Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Apollo project”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

History and Status of ALSEP and the Apollo Lunar Data Project

A suite of automated scientific instruments (the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment Package, or ALSEP) was installed at each of the landing sites of Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 from 1969 to 1972. They operated from deployment until decommissioning on 30 September 1977. These data were continuously transmitted to Earth and saved on the Range Tapes, which were recorded at the Manned Space Flight Network stations. These data were also broken out by experiment and sent to the experiment Principal Investigators on what were called the P.I. Tapes. Starting in April 1973 the Range Tape data were stored in digital format on 7-track magnetic tapes, the ARCSAV Tapes. In February 1976, the handling of the Range Tapes was transferred to UT Galveston. They produced 9-track tapes referred to as the Work Tapes. Following the Apollo program the Range and ARCSAV tapes, which were never archived, were lost. The Work Tapes were archived at the National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC). Some investigators archived their individual experiment data with NSSDC as well, but much of the data had minimal documentation, were not in digital form, or were stored in difficult to translate formats. Data from many experiments were never delivered to the NSSDC. The Lunar Data Project was started to address the problem of both missing and not readily usable data. Our effort has resulted in recovery of some of the ARCSAV tapes, recovery and digitization of a large volume of Apollo scientific and technical documentation, and restoration of many ALSEP and other Apollo data collections. Restoration involves deciphering formats, assembling necessary ancillary data (metadata), and packaging data in digital format to be archived with the Planetary Data System (PDS). Recovery of the data from the ARCSAV tapes involved having the tapes read on special equipment and extracting the individual experiment data out of the integrated data stream. We will report on the history and status of the various recovery efforts.

Work Tapes↗
NASA NTRS2009

Main Propulsion for the Ares Projects

The goal of this slide presentation is to provide an update on the status of the Ares propulsion systems. The Ares I is the vehicle to launch the crew and the Ares V is a heavy lift vehicle that is being designed to launch cargo into Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and transfer cargo and crews to the moon. The Ares propulsion systems are based on the heritage hardware and experiences from the Apollo project to the Space Shuttle and also to current expendable launch vehicles (ELVs). The presentation compares the various launch vehicles from the Saturn V to the space shuttle, including the planned details of the Ares I and V. There are slides detailing the elements of the Ares I and the Ares V, including views of the J2X upper stage engine that is to serve both the Ares I and V. The extent of the progress is reviewed.

Sumrall, Phil↗
NASA NTRS1976

The O(3P) and N(4S) density measurement at 225 km by ultraviolet absorption and fluorescence in the Apollo-Soyuz test project

The densities of O(3P) and N(4S) at 225 km were determined during the Apollo Soyuz Test Project by a resonance absorption/fluorescence technique in which OI and NI line radiation produced and collimated on board the Apollo was reflected from the Soyuz back to the Apollo for spectral analysis. The two spacecraft maneuvered so that a range of observation angles of plus or minus 15 deg with respect to the normal to the orbital velocity vector was scanned. The measurements were made at night on two consecutive orbits at spacecraft separations of 150 and 500 m. The resulting relative counting rates as function of observation angle were compared to calculated values to determine the oxygen value. This value agrees with mass spectrometric measurements made under similar conditions. The nitrogen value is in good agreement with other measurements and suggests a smaller diurnal variation than is predicted by present models.

Kaufman, F.↗
NASA NTRS2007

Biomedical Support of U.S. Extravehicular Activity

The world's first extravehicular activity (EVA) was performed by A. A. Leonov on March 18, 1965 during the Russian Voskhod-2 mission. The first US EVA was executed by Gemini IV astronaut Ed White on June 3, 1965, with an umbilical tether that included communications and an oxygen supply. A hand-held maneuvering unit (HHMU) also was used to test maneuverability during the brief EVA; however the somewhat stiff umbilical limited controlled movement. That constraint, plus difficulty returning through the vehicle hatch, highlighted the need for increased thermal control and improved EVA ergonomics. Clearly, requirements for a useful EVA were interrelated with the vehicle design. The early Gemini EVAs generated requirements for suits providing micro-meteor protection, adequate visual field and eye protection from solar visual and infrared radiation, gloves optimized for dexterity while pressurized, and thermal systems capable of protecting the astronaut while rejecting metabolic heat during high workloads. Subsequent Gemini EVAs built upon this early experience and included development of a portable environmental control and life support systems (ECLSS) and an astronaut maneuvering unit. The ECLSS provided a pressure vessel and controller with functional control over suit pressure, oxygen flow, carbon dioxide removal, humidity, and temperature control. Gemini EVA experience also identified the usefulness of underwater neutral buoyancy and altitude chamber task training, and the importance of developing reliable task timelines. Improved thermal management and carbon dioxide control also were required for high workload tasks. With the Apollo project, EVA activity was primarily on the lunar surface; and suit durability, integrated liquid cooling garments, and low suit operating pressures (3.75 pounds per square inch absolute [psia] or 25.8 kilopascal [kPa],) were required to facilitate longer EVAs with ambulation and significant physical workloads with average metabolic rates of 1000 BTU/hr and peaks of up to 2200 BTU/hr. Mobility was further augmented with the Lunar Roving Vehicle. The Apollo extravehicular mobility unit (EMU) was made up of over 15 components, ranging from a biomedical belt for capturing and transmitting biomedical data, urine and fecal containment systems, a liquid cooling garment, communications cap, a modular portable life support system (PLSS), a boot system, thermal overgloves, and a bubble helmet with eye protection. Apollo lunar astronauts performed successful EVAs on the lunar surface from a 5 psia (34.4 kPa) 100% oxygen environment in the Lunar Lander. A maximum of three EVAs were performed on any mission. For Skylab a modified A7LB suit, used for Apollo 15, was selected. The Skylab astronaut life support assembly (ALSA) provided umbilical support through the life support umbilical (LSU) and used open loop oxygen flow, rather than closed-loop as in Apollo missions. Thermal control was provided by liquid water circulated by spacecraft pumps and electrical power also was provided from the spacecraft via the umbilical. The cabin atmosphere of 5 psia (34.4 kPa), 70% oxygen, provided a normoxic atmosphere and because of the very low nitrogen partial pressures, no special protocols were required to protect against decompression sickness (DCS) as was the case with the Apollo spacecraft with a 5 psi, 100% oxygen environment.

Gernhardt, Michael L.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Medical microbiological analysis of Apollo-Soyuz test project crewmembers

The procedures and results of the Microbial Exchange Experiment (AR-002) of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project are described. Included in the discussion of procedural aspects are methods and materials, in-flight microbial specimen collection, and preliminary analysis of microbial specimens. Medically important microorganisms recovered from both Apollo and Soyuz crewmen are evaluated.

Taylor, G. R.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Development of a slicing device for Apollo-Soyuz Test Project (ASTP) electrophoresis technology experiment MA-011

The electrophoresis of six columns was accomplished on the Apollo-Soyuz test Project. After separation, these columns were frozen in orbit and were returned for ground-based analyses. One major goal of the MA-011 experiment was the assessment of the separation achieved in orbit by slicing these frozen columns. The slicing of the frozen columns required a new device. The development of that device is described.

Nerren, B. H.↗
NASA NTRS1978

The Partnership: a History of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project

Correspondance, interviews, official documents, and other published materials were used to trace the evolution of the Apollo Soyuz Test Project from the initial proposal for international cooperation in space use and exploration until the successful completion of the joint Soviet-American mission. Conceptual drawings of proposed docking modules and mechanisms are presented and dicussed. Black and white photographs taken during mission planning and in-flight activities are included with color photographs of the earth taken during the mission. Joint meetings are summarized and the scientific experiments and launch vehicles are discussed in the appendices.

Ezell, E. C.↗
DOE OSTI2019

Demonstration of High-Temperature Calcium-Based Thermochemical Energy Storage System for use with Concentrating Solar Power Facilities

Thermochemical energy storage (TCES) systems offer several advantages over sensible heat storage via molten salts for concentrating solar power (CSP) including: energy density, cost, indefinite storage time, and no risk of freezing. SR’s TCES system utilizes a CaO-based carbonation reaction at high temperature in a fixed bed heat exchanger reactor. The SunShot APOLLO project focuses on the validation of the calcium oxide sorbent for capacity, durability, system economics, and demonstration of the system at a small pilot scale, including system control and operation in simulated on-sun conditions, discharging at 720°C. Under phase I SR completed evaluation of the sorbent loaded in a single-channel heat exchanger reactor. The major accomplishments of phase II are: Design, fabrication and commissioning of a 4 kWhth pilot plant (50x capacity increase from previous bench scale) with a closed-loop CO 2 system, and a commercially relevant heat exchange reactor. The heat exchange reactor has been designed with state-of-the-art modeling tools to ensure 1) sufficient lifetime of the Incoloy body and 2) performance of the packed bed reactor will be adequate to meet the milestones. The rest of the pilot system has been designed with off-the shelf components to maximize reliability and cost effectiveness. The system is highly instrumented and capable of time resolved, independent measurements of the heat and mass balances respectively. Major developments in the technoeconomic analysis (TEA) include 1) reduction of the cost of membrane gas storage for the near-term and future systems and 2) integration with liquid metal receivers and particle receivers for higher decarbonation temperatures and pressures which reduced the cost of gas compression and increased system efficiency. The result are three scenarios with costs bases of 21.9 dollars, 14.3 dollars, and 10.9 dollars/kWh th corresponding to a real LCOE of 59, 57, 56 dollars/MW he , respectively. The basic operations of the energy storage system were demonstrated for carbonation (discharging) and decarbonation (charging) over short time periods. Excellent control of the CO 2 mass balance across the reactor was achieved with mass flow controllers and the basic operation of the level control of the CO 2 gas bladder was achieved. The system was apparently free from leaks and operated continuously for 18 days with no mechanical failures, thus meeting milestone 2.5.5. The major shortcomings of the system had to do with the controls which prevented us from deep cycling and or reaching high cycles. We were unable to decarbonate (charge) the system for more than a few minutes at a time, which was much shorter than the design target of 10 hrs. This issue could not be resolved due to facility availability and contract closure. One major finding is that CaO-based TCES is most cost efficient when charged with HTF (heat transfer fluid) temperatures >850°C to reach the round-trip exergy efficiency and system cost targets which are higher temperatures than those considered for Gen 3 CSP. Many of the balance of plant components do not exist today, however we are encouraged by our findings that in general with more work we are able to reduce the capital cost, for example with the membrane gas storage, which is an innovative component in itself. The CaO-based TCES system has potential to meet the latest SunShot 2030 goals of LCOE at 50 $/MW he with capital costs of <11/kWh th .

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2019

Demonstration of High-Temperature Calcium-Based Thermochemical Energy Storage System for use with Concentrating Solar Power Facilities

Thermochemical energy storage (TCES) systems offer several advantages over sensible heat storage via molten salts for concentrating solar power (CSP) including: energy density, cost, indefinite storage time, and no risk of freezing. SR’s TCES system utilizes a CaO-based carbonation reaction at high temperature in a fixed bed heat exchanger reactor. The SunShot APOLLO project focuses on the validation of the calcium oxide sorbent for capacity, durability, system economics, and demonstration of the system at a small pilot scale, including system control and operation in simulated on-sun conditions, discharging at 720°C. Under phase I SR completed evaluation of the sorbent loaded in a single-channel heat exchanger reactor. The major accomplishments of phase II are: Design, fabrication and commissioning of a 4 kWhth pilot plant (50x capacity increase from previous bench scale) with a closed-loop CO 2 system, and a commercially relevant heat exchange reactor. The heat exchange reactor has been designed with state-of-the-art modeling tools to ensure 1) sufficient lifetime of the Incoloy body and 2) performance of the packed bed reactor will be adequate to meet the milestones. The rest of the pilot system has been designed with off-the shelf components to maximize reliability and cost effectiveness. The system is highly instrumented and capable of time resolved, independent measurements of the heat and mass balances respectively. Major developments in the technoeconomic analysis (TEA) include 1) reduction of the cost of membrane gas storage for the near-term and future systems and 2) integration with liquid metal receivers and particle receivers for higher decarbonation temperatures and pressures which reduced the cost of gas compression and increased system efficiency. The result are three scenarios with costs bases of 21.9 dollars, 14.3 dollars, and 10.9 dollars/kWhth corresponding to a real LCOE of 59, 57, 56 dollars/MWhe, respectively. The basic operations of the energy storage system were demonstrated for carbonation (discharging) and decarbonation (charging) over short time periods. Excellent control of the CO 2 mass balance across the reactor was achieved with mass flow controllers and the basic operation of the level control of the CO 2 gas bladder was achieved. The system was apparently free from leaks and operated continuously for 18 days with no mechanical failures, thus meeting milestone 2.5.5. The major shortcomings of the system had to do with the controls which prevented us from deep cycling and or reaching high cycles. We were unable to decarbonate (charge) the system for more than a few minutes at a time, which was much shorter than the design target of 10 hrs. This issue could not be resolved due to facility availability and contract closure. One major finding is that CaO-based TCES is most cost efficient when charged with HTF (heat transfer fluid) temperatures >850°C to reach the round-trip exergy efficiency and system cost targets which are higher temperatures than those considered for Gen 3 CSP. Many of the balance of plant components do not exist today, however we are encouraged by our findings that in general with more work we are able to reduce the capital cost, for example with the membrane gas storage, which is an innovative component in itself. The CaO-based TCES system has potential to meet the latest SunShot 2030 goals of LCOE at 50 dollars/MWhe with capital costs of <11/kWhth.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
NASA NTRS1963

2ND MANNED SPACE FLIGHT MEETING

Collection of papers concerning u.s. manned space flight, including the mercury, gemini, and apollo projects

INTERPLANETARY FLIGHT↗
NASA NTRS1963

MISSION CONTROL FOR MANNED SPACE FLIGHT

Flight control development for the mercury, gemini and apollo projects, including preflight, inflight and postflight analysis, personnel training, and mission control center facilities

MANNED SPACECRAFT↗