Engineering PapersSearch

DOE OSTI · 3006953

CIE Curriculum Guide (V.2.0)

Abstract

The Cyber-Informed Engineering (CIE) Curriculum Guide offers a comprehensive framework, guidance, and resources for integrating CIE into university-level engineering programs and related educational activities. The primary goal is to help educators adopt CIE principles into their teaching to produce future engineers and technicians who understand digital risks in modern engineered systems, thereby addressing the nation’s infrastructure resilience needs. This guide outlines practical integration examples, links to resources to accelerate CIE adoption, and shares insights from partner academic institutions on various implementation strategies. CIE is a framework for embedding engineered controls that mitigate the impact of cyber-attacks in any cyber-physical system used in critical energy infrastructure and other sectors. Developed by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response (CESER), the National Cyber-Informed Engineering Strategy emphasizes embedding CIE into formal education, training, and credentialing. This guide supports this strategic objective by providing examples of integrating CIE concepts into engineering curricula, from class activities to new courses and certificate programs. The importance of educating cyber-informed engineers is underscored by the evolving cybersecurity threats facing engineered systems. As industrial control systems (ICS) increasingly incorporate digital technologies, the responsibility for security extends to both cyber professionals and engineers. CIE addresses critical gaps in designing and protecting physical systems with digital components against cyber risks, ensuring engineers consider digital risk throughout the engineering design lifecycle. Currently, engineering education does not routinely include cyber-informed principles, highlighting a gap in addressing modern engineering system risks. This guide advocates for updating engineering curricula to include digital risk management as a fundamental element. By doing so, future engineers will be equipped to design resilient systems that mitigate digital risks from the outset. Through this guide, engineering faculty can integrate CIE into their curricula, bridging the gap between digital risk and engineering. This approach prepares a cyber-informed workforce capable of safeguarding the cyber-physical systems crucial to national security and public welfare. By embedding CIE into education and training, institutions can produce engineers and technicians who can effectively mitigate cyber impacts throughout the engineering design lifecycle, resulting in more secure critical infrastructures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lampe, Benjamin [Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)], Lyons, William [Norwich Univ., Northfield, VT (United States)], Zonouz, Saman [Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, GA (United States)], Conklin, Wm. Arthur [Univ. of Houston, TX (United States); Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO (United States)], O'Brien, Casey [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Chhotaray, Animesh [Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, GA (United States)], Cole, Daniel [Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA (United States)], Saebeler, Dominic [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Castillo, Krystel [Univ. of Texas at San Antonio, TX (United States)], McFly, Shane [National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR), Golden, CO (United States); Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (United States)], Loo, Sin Ming [Boise State Univ., ID (United States)], Medina, Gonzalo Martinez [Gonzalo Martinez Medina University of Texas at San Antonio], Huang, Edward [Auburn Univ., AL (United States)], Forte, Dominic [Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL (United States)], Ahmed, Mizra [Norwich Univ., Northfield, VT (United States)]. 2025-05-01. CIE Curriculum Guide (V.2.0). https://doi.org/10.2172/3006953

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Simulating Thermoelectric Devices Using the MOOSE Framework

Thermoelectric generators (TEG) are devices that generate energy by converting heat into electricity or provide cooling via the Peltier effect. This feature of thermoelectric devices originates from the Seebeck, Peltier, Thomson, and Joule heating effects. TEGs can be applied in energy and thermal management systems such as waste heat recovery and refrigeration, respectively. Thermoelectric device design is influenced by the material selection and the device's geometry operating conditions. Therefore, predicting, verifying, and validating thermoelectric device performance using simulations tools is essential to deploying thermoelectric devices in industry. The Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) Framework is an open-source simulation tool capable of modeling simple to complex systems. In this work, we demonstrate MOOSE's thermoelectric device modeling capabilities by simulating a unicouple, module, and exhaust gas recovery system. The Seebeck, Peltier, Thomson, and Joule heating physics are implemented into MOOSE. The MOOSE thermoelectric physics were thoroughly verified and validated using published COMSOL® results and experimental data. In addition, thermoelectric modules were integrated into an exhaust gas recovery system using the MOOSE MultiApp function as a demonstration of the model's ability. The verification and validation results and exhaust gas heat recovery system showcases MOOSE's capability to model thermoelectric devices and integrate these devices into practical energy systems.

42 - ENGINEERING

Validation of OpenPronghorn for Periodic Hill Flow Separation

OpenPronghorn is an open-source, MOOSE-based thermal-hydraulics simulation tool used for advanced reactor analysis. As an open-source code, it offers a transparent framework for validating governing equations, assumptions, and numerical methods against established benchmarks. This study evaluates OpenPronghorn's RANS turbulence model against the ERCOFTAC Case 81 periodic hill benchmark, a standard test case for separated turbulent flow featuring curved-wall separation, recirculation, shear-layer development, and reattachment. Streamwise velocity profiles predicted by OpenPronghorn were compared to reference LES data at multiple x/h locations. Results show that OpenPronghorn captures the overall trend of the velocity profiles, but the largest discrepancies occur in the separated-flow region, where turbulence is highly anisotropic and strongly affected by adverse pressure gradients and wall curvature—conditions that are inherently difficult for standard RANS models to resolve. Future work will test alternative k-e model variants and correction terms to improve prediction accuracy in this region.

42 - ENGINEERING

XAFS Analysis Report

X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements were performed using a laboratory-based easyXAFS 300+ spectrometer. The XAFS data shows predominantly metallic phases.

42 - ENGINEERING