Engineering PapersSearch

DOE OSTI · 2587886

Advancements in the modification of TiFe alloys for enhanced hydrogen Storage: Strategies and future Directions

Abstract

Hydrogen is considered a promising clean energy source, and a potential alternative to conventional fossil fuels. TiFe alloy has been particularly interesting due to its ability to reversibly absorb and desorb hydrogen at room temperature and low pressure. The initial hydrogen absorption stage of TiFe alloy requires activation under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions, which hinders its practical application. Here, this paper primarily examines the impact of elemental substitution methods on the hydrogen storage capabilities of TiFe alloys, with a particular emphasis on elucidating the mechanisms associated with various substituent elements. Commonly utilized elements, such as Mn, V, and Zr, significantly improve the activation performance of TiFe alloys. Additionally, the incorporation of elements such as Ni, Cr, Ce, and Y contributes to the modulation of phase composition, as well as the enhancement of activation and kinetic properties. However, there exists a notable deficiency in systematic investigations concerning alternative elements, coupled with a frequent oversight of the preparation process's influence on the hydrogen storage characteristics of these alloys. Consequently, the mechanisms by which different elements affect the hydrogen storage process in TiFe alloys remain inadequately understood among current research, thereby complicating the establishment of experiment-based design guidelines for TiFe alloys. Furthermore, the plasma treatment and high-entropy alloying present new approaches for optimizing the hydrogen storage properties of TiFe alloys. This paper aims to present novel research perspectives and insights to scholars in the field by introducing methods for the modification of TiFe alloys.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yu, Linhan [Chongqing Univ. (China)], Qu, Ruiyang [Leibniz Institute for Catalysis (Germany)] (ORCID:0000000340291263), Jiang, Shijie [Chongqing Univ. (China)], Hu, Chenlong [Chongqing Univ. (China)], Wang, Yumin [Chongqing Univ. (China)], Xu, Liuyang [Chongqing Univ. (China)], Li, Sichi [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000225655906), Du, Xuesen [Chongqing Univ. (China)]. 2025-08-02. Advancements in the modification of TiFe alloys for enhanced hydrogen Storage: Strategies and future Directions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116151

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Broad range material-to-system screening of metal–organic frameworks for hydrogen storage using machine learning

Hydrogen is pivotal in the transition to sustainable energy systems, playing major roles in power generation and industrial applications. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as promising mediums for efficient hydrogen storage. However, identifying potential candidates for deployment is challenging due to the vast number of currently available synthesized MOFs. This study integrates molecular simulations, machine learning, and techno-economic analysis to evaluate the performance of MOFs across broad operation conditions for hydrogen storage applications. While previous screenings of MOF databases have predominantly emphasized high hydrogen capacities under cryogenic conditions, this study reveals that optimal temperatures and pressures for cost minimization depend on the raw price of the MOF. Specifically, when MOFs are priced at $15/kg, among the 9720 MOFs tested, 9692 MOFs achieve the lowest cost at temperatures between 170 K and 250 K and a pressure of 150 bar. Under these optimal conditions, 362 MOFs deliver a lower levelized cost of storage than 350 bar compressed gas hydrogen storage. Furthermore, this study reveals key material properties that result in low system cost, such as high surface areas (>3000 m2/g), large void fractions (>0.78), and large pore volumes (>1.1 cm3/g).

Hydrogen storage