or greater. During reactor operation, the porosity remaining in the fuel after fabrication decreases further due to irradiation-assisted densification. While empirical models have been developed to describe this densification process, a mechanistic model is needed as part of the ongoing work by the NEAMS program to develop a more predictive fuel performance code. In this work we will develop a phase field model of sintering of UO 2 in the MARMOT code, and validate it by comparing to published sintering data. We will then add the capability to capture irradiation effects into the model, and use it to develop a mechanistic model of densification that will go into the BISON code and add another essential piece to the microstructure-based materials models. The final step will be to add the effects of applied fields, to model field-assisted sintering of UO 2 . The results of the phase field model will be validated by comparing to data from field-assisted sintering. Tasks over three years: 1. Develop a sintering model for UO 2 in MARMOT 2. Expand model to account for irradiation effects 3. Develop a mechanistic macroscale model of densification for BISON

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Application of HRGS for forensic characterization of uranium oxides, pure uranium metals and uranium alloys

A nondestructive iterative method for uranium-bearing material characterization with HRGS developed earlier in (J. appl. Rad. Isotopes, 166 (2020) 109433) is applied to determine matrix densities and uranium isotope masses of a variety of uranium materials, namely uranium ore, UO 2 and U 3 O 8 powders, fuel elements in the form of UO2 microspheres, uranium metal and uranium alloys. It is shown that U 3 O 8 powders with uranium mass fraction of about 84% can be distinguished from the powders of UO 2 with uranium mass fraction of about 87%; uranium products in the form of liquid or loose powder with matrix density of 0.5-2.0 g/cm 3 can be distinguished from uranium products in the form of compacted fuel elements with matrix density of 6.0-10.0 g/cm 3 and from pure metal uranium and uranium alloys with matrix density of 14.0- 19.0 g/cm 3 . In fuel microspheres based on UO2 the uranium mass fraction 88.02% measured by HRGS is consistent, within the measurement uncertainties, with the results of isotope dilution mass spectrometry 87.76±0.64 % and also is confirmed by X-ray diffraction technique. The uranium mass fraction of the uranium ore estimated as 0.08% by HRGS is consistent, within the measurement uncertainties, with the value 0.09±0.01% determined with WDXRF. Densities of two different uranium metal samples, estimated as 18.42 g/cm 3 and 19.33 g/cm 3 by HRGS are consistent with values 18.24±0.55 g/cm 3 and 18.86±0.59 g/cm 3 , respectively, obtained by the gas pycnometry technique.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Evaluation of a Potassium Filled UO2 Core in a Beryllium- ??eflected Space Reactor

The critical configuration of the small, compact critical assembly (SCCA) experiments performed at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) in 1962-1965[1,2] have been evaluated for the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) and were determined to be acceptable benchmark experiments and are included in the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (ICSBEP Handbook)[3]. The initial intent of these experiments was to support the design of the Medium Power Reactor Experiment (MPRE) program, whose purpose was to study “power plants for the production of electrical power in space vehicles.”[4] The third configuration in this series of experiments was a beryllium-reflected mockup of a stainless-steel-clad, highly enriched uranium (HEU)-O2 fuel, potassium-cooled, space power reactor. Reactivity measurements, cadmium ratio spectral measurements, and fission rate measurements were measured through the core and top reflector. Fuel effect worth measurements and neutron moderating and absorbing material worths were also measured in the assembly fuel region. The cadmium ratios, fission rate, and worth measurements were evaluated for the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) and are published in the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments (IRPhEP Handbook)[5]. More recently, two additional critical configurations have been evaluated and added to the existing evaluation report in the ICSBEP Handbook. The new critical configurations measure the effect of filling the core with potassium. The critical configuration consisted of 30.48 cm tall fuel tubes of 93.15 wt.% enriched uranium dioxide (UO2) pellets. Each fuel tube had 26 pellets with a total mass of 295.8 g UO2 per tube. There were 253 tubes were arranged with 1.506-cm center-to-center, triangular spacing and surrounded on all side by a beryllium reflected. The reactivity of the system was measured with the core tank empty and filled with potassium. The system reactivity was increased from 13.4 ¢ to 32 ¢. This change in system reactivity represents the worth of the potassium. Simple benchmark models for the empty and potassium filled cores have been derived and evaluated and found to be acceptable as benchmark experiments. The benchmark experiment eigenvalues are 1.0001 ± 0.0008 and 1.0011 ± 0.0009 for the empty and filled cores, respectively. When calculated with MCNP5 and ENDF/B-VII.0 the calculated eigenvalues are 0.98906 ± 0.00002 and 0.98883 ± 0.00002, respectively. These results are concerning due to the drop of the calculated system reactivity when potassium is added to the system rather than the expected increase in system reactivity.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Redwing: A MOOSE application for coupling MPACT and BISON

Fuel performance and whole core neutron transport programs are often used to analyze fuel behavior as it is depleted in a reactor. For fuel performance programs, internal models provide the local intra-pin power density, fast neutron flux, burnup, and fission rate density, which are needed for a fuel performance analysis. The fuel performance internal models have a number of limitations. These include effects on the intra-pin power distribution by nearby assembly elements, such as water channels and control rods, and the further limitation of applicability to a specified fuel type such as low enriched UO2. In addition, whole core neutron transport codes need an accurate intra-pin temperature distribution in order to calculate neutron cross sections. Fuel performance simulations are able to model the intra-pin fuel displacement as the fuel expands and densifies. These displacements must be accurately modeled in order to capture the eventual mechanical contact of the fuel and the clad; the correct radial gap width is needed for an accurate calculation of the temperature distribution of the fuel rod. Redwing is a MOOSE-based application that enables coupling between MPACT and BISON for transport and fuel performance coupling. MPACT is a 3D neutron transport and reactor core simulator based on the method of characteristics (MOC). The development of MPACT began at the University of Michigan (UM) and now is under the joint development of ORNL and UM as part of the DOE CASL Simulation Hub. MPACT is able to model the effects of local assembly elements and is able calculate intra-pin quantities such as the local power density on a volumetric mesh for any fuel type. BISON is a fuel performance application of Multi-physics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE), which is under development at Idaho National Laboratory. BISON is able to solve the nonlinearly coupled mechanical deformation and heat transfer finite element equations that model a fuel element as it is depleted in a nuclear reactor. Redwing couples BISON and MPACT in a single application. Redwing maps and transfers the individual intra-pin quantities such as fission rate density, power density, and fast neutron flux from the MPACT volumetric mesh to the individual BISON finite element meshes. For a two-way coupling Redwing maps and transfers the individual pin temperature field and axially dependent coolant densities from the BISON mesh to the MPACT volumetric mesh. Details of the mapping are given. Redwing advances the simulation with the MPACT solution for each depletion time step and then advances the multiple BISON simulations for fuel performance calculations. Sub-cycle advancement can be applied to the individual BISON simulations and allows multiple time steps to be applied to the fuel performance simulations. Currently, only loose coupling where data from a previous time step is applied to the current time step is performed.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2017

A modified Embedded-Atom Method interatomic potential for uranium-silicide

Uranium-silicide (U-Si) fuels are being pursued as a possible accident tolerant fuel (ATF). U-Si fuels benefit from higher thermal conductivity and higher fissile density compared to UO2. In order to perform engineering scale nuclear fuel performance simulations, the material properties of the fuel must be known. Currently, the experimental data available for U-Si fuels is rather limited. Thus, multiscale modeling efforts are underway to address this gap in knowledge. In this study, a semi-empirical Modified Embedded Atom Method (MEAM) potential is presented for the description of the U-Si system. The potential accurately describes not only the primary phase of interest (U3Si2), but also a variety of U-Si phases across the composition spectrum.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report: Module D1-1: Uranium-based Ceramic LWR Fuel Fabrication (Rev.2)

Cost module on LWR fuel fabrication to accompany the Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report. In this update, we are adding detailed life cycle cost data and a calculated, levelized fabrication cost derived from a non-proprietary bottom-up estimate prepared in 1978 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) (Judkins and Olsen 1978a). In 2018, the 1978 ORNL estimate was escalated by SA&I authors to 2017 USD using factors that represent inflation, escalation above inflation typical of nuclear projects, and the effects of more stringent safety and environmental regulations. In this FY-21 document, the $/kgU results in 2017 USD from the unpublished 2018 interim study (Williams and Ganda 2018) can be escalated to 2020 USD using a factor of 1.052. The literature-based unit cost (or price) data from previous (2004–2017) AFC-CBRs are escalated to 2020 USD using factors from Chapter 8 of the main FY-21 AFC-CBR document. This data, in addition to the results of the updated bottom-up estimate, are used to define the “what-it-takes” (WIT) range for the unit fabrication costs for conventional ceramic UOX light-water reactor (LWR) fuel. This FY-23 document also includes calculated unit costs for accident-tolerant LWR fuels (ATFs) of three different types. Some of these fuels constitute a ceramic pelletized form with fuel meat uranium compounds other than UO2 (a.k.a.,. UOX), thus the change in the title of this module in which the word “UO2” is changed to “Uranium-based Ceramic.”

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Versatile Oxide Films Protect FeCrAl Alloys Under Normal Operation and Accident Conditions in Light Water Power Reactors

The US has currently a fleet of 99 nuclear power light water reactors which generate approximately 20% of the electricity consumed in the country. Near 90% of the reactors are at least 30 years old. There are incentives to make the existing reactors safer by using accident tolerant fuels (ATF). Compared to the standard UO2–zirconium-based system, ATF need to tolerate loss of active cooling in the core for a considerably longer time while maintaining or improving the fuel performance during normal operation conditions. Ferritic iron-chromium-aluminum (FeCrAl) alloys have been identified as an alter-native to replace current zirconium alloys. They contain Fe (base) + 10–22 Cr + 4–6 Al and may contain smaller amounts of other elements such as molybdenum and traces of others. FeCrAl alloys offer outstanding resistance to attack by superheated steam by developing an alumina oxide on the surface in case of a loss of coolant accident like at Fukushima. FeCrAl alloys also perform well under normal operation conditions both in boiling water reactors and pressurized water reactors because they are protected by a thin oxide rich in chromium. Under normal operation condition, the key element is Cr and under accident conditions it is Al.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2016

Fission Product Inventory and Burnup Evaluation of the AGR-2 Irradiation by Gamma Spectrometry

Gamma spectrometry has been used to evaluate the burnup and fission product inventory of different components from the US Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program's second TRISO-coated particle fuel irradiation test (AGR-2). TRISO fuel in this irradiation included both uranium carbide / uranium oxide (UCO) kernels and uranium oxide (UO2) kernels. Four of the 6 capsules contained fuel from the US Advanced Gas Reactor program, and only those capsules will be discussed in this work. The inventories of gamma-emitting fission products from the fuel compacts, graphite compact holders, graphite spacers and test capsule shell were evaluated. These data were used to measure the fractional release of fission products such as Cs-137, Cs-134, Eu-154, Ce-144, and Ag-110m from the compacts. The fraction of Ag-110m retained in the compacts ranged from 1.8% to full retention. Additionally, the activities of the radioactive cesium isotopes (Cs-134 and Cs-137) have been used to evaluate the burnup of all US TRISO fuel compacts in the irradiation. The experimental burnup evaluations compare favorably with burnups predicted from physics simulations. Predicted burnups for UCO compacts range from 7.26 to 13.15 % fission per initial metal atom (FIMA) and 9.01 to 10.69 % FIMA for UO2 compacts. Measured burnup ranged from 7.3 to 13.1 % FIMA for UCO compacts and 8.5 to 10.6 % FIMA for UO2 compacts. Results from gamma emission computed tomography performed on compacts and graphite holders that reveal the distribution of different fission products in a component will also be discussed. Gamma tomography of graphite holders was also used to locate the position of TRISO fuel particles suspected of having silicon carbide layer failures that lead to in-pile cesium release.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Development of molecular dynamics potential for uranium silicide fuels

Use of uranium–silicide (U-Si) in place of uranium dioxide (UO2) is one of the promising concepts being proposed to increase the accident tolerance of nuclear fuels. This is due to a higher thermal conductivity than UO2 that results in lower centerline temperatures. U-Si also has a higher fissile density, which may enable some new cladding concepts that would otherwise require increased enrichment limits to compensate for their neutronic penalty. However, many critical material properties for U-Si have not been determined experimentally. For example, silicide compounds (U3Si2 and U3Si) are known to become amorphous under irradiation. There was clear independent experimental evidence to support a crystalline to amorphous transformation in those compounds. However, it is still not well understood how the amorphous transformation will affect on fuel behavior. It is anticipated that modeling and simulation may deliver guidance on the importance of various properties and help prioritize experimental work. In order to develop knowledge-based models for use at the engineering scale with a minimum of empirical parameters and increase the predictive capabilities of the developed model, inputs from atomistic simulations are essential. First-principles based density functional theory (DFT) calculations will provide the most reliable information. However, it is probably not possible to obtain kinetic information such as amorphization under irradiation directly from DFT simulations due to size and time limitations. Thus, a more feasible way may be to employ molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Unfortunately, so far no MD potential is available for U-Si to discover the underlying mechanisms. Here, we will present our recent progress in developing a U-Si potential from ab initio data. This work is supported by the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

An evaluation of tri-valent oxide (Cr 2 O 3 ) as a grain enlarging dopant for UO 2 nuclear fuels fabricated under reducing environment

A study was performed to evaluate the microstructure and crystallography of nominally 500–2000 Cr 2 O 3 -doped UO 2 fabricated in a temperature range of 1150–1750°C under reducing experimental conditions. We observed an increase in grain size of the samples with the increase in heat treating temperature as expected. For a given sintering temperature (1700–1750°C), an increase in the grain size was also observed with the increase in Cr 2 O 3 concentration up to a value of ~1000–1200 wppm. A decrease in fission gas release as a function of grain size was estimated for the Cr 2 O 3 -doped UO 2 samples assuming specified post-irradiation annealing conditions. A nearly linear decrease was obtained in the lattice parameter of the Cr 2 O 3 -doped UO 2 fcc phase with the increase in Cr 2 O 3 concentration, especially up to a nominal value of 1000 wppm. The lattice parameter decrease was also persistent with the increase in the average grain size as a result of addition of Cr 2 O 3 into the UO 2 lattice. An increase in the crystallite size and a decrease in the microstrain of the $fcc$ phase were observed with the increase in the average grain size of the samples, indicating a higher crystallinity of the Cr 2 O 3 -doped samples than that of the undoped UO 2 sample.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Special Analysis for the Disposal of the Idaho National Laboratory Unirradiated Light Water Breeder Reactor Rods and Pellets Waste Stream at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada

The purpose of this special analysis (SA) is to determine if the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Unirradiated Light Water Breeder Reactor (LWBR) Rods and Pellets waste stream (INEL103597TR2, Revision 2) is suitable for disposal by shallow land burial (SLB) at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site (RWMS). The INL Unirradiated LWBR Rods and Pellets waste stream consists of 24 containers with unirradiated fabricated rods and pellets composed of uranium oxide (UO2) and thorium oxide (ThO2) fuel in zirconium cladding. The INL Unirradiated LWBR Rods and Pellets waste stream requires an SA because the 229 Th, 230 Th, 232 U, 233 U, and 234 U activity concentrations exceed the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) Action Levels.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗