Engineering PapersSearch

DOE OSTI · 2584167

Expedition UT-GOM2-2 Site H

Flemings, Peter B. [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000253773694)·Thomas, Carla [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000181310649)·Phillips, Stephen C. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000308584701)·Collett, Timothy S. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000275984708)·Cook, Ann E. [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)] (ORCID:0000000256580329)·Solomon, Evan [Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000336842958)·Colwell, Frederick S. [Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)] (ORCID:0000000271095874)·Johnson, Joel E. [Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States)] (ORCID:0000000256717209)·Awwiller, David [ExxonMobil, Houston, TX (United States)]·Aylward, Irita [Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)]·Bhandari, Athma R. [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000209858041)·Brooks, Donald [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)]·Buser-Young, Jessica Z. [Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)] (ORCID:0000000236664074)·Cardona, Alejandro [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:000000017964384X)·Casso, Michael A. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000269909090)·Coyte, Rachel [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)] (ORCID:0000000163695311)·Darrah, Tom [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)]·Davis, Marcy [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)]·Dugan, Brandon [Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (United States)] (ORCID:0000000225556430)·Duncan, Dan [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000347827104)·Germaine, John T. [Tufts Univ., Medford, MA (United States)] (ORCID:000000017882098X)·Holland, Melanie [Geotek Ltd., Daventry (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000335106457)·Houghton, Jesse [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000255109789)·Martin, Saffron [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)] (ORCID:0009000638911653)·Mills, N. Tanner [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000185783232)·Mimitz, Michael [Geotek Coring Inc., Salt Lake City, UT (United States)]·Minarich, Daniel [Geotek Coring Inc., Salt Lake City, UT (United States)]·Morono, Yuki [Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama (Japan)] (ORCID:0000000189284254)·Murphy, Zachary [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000259359101)·O’Connell, Joshua [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)]·Petrou, Ethan [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000265427318)·Pettigrew, Tom [Pettigrew Engineering, PLLC, Milam, TX (United States)]·Pohlman, John W. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000235634586)·Portnov, Alexey [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000349308308)·Purkey Phillips, Marcie [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000313424358)·Redd, Thomas [TR Consulting (United States)]·Sawyer, Derek E. [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)] (ORCID:0000000207797775)·Schultheiss, Peter [Geotek Ltd., Daventry (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:000000029090944X)·Shannon, Kelly [Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)] (ORCID:0000000277831473)·Small, Cathal [Tufts Univ., Medford, MA (United States)]·Sullivan, Camille [Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States)]·Tozier, Kayla [Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States)] (ORCID:0009000991325014)·Tsang, Man-Yin [Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000211592588)·Van Der Maal, Camila [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0009000910271350)·Waite, William F. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000294364109)·Walton, Taylor [Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000242275294)

Abstract

Pressure and conventional cores were collected at Site H of the Walker Ridge Protracted Area Block 313 in the Terrebonne Basin, deepwater Gulf of America (Gulf of Mexico) during the University of Texas (UT) Deepwater Hydrate Coring Expedition (UT-GOM2-2). Pressure and conventional cores were collected continuously to a depth of 155.1 meters below the seafloor (mbsf). At deeper depths, cores were taken periodically from hydrate-bearing sands and their bounding muds to a total depth of 861.3 mbsf. 162.6 m of conventional core and 54.8 m of pressure core were recovered. Twelve temperature measurements were made between 27.1 and 144.5 mbsf to determine the geothermal gradient. At the seafloor, more than 4 m of sandy silt of unknown origin was encountered. Beneath this sand, to a depth of about 200 mbsf, the section was composed of interbedded mud and biogenic carbonate ooze. The ooze correlated to low density and high porosity intervals observed in the previously acquired logging while drilling (LWD) data and as measured. These ooze intervals also correspond to lighter sediment color, increased Ca content based on X-ray florescence (XRF) core scanning, and increased calcareous nannofossil abundance. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy constrains the entire record to the Pleistocene (< 0.91 million years), with a pronounced increase in sedimentation rate with depth. Below 200 mbsf, the section was predominantly composed of mud with two thicker, hydrate-bearing coarse-grained intervals, which are commonly known as the Blue and Orange sands. The dissolved gas concentration was quantified from pressure cores. In the shallow section, dissolved methane concentration increased below the sulfate-methane transition zone (SMTZ) and reaches saturation (the limit of solubility for methane) at 147 mbsf. Gas expansion was very common in conventional and depressurized pressure (conventionalized) cores below the SMTZ. At deeper depths, the methane concentration within muds bounding the Blue and Orange reservoirs was generally found to be less than saturation. The dissolved and hydrate gas composition is consistent with a microbial source, containing greater than 99.99% methane and only trace concentrations of ethane, propane, and butane. The methane to ethane ratio (C1 /C2 ) and the methane to ethane plus propane (C1 /(C2 +C3 )) decrease with depth down to at least 678 mbsf, mainly driven by the increase in ethane with depth. It is unclear if this trend continues through the Orange sand interval. The δ13C isotopic signature of methane ranges between -69.9 and -78.5 ‰ relative to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) standard. Pressure core recovery in sandy intervals was poor. However, pressure core logs of the Orange sand show intervals of low density and high velocity, which are indicative of high hydrate saturation. One pressure core was degassed and the average hydrate saturation in the core was determined to be 24%. One core from within the Orange sand was composed of interbedded graded sandy silt and mud. The sandy silts from this core are composed of mainly quartz and feldspar with some lithics. Most of the recovered pressure core samples are maintained at near in-situ pressure and temperature (within the hydrate stability field) at the University of Texas Pressure Core Center awaiting analysis. In the shallow section, samples will be used to determine the flux of organic carbon through the basin system, find the rate at which that carbon was consumed, and understand the microbial population responsible for these processes. In the deeper section, samples from in and around the hydrate reservoirs will be used to determine the petrophysical properties of the reservoir and bounding seals in these systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Flemings, Peter B. [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000253773694), Thomas, Carla [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000181310649), Phillips, Stephen C. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000308584701), Collett, Timothy S. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000275984708), Cook, Ann E. [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)] (ORCID:0000000256580329), Solomon, Evan [Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000336842958), Colwell, Frederick S. [Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)] (ORCID:0000000271095874), Johnson, Joel E. [Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States)] (ORCID:0000000256717209), Awwiller, David [ExxonMobil, Houston, TX (United States)], Aylward, Irita [Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)], Bhandari, Athma R. [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000209858041), Brooks, Donald [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)], Buser-Young, Jessica Z. [Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)] (ORCID:0000000236664074), Cardona, Alejandro [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:000000017964384X), Casso, Michael A. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000269909090), Coyte, Rachel [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)] (ORCID:0000000163695311), Darrah, Tom [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)], Davis, Marcy [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)], Dugan, Brandon [Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (United States)] (ORCID:0000000225556430), Duncan, Dan [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000347827104), Germaine, John T. [Tufts Univ., Medford, MA (United States)] (ORCID:000000017882098X), Holland, Melanie [Geotek Ltd., Daventry (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000335106457), Houghton, Jesse [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000255109789), Martin, Saffron [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)] (ORCID:0009000638911653), Mills, N. Tanner [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000185783232), Mimitz, Michael [Geotek Coring Inc., Salt Lake City, UT (United States)], Minarich, Daniel [Geotek Coring Inc., Salt Lake City, UT (United States)], Morono, Yuki [Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama (Japan)] (ORCID:0000000189284254), Murphy, Zachary [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000259359101), O’Connell, Joshua [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)], Petrou, Ethan [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000265427318), Pettigrew, Tom [Pettigrew Engineering, PLLC, Milam, TX (United States)], Pohlman, John W. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000235634586), Portnov, Alexey [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000349308308), Purkey Phillips, Marcie [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0000000313424358), Redd, Thomas [TR Consulting (United States)], Sawyer, Derek E. [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)] (ORCID:0000000207797775), Schultheiss, Peter [Geotek Ltd., Daventry (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:000000029090944X), Shannon, Kelly [Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)] (ORCID:0000000277831473), Small, Cathal [Tufts Univ., Medford, MA (United States)], Sullivan, Camille [Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States)], Tozier, Kayla [Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States)] (ORCID:0009000991325014), Tsang, Man-Yin [Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000211592588), Van Der Maal, Camila [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)] (ORCID:0009000910271350), Waite, William F. [US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000294364109), Walton, Taylor [Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000242275294). 2025-09-01. Expedition UT-GOM2-2 Site H. https://doi.org/10.2172/2584167

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Green Era Anaerobic Digester

Green Era Educational NFP constructed and commissioned the Green Era Renewable Energy & Urban Farming Campus in Chicago’s Auburn Gresham neighborhood. The project transformed a long-vacant brownfield site into a commercial-scale anaerobic digestion facility that converts food waste into renewable natural gas and nutrient-rich material for agricultural use. The facility can process up to 80,000 wet tons of food waste annually and supports approximately 15 permanent jobs while advancing food waste diversion, renewable energy production, nutrient recovery and community revitalization.

03 NATURAL GAS

Circumventing thermodynamic limitations in converting carbon dioxide into carbon nanotubes via tandem catalysis

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are important materials for electronics and structural composites, but their production still relies on hydrocarbon-based chemical vapor deposition, an energy-intensive and fossil-dependent process, limited by rapid catalyst deactivation. Using CO2 as a carbon feedstock offers a sustainable route for CNT synthesis, yet direct CO2 conversion to CNTs is thermodynamically unfavorable and existing CO2-to-carbon pathways mainly yield amorphous or weakly graphitized solids. Here, we demonstrate a tandem electrochemical–thermochemical (EC-TC) strategy that overcomes these limitations. CO2 is first electrochemically reduced to a tunable mixture of C2H4 and CO, which is directly fed into a thermochemical reactor and converted into CNTs with controllable morphology and high CNT-to-metal mass ratios (~200) over NiFe catalysts at 750 °C. In situ synchrotron-based characterization and density functional theory calculations reveal that CO dissociation and C2H4 decomposition on NiFe alloys cooperatively promote CNT nucleation and sustained growth. This EC-TC strategy establishes a modular route for converting CO2 into value-added carbon nanomaterials.

03 NATURAL GAS

Coordinated Natural Gas and Electric Planning: Case Studies of Current Approaches and Practices

This paper examines how natural gas and electric utilities across eight U.S. states and two Canadian provinces are beginning to coordinate historically separate planning processes in response to growing system interdependencies, policy mandates, aging infrastructure, and changing customer energy choices. Electricity planning has long relied on robust integrated resource planning frameworks that weigh numerous objectives, risks, and costs. Natural gas planning, on the other hand, is typically less transparent and more narrowly focused on safety and system integrity. As economic, reliability, and policy drivers place new and shared demands on both systems, jurisdictions and utilities are experimenting with approaches such as coordinated forecasting, non pipeline alternatives, and combined planning pilots. A few have issued regulatory or statutory directives for greater data sharing and methodological alignment. Case studies from British Columbia, California, Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Québec, Rhode Island, and Washington illustrate a wide range of approaches to rethinking siloed planning. The paper identifies several common themes across the jurisdictions examined. It provides observations on the methods, processes, and organizational steps that may be needed in the future to address the challenges being faced by states and utilities. Lastly, it identifies some initial steps that states and utilities can consider if they would like to pursue more integrated, cost-effective, policy-aligned energy system planning.

03 NATURAL GAS