Engineering PapersSearch

DOE OSTI · 2483545

FEED Study of CarbonCapture Inc DAC and CarbonCure Utilization Technologies Using United States Steel’s Gary Works Plant Waste Heat (Final Report)

Gioja, Leslie Michael [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·DeYoung, Mike [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·Giardinella, Sebastiano [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·Varghese Kaleeckal, Bajio [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·Echeto Palmar, Maholy [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·Larimore, Ryan [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·Prause, Scott [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·O'Brien, Kevin [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·Baroi, Chinmoy [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·Liu, Deborah [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)]·Loria, Patricia [CarbonCapture Inc., Los Angeles, CA (United States)]·Kenny, Meghan [CarbonCapture Inc., Los Angeles, CA (United States)]·Besarati, Saeb [CarbonCapture Inc., Los Angeles, CA (United States)]·Lee, Jonas [CarbonCapture Inc., Los Angeles, CA (United States)]·Cail, Kevin [CarbonCure Technologies, Halifax, NS (Canada)]·Rogers, James [CarbonCure Technologies, Halifax, NS (Canada)]·Baumeister, Alberto [Ecotek Engineering USA, LLC, Coral Gables, FL (United States)]·Mazzei, Claudio [Ecotek Engineering USA, LLC, Coral Gables, FL (United States)]·Petrilena, Brenda [U.S. Steel Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA (United States)]·Hoppe, James [U.S. Steel Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA (United States)]·Cialdella, Ryan [Ozinga, Chicago, IL (United States)]·Guletsky, Paula [Sargent & Lundy, Chicago, IL (United States)]·Lawlor, John [Sargent & Lundy, Chicago, IL (United States)]·Watters, Clint [Sargent & Lundy, Chicago, IL (United States)]·Johnson, Will [Visage Energy, Culver City, CA (United States)]·Roberts, Daryl-Lynn [Visage Energy, Culver City, CA (United States)]

Abstract

The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) led this project to produce a front-end engineering design (FEED) study of an advanced Direct Air Capture and Utilization System (DACUS) system that can remove a minimum of 5,000 tonnes/yr net of carbon dioxide from air (based on cradle-to-gate LCA) and utilizing the CO 2 to produce low carbon intensity ready mix concrete. The designed system, if built, would be larger than any currently existing Direct Air Capture (DAC) collector in the U.S. Such carbon capture technologies are critical to meeting the goals of the DOE’s program to accelerate climate-critical technology. In addition to the power sector, industrial facilities for the manufacture of steel and cement/concrete are among the major sources of anthropogenic CO 2 . DAC is a promising new technology for reducing CO 2 , a potent greenhouse gas, in the atmosphere but is expensive, in part due to the energy required to adsorb and desorb captured CO 2 during cycles. By integrating CarbonCapture Inc. (CCI) DAC modules at United States Steel's Gary Works (USS) and utilizing the site's waste heat, energy, and location this project evaluates the feasibility of utilizing the captured CO 2 and the logistics of transportation. CarbonCapture Inc. has developed an innovative DAC system using novel adsorbents to cost-effectively capture CO 2 . The captured, liquified gas will be trucked to ready-mix concrete plants within the region, the closest of which is approximately 3.5 miles away, where CarbonCure will inject it into concrete during the mixing process at the facilities. The carbon dioxide reacts with concrete, mineralizing into calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ), permanently locking the greenhouse gas into the matrix of the building material. This FEED study demonstrated a full CO 2 value chain for DACUS from industrial facilities. It also provided a means for Visage Energy Corp. (Visage) to assess the impact of this holistic approach on job creation, regional economic impact, and environmental justice. The project team also included Sargent & Lundy (S&L) to provide the constructability review and costing of the integration of the DAC with the steel plant. Ecotek Engineering USA, LLC designed the outside battery limit (OSBL) infrastructure to connect the DAC and the plant. Activities performed during the project included: (1) Project Management Plan; (2) Technology Maturation Plan (TMP); (3) Initial Workforce Readiness Plan; (4) Workforce Readiness Plan; (5) Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) Study; (6) Project Design Basis; (7) Hazards and Operability (HAZOP) Study; (8) Constructability Review; (9) Project Cost Assessment; (10) Logistics Analysis of CO 2 Transportation to the Utilization Site; (11) Business Case Analysis; (12) Life Cycle Analysis (LCA); (13) Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Analysis; (14) Environmental Justice Analysis; and (15) Economic Revitalization and Job Creation Outcomes Analysis. This report provides a summary of the outcomes and results of the project, which was performed between Oct. 1, 2022, through Sept. 30, 2024.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gioja, Leslie Michael [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], DeYoung, Mike [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Giardinella, Sebastiano [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Varghese Kaleeckal, Bajio [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Echeto Palmar, Maholy [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Larimore, Ryan [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Prause, Scott [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], O'Brien, Kevin [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Baroi, Chinmoy [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Liu, Deborah [Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)], Loria, Patricia [CarbonCapture Inc., Los Angeles, CA (United States)], Kenny, Meghan [CarbonCapture Inc., Los Angeles, CA (United States)], Besarati, Saeb [CarbonCapture Inc., Los Angeles, CA (United States)], Lee, Jonas [CarbonCapture Inc., Los Angeles, CA (United States)], Cail, Kevin [CarbonCure Technologies, Halifax, NS (Canada)], Rogers, James [CarbonCure Technologies, Halifax, NS (Canada)], Baumeister, Alberto [Ecotek Engineering USA, LLC, Coral Gables, FL (United States)], Mazzei, Claudio [Ecotek Engineering USA, LLC, Coral Gables, FL (United States)], Petrilena, Brenda [U.S. Steel Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA (United States)], Hoppe, James [U.S. Steel Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA (United States)], Cialdella, Ryan [Ozinga, Chicago, IL (United States)], Guletsky, Paula [Sargent & Lundy, Chicago, IL (United States)], Lawlor, John [Sargent & Lundy, Chicago, IL (United States)], Watters, Clint [Sargent & Lundy, Chicago, IL (United States)], Johnson, Will [Visage Energy, Culver City, CA (United States)], Roberts, Daryl-Lynn [Visage Energy, Culver City, CA (United States)]. 2024-12-23. FEED Study of CarbonCapture Inc DAC and CarbonCure Utilization Technologies Using United States Steel’s Gary Works Plant Waste Heat (Final Report). https://doi.org/10.2172/2483545

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Building the Business Case with JUSTIFI: Quantifying Multiple Benefits in the Automotive Industry

The Michigan State University Industrial Training and Assessment Center (MSU ITAC) conducted a pilot study at an automotive parts manufacturer in Michigan. The study identified energy-productivity enhancements through the application of the JUSTIFI software. Key recommendations included replacing six inefficient rooftop units (RTUs) with a new air rotational unit. By quantifying operational savings for this project, the expected payback period went from 6.6 years to 1.4 years. Additionally, the installation of variable frequency drives (VFDs) on condenser tower motors was suggested. By including all operational benefits, the payback period was reduced from 8.2 years to 1.3 years. This comprehensive analysis aims to bolster the manufacturer's goals of reducing energy while enhancing overall operational efficiency.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI

A Physics-Informed Reinforcement Learning Framework for Economic-Thermal Co-Optimization of Crypto Mining Data Centers: Preprint

The rapid expansion of cryptocurrency mining has created a new class of high-density data centers characterized by extreme thermal flux and high sensitivity to volatile economic markets. Traditional thermal management strategies, typically reliant on rule-based control, maintain static setpoints that fail to account for fluctuating electricity prices and cryptocurrency values - factors critical to mining profitability. To address this, we present a physics-informed reinforcement learning (PIRL) framework for economic-thermal co-optimization in crypto mining data centers. This framework consists of a proximal policy optimization (PPO) agent, a virtual testbed powered by high-fidelity physics-based models, and an interactive frontend dashboard. The PPO agent is trained using the virtual testbed and strict hardware safety limits. This physics-informed approach allows the agent to learn a stochastic policy that dynamically balances mining revenue against operational costs by co-optimizing HVAC cooling setpoints and IT computational hashrate. The simulation results demonstrate that the integrated framework achieved an 8.62% increase in net operational profit compared to traditional baseline strategies while strictly adhering to safety-critical temperature constraints (coolant supply temperature < 32 degrees C). This work provides a scalable template for the deployment of reinforcement learning in mission critical facilities where economic volatility and physical safety must be managed simultaneously.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI

Field Validation of a Grid-Interactive Efficient Building Software Solution

The U.S. General Services Administration's (GSA's) Green Proving Ground (GPG) program, in partnership with the National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR), completed a field study of a Grid-Interactive Efficient Buildings (GEB) software solution. The study focused on a single testbed facility to test the GEB functionality of the software solution, along with other features. The testbed facility - a courthouse - is a common building type in GSA's vast building portfolio, offering potentially impactful findings on a scalable level. The study evaluated Prescriptive Data's technology, Nantum OS, a connected building operating system ("GEB Solution") which aggregates multiple sources of previously siloed building data and combines that data with external sources, such as weather information or utility signals, into a single integrated platform. A GEB Solution is a type of Energy Management Information System (EMIS). EMIS is defined as a system of devices, data services, and software applications that communicates with any building system or third-party data source to aggregate and transform data into new capabilities to aid in the optimization of energy use at the building, campus, or agency level. This specific GEB Solution is an EMIS with ASO, automated system optimization, offering supervisory control of certain aspects of the Building Automation System (BAS). Multiple features were evaluated including, but not limited to, Continuous Demand Management to avoid setting new monthly kilowatt (kW) peaks, energy efficiency for reduction of kilowatt hours (kWh) and natural gas consumption, and automated demand response (ADR) for purposes of lowering demand during a utility called Demand Response (DR) event. The testbed facility was the Foley Federal Building and US Courthouse ("Foley Federal Building") located in Las Vegas, NV. This is a 209,496 sq. ft. building constructed in the 1960s with major renovations in 2004. The facility was a good candidate due to the large prevalence of office and courthouse spaces in the GSA portfolio of buildings. It also has many features which allow integration into and control of the building and a strong facilities team to assist with the study. Quantitative and qualitative performance objectives were developed using GSA's GPG GEB project template along with input from the vendor and building facility staff; these are outlined in Table 1. The quantitative performance objectives focused on continuous demand management, energy efficiency, and automated demand response. The qualitative performance objectives focused on the ease of installation and commissioning as well as the operability of the GEB solution. Other performance metrics that are reported on include carbon reduction, cost effectiveness, and occupant acceptance.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI