CTF Parallel Performance Improvements

Abstract

CTF is a modernized version of COBRA-TF (Coolant Boiling in Rod Arrays-Two Fluid), which is a thermal hydraulic (T/H) sub-channel code based on a two-phase, two-fluid model that formulates the conservation equations of mass, energy, and momentum for three fields of vapor, continuous liquid, and entrained liquid droplets. Under the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) program sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, CTF is being further developed and improved for modeling and simulation of light water reactors. The code improvements for predicting T/H responses of pressurized water reactor (PWR) cores are focused on its applications to specific challenge problems deemed significant to the industry, such as departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) and crud-induced power shift. The code is also being used for T/H feedback in normal operating condition depletions in PWR and boiling water reactor designs in the reactor core simulator, Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications Core Simulator (VERA-CS), being developed by CASL. CTF modifications under the CASL program include software optimization, new closure models, and parallelization for modeling full reactor core T/H responses. The purpose of this work was to improve the parallel performance of CTF. CTF was originally parallelized via a domain-decomposition strategy using the Message Passing Interface (MPI), in which the basis of a solution domain was a physical assembly in the model. In other words, a user who wanted to perform a parallel solution with CTF had to provide the code one processor per assembly in the model (e.g., 56 cores for a 56 assembly quarter-core model, or 193 cores for a 193 assembly full-core model). This design was rigid, demanding a very specific number of processors for a model; furthermore, when CTF was run in VERA-CS-which typically uses thousands of processors- many processors sat idle during the CTF solve because CTF was unable to use any more processors than there are physical assemblies. This was not necessarily a problem if the CTF execution speed was very fast, but the average time spent in a CTF solve for prototypical PWR operating conditions was significant (i.e., over 20 % of the simulation wall time was being spent in CTF for a standard core depletion simulation). Larger, more computationally intensive simulations performed in support of the CASL DNB challenge problem demonstrated a need for improvements in this original parallelization approach. The specific goal of this work was to allow CTF to use more processors than there are physical assemblies in the model, which would not only speed up CTF and improve the overall efficiency of VERA-CS but also give users more-flexible options for executing their simulations. (authors)