Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 23178734

Optimizing group structures using hierarchical division

Abstract

Creating group structures with few groups that give low errors is a difficult problem in reactor analysis. In recent years, automated optimization techniques have been applied to this task. We continue this trend by applying the hierarchical division algorithm to generate optimized group structures that minimize a cost function. At each stage, the algorithm adds a single group boundary to an existing group structure, dividing one group into two to increase the resolution of the group structure. The location of the added boundary is the one that gives the lowest error over all possible new boundary locations. Our implementation requires a beginning group structure, a set of candidate new boundary locations, and a set of reference reaction rates. As a proof of concept, we used WIMS-69 as the initial group structure, XMAS-172 as the ending group structures, and a 344-group reference group structure. Testing on two simple, homogenized reactor problems, we found that hierarchical division was able to reduce the error by a factor of around 5 with an increase of only 15% in the number of groups. Because hierarchical division can get stuck in local minima, it often reaches a plateau in its error reduction capability as many groups are added. Nevertheless, we find hierarchical division has strong potential to make good group structures into great group structures at a modest increase in computational cost. (authors)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Till, A., Saller, T., Gibson, N.. 2022-07-01. Optimizing group structures using hierarchical division. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/23178734

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

ZiaCore Critical Experiment Demonstrates Key Technologies for Nuclear Energy Systems

ZiaCore is a LANL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) project focused on developing and demonstrating key technologies for future nuclear energy systems. The project itself was split into three tasks: 1) Design of the ZiaCore Reactor, a UO2 fueled, graphite and zirconium-hydride (ZrH) moderated, heat pipe cooled micro-reactor 2) Development of the ZrH and heat pipes components 3) Performance of a critical experiment with a representative portion of the ZiaCore reactor incorporating the ZrH and heat pipes developed and made at LANL.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Operating Experience Data Analysis for Digital Instrumentation and Control System Reliability and Risk Assessment in Nuclear Power Plants

The implementation of advanced digital instrumentation and control (DI&C) systems in U.S. nuclear power plants (NPPs) can bring significant advancements in reliability, monitoring, and control capabilities. However, these systems also introduce new challenges, particularly in assessing risks such as common-cause failures (CCFs) and establishing robust reliability estimates for DI&C components. Addressing these challenges is critical for ensuring the safe and efficient operation of NPPs. Recently, Idaho National Laboratory was tasked by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to conduct a DI&C reliability study using operating experience data from the nuclear industry. The two operating experience data sources for the study are the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations’ Industry Reporting and Information System (IRIS) and the NRC’s Licensee Event Report database which is hosted at Idaho National Laboratory at https://lersearch.inl.gov/LERSearchCriteria.aspx. This report provides a comprehensive examination of DI&C systems, including their architecture, operational advantages, and associated challenges. It reviews existing industry DI&C studies and failure mode taxonomies, along with reliability data from various industries. Through a detailed analysis of these databases, the study provides insights into DI&C system performance. Considerations should be given to incorporate DI&C failure data into the NRC's Integrated Data Collection and Coding System and updating the Reliability and Availability Data System to support ongoing DI&C reliability studies. Recommendations are also provided for modeling DI&C reliability and CCF in probabilistic risk assessment, thereby supporting risk-informed decision-making and enhancing the reliability and safety of NPPs.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗