Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1883200

Comparison of Some RANS Solvers

Abstract

We will take a look at solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations that are encountered in the context of wind farm performance simulations and optimizations. We will compare some of the more popular ways to solve these equations with a focus on using iterative solvers for the linear solve. We will compare their performance and reliability to a direct solve as we scale the problem both by adding more and parallel resources and by increasing the size of the domain, both in two and three dimensions. There are many strategies that can be applied to solving the RANS equations, some are very efficient, while others are very insensitive to, for example, the Reynolds number. The first contender we will consider is the Pressure-Convection-Diffusion (PCD) preconditioner. Early results suggest that PCD is indeed a very efficient solver, in particular in two dimensions, as long as the Reynold's number remains small. Next we will try to reorder our degrees of freedom such that we can use GMRES with ILU for our linear solve. Another popular choice we will consider for solving the RANS equations is SIMPLE (and its derivatives). For all of our implementations we make use of either FEniCS or Firedrake, basing our work on both existing implementations of some of these solvers while also writing new extensions for others.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Spies, Lukas. 2022-08-17. Comparison of Some RANS Solvers. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1883200

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Two-Way Coupled CFD/DEM Simulation of Electromagnetic Heating in a Fluidized Bed Reactor

A set of tools has been developed to couple a multiphase reacting computational fluid dynamics solver (MFIX) with two computational electromagnetic solvers (COMSOL and Elmer). In contrast to several recent investigations, which calculate a single static EM field prior to the CFD calculation, in the present work the electromagnetic field is periodically updated during the simulation. This enables the EM field and associated EM heating predictions to reflect the effects of evolving material properties (temperature, composition, size etc.) and the evolving distribution of material in the system. The present work uses effective medium theory (EMT) for the electromagnetic field calculations since the goal is to apply the tool for industrial scale reacting systems. Predictions using MFIX/COMSOL and MFIX/Elmer are compared to in bed thermocouple measurements from a fluidized bed experiment and recent simulation predictions and recent experiments performed at NETL. The NETL experiments also include packed bed operating conditions. Coupled MFIX/COMSOL simulations at these conditions are compared with similar simulations using only COMSOL to measure errors due to the solver coupling approach.

CFD↗

Two-Way Coupled CFD/DEM Simulation of Electromagnetic Heating in a Fluidized Bed Reactor - Extended Abstract

A set of tools has been developed to couple a multiphase reacting computational fluid dynamics solver (MFIX) with two computational electromagnetic solvers (COMSOL and Elmer). In contrast to several recent investigations, which calculate a single static EM field prior to the CFD calculation, in the present work the electromagnetic field is periodically updated during the simulation. This enables the EM field and associated EM heating predictions to reflect the effects of evolving material properties (temperature, composition, size etc.) and the evolving distribution of material in the system. The present work uses effective medium theory (EMT) for the electromagnetic field calculations since the goal is to apply the tool for industrial scale reacting systems. Predictions using MFIX/COMSOL and MFIX/Elmer are compared to in bed thermocouple measurements from a fluidized bed experiment and recent simulation predictions and recent experiments performed at NETL. The NETL experiments also include packed bed operating conditions. Coupled MFIX/COMSOL simulations at these conditions are compared with similar simulations using only COMSOL to measure errors due to the solver coupling approach.

CFD↗

Numerical assessment of triply periodic minimal surfaces for direct air capture of carbon dioxide

Direct air capture (DAC) systems often consist of packing material wetted by a capture fluid that reacts with CO 2 in the airstream. The efficiency of the contactor is determined by a complex relationship of fluid dynamics, heat and mass transfer, contactor geometry, and chemical properties. The efficiency of the contactor must be balanced with other factors, primarily pressure drop through the system. Triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) are a class of differential surfaces that have been explored in multiple engineering applications and have been shown to exhibit excellent performance when used in heat exchangers. Their tortuous path provides a high surface-to-volume ratio and favorable trade-off between contact area and pressure drop. In this work, a gyroid-type TPMS contactor was evaluated using computational fluid dynamics for a variety of geometric parameters to explore the potential benefit of TPMS shapes for DAC applications. A thin-film model was employed to model the flow and distribution of the capture solvent, allowing efficient simulations of TPMS structures at scale by eliminating the need for a computationally intensive interface capturing method. A liquid-gas mass transfer model was implemented in the commercial software STAR-CCM+ and used to predict the CO 2 capture efficiency and study the trade-off between capture performance and pressure drop through analysis of capture rates, mass transfer coefficients, and other relevant variables. TPMS contactors with a variety of geometric parameters and two capture solvent options were investigated to determine the effect of design choices on the operational performance of DAC systems. In conclusion, results showed that while contactor geometry is the dominant factor in efficiency and pressure drop, the physiochemical properties of the solvent are an important secondary influence on the contactor performance.

CFD↗