Engineering PapersSearch

DOE OSTI · 3395408

Single-Particle Isotopic Analysis Using the Liquid Sampling-Atmospheric Pressure Glow Discharge Microplasma Coupled to an Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer

Abstract

Isotope ratio (IR) determinations on individual particles can provide valuable information relative to the sample, including processing and dating, which could be valuable to geological and nuclear material analysis communities. In comparison to “bulk” measurements, in which all particle information is lost and homogenized within a sample, “particle” measurements allow for fingerprinting and can provide unique insights related to the sample’s nano- and micro- compositions. Furthermore, the complex nature of particles, with potential isobaric interferences from either the matrix or other elements within the same particle, poses a significant analytical challenge for conventional mass spectrometry platforms employed for elemental analysis due to their limited mass resolution. Presented here is the first demonstration of an ultrahigh resolution method for single particle (SP) isotopic analysis using the liquid sampling-atmospheric pressure glow discharge (LS-APGD) microplasma ionization source coupled to an Orbitrap mass spectrometer and FTMS Booster X2T acquisition/processing system. For proof of concept, well-characterized CeO 2 microparticles with a nominal diameter of 1.0 μm were analyzed at a mass resolution of ∼330,000. Important instrumental parameters were optimized to enable the detection of single particles. The 142 Ce/ 140 Ce ratio of individual particles and the population average were determined and compared to an SP inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ICP-TOF-MS) analysis. The isotopic accuracy and precision were determined by two methods and found to be in good agreement with the SP-ICP-TOF-MS method, with the linear regression slope method providing a more accurate ratio, showing a ∼1.4% relative difference from the ratio determined from a particle digest. The encouraging performance of the method was further supported by a determined detection limit of 2.9 fg ( 142 Ce). The developed method is anticipated to overcome many of the challenges posed by isobaric interferences encountered in conventional mass spectrometry techniques when analyzing real-world samples for particle isotopic composition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shrestha, Suraj [Clemson Univ., SC (United States)], Szakas, Sarah E. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000241332197), Andrews, Hunter B. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000220919415), Manard, Benjamin T. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000207400627), Marcus, R. Kenneth [Clemson Univ., SC (United States)] (ORCID:0000000342765805). 2026-06-25. Single-Particle Isotopic Analysis Using the Liquid Sampling-Atmospheric Pressure Glow Discharge Microplasma Coupled to an Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6c02718

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Frontiers in divalent $f$-block chemistry

Divalent f-block chemistry has undergone rapid expansion in recent years, driven by advances in the stabilization of low-valent lanthanide and actinide complexes. Although f-elements were historically accessed in the +3 or higher oxidation states, the isolation of +2 species has revealed unusual spectroscopic signatures, distinct bonding motifs, and multiple accessible electronic configurations that influence their chemical and physical properties. These developments have generated opportunities in areas including quantum information science, molecular magnetism, catalysis, and luminescence. Computational chemistry has played a pivotal role in interpreting the electronic structure and reactivity of these systems. However, accurately modeling divalent f-block complexes remains challenging because of strong electronic correlation, multiconfigurational character, and the presence of close-in-energy competing electronic states. As experimental capabilities and theoretical methodologies continue to advance, a comprehensive assessment of divalent chemistry is both timely and needed. In this Review, we integrate experimental and theoretical perspectives to provide a systematic analysis of divalent lanthanide and actinide complexes across the f-block series. We critically assess the role of ligands in determining competing ground-state configurations (f n d 1 vs. f n+1 ) resulting in their distinct spectroscopic, magnetic, and bonding properties. Finally, we discuss emerging strategies for predictive modeling and rational design of low-valent f-block molecular systems, with potential applications ranging from dinitrogen reduction to quantum technologies.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH

Unveiling the electronic structure and chemical bonding of the deprotonated cisplatin anion [(NH 3 )(NH 2 )PtCl 2 ] − via low-temperature photoelectron spectroscopy and theoretical calculations

The dehydrogenated cisplatin anion, [(NH 3 )(NH 2 )PtCl 2 ] − , was investigated via low-temperature photoelectron spectroscopy and theoretical calculations. Seven and four spectral peaks are respectively resolved at 193 and 266 nm, yielding rich electronic structure information for both the anion and neutral. From the threshold and maximum of the lowest electron binding energy band, the experimental adiabatic (ADE) and vertical detachment energies (VDE) are determined to be 3.3 ± 0.1 and 3.525 ± 0.025 eV, respectively. Theoretical calculations indicate the dominant isomer adopting a cis-geometry, in which the platinum center is coplanar with two chlorine and two nitrogen ligands. The calculated VDE of 3.54 eV based on this structure agrees well with the experimental value. Charge analyses reveal that the excess electron in the anion is primarily localized on the Pt and Cl atoms. A suite of theoretical analysis tools was employed to elucidate the bonding characteristics and interaction strength between Pt and its ligands.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH

Adsorption, charge transfer and a coverage-driven transition of alkali metals on rutile TiO 2 (110)

The interaction of alkali metals with metal oxide surfaces is central to tuning surface reactivity in heterogeneous catalysis and photocatalysis. Here we present a comprehensive DFT+U study of the adsorption of alkali metals (Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs) on the (110) surface of rutile TiO 2 . At low coverage (θ = 1/8), all alkali metals bind preferentially to bridging oxygen sites with adsorption energies in the range −4.06 to −3.33 eV, transferring nearly one full electron (0.92–0.99 |e|) to the substrate and inducing Ti 4+ → Ti 3+ reduction. The excess charge localizes preferentially at subsurface Ti sites in the form of small polarons. Diffusion barriers indicate facile motion along bridging-oxygen rows, whereas inter-row hopping is strongly hindered. Coverage effects were examined systematically for potassium: adsorption energy and charge transfer per K atom decrease monotonically with increasing θ. Strikingly, a sharp energy discontinuity occurs between θ = 4/8 and θ = 5/8 (ΔE ≈ 1 eV per atom), which we identify as a coverage-driven structural transition arising from steric packing constraints and enhanced K–K electrostatic repulsion once every (1×1) surface cell is occupied. This structural transition perfectly correlates with a dramatic drop in the work function down to an ultra-low minimum of 0.84 eV at θ=5/8, followed by a metallization- driven recovery at higher coverages. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations confirm zigzag K arrangements at moderate coverage (θ = 1/3), while at high coverage (θ = 2/3) short-range K–K correlations emerge without long-range order. These results provide atomistic insight into the structure–activity relationships underlying alkali promotion effects on oxide-supported catalysts.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH