Solid Oxide Cell Manufacturing Cost Tool

Buchheit, Kyle; Noring, Alex; Iyengar, Arun; Hackett, Gregory

Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 1842511

Solid Oxide Cell Manufacturing Cost Tool

Buchheit, Kyle·Noring, Alex·Iyengar, Arun·Hackett, Gregory

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

NETL has developed a detailed solid oxide cell (SOC) cost modeling tool. The tool provides a fully customizable spreadsheet that aids in cost estimation of large volume manufacturing of SOC (both fuel cell and electrolysis cell). The tool can be used to assist commercial developers and other end users to evaluate the costs of producing cells and stack components as SOC systems increase in scale. The manufacturing materials, labor, component costs, and specific equipment can be tailored to accurately reflect the desired manufacturing process. The tool is paired with a detailed user manual to assist in the understanding of the full functionality. This document is the spreadsheet tool. To access the associated user guide, please visit: <a href="https://netl.doe.gov/energy-analysis/details?id=f5823130-0d20-4a04-9c53-341682e58ac1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Energy Analysis | netl.doe.gov</a>

Explore related subjects

cost modeling manufacturing costing solid oxide cells solid oxide electrolysis cell solid oxide fuel cell

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Buchheit, Kyle, Noring, Alex, Iyengar, Arun, Hackett, Gregory. 2022-01-25. Solid Oxide Cell Manufacturing Cost Tool. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1842511

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2025

Carbon storage cost modeling for the offshore Gulf of America

At the 2025 Annual University of Houston ROICE Workshop, Dr. Chung Shih delivered an invited talk titled "Carbon Storage Cost Modeling for the Offshore Gulf of America." This presentation highlighted the capabilities of NETL's offshore saline carbon storage cost model (CO2_S_COM_Offshore) in evaluating the economics of both new and reused storage infrastructure. While primarily intended for screening-level analysis, the model comprehensively considers critical components such as onshore facilities, pipelines connecting shore to offshore platforms, main platforms, and satellite platforms. Additionally, its integrated cashflow model encompasses the entire project lifecycle, from initial site screening to post-injection site care, providing users with a thorough understanding of how various operational or financial parameters impact project economics.

cost modeling↗

DOE OSTI2023

Follow-Up from the Photovoltaic Reliability Workshop (PVRW): Cost Modeling Capabilities to Evaluate Trends in PV Technologies

NREL's Solar and Storage Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) team reviews live polling results from the Photovoltaic Reliability Workshop (PVRW) related to module technology trends believed to have the greatest reliability impacts. Then, the team reviews the publicly available tools and inputs necessary for evaluating reliability tradeoffs between initial module and system costs, degradation profiles, and levelized cost of energy (LCOE). These tools include the online Detailed Cost Analysis Models (DCAM) and the DuraMAT LCOE calculator.

cost modeling↗

DOE OSTI2023

Great Lakes Wind Energy Challenges and Opportunities Assessment

Many issues associated with wind development in the Great Lakes will require solutions different from those developed for offshore wind in ocean states and may not fully benefit from the industry learnings of nearby states. As a result, technology readiness and cost reduction for Great Lakes Wind (GLW) energy generation is likely to be delayed relative to other regions without a substantial, targeted GLW research campaign, and proactive stakeholder engagement in the region at all levels. Failure to conduct the necessary research to lower GLW costs in the near term could limit its contribution to the Nation's decarbonization goals by 2035, and could potentially raise long term energy prices in Great Lakes states if demand for renewable energy continues to accelerate. The overall objective of a research program such as that described in this report would be to enable the realization of commercial GLW before 2035. With the aim of ensuring that prospective development of GLW is conducted efficiently, safely, and coordinated in the best interests of the local residents and stakeholders, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Wind Energy Technologies Office (WETO) tasked the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to assist in (a) developing an improved understanding of offshore wind power's development potential in the Great Lakes, (b) identifying the key issues that need to be resolved for this potential to be achieved, and (c) defining a comprehensive research program to address and resolve these issues. This report presents the results of NREL's effort to address these needs.

cost modeling↗