Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 2251549

A Fully Explicit Integrator for Modeling Astrophysical Reactive Flows

Abstract

Simulating complex astrophysical reacting flows is computationally expensive—reactions are stiff and typically require implicit integration methods. The reaction update is often the most expensive part of a simulation, which motivates the exploration of more economical methods. In this research note, we investigate how the explicit Runge–Kutta–Chebyshev (RKC) method performs compared to an implicit method when applied to astrophysical reactive flows. These integrators are applied to simulations of X-ray bursts arising from unstable thermonuclear burning of accreted fuel on the surface of neutron stars. We show that the RKC method performs with similar accuracy to our traditional implicit integrator, but is more computationally efficient when run on CPUs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Johnson, Parker, Zingale, Michael, Johnson, Eric T., Smith, Alexander, Niemeyer, Kyle E.. 2023-12-22. A Fully Explicit Integrator for Modeling Astrophysical Reactive Flows. https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172%2Fad175d

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Numerical Treatment of Shock-induced Nuclear Burning in Double Detonation Type Ia Supernovae

We present a benchmark problem to assess the treatment of shock-induced nuclear burning in the context of double detonation Type Ia supernovae. In a stratified white dwarf model, we implement a shock-detection criterion that suppresses burning in zones characterized by compression and significant pressure gradients, controlled by a tunable parameter, f shock . One-dimensional simulations, using the open-source Castro suite, were conducted across three treatments—burning fully enabled, and burning suppressed with f shock = 2/3 and f shock = 1—across three spatial resolutions (5.0, 2.5, and 0.3125 km). At the finest resolution, the burning-enabled and f shock = 1 models converge, while the f shock = 2/3 front continues to show slight offset behavior. Since most simulations are carried out at much lower resolutions, our tests support the idea that burning in shocks should always be disabled in practice. We also observe that the behavior of lower-resolution simulations remains extremely sensitive to the choice of f shock .

GPU computing↗