Engineering Papers⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 3014654

United States Nuclear Data Program Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2026

Brown, David [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)] (ORCID:0000000298690278)·Bernstein, Lee [Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Chen, Jun [Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States)]·Kelley, John [Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL), Durham, NC (United States)]·Kondev, Filip G. [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)]·Lee, Hye Young [Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)]·Macchiavelli, Augusto [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)]·Nesaraja, Caroline [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)]·Nica, Ninel [Texas A & M Univ., College Station, TX (United States)]·Richard, Elizabeth [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)]·Sieverding, Andre [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The work plan described in this document has been developed to cover work to be performed by the U. S. Nuclear Data Program (USNDP) during Fiscal Year 2026 that begins on October 1, 2025. Previously, 26 work plans have been prepared for the nuclear data program covering FYs 2000-2025. This plan has been prepared in consultation with the members of the Coordinating Committee who represent the organizations participating in the program. Each Coordinating Committee member prepared a draft plan for his/her organization. Each contribution was integrated into a unified work plan. The draft plan was then circulated to the Coordinating Committee for comments and corrections before the final document was submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). As was done in previous years, the tasks proposed by the various organizations were reviewed internally according to the following criteria, which were developed considering the mission and goals outlined in past review panel reports and oversight committee discussions, and in consultation with the DOE program manager.

Explore related subjects

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brown, David [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)] (ORCID:0000000298690278), Bernstein, Lee [Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], Chen, Jun [Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States)], Kelley, John [Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL), Durham, NC (United States)], Kondev, Filip G. [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)], Lee, Hye Young [Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)], Macchiavelli, Augusto [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)], Nesaraja, Caroline [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)], Nica, Ninel [Texas A & M Univ., College Station, TX (United States)], Richard, Elizabeth [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)], Sieverding, Andre [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]. 2025-12-02. United States Nuclear Data Program Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2026. https://doi.org/10.2172/3014654

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Design-informed neutronics assessment of long-lived fission product transmutation in a tokamak fusion reactor blanket

This study presents a neutronics-based assessment of the feasibility and viability of transmuting six major long-lived fission products (LLFPs) from light-water reactors, namely 99 Tc, 129 I, 79 Se, 93 Zr, 126 Sn, and 135 Cs, within the blanket region of a tokamak fusion reactor, using the MIT ARC design as a concrete fusion configuration. Monte Carlo neutronics simulations were performed to evaluate LLFP transmutation and to compare the results with a reference boiling water reactor (BWR). The results indicate that transmutation of all six LLFPs is neutronics-feasible in fusion reactors, with transmutation half-lives significantly shorter than their natural decay half-lives. For elemental targets, transmutation of 135 Cs, 126 Sn, and 93 Zr was found potentially viable, as the net mass transmuted exceeded that achievable in the reference BWR under identical target volume and irradiation time. When isotopically separated targets were considered, transmutation of 126 Sn and 93 Zr appeared potentially viable. A parametric study demonstrated that plasma geometry modifications can enhance local neutron flux, increasing the transmuted 93 Zr mass by approximately 33% and reducing the transmutation half-life from approximately 240 years to 180 years. Repositioning the target and adjusting material layer thickness reduced the transmutation half-life of 93 Zr to 67 years and increased the net mass transmuted by a factor of 50. Furthermore, these results demonstrate that fusion reactors can enable LLFP transmutation beyond the practical limits of thermal fission reactors and highlight the critical role of reactor and blanket design optimization. Engineering and fuel-cycle considerations required for deployment are beyond the scope of this neutronics-focused study.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2026

A hybrid Monte Carlo-deterministic second moment method with efficient variance reduction

In this work, we present a hybrid method that combines Monte Carlo with deterministic finite element methods to solve a linear Boltzmann transport equation. Our hybrid method runs orders of magnitude faster than Monte Carlo, without sacrificing accuracy, for a proxy problem from radiative transfer that contains both optically-thick and optically-thin material. We believe that this is the first demonstration of a hybrid Second Moment Method in more than one spatial dimension, the first to consider more than one material, and the first to use variance reduction. Our variance reduction approach arises from an asymptotic analysis in which we show that the magnitude of the scattering source grows without bound. We transform the problem to compute the deviation of the radiation intensity from isotropy. The magnitude of the source in the transformed problem is bounded, and the quality of the hybrid method solution is dramatically improved by a substantial reduction in the variance.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗