SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The dawn of the Nuclear Age occurred on the morning of July 16,1945, when Los Alamos conducted the Trinity test. Scientists and engineers from the U.S., Britain, and Canada proved the feasibility of weaponizing energy from plutonium nuclear fission using an implosion mechanism.
A feasibility study was conducted to install a 10 MWe coal direct chemical looping large pilot plant at a host site. The coal direct chemical looping technology was based on The Ohio State University and Babcock & Wilcox iron-based metal oxide technology coupling a moving bed reduction reactor with a circulating fluidized-bed oxidation reactor. The host site was the Dover Light & power Plant in Dover, Ohio. The Electric Power Research Institute performed the host site evaluation. Trinity Consultants prepared the Environmental Information Volume. WorleyParsons Group performed the civil engineering. Clear Skies Consulting served as lead on the Industrial Advisory Committee.
Long computations often use checkpoint/restart to survive the inevitable failures. Optimal checkpoint/restart strategy can be derived in terms of special functions, and approximated within the regime of interest. As a further step under nominal assumptions, platforms can be optimized for maximum progress rate, computed in terms of non-dimensional parameter JMTTI/Delta, where JMTTI is the Job Mean Time To Interrupt and Delta is the time it takes to write (or read) a checkpoint. Scaling to a larger platform of the same technology requires scaling checkpoint bandwidth quadratically to maintain the same progress rate. This was observed during the design of LANL’s Roadrunner in 2007, led to burst buffers proposed in 2009 and introduced on Trinity in 2015. The need to compute reliably continues to impact the design of future exascale platforms.
The next two Advanced Technology platforms for the ASC program will feature complex memory hierarchies – in the Trinity supercomputer being deployed in 2016, Intel’s Knights Landing processors will feature 16GB of on-package, high-bandwidth memory, combined with a larger capacity DDR4 memory and in 2018, the Sierra machine deployed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory will feature powerful compute nodes containing POWER9 processors with large capacity memories and an array of coherent GPU accelerators also with high bandwidth memories.
Credibility of end-to-end CompSim (Computational Simulation) models and their agile execution requires an expressive framework to describe, communicate and execute complex computational tool chains representing the model. All stakeholders from system engineering and customers through model developers and V&V partners need views and functionalities of the workflow representing the model in a manner that is natural to their discipline. In the milestone and in this report we define workflow as a network of computation simulation activities executed autonomously on a distributed set of computational platforms. The FY19 ASC L2 Milestone (6802) for the Integrated Workflow (IWF) project was designed to integrate and improve existing capabilities or develop new functionalities to provide a wide range of stakeholders a coherent and intuitive platform capable of defining and executing CompSim modeling from analysis workflow definition to complex ensemble calculations. The main goal of the milestone was to advance the integrated workflow capabilities to support the weapon system analysts with a production deployment in FY20. Ensemble calculations supporting program decisions include sensitivity analysis, optimization and uncertainty quantification. The goal of the L2 milestone aligned with the ultimate goal of the IWF project is to foster cultural and technical shift toward and integrated CompSim capability based on automated workflows. Specific deliverables were defined in five broad categories: 1) Infrastructure, including development of distributed-computing workflow capability, 2) integration of Dakota (Sandia's sensitivity, optimization and UQ engine) with SAW (Sandia Analysis Workbench), 3) ARG (Automatic Report Generator introspecting analysis artifacts and generating human-readable extensible and archivable reports), 4) Libraries and Repositories aiding capability reuse, and 5) Exemplars to support training, capturing best practices and stress testing of the platform. A set of exemplars was defined to represent typical weapon system qualification CompSim projects. Analyzing the required capabilities and using the findings to plan implementation of required capabilities ensured optimal allocation of development resources focused on production deployment after the L2 is completed. It was recognized early that the end-to-end modeling applications pose a considerable number of diverse risks, and a formal risk tracking process was implemented. The project leveraged products, capabilities and development tasks of IWF partners. SAW, Dakota, Cubit, Sierra, Slycat, and NGA (NexGen Analytics, a small business) contributed to the integrated platform developed during this milestone effort. New products delivered include: a) NGW (Next Generation Workflow) for robust workflow definition and execution, b) Dakota wizards, editor and results visualization, and c) the automatic report generator ARG. User engagement was initiated early in the development process eliciting concrete requirements and actionable feedback to assure that the integrated CompSim capability will have high user acceptance and impact. The current integrated capabilities have been demonstrated and are continually being tested by a set of exemplars ranging from training scenarios to computationally demanding uncertainty analyses. The integrated workflow platform has been deployed on both SRN (Sandia Restricted Network) and SCN (Sandia Classified Network). Computational platforms where the system has been demonstrated span from Windows (Creo the CAD platform chosen by Sandia) to Trinity HPC (Sierra and CTH solvers). Follow up work will focus on deployment at SNL and other sites in the nuclear enterprise (LLNL, KCNSC), training and consulting support to democratize the analysis agility, process health and knowledge management benefits the NGW platform provides.
The overall goal of this work was to advance the integrated workflow capabilities to provide the weapon system analysts the tools to construct, communicate and robustly execute end-to-end computational simulation models and analysis. Specifically, this includes developing and running automated, CompSim workflows that map model inputs to responses from large-scale studies executed on a distributed, heterogenous computing environment (e.g., CAD applications on Windows laptop to Sierra FEM codes on Trinity within a single workflow). The workflows developed enable ensemble calculations in support of ND program decisions, including sensitivity analysis, optimization and uncertainty quantification.
This milestone 1) exercised a broad set of performance profiling and analysis tools, including tools whose development has been promoted by the ASC program; 2) exercised the tools on two different SNL ASC codes, one Sierra code (Sierra/Aria, a C++ codebase) and one RAMSES code (ITS, a Fortran codebase); and 3) exercised the tools on multiple platforms, including the CTS-1 (e.g., Serrano) and ATS-1 Trinity (e.g., Mutrino) platforms. The milestone generated a plethora of strong and weak scaling, trend and profile data for multiple versions and problem cases for each of the two codes. A wealth of experience was gained with the various tools that included identification of problems, an improved understanding of feature sets, enhanced usage documentation, and insights for future tool-development. Results are provided from a large number and variety of performance analysis runs with the target codes, together with instructions for how to make use of the tools with the codes.
This report is an outcome of the ASC ATDM Level 2 Milestone 6015: Asynchronous Many-Task Software Stack Demonstration. It comprises a summary and in depth analysis of DARMA and a DARMA-compliant Asynchronous Many-Task (AMT) runtime software stack. Herein performance and productivity of the over- all approach are assessed on benchmarks and proxy applications representative of the Sandia ATDM applications. As part of the effort to assess the perceived strengths and weaknesses of AMT models compared to more traditional methods, experiments were performed on ATS-1 (Advanced Technology Systems) test bed machines and Trinity. In addition to productivity and performance assessments, this report includes findings on the generality of DARMAs backend API as well as findings on interoperability with node- level and network-level system libraries. Together, this information provides a clear understanding of the strengths and limitations of the DARMA approach in the context of Sandias ATDM codes, to guide our future research and development in this area.
“Now!” With that word, the Atomic Age – and the era of nuclear weapons testing – dawned. The advent of World War II’s first irresistible weapon, which had been secretly tested in the New Mexico desert in July 1945, would help hasten the inevitable: complete victory for the Allies. Codenamed Trinity, the test was the first of over a thousand conducted by the United States between 1945 and 1992. Nuclear weapons would change future clashes as well. The looming Cold War, with roots stretching all the way back to 1917, was history’s first conflict between two, major nations armed with nuclear weapons. It is clear the existence of those weapons played an important role in maintaining a tenuous peace between the United States and the Soviet Union; it is also clear nuclear weapons testing played a prominent role in fueling both the arms race and the success of deterrence. Yet, the history of nuclear weapons testing is rarely remembered, even though nuclear tests have been performed in the very recent past. Of the estimated 2,000-plus nuclear tests ever performed, the U.S. is responsible for approximately half. This is the story of U.S. full-scale nuclear weapons testing.
The Christy Gadget, named after its principal inventor, is the informal name for the device tested at Trinity on July 16th, 1945. In late 1944, Robert Christy proposed a novel invention that altered the design of the plutonium pit in Fat Man. While scientists originally intended to use a hollow sphere of plutonium, there was a substantial risk given a number of asymmetries that resulted from implosion. Christy proposed changing the design of the plutonium core to a solid sphere of plutonium with a modulated neutron source. The new model was adopted and used in the early implosion bombs. While there is little debate about the important role that Christy played in demonstrating its feasibility as a safe design, there is a debate as to who initially proposed the idea of the Christy Device. My project this summer outlines and resolves this dispute. While Christ does deserve the majority of the credit for the invention and design, I also acknowledge the important role Rudolf Peierls and John von Neumann played in its development.
Seventy-five years later, the Trinity test of July 16, 1945 is still rightly remembered as a monumental scientific achievement. The test has a multifaceted legacy representing incredible discovery, unparalleled hope and unprecedented peril. The weapons designed and tested at wartime Los Alamos were not intended to deter, but to destroy: On August 6, 1945, the world’s first weaponized nuclear device was used for that very purpose. Little Boy, a gun-assembled enriched uranium weapon, detonated over Hiroshima that morning destroying several square miles of the city and killing tens of thousands. Three days later, Fat Man, an imploding plutonium weapon, destroyed Nagasaki. On August 14, an armistice was declared and a few weeks later World War II came to an official end. We’ve all heard these historical facts before, but was it really that simple? Nuclear strike + nuclear strike = unconditional surrender? Bringing World War II to an end was an arduous, complex, and very tenuous undertaking with important historical nuances to consider.
The SPARC team has completed much of the workflow development needed for the coupled and uncoupled analyses needed to support our flight test validation work. The SPARC team has continued to make progress on development activities to support unsteady, full reentry vehicle aero analysis, which have focused on turbulence modeling, uniform mesh refinement, in-situ visualization (with the Paraview/Catalyst team), and performance analysis. The SPARC team is making solid progress towards our Q4 goal of demonstrating an improved Wall Modeled Large Eddy Simulation (WMLES) capability for standard geometries using high-order finite difference, discontinuous Galerkin, and low-dissipation finite volume methods. The SPARC team has met the minimum completion criteria for parts of the L1, including documenting performance and scaling of SPARC on Trinity, Sierra and Astra, and performing runs for the flight test validation case.
The study of nuclear forensics harkens back to the Manhattan Project-era, when scientists first started to analyze the debris from the 1945 Trinity test. Political turmoil stemming from the Cold War and the rehabilitation of Germany following WWII has led to new challenges in international security involving nuclear proliferation. Nuclear materials have, on occasion, been lost, misplaced, or stolen from former Soviet countries, and illicit materials have been interdicted all over the world. The National Technical Nuclear Forensics Center (NTNFC) was established in 2006, and has been at the forefront of drive to advance nuclear forensic capabilities in the United States. The ultimate goal of nuclear forensics is to examine nuclear and other radioactive materials using analytical techniques to determine origin and history of the material, particularly in the context of law enforcement investigations. Nuclear forensics can be divided into two parts: predetonation and post-detonation. Pre-detonation forensics, as the name implies, is the investigation of a nuclear material or weapon that has not been detonated or involved in an explosion, whereas postdetonation forensics is the study of activation or fission products in debris or the environment following the use of a nuclear or radiological dispersal device (RDD). Both parts require a number of analytical chemical and radiochemical techniques to determine identification of the material. Many advancements in analytical techniques, including rapidity, sample size, and forensic signatures have been made in recent years. The analytical methods that can be used in a nuclear forensic investigation, such as mass spectrometry and gamma spectroscopy, have been described in detail in previous reviews, including Straub et.al, and will not be explained here. This review will discuss recent publications (from 2016 to present) describing advancements of techniques such as radiochronometry, morphology, development of novel reference materials, and inter-laboratory collaborations for both pre- and post-detonation nuclear forensics.
Buster-Jangle changed the working relationship between the AEC and the DoD. Beginning with Trinity and continuing through Greenhouse, the military was the logistical hub of nuclear testing, supplying men and material to carry out the myriad of mostly non-technical tasks. With the inclusion of the two Jangle tests and the Desert Rock exercises, that relationship became more symbiotic driven by the growing requirements for tactical weapons and their possible battlefield use. At Buster-Jangle, as well, the first use of a jet bomber was evidence that the military technology was evolving, requiring closer cooperation between the two agencies to match weapons and delivery systems.
What do Galileo, Husky Pup, Turquoise and Barracuda have in common? They are names of nuclear weapons tests conducted at what is now called the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). Over 1,000 U.S. nuclear tests were conducted at various sites between 1945 and 1992, and each of the tests was inaugurated with a name, as documented in the Lab’s vast weapons test collections housed in the National Security Research Center (NSRC). To protect the classified information about nuclear weapons and maintain security, nuclear weapons tests were assigned names. This has been true from the beginning with Trinity, the first atomic bomb test in 1945. Lab Director J. Robert Oppenheimer later said the test name may have been inspired by his love of poetry.
Little Boy and Fat Man. Two types of nuclear weapons were developed at the Los Alamos wartime lab in an effort to help end World War II. Both would be released above Japan just days apart in August 1945, and just weeks after the Trinity test in the New Mexico desert. These weapons were, however, as different as their monikers imply. Little Boy was a uranium, gun-type weapon, whereas Fat Man was a plutonium, implosion-style weapon. Two types were needed because there was only enough uranium for one gun-type weapon and the U.S. government knew it would need to make more than one weapon. Also, the unattainable challenges of a plutonium gun-type design prompted the shift to the implosion-style weapon.
What luck! Tucked inside J. Robert Oppenheimer’s book Bhagavad-Gita is a four-leaf clover. The famed physicist and first Lab director regularly quoted the Hindu scripture, most notably upon witnessing the Trinity test, which was the successful detonation of the first-ever Los Alamos created atomic bomb. Oppenheimer was said to have recalled the line, “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” (The quote, though, has been widely misinterpreted.) The clover is taped to what appears to be a calling card from his spouse Kitty and was found inside his copy of the Bhagavad Gita, which was donated to the Lab’s Bradbury Science Museum by private donors Ben and Sara Beck Svetitsky in early 2020. Kitty Oppenheimer was educated as a botanist and biologist, and accompanied her husband to Los Alamos, along with their two children. The family was here in 1943 through the end of World War II in 1945. The book, with the card found inside, makes up one of two of J. Robert Oppenheimer’s personal effects within the Lab’s collections.
In September 2021 E-2 obtained its first Spot robot from Boston Dynamics to evaluate their suitability for work in and around laboratory facilities. Spot is a highly mobile quadruped robot capable of up to 90 minutes of operation. They can be outfitted with payloads up to 30 pounds and support Boston Dynamics-developed equipment, third party payloads, or custom-developed payloads. The platform showed immediate promise resulting in the procurement of a total of four units by the end of FY22 (Trinity, Gadget, Crossroads, and Sandstone).