Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Radioisotopes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10

Pyroshock Testing of the Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG)

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator, or MMRTG, was developed by the Department Of Energy to a set of requirements from multiple NASA mission concepts. Those concepts included deep space missions to the outer planets as well as missions to Mars. The synthesis of that diverse set of requirements addressed functional as well as environmental requirements.

radioisotope↗

The F1 Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) : a Power Subsystem Enabler for the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Mission

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) spacecraft carrying the Curiosity rover launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS) on November 26, 2011. Following an 8.5-month cruise and after a successful Entry, Descent and Landing (EDL) phase, the Curiosity rover arrived at the surface of Mars on August 6, 2012 UTC. At the core of the Curiosity rover power subsystem is the F1 Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) supplied by the Department of Energy. Integration of the F1 MMRTG into the MSL spacecraft has provided the first opportunity to architect a power subsystem that also included a Solar Array (during the cruise phase of the mission and up to the initial stage of the EDL phase) and secondary Li-ion batteries for operation during the planned one Martian year surface phase of the mission. This paper describes the F1 MMRTG functional features as an enabler of the MSL mission and as a novel component of the MSL power subsystem architecture.

Curiosity rover↗

NASA's Radioisotope Power Systems - Plans

NASA's Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) Program continues to plan and implement content to enable planetary exploration where such systems could be needed, and to prepare more advanced RPS technology for possible infusion into future power systems. The 2014-2015 period saw significant changes, and strong progress. Achievements of near-term objectives have enabled definition of a clear path forward in which payoffs from research investments and other sustaining efforts can be applied. The future implementation path is expected to yield a higher-performing thermoelectric generator design, a more isotope-fuel efficient system concept design, and a robust RPS infrastructure maintained effectively within both NASA and the Department of Energy. This paper describes recent work with an eye towards the future plans that result from these achievements.

Program↗

Radioisotope Power Systems Program: A Program Overview

NASA's Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) Program continues to plan, mature research in energy conversion, and partners with the Department of Energy (DOE) to make RPS ready and available to support the exploration of the solar system in environments where the use of conventional solar or chemical power generation is impractical or impossible to meet potential future mission needs. Recent programs responsibilities include providing investment recommendations to NASA stakeholders on emerging thermoelectric and Stirling energy conversion technologies and insight on NASA investments at DOE in readying a generator for the Mars 2020 mission. This presentation provides an overview of the RPS Program content and status and the approach used to maintain the readiness of RPS to support potential future NASA missions.

Nuclear↗

NASA's Radioisotope Power Systems Program Overview - A Focus on RPS Users

The goal of NASA's Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) Program is to make RPS ready and available to support the exploration of the solar system in environments where the use of conventional solar or chemical power generation is impractical or impossible to meet potential future mission needs. To meet this goal, the RPS Program manages investments in RPS technologies and RPS system development, working closely with the Department of Energy. This paper provides an overview of the RPS Program content and status, its collaborations with potential RPS users, and the approach employed to maintain the readiness of RPS to support future NASA mission concepts.

Radioisotope↗

Radioisotope Power Systems Program Status and Expectations

The Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) Programs goal is to make RPS available for the exploration of the solar system in environments where conventional solar or chemical power generation is impractical or impossible to use to meet mission needs. To meet this goal, the RPS Program manages investments in RPS system development and RPS technologies. The RPS Program exists to support NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD). The RPS Program provides strategic leadership for RPS, enables the availability of RPS for use by the planetary science community, successfully executes RPS flight projects and mission deployments, maintains a robust technology development portfolio, manages RPS related National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Nuclear Launch Safety (NLS) approval processes for SMD, maintains insight into the Department of Energy (DOE) implementation of NASA funded RPS production infrastructure operations, including implementation of the NASA funded Plutonium-238 production restart efforts. This paper will provide a status of recent RPS activities.

Radioisotope↗

Analysis of a Radioisotope Thermal Rocket Engine

The Triton Hopper is a concept for a global hopper vehicle which uses a radioisotope rocket engine and In-situ propellant acquisition to explore the surface of Neptune's moon, Triton. The current Triton Hopper concept stores heated Nitrogen in a spherical tank to be used as the propellant. The aim of the research was to investigate the benefits of storing propellant at ambient temperature and heating it through the use of a thermal block during engine operation, as opposed to storing gas at a high temperature. Lithium, Lithium Fluoride and Beryllium were considered as possible materials for the thermal block. A heat energy analysis indicated that a lithium thermal mass would provide the highest heat energy for a temperature change from 900 Celsius to -100 Celsius. A heat transfer analysis was performed for Nitrogen at -100 Celsius flowing through 1000 passages inside a 1kg lithium thermal block at a temperature of 900 Celsius. The system was analyzed as turbulent flow through a tube with constant surface temperature. The analysis indicated that the propellant reached a maximum temperature of 877 Celsius before entering the nozzle. At this exit temperature, the average specific impulse [I(sub sp)] of the engine was determined to be 157s. Previous studies for the stored heated gas concept suggest that the engine would have an average I(sub sp) of approximately 52s. Thus, the use of a thermal block concept results in a 200 percent engine performance increase. In addition, a tank sizing study was performed to determine if the concept is feasible in terms of mass requirements. The mass for a spherical carbon fiber COPV storing 35kg of nitrogen at an initial temperature of -100 Celsius and a pressure of 1000psia, was determined to be 7.2kg. The specific impulse analysis indicated that the maximum engine performance is obtained for a mass ratio of 5kg of Nitrogen per every 1kg of lithium thermal mass. Thus for 35kg of Nitrogen the total thermal mass would be 7kg. This brings the total mass of the system to 49.2.kg which is less than the 56kg landing payload capacity of the Triton Hopper. Finally, an insulation analysis using 10mm of MLI insulation indicated that a total of 22 watts of heat are lost to the environment. With the heat loss known, the power required to heat the thermal mass to 900 Celsius in 24 days was determined to be 2.15 watts. The study's results allowed us to conclude that the thermal mass concept is the better option due to the performance increase provided, the low power requirement and its compliance with the landing mass requirement of the Triton Hopper.

Radioisotope↗

A radioisotope powered cryobot for penetrating the Europan ice shell

This paper concentrates on a Europa deep ice application of the Cryo-Hydro Integrated Robotic Penetrator System, and introduces the reader to the vehicle design with focus on the use of radioisotope thermoeletric generator (RTG) technology as the primary heat and power source for the robotic vehicle.

radioisotopes↗

Dynamic Radioisotope Power System (DRPS) Permanently Shadowed Region (PSR) Demonstrator Rover

This conceptual design study investigated trading several Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems (DRPS) in development to supply power to a lunar science rover which operates for long periods (months) in permanently shadowed regions (PSR) over many years. The design was conducted by the Compass team and relied heavily on the planned VIPER rover design, which is limited to only a few hours of operations in PSRs and less than a month near the south pole. As such this conceptual design shows what a DRPS can do for a follow-on type VIPER rover. In addition to the long duration, go anywhere DRPS power system, the Compass team added a communications system that utilizes the Gateway spacecraft as a relay node for nearly 24/7 communications link to the DRPS rover in lunar craters not visible from the earth. The Compass design includes a notional conops, launch and delivery, subsystem designs of power, mobility, structures, science, command and data handling, communications, guidance and control, and thermal. The thermal design was especially important due the low temperatures in PSRs where the science environment needs to be shielded from the waste heat from the DRPS.

Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems↗

Modeling Ionizing Radiation for Spaceflight Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems

This paper presents methods, simulations, and analyses for spaceflight ionizing radiation exposures to three dynamic radioisotope power systems(DRPSs). The specific systems being investigated are part of an open solicitation by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the US Department of Energy (DOE)to develop DRPS convertor technologies. The analyses include ionizing radiation sources from PuO2andgalactic cosmic rays (GCRs) over notional 20-year mission architectures with optional 10-year exposures from Jovian radiation environments. Total integrated doses to various components are calculated and compared to known material degradation thresholds in the open literature. Based on the findings, certain material trades are recommended for Jovian and non-Jovian mission architectures based solely on ionizing radiation. However, consideration is given to known and unknown synergistic degradation effects(i.e., radiation in combination with heat, pressure, or outgassing)that may be relevant to these systems and are not captured in these analyses.

Models↗

Multi-Convertor Configurable Simulator for Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems

This paper presents the multi-convertor configurable simulator (MCCS) that can emulate piston/displacer dynamics and power outputs of various types of free-piston Stirling convertors developed at NASA GRC, including Technical Demonstration Convertor (TDC), Advanced Stirling Convertor (ASC), Flexure Isotope Stirling Convertor (FISC), Sunpower Robust Stirling Convertor (SRSC), and P2A. The MCCS can emulate up to four convertors, instead of two convertors in state-of-the-art Stirling simulators, and the maximum power output for each convertor is 1kW. Furthermore, hardware and software changes required to switch between convertors are minimized for easy conversion. A hardware-in-loop (HIL) system is used to easily switch between convertors by updating linearized modeling parameters in software. Also, switched-mode AC power supplies are used to generate wide ranges of voltage and current to emulate different types of Stirling convertors without replacing AC power supplies. Finally, the inductors emulating the linear alternator, which is the only hardware change needed for conversion, are modularized in alternator boxes to enable easy replacement of the inductors. These two features—easy conversion and capability of emulating up to four 1kW-convertors—will enable the validation tests of multi-convertor controller (MCC) concepts that are being developed by APL, the Dynamic Radioisotope Power System (DRPS) generator, and other controller developments for current and future DRPS flight projects. Finally, the MCCS is configured to demonstrate emulation of four FISCs and the outputs of the MCCS are compared with experimental data from the actual FISC.

Free-Piston Stirling Convertor Controller↗

Magnetics Testing on Radioisotope Power Systems at the Idaho National Laboratory

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) uses Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) to power deep-space and planetary explorations such as Cassini-Huygens, Galileo, New Horizons, Mars Science Laboratory—Curiosity, and most recently Mars 2020--Perseverance. The Space Nuclear Power and Isotope Technologies (SNPIT) division, at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), fuels, tests, and delivers the RPS to ensure it can provide the electrical power needed to complete mission objectives. Some space crafts have instrumentation specifically designed to study the subject’s magnetic field or may have instruments that can be affected by magnetic fields produced by the RPS. Analyzing and measuring the RPS’s magnetic fields ensures the required thresholds are not exceeded and accurate data can be collected for the mission. Magnetics testing provides numerical values of the RPS’s magnetic field. During Magnetics testing at INL, the RPS is placed on a resistive load to simulate actual spacecraft load characteristics (voltage and current). During this simulation, magnetometers are used to measure the magnetic field of the RPS. Raw data is collected and then analyzed to ensure the field created by the RPS is below NASA thresholds or that the magnitude of the field is accounted for to ensure mission success.

42 ENGINEERING↗