Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 23203862

Particle Swarm Optimisation for group structure optimization for radiotherapy shielding

Abstract

Neutron transport simulations are ubiquitous in nuclear engineering because they allow one to model experimental systems and render a model platform for easy perturbation of experimental designs. In addition, simulations allow one to gain experimental insight without actually having to go through the trouble of building a physical experiment. Neutron transport simulations can be stochastic or deterministic based. Stochastic neutron transport simulations are typically simulated using the Monte Carlo method and yield very accurate solutions but are computationally expensive, while deterministic methods are typically faster but can be less accurate. Here we focus on optimizing the accuracy of deterministic neutron transport simulations for radiotherapy simulations. Deterministic neutron transport requires discretization of angle, energy, and space to appropriately analyze the system one is trying to model. Discretization of energy is challenging because of the highly variable neutron flux at certain neutron energies. Improper discretization of energy in the transport model can lead to erroneous results and therefore inaccurate interpretations of the solution. In this study, we evaluate Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) as a mechanism for selecting optimal group structures for radiotherapy shielding. We tested the particle swarm optimization algorithm on radiotherapy shielding problems using Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) main deterministic transport code PARTISN. Results show that the optimized energy group structures generated from the optimization algorithm outperformed LANL's standard energy group structures, and therefore demonstrate utility in using PSO to expedite computation times due to the increased accuracy obtained with a smaller but optimized group structure. (authors)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fasina, O., Saller, T.. 2022-07-01. Particle Swarm Optimisation for group structure optimization for radiotherapy shielding. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/23203862

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Design and Integration of High Precision Superconducting Magnet Power Supply Systems

This paper reviews the design and integration approach being taken to power more than 400 superconducting magnets in Electron Ion Collider (EIC) by power supplies ranging from 20V to 400V and 100A to 18kA. A major challenge is to integrate existing legacy power supplies with new high current systems and maximize performance and reduce costs. Successful implementation requires coordinated integration of power convertors, current regulation, quench protection, energy extraction, machine protection, controls and existing accelerator infrastructure.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Searching for the Most Harmful Field Errors in the HSR IR Superconducting Magnets

In this project, we improve beam stability for the Electron-Ion Collider. Magnetic field errors can reduce beam stability, making it essential to identify the field errors that have the greatest impact on accelerator performance. However, this is particularly challenging because beam stability depends on the complex interactions of many magnetic field errors, resulting in a high-dimensional and nonlinear optimization problem. We determine which field errors are the most influential for the large physical aperture superconducting magnet B2PF, a critical magnet in the Interaction Region (IR) in the Hadron Storage Ring (HSR). We complete and analyze nearly 30,000 simulations on the Brookhaven National Laboratory Linux Cluster by varying 18 nonlinear magnetic field errors. We evaluate beam stability using the dynamic aperture and the tune diffusion. We identify the field errors that most strongly influence beam stability and establish quantitative field error tolerances that improve accelerator performance.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗